Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Portatile Fujitsu Lifebook E756 (i7-6600U, HD520)

Mike Wobker (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 11/13/2017

Molte porte. Il LifeBook E756 è un portatile per utenti business. Nella nostra recensione, questo 15" brilla le ottime possibilità di manutenzione, tuttavia in altri aspetti mostra qualche difficoltà. Come sarà l'impressione complessiva del dispositivo e come si comporta rispetto alla concorrenza lo vediamo insieme nella recensione.

Fujitsu Lifebook E756 (Lifebook E Serie)
Scheda grafica
Memoria
16384 MB 
, DDR4
Schermo
15.6 pollici 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, SDC3150, IPS, lucido: no
Harddisk
Samsung MZ7TN512HDHP-00000, 512 GB 
, 380 GB libera
Scheda audio
Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Porta Docking, Connessioni Audio: 1x Mikrofon, 1x Kopfhörer, Lettore schede: SD, 1 Lettore impronte digitali
Rete
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Drive ottico
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 28 x 375 x 250
Batteria
72 Wh, 6700 mAh ioni di litio, removibile, Autonomia della batteria (dichiarata dal produttore): 14 ore
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 7 Professional (64 Bit) + Windows 10 Pro (64 Bit)
Camera
Webcam: 1.920 x 1.080
Fotocamera Principale: 2 MPix
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Stereo, Tastiera: Chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, 24 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
1.85 kg, Alimentazione: 390 gr
Prezzo
1860 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Connectivity

Left side: DC power socket, Ethernet port, VGA port, DisplayPort output, 1 USB 3.0 port, SD card reader
Left side: DC power socket, Ethernet port, VGA port, DisplayPort output, 1 USB 3.0 port, SD card reader
Right side: headphone jack, microphone jack, two USB 3.0 ports, DVD drive, Kensington lock
Right side: headphone jack, microphone jack, two USB 3.0 ports, DVD drive, Kensington lock
Backside: one USB 2.0 port, HDMI out
Backside: one USB 2.0 port, HDMI out
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
155 MB/s ∼100% +370%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
68.1 MB/s ∼44% +106%
HP EliteBook 850 G3
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
67.2 MB/s ∼43% +104%
Fujitsu Lifebook E756
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33 MB/s ∼21%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP EliteBook 850 G3
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
84 MB/s ∼100%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Fujitsu Lifebook E756
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
533 MBit/s ∼100%
Fujitsu Lifebook E557
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
515 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-21-651Y
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
313 MBit/s ∼59% -41%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
287 MBit/s ∼54% -46%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Fujitsu Lifebook E756
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
668 MBit/s ∼100%
Fujitsu Lifebook E557
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
662 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
335 MBit/s ∼50% -50%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-21-651Y
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
202 MBit/s ∼30% -70%
314
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
350
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
308
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 350 cd/m² Media: 316.1 cd/m² Minimum: 36 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 85 %
Al centro con la batteria: 352 cd/m²
Contrasto: 729:1 (Nero: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.61 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.52 | - Ø
98% sRGB (Argyll) 64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.43
Fujitsu Lifebook E756
SDC3150, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Panasonic VVX16T028J00, , 2880x1620, 15.6
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
LG Philips LGD04D5 / LG Display LP156WF6-SPP1, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
LG Philips 156WHU, , 1366x768, 15.6
HP EliteBook 850 G3
AU Optronics, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
27%
29%
17%
10%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
48 (25, 23)
32.8 (17.2, 15.6)
32%
38 (14, 24)
21%
47 (22, 25)
2%
46.4 (22.4, 24)
3%
Response Time Black / White *
40 (25, 15)
22.4 (11.6, 10.8)
44%
25 (6, 19)
37%
27 (10, 17)
32%
27.2 (9.2, 18)
32%
PWM Frequency
208 (90)
220 (90)
6%
200 (50)
-4%
Screen
-22%
-19%
-81%
-71%
Brightness
316
322
2%
319
1%
236
-25%
287
-9%
Brightness Distribution
85
88
4%
71
-16%
90
6%
85
0%
Black Level *
0.48
0.32
33%
0.61
-27%
0.56
-17%
0.54
-13%
Contrast
729
1059
45%
505
-31%
407
-44%
537
-26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.61
5.88
-125%
4.51
-73%
10.02
-284%
9.7
-272%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.52
7.41
-111%
2.91
17%
10.66
-203%
10.83
-208%
Gamma
2.43 99%
2.36 102%
2.4 100%
2.48 97%
2.91 82%
CCT
7178 91%
6036 108%
6740 96%
11800 55%
12761 51%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
64
57.14
-11%
56
-12%
39
-39%
51.15
-20%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
98
87.68
-11%
86
-12%
61
-38%
78.96
-19%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
3% / -8%
5% / -10%
-32% / -61%
-31% / -49%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms Incremento
↘ 15 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms Incremento
↘ 23 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 208 Hz90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 208 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 208 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 55 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8536 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Screen bleeding
Screen bleeding
Viewing angles
Viewing angles
CalMAN - grayslace
CalMAN - grayslace
CalMAN - color accuracy
CalMAN - color accuracy
CalMAN - saturation
CalMAN - saturation
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
143 Points ∼72% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
143 Points ∼72% +2%
Fujitsu Lifebook E756
Intel Core i7-6600U
140 Points ∼70%
HP EliteBook 850 G3
Intel Core i7-6500U
130 Points ∼65% -7%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
Intel Core i5-6300U
124 Points ∼62% -11%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
Intel Core i5-6200U
78 Points ∼39% -44%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
348 Points ∼16% +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
306 Points ∼14% -1%
HP EliteBook 850 G3
Intel Core i7-6500U
322 Points ∼15% +4%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
Intel Core i5-6300U
310 Points ∼14% 0%
Fujitsu Lifebook E756
Intel Core i7-6600U
310 Points ∼14%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
Intel Core i5-6200U
219 Points ∼10% -29%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
140 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
310 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
33.43 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.9 %
Aiuto
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
3475 Points ∼58% +6%
Fujitsu Lifebook E756
HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung MZ7TN512HDHP-00000
3284 Points ∼55%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN128HCHP
3282 Points ∼55% 0%
HP EliteBook 850 G3
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
3202 Points ∼54% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
GeForce 940MX, 6600U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN256HCHP
3017 Points ∼50% -8%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3284 punti
Aiuto
Fujitsu Lifebook E756
Samsung MZ7TN512HDHP-00000
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN256HCHP
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN128HCHP
HP EliteBook 850 G3
Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-10%
-21%
-28%
-19%
Write 4k QD32
338.4
278.9
-18%
211.4
-38%
100.2
-70%
162.1
-52%
Read 4k QD32
393.3
346.9
-12%
226.2
-42%
383.3
-3%
326.1
-17%
Write 4k
120.8
85.64
-29%
64.67
-46%
96.59
-20%
80.11
-34%
Read 4k
37.38
33.4
-11%
25.66
-31%
34
-9%
30.42
-19%
Write 512
344.5
305.5
-11%
320.5
-7%
119.7
-65%
282.1
-18%
Read 512
379.6
450.6
19%
418
10%
393.6
4%
295.3
-22%
Write Seq
374
306.1
-18%
333.1
-11%
155
-59%
426.1
14%
Read Seq
494
512.6
4%
479.1
-3%
474.7
-4%
466.3
-6%
Samsung MZ7TN512HDHP-00000
Sequential Read: 494 MB/s
Sequential Write: 374 MB/s
512K Read: 379.6 MB/s
512K Write: 344.5 MB/s
4K Read: 37.38 MB/s
4K Write: 120.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 393.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 338.4 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6600U
2360 Points ∼5% +93%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1347 Points ∼3% +10%
HP EliteBook 850 G3
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
1327 Points ∼3% +8%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U
1296 Points ∼3% +6%
Fujitsu Lifebook E756
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6600U
1224 Points ∼2%
3DMark 11 Performance
1373 punti
Aiuto
basso medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 43.3522.9818.945.86fps

Rumorosità

Idle
30.3 / 30.3 / 30.3 dB(A)
DVD
34.8 / dB(A)
Sotto carico
33.5 / 32.5 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 30.3 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.631.932.433.331.62531.829.631.630.631.83134.333.53434.334.34029.630.230.130.229.65030.23129.536.230.26327.427.929.328.127.48025.525.827.125.725.510025.325.925.42525.312525.824.124.424.525.816022.824.323.423.122.820022.422.822.722.222.425022.321.921.321.822.331520.721.521.520.620.740020.122.121.819.720.150019.721.821.719.119.763018.721.721.618.618.780018.225.12418.418.210001822.922.418.118125017.722.22217.717.7160017.622.621.817.417.6200017.620.42017.317.6250017.51918.617.517.5315017.618.31817.717.6400017.718.718.217.917.750001819.518.2181863001819.918.318.118800018.121.518.418.318.11000018.421.118.318.518.41250018.424.518.618.418.41600018.626.41918.618.6SPL30.333.532.530.330.3N1.41.91.71.41.4median 18.4Fujitsu Lifebook E756 median 21.9median 21.5median 18.4median 18.4Delta21.62.41.12hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
Carico massimo
 29 °C25.2 °C23.4 °C 
 29.4 °C27 °C23.4 °C 
 26 °C25 °C24.1 °C 
Massima: 29.4 °C
Media: 25.8 °C
23.1 °C23.6 °C32.8 °C
23.4 °C28.2 °C28.8 °C
23.5 °C25.3 °C26.6 °C
Massima: 32.8 °C
Media: 26.1 °C
Alimentazione (max)  36 °C | Temperatura della stanza 22.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.333.332.32532.630.632.6313534.335403030.2305028.636.228.66327.928.127.98026.525.726.510027.12527.11252624.52616024.923.124.920024.922.224.925034.221.834.231542.520.642.540042.119.742.150042.919.142.963052.418.652.480058.118.458.1100065.318.165.3125066.717.766.7160067.917.467.9200067.117.367.1250067.317.567.3315063.617.763.640006517.965500067.31867.3630072.118.172.1800067.418.367.41000067.518.567.51250068.618.468.61600058.718.658.7SPL78.730.378.7N39.51.439.5median 63.6Fujitsu Lifebook E756 median 18.4median 63.6Delta13.31.113.335.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Fujitsu Lifebook E756 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 8.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 96% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.23 / 0.71 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.7 / 9.2 / 9.3 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 28 / 28 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
6300U, HD Graphics 520, 62 Wh
632 min ∼53% +166%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 55 Wh
512 min ∼43% +115%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
6600U, GeForce 940MX, 67 Wh
456 min ∼38% +92%
HP EliteBook 850 G3
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 46 Wh
417 min ∼35% +75%
Fujitsu Lifebook E756
6600U, HD Graphics 520, 72 Wh
238 min ∼20%
Autonomia della batteria
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
3ore 58minuti

Pro

+ ottime possibilità di manutenzione
+ molte porte
+ batteria modulare

Contro

- clickpad lento
- autonomia scarsa
Dispositivo fornito da Fujitsu Germany.
Dispositivo fornito da Fujitsu Germany.

Il LifeBook E756 è un portatile business che impressiona, soprattutto, per le numerose porte e per le buone possibilità di manutenzione. Il design è semplice, ma sensibile e dovrebbe andare bene per qualsiasi ambiente business. Una vasta gamma di configurazioni hardware consente di scegliere il dispositivo più adatto alle proprie necessità.

Il LifeBook E756 Fujitsu offre una vasta gamma di porte e possibilità di manutenzione. Inoltre, prestazioni e porte possono essere personalizzate in modo abbastanza dettagliato.

Avrete un portatile con prestazioni sufficienti per la maggioranza di attività da ufficio. Il LifeBook E756 non è adatto a complesse operazioni 3D o giochi. Coloro che vogliono una ampia autonomia dovrebbero prendere una batteria più grande o investire in una batteria secondaria.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Fujitsu Lifebook E756 - 11/07/2017 v6
Mike Wobker

Chassis
79 / 98 → 80%
Tastiera
71%
Dispositivo di puntamento
69%
Connettività
60 / 81 → 75%
Peso
65 / 67 → 95%
Batteria
75%
Display
88%
Prestazioni di gioco
54 / 85 → 63%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
85 / 92 → 92%
Temperatura
96%
Rumorosità
94 / 95 → 99%
Audio
56%
Fotocamera
42 / 85 → 49%
Media
72%
80%
Multimedia - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Portatile Fujitsu Lifebook E756 (i7-6600U, HD520)
Mike Wobker, 2017-11-13 (Update: 2017-11-13)