Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Portatile Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ (i5-7200U, 940MX)

Sven Kloevekorn (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 10/21/2017

Incompleto. Il nuovo Asus multimedia-ufficio colpisce con il design elegante e il case particolarmente leggero e compatto, ma non riesce a competere in pieno nell'arena del gaming con la sua GeForce 940MX. Nonostante molti aspetti positivi, non possiamo raccomandare questo dispositivo, e questo non solo per la modesta autonomia.

Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
Processore
Intel Core i5-7200U
Scheda grafica
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB, Core: 1083 - 1189 MHz, Memoria: 4000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 377.05, Nvidia Optimus
Memoria
8192 MB 
, DDR4, 2400 MHz, Single-Channel, 1 von 2 Bänken belegt
Schermo
15.6 pollici 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156W02 / AUO B156HAN02.1, IPS, lucido: no
Scheda madre
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Harddisk
Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8, 128 GB 
, + HDD 1 TB Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 (5400 rpm)
Scheda audio
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Porte di connessione
2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 HDMI, Connessioni Audio: Audio in/out kombiniert, 3,5 mm Klinke, Lettore schede: SD/SDHC/SDXC, 1 Lettore impronte digitali, Sensore luminosità
Rete
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 18 x 361 x 244
Batteria
42 Wh ioni di litio, 3 Zellen
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: VGA
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: stereo, unten, Tastiera: Chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, 24 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
1.7 kg, Alimentazione: 219 gr
Prezzo
950 EUR

 

Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ

Size Comparison

Photo: Asus
Photo: Asus
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.27 MB/s ∼100% +140%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
62.5 MB/s ∼77% +84%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33.9 MB/s ∼42%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.3 MB/s ∼29% -31%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86.39 MB/s ∼100% +131%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.71 MB/s ∼95% +118%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
37.4 MB/s ∼43%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
24.9 MB/s ∼29% -33%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
645 MBit/s ∼100% +26%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
529 MBit/s ∼82% +4%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
510 MBit/s ∼79%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
495 MBit/s ∼77% -3%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
668 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
649 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
465 MBit/s ∼70% -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
434 MBit/s ∼65% -35%
278
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
260
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 293 cd/m² Media: 275.1 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 86 %
Al centro con la batteria: 293 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1172:1 (Nero: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.81 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.66 | - Ø
58% sRGB (Argyll) 37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.54
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
AU Optronics B156W02 / AUO B156HAN02.1, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
BOE0700 / BOE CQ NV156FHM-N48, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
AUO B156HAN04.4, , 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
ID: AU Optronics AUO41ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-2%
7%
9%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
47 (21, 26)
42 (22, 20)
11%
44.8 (16.4, 28.4)
5%
38.8 (20, 18.8)
17%
Response Time Black / White *
28 (16, 12)
32 (18, 14)
-14%
25.6 (6.8, 18.8)
9%
28 (16.4, 11.6)
-0%
PWM Frequency
1087 (90)
Screen
-8%
-11%
-2%
Brightness
275
239
-13%
243
-12%
243
-12%
Brightness Distribution
86
69
-20%
75
-13%
81
-6%
Black Level *
0.25
0.18
28%
0.24
4%
0.19
24%
Contrast
1172
1378
18%
1008
-14%
1351
15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.81
4.85
-27%
4.65
-22%
5
-31%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.66
3.84
-44%
3.39
-27%
2.7
-2%
Gamma
2.54 94%
2.29 105%
2.7 89%
2.32 103%
CCT
6541 99%
6790 96%
6246 104%
6599 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37
37
0%
36.69
-1%
36.7
-1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
58
57
-2%
57.66
-1%
57.7
-1%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-5% / -6%
-2% / -7%
4% / 0%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms Incremento
↘ 12 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms Incremento
↘ 26 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 55 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8587 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
151 Points ∼100% +16%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
Intel Core i5-8250U
145 Points ∼96% +12%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
Intel Core i5-7200U
130 Points ∼86%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼85% -1%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Intel Core i5-7200U
128 Points ∼85% -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
740 Points ∼100% +124%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
Intel Core i5-8250U
560 Points ∼76% +69%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points ∼45%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Intel Core i5-7200U
330 Points ∼45% 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Intel Core i5-7200U
326 Points ∼44% -2%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
331 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
130 Points
Aiuto
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4964 Points ∼100% +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
4666 Points ∼94% +4%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
GeForce MX150, 7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
4577 Points ∼92% +2%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
GeForce 940MX, 7200U, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8
4483 Points ∼90%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4042 Points ∼100% +17%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
GeForce MX150, 7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
3719 Points ∼92% +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
3550 Points ∼88% +2%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
GeForce 940MX, 7200U, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8
3468 Points ∼86%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3468 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4483 punti
Aiuto
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
46%
139%
4%
Write 4k QD32
121.8
170.6
40%
319.2
162%
104.8
-14%
Read 4k QD32
279.1
287.9
3%
529.5
90%
348.5
25%
Write 4k
86.19
73.22
-15%
123.4
43%
76.3
-11%
Read 4k
16.05
31.89
99%
34.3
114%
18.83
17%
Write 512
138.2
216.6
57%
414
200%
142.6
3%
Read 512
368.6
310.3
-16%
759
106%
345.6
-6%
Write Seq
138.6
409.9
196%
468.1
238%
141.7
2%
Read Seq
437.6
462.2
6%
1140
161%
491.6
12%
Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8
Sequential Read: 437.6 MB/s
Sequential Write: 138.6 MB/s
512K Read: 368.6 MB/s
512K Write: 138.2 MB/s
4K Read: 16.05 MB/s
4K Write: 86.19 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 279.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 121.8 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7537 Points ∼100% +180%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), Intel Core i5-7200U
4547 Points ∼60% +69%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
4243 Points ∼56% +58%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
2689 Points ∼36%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6002 Points ∼100% +178%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), Intel Core i5-7200U
3603 Points ∼60% +67%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
3545 Points ∼59% +64%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
2158 Points ∼36%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
38082 Points ∼100% +218%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
21835 Points ∼57% +82%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), Intel Core i5-7200U
21160 Points ∼56% +77%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
11986 Points ∼31%
3DMark 11 Performance
2843 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
7748 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1944 punti
Aiuto
basso medio alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 41.425.4fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 46.926.1fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 43.829.8fps

Rumorosità

Idle
31.2 / 31.2 / 31.2 dB(A)
HDD
31.6 dB(A)
Sotto carico
43.3 / 43.3 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 30.6 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.935.63435.532.9253434.335.438.6343138.238.839.348.238.24031.933.734.535.631.95038.640.138.83438.66333.33130.332.233.38028.231.726.428.228.210028.728.626.42728.712526.627.524.724.326.616025.7272423.225.720025.625.822.722.825.625026.626.72222.326.631528.729.321.221.528.740026.126.520.320.226.150027.627.819.619.227.663026.627.519.418.926.68002929.720.318.429100030.8311917.930.8125030.530.618.31830.5160032.633.518.617.632.6200034.534.519.717.534.5250034.234.518.217.934.2315032.132.518.41832.1400030.630.918.518.230.6500029.329.818.718.529.363002828.318.618.628800025.52618.818.825.51000021.321.418.918.721.31250020.320.518.918.920.31600019.519.419.119.119.5SPL4343.331.230.743N4.14.31.51.54.1median 28Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189Tmedian 28.3median 19.1median 18.8median 28Delta2.521.31.82.531.934.93335.531.933.636.735.838.633.642.745.349.748.242.733.834.439.235.633.829.934.933.93429.928.729.830.732.228.727.329.130.628.227.326.430.527.12726.424.826.526.524.324.824.724.124.723.224.724.324.123.222.824.322.922.722.722.322.92323.620.821.52322.622.720.420.222.622.322.119.819.222.322.8231918.922.827.628.31918.427.625.426.61817.925.426.327.4181826.324.325.217.917.624.324.625.51817.524.624.125.21817.924.125.92718.21825.921.422.418.418.221.421.822.918.518.521.820.22118.518.620.219.319.718.818.819.31919.318.918.71919.119.51918.919.119.52019.319.119.53636.930.930.7362.42.61.51.52.4median 23Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9median 23.6median 19median 18.8median 231.71.91.61.81.7hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
Carico massimo
 30.5 °C38.2 °C37.4 °C 
 23.7 °C29.4 °C36.6 °C 
 23 °C23.8 °C26 °C 
Massima: 38.2 °C
Media: 29.8 °C
36.4 °C49 °C33.3 °C
35.6 °C35 °C26.1 °C
26 °C24.2 °C23.6 °C
Massima: 49 °C
Media: 32.1 °C
Alimentazione (max)  47.5 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.3 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.635.532.6253538.6353136.848.236.8403435.6345038.83438.86328.832.228.88030.728.230.710034.72734.712540.924.340.916041.923.241.920046.122.846.125057.422.357.43156121.56140063.420.263.45006619.26663066.618.966.680065.418.465.4100063.617.963.6125067.21867.2160069.417.669.4200071.217.571.2250073.417.973.4315069.41869.4400069.318.269.3500068.318.568.3630069.818.669.8800069.518.869.5100006818.7681250061.918.961.91600054.719.154.7SPL81.230.781.2N50.91.550.9median 66Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189Tmedian 18.8median 66Delta7.31.87.336.535.536.533.738.633.737.648.237.633.735.633.732.13432.129.432.229.427.528.227.526.12726.128.424.328.440.523.240.544.722.844.756.922.356.959.121.559.162.320.262.364.519.264.572.518.972.57618.47674.317.974.373.31873.373.217.673.274.517.574.575.717.975.776.41876.477.518.277.574.318.574.370.318.670.358.618.858.662.818.762.873.518.973.570.419.170.486.130.786.165.61.565.6median 70.4Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9median 18.8median 70.49.51.89.530.331.130.331.73133.229.23029.131.328.429.534.133.538.236.831.333.625.539.726.354.825.266.926.670.824.368.222.764.319.461.119.656.518.657.518.764.518.570.918.27618.37118.566.920.96520.364.819.563.619.764.219.756.820.554.219.652.332.480.71.945.7median 19.7Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000median 64.23.25.838.94036.33736.736.334.835.334.936.336.43333.532.631.831.430.130.230.533.729.643.828.850.828.154.127.355.82857.228.359.725.861.925.763.925.366.425.668.524.459.824.867.124.261.324.259.524.262.724.161.223.958.323.854.123.853.123.949.437.475.5334.6median 25.6HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AVmedian 58.326.2hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.52 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 0.5 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.6 / 6.8 / 9.5 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 51.6 / 56 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
7200U, GeForce 940MX, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE
7200U, GeForce 940MX, SK Hynix HFS256G3BTND, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
7200U, GeForce MX150, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
21%
1%
6%
-84%
Idle Minimum *
3.6
2.9
19%
3.7
-3%
2.8
22%
9.4
-161%
Idle Average *
6.8
5.9
13%
6.2
9%
6.3
7%
9.7
-43%
Idle Maximum *
9.5
7.3
23%
8.4
12%
6.9
27%
16.8
-77%
Load Average *
51.6
39.5
23%
50
3%
51.6
-0%
76.5
-48%
Load Maximum *
56
42
25%
65.2
-16%
69.7
-24%
105.6
-89%
Witcher 3 ultra *
86.5

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
7ore 03minuti
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
4ore 15minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
1ore 11minuti
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
7200U, GeForce 940MX, 42 Wh
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
7200U, GeForce MX150, 49 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 41 Wh
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 70 Wh
Autonomia della batteria
108%
91%
91%
Reader / Idle
423
916
117%
883
109%
971
130%
WiFi v1.3
255
509
100%
462
81%
481
89%
Load
71
146
106%
129
82%
110
55%

Pro

+ molte varianti tra cui scegliere
+ leggero, compatto, sottile
+ design premium
+ costruzione impeccabile
+ features di sicurezza
+ touchpad buono
+ valore di contrasto molto buono
+ SSD sotto la media
+ silenzioso
+ sound system decente
+ software risparmio energetico disponibile

Contro

- stabilità del case da migliorare
- 2x USB 2.0
- posizione delle porte non ideale
- lettore SD-card lento
- tasti spugnosi
- display non molto luminoso
- insufficiente copertura del colore
- webcam scarsa
- autonomia troppo breve
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T - fornito da notebooksbilliger.de
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T - fornito da notebooksbilliger.de

Ci dispiace Asus, ma il vostro stiloso VivoBook S15 S510UQ è in parte un fallimento. Il modello di test costa circa 1000 Euro (~$1180) sul mercato, e questo non è in linea né con la mediocre stabilità del case né con la tastiera che è appena ok. E a cosa servono TPM, sensore delle impronte, dimensioni compatte e peso contenuto, se l'autonomia della batteria regge appena per quattro ore? Come può beneficiare l'editing di immagini con un contrasto buono e colori adeguati, se non si copre la gamma di colore sRGB. Perché Asus usa una scheda grafica che non migliora di molto le cose, invece di scegliere una più veloce GeForce MX150? Dove ha trovato l'SSD il produttore, che risulta antiquato? E come si giustificano col prezzo le due USB 2.0, il card reader lento, e la pessima webcam?

A nostro parere, Asus è stata vittima della strategia del modello. Le varianti del modello della serie partono da prezzi dove ci si aspetta di più per 1000 Euro. Chi cerca un compatto portatile multimedia da 15" da portare in giro farebbe meglio a scegliere l'Acer Swift 3 SF315 in una delle varie configurazioni che abbiamo recentemente recensito. 

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T - 10/17/2017 v6
Sven Kloevekorn

Chassis
77 / 98 → 79%
Tastiera
72%
Dispositivo di puntamento
84%
Connettività
49 / 81 → 61%
Peso
67 / 67 → 99%
Batteria
80%
Display
88%
Prestazioni di gioco
68 / 85 → 80%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
83 / 92 → 90%
Temperatura
93%
Rumorosità
84 / 95 → 88%
Audio
73%
Fotocamera
29 / 85 → 34%
Media
73%
81%
Multimedia - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Portatile Asus VivoBook S15 S510UQ (i5-7200U, 940MX)
Sven Kloevekorn, 2017-10-21 (Update: 2017-10-21)