Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Portatile Asus ASUSPRO P541 (i3 6006U, HD 520)

Sascha Mölck (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 09/08/2017

Linux office. Questo portatile Asus da 15,6" costerà circa 400 Euro (~$482). In cambio, avrete un processore Core i3 ed 8 GB di memoria di lavoro ed un SSD. Non c'è il sistema operativo Windows - Asus punta su Linux.

Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532 (ASUSPRO Serie)
Scheda grafica
Intel HD Graphics 520, Core: 300-900 MHz, Single-Channel
Memoria
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2133, Single-Channel, keine Speicherbänke, Speicher fest verlötet
Schermo
15.6 pollici 16:9, 1366x768 pixel 100 PPI, BOE NT156WHM-N42, TN LED, lucido: no
Scheda madre
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Harddisk
SK Hynix HFS128G32TND, 128 GB 
Scheda audio
Realtek ALC256 @ Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 0 USB 3.1 Gen 2, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Connessioni Audio: Audiokombo, Lettore schede: SD, TPM 2.0
Rete
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8101/2/3 Family Fast Ethernet NIC (10/100MBit), Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0
Drive ottico
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE1N
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 28 x 381 x 252
Batteria
34.5 Wh ioni di litio
Sistema Operativo
Endless OS 3 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: SD
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Stereo, Tastiera: Chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: no, 12 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
2 kg, Alimentazione: 171 gr
Prezzo
399 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Connectivity

Left: Power-in, USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Type C), Ethernet port, VGA, HDMI, USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Type A), USB 2.0 (Type A), combo audio
Left: Power-in, USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Type C), Ethernet port, VGA, HDMI, USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Type A), USB 2.0 (Type A), combo audio
Right: DVD burner, cable lock slot
Right: DVD burner, cable lock slot
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83.8 MB/s ∼100%
Acer Chromebook 14 CP5-471-53QV
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
37.5 MB/s ∼45% -55%
HP 15-ba077ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.2 MB/s ∼32% -68%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.6 MB/s ∼32% -68%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
22.7 MB/s ∼27% -73%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
22.7 MB/s ∼27% -73%
Acer Chromebook C910-354Y
17 MB/s ∼20% -80%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
39.4 MB/s ∼100%
HP 15-ba077ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
38.3 MB/s ∼97%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.6 MB/s ∼68%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.6 MB/s ∼68%
264
cd/m²
260
cd/m²
250
cd/m²
270
cd/m²
262
cd/m²
246
cd/m²
244
cd/m²
231
cd/m²
223
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 270 cd/m² Media: 250 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 83 %
Al centro con la batteria: 262 cd/m²
Contrasto: ∞:1 (Nero: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Greyscale 10.07 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.36
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
HP 15-ba077ng
TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
Acer Chromebook 14 CP5-471-53QV
IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Acer Chromebook C910-354Y
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-57%
-44%
-55%
-76%
-63%
-91%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
47 (27, 20)
68 (32, 36)
-45%
58
-23%
42 (21, 21)
11%
42.4 (14.8, 27.6)
10%
38 (19, 19)
19%
51 (17, 34)
-9%
Response Time Black / White *
11 (7, 4)
26 (20, 6)
-136%
23
-109%
22 (6, 16)
-100%
28.8 (10.8, 18)
-162%
27 (16, 11)
-145%
30 (8, 22)
-173%
PWM Frequency
200 (90)
217 (90)
9%
200 (90)
0%
50 (70)
-75%
Screen
-4%
-3%
-16%
-17%
19%
6%
Brightness
250
217
-13%
246
-2%
200
-20%
199
-20%
214
-14%
244
-2%
Brightness Distribution
83
91
10%
86
4%
88
6%
85
2%
90
8%
86
4%
Black Level *
0.58
0.44
0.56
0.712
0.1
0.34
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
10.07
11.1
-10%
11.05
-10%
13.48
-34%
13.33
-32%
3.86
62%
8.41
16%
Gamma
2.36 102%
2.35 102%
2.55 94%
2.34 103%
1.69 142%
2.42 99%
2.45 98%
CCT
10532 62%
11979 54%
11451 57%
15364 42%
15879 41%
6276 104%
6361 102%
Contrast
390
575
373
281
2140
747
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
9.84
9.2
12.21
13.24
7.99
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
39
36
38
33.8
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
61
56
60
53.4
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-31% / -31%
-24% / -23%
-36% / -35%
-47% / -40%
-22% / -14%
-43% / -33%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6668 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms Incremento
↘ 4 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27 ms Incremento
↘ 20 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel Core i3-6006U, Endless OS 3 64 Bit
436 ms * ∼11%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
366.5 ms * ∼9% +16%
Acer Chromebook 14 CP5-471-53QV
Intel Core i5-6200U, Google Chrome OS
298.2 ms * ∼7% +32%
Acer Chromebook C910-354Y
Intel Core i3-5005U, Google Chrome OS
275 ms * ∼7% +37%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
164.9 ms * ∼4% +62%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
147.4 ms * ∼4% +66%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
135.3 ms * ∼3% +69%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
142.55 Points ∼43% +46%
Acer Chromebook 14 CP5-471-53QV
Intel Core i5-6200U, Google Chrome OS
142.28 Points ∼43% +46%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
140.38 Points ∼42% +44%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
134 Points ∼40% +37%
Acer Chromebook C910-354Y
Intel Core i3-5005U, Google Chrome OS
115.73 Points ∼35% +19%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel Core i3-6006U, Endless OS 3 64 Bit
97.634 Points ∼29%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
75.5 Points ∼23% -23%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
58.54 Points ∼18% -40%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
2058.6 ms * ∼3% -19%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
1797.4 ms * ∼3% -4%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
1743.6 ms * ∼3% -1%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel Core i3-6006U, Endless OS 3 64 Bit
1734.4 ms * ∼3%
Acer Chromebook C910-354Y
Intel Core i3-5005U, Google Chrome OS
1636 ms * ∼3% +6%
Acer Chromebook 14 CP5-471-53QV
Intel Core i5-6200U, Google Chrome OS
1240 ms * ∼2% +29%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Acer Chromebook 14 CP5-471-53QV
Intel Core i5-6200U, Google Chrome OS
27414 Points ∼55% +48%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
20082 Points ∼41% +8%
Acer Chromebook C910-354Y
Intel Core i3-5005U, Google Chrome OS
19700 Points ∼40% +6%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
19404 Points ∼39% +4%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
19174 Points ∼39% +3%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel Core i3-6006U, Endless OS 3 64 Bit
18570 Points ∼38%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
8303 Points ∼17% -55%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Acer Chromebook 14 CP5-471-53QV
Intel Core i5-6200U, Google Chrome OS
373 Points ∼50% +36%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
312 Points ∼41% +14%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
298 Points ∼40% +9%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
281 Points ∼37% +3%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel Core i3-6006U, Endless OS 3 64 Bit
274 Points ∼36%
Acer Chromebook C910-354Y
Intel Core i3-5005U, Google Chrome OS
244 Points ∼32% -11%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
84 Points ∼43%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
84 Points ∼43%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
80 Points ∼41%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
50 Points ∼26%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
37 Points ∼19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
222 Points ∼10%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
218 Points ∼10%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
216 Points ∼10%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
166 Points ∼8%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
68 Points ∼3%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
3236 Points ∼36%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
3227 Points ∼36%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
2596 Points ∼29%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
1917 Points ∼22%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
1216 Points ∼14%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
7388 Points ∼15%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
7364 Points ∼15%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
7188 Points ∼14%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
6169 Points ∼12%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
2256 Points ∼5%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
5371 Points ∼17%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
4415 Points ∼14%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
4265 Points ∼14%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
3918 Points ∼13%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
2062 Points ∼44%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
2012 Points ∼43%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
1943 Points ∼42%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
1307 Points ∼28%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
4914 Points ∼18%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
4899 Points ∼18%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
4723 Points ∼17%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
3460 Points ∼13%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
2593 Points ∼46%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
2468 Points ∼44%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
2158 Points ∼38%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
1356 Points ∼24%
Geekbench 4.1
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
5109 Points ∼28%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
2639 Points ∼55%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
HD Graphics 520, 6006U, SK Hynix HFS128G32TND
3269 Points ∼55%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
HD Graphics 520, 6006U, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075
2937 Points ∼49%
HP 15-ba077ng
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
2777 Points ∼46%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
1956 Points ∼33%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
1661 Points ∼28%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), AMD A12-9700P, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
23.8 fps ∼7% +49%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
21 fps ∼6% +31%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U, Endless OS 3 64 Bit
16 fps ∼5%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
36.6 fps ∼1% +27%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U, Endless OS 3 64 Bit
28.9 fps ∼1%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), AMD A12-9700P, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
23.7 fps ∼1% -18%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
29.2 fps ∼7% +24%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), AMD A12-9700P, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
24.3 fps ∼6% +3%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U, Endless OS 3 64 Bit
23.6 fps ∼6%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
48.8 fps ∼28% +12%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U, Endless OS 3 64 Bit
43.4 fps ∼25%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), AMD A12-9700P, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
24.7 fps ∼14% -43%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
44.9 fps ∼8% +32%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U, Endless OS 3 64 Bit
33.9 fps ∼6%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), AMD A12-9700P, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
25.9 fps ∼5% -24%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
66.7 fps ∼18% +27%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U, Endless OS 3 64 Bit
52.6 fps ∼14%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), AMD A12-9700P, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
25.7 fps ∼7% -51%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
90.1 fps ∼7% +17%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), AMD A12-9700P, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
90 fps ∼7% +17%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U, Endless OS 3 64 Bit
76.8 fps ∼6%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
119.9 fps ∼26% +22%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U, Endless OS 3 64 Bit
98.1 fps ∼21%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), AMD A12-9700P, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
87.2 fps ∼19% -11%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), AMD A12-9700P, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
1856 Points ∼4%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
1141 Points ∼2%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U, Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
1090 Points ∼2%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
899 Points ∼2%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3060, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
382 Points ∼1%

Rumorosità

Idle
32.1 / 32.6 / 32.6 dB(A)
DVD
37.8 / dB(A)
Sotto carico
35.7 / 40 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 30 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.346.941.437.442.32537.340.83732.737.33133.834.635.931.733.84034.433.434.831.134.45033.434.332.830.833.46333.738.235.633.933.78029.230.730.529.129.210029.13130.829.329.112525.928.226.924.225.916026.729.327.624.826.720026.228.230.725.526.225024.626.424.621.924.631523.92625.523.323.940023.325.324.62123.350023.227.125.820.823.263022.727.939.82022.780024.428.832.719.224.4100023.827.829.618.323.8125021.423.624.417.721.4160019.824.525.717.119.8200018.621.824.616.518.6250018.120.221.916.618.1315017.719.620.316.217.7400017.718.919.516.317.7500017.518.418.716.317.5630017.618.11816.217.6800017.518.117.916.217.51000017.517.917.816.417.51250017.417.917.816.317.41600018.118.318.216.718.1SPL32.635.840.43032.6N1.82.431.41.8median 21.4Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532median 24.5median 24.6median 17.7median 21.4Delta3.34.24.62.73.3hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
Carico massimo
 31.5 °C27 °C27.7 °C 
 32.6 °C29 °C25.7 °C 
 30 °C29.5 °C27.6 °C 
Massima: 32.6 °C
Media: 29 °C
27.4 °C28.2 °C29.7 °C
27.4 °C30.7 °C30.7 °C
25.9 °C27.6 °C28.7 °C
Massima: 30.7 °C
Media: 28.5 °C
Alimentazione (max)  34.8 °C | Temperatura della stanza 223.8 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2048.137.448.12544.132.744.13142.631.742.64044.131.144.15047.330.847.36348.133.948.18050.229.150.21005229.35212554.424.254.41605624.85620057.425.557.425058.921.958.931567.323.367.340071.12171.150072.120.872.163072.62072.680070.319.270.310007018.370125067.417.767.4160063.117.163.1200062.316.562.3250061.416.661.4315058.616.258.640005816.358500063.716.363.7630066.516.266.5800065.316.265.31000059.816.459.81250059.316.359.31600048.616.748.6SPL78.53078.5N45.91.445.9median 62.3Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532median 17.7median 62.3Delta4.72.74.735.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 21%, worst was 48%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.5 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 6.9 / 8.9 / 9.6 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 19 / 27 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Autonomia della batteria
Navigazione WiFi v1.3 (Chromium 59.0.3071.86 (Linux))
3ore 51minuti
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
Acer Chromebook 14 CP5-471-53QV
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh, Google Chrome OS
540 min ∼45% +134%
Acer Chromebook C910-354Y
5005U, HD Graphics 5500, 48 Wh, Google Chrome OS
520 min ∼43% +125%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
6006U, HD Graphics 520, 34.5 Wh, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
399 min ∼33% +73%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
N3060, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 41 Wh, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
376 min ∼31% +63%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
6006U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh, Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
356 min ∼30% +54%
HP 15-ba077ng
A12-9700P, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), 41 Wh, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
296 min ∼25% +28%
Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532
6006U, HD Graphics 520, 34.5 Wh, Endless OS 3 64 Bit
231 min ∼19%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
A8-7410, Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), 24 Wh, Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
201 min ∼17% -13%

Pro

+ schermo matto
+ SSD
+ temperature basse
+ USB Type-C

Contro

- solo un anno di garanzia
- autonomia breve con Linux
- solo Fast Ethernet
- schermo scuro
Asus Pro Light P541UA-GQ1532, fornito da Notebooksbilliger.de.
Asus Pro Light P541UA-GQ1532, fornito da Notebooksbilliger.de.

Asus inserisce nella sua linea un portatile basic da 15,6" con il P541UA. Il processore Core i3 ha potenza di calcolo sufficiente per applicazioni da ufficio e Internet. Il portatile virtualmente non si scalda per nulla. Tuttavia, non è uno tra i più silenziosi. La ventola occasionalmente accelera in idle e fa rumore. C'è bisogno di un miglioramento da questo punto di vista.

Asus realizza un portatile da ufficio basic con il P541UA-Q1532.

Un SSD consente un sistema scattante. Sarebbe possibile sostituire l'SSD, ma occorre aprire il case. La tastiera è adatta all'utilizzo domestico. Chi scrive molto dovrebbe optare per un altro dispositivo. Il portatile non sembra nemmeno essere molto duraturo. Arriva ad appena 3:51 ore di autonomi con Endless OS nel nostro test pratico Wi-Fi. Va molto meglio con Windows 10 dove dura tre volte di più.

Il sistema operativo Endless 3 precaricato fa una buona impressione. Tuttavia, il principale motivo per cui Asus lo ha installato è per non consegnare un portatile "nudo" ai clienti. Il sistema è adatto per utenti che aprono siti internet occasionalmente. Coloro che vogliono usare Microsoft Office, ad esempio, dovrebbero installare Windows. E' semplice farlo.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Asus ASUSPRO P541UA-GQ1532 - 09/05/2017 v6
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
67 / 98 → 68%
Tastiera
69%
Dispositivo di puntamento
81%
Connettività
36 / 80 → 45%
Peso
63 / 67 → 91%
Batteria
74%
Display
77%
Prestazioni di gioco
54 / 68 → 80%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
69 / 92 → 75%
Temperatura
95%
Rumorosità
85%
Audio
53%
Fotocamera
27 / 85 → 32%
Media
65%
74%
Office - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Portatile Asus ASUSPRO P541 (i3 6006U, HD 520)
Sascha Mölck, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09- 8)