Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Portatile Lenovo IdeaPad 110-15ACL (A8-7410, HD)

Sascha Mölck, 04/05/2017

Poco potente. Il laptop Lenovo da 15.6 pollici costa circa 350 euro (~ $ 372). I punti forza del laptop sono il suo hard disk da 1 TB e 8 GB di memoria lavoro. Tuttavia, gli acquirenti dovranno accettare basse perfomance APU ed una breve durata della batteria.

Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE (IdeaPad 110 Serie)
Processore
AMD A8-7410
Scheda grafica
AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), Core: 200-847 MHz, single-channel, Crimson 17.2.1
Memoria
8192 MB 
, DDR3-1600, single-channel, un banco di memoria (occupato)
Schermo
15.6 pollici 16:9, 1366x768 pixel 100 PPI, BOE NT156WHM-N32, TN LED, lucido: si
Scheda madre
AMD KernCZ
Harddisk
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, 1024 GB 
, 850 GB libera
Scheda audio
Realtek ALC235 @ AMD Avalon FCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Connessioni Audio: combo audio, Lettore schede: SD, TPM 2.0
Rete
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8101/2/3 Family Fast Ethernet NIC (10/100MBit), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0
Drive ottico
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE0N
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 30 x 378 x 265
Batteria
24 Wh ioni di litio
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: SD
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: stereo, Tastiera: chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: no, Cyberlink Power2Go 8, Cyberlink PowerDVD 14, MS Office 365 (trial), McAfee LiveSafe (trial), 12 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
2.2 kg, Alimentazione: 168 gr
Prezzo
349 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Connectivity

Right: DVD burner, cable-lock slot
Right: DVD burner, cable-lock slot
Left: power-in, One Key Recovery button, HDMI, Fast-Ethernet, USB 2.0 (Type-A), USB 3.1 Gen. 1 (Type-A), combo audio
Left: power-in, One Key Recovery button, HDMI, Fast-Ethernet, USB 2.0 (Type-A), USB 3.1 Gen. 1 (Type-A), combo audio
Front: SD-card reader
Front: SD-card reader
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus F540SA-XX087T
33 MB/s ∼100% +24%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
26.6 MB/s ∼81%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
22.7 MB/s ∼69% -15%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
17.8 MB/s ∼54% -33%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
39.4 MB/s ∼100%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
36.7 MB/s ∼93% -7%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
26.6 MB/s ∼68% -32%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
315 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
186 MBit/s ∼59% -41%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
312 MBit/s ∼100% +15%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
272 MBit/s ∼87%
265
cd/m²
252
cd/m²
251
cd/m²
254
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
235
cd/m²
235
cd/m²
238
cd/m²
228
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 265 cd/m² Media: 245.7 cd/m² Minimum: 8.7 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 86 %
Al centro con la batteria: 253 cd/m²
Contrasto: 575:1 (Nero: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.2 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 11.05 | - Ø
56% sRGB (Argyll) 36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.55
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
Asus F540SA-XX087T
TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
Response Times
2%
13%
1%
26%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
58
48 (26, 22)
17%
43 (21, 22, Plateau)
26%
42.4 (14.8, 27.6)
27%
20 (10, 10)
66%
Response Time Black / White *
23
26 (9, 17)
-13%
23 (7, 16, Plateau)
-0%
28.8 (10.8, 18)
-25%
20 (12, 8)
13%
PWM Frequency
200 (90)
200 (90)
0%
Screen
-14%
-15%
-26%
12%
Brightness
246
246
0%
202
-18%
199
-19%
200
-19%
Brightness Distribution
86
86
0%
92
7%
85
-1%
87
1%
Black Level *
0.44
0.46
-5%
0.67
-52%
0.712
-62%
0.26
41%
Contrast
575
489
-15%
300
-48%
281
-51%
827
44%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
9.2
13.57
-48%
10.36
-13%
13.24
-44%
13.07
-42%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
11.05
15.07
-36%
11.06
-0%
13.33
-21%
4.34
61%
Gamma
2.55 94%
2.27 106%
2.56 94%
1.69 142%
2.48 97%
CCT
11451 57%
22046 29%
11368 57%
15879 41%
7212 90%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36
34
-6%
36
0%
33.8
-6%
38
6%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
56
53
-5%
57
2%
53.4
-5%
60
7%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-6% / -11%
-1% / -10%
-13% / -21%
19% / 16%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6262 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms Incremento
↘ ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms Incremento
↘ ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
1917
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
6169
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
2819
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
50 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
166 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
17.25 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Aiuto
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Intel Core i3-5005U
82 Points ∼42% +64%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
53 Points ∼27% +6%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L
AMD A8-7410
52 Points ∼27% +4%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE
AMD A8-7410
52 Points ∼27% +4%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
50 Points ∼26%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
37 Points ∼19% -26%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
33 Points ∼17% -34%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Intel Core i3-5005U
210 Points ∼10% +27%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L
AMD A8-7410
174 Points ∼8% +5%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE
AMD A8-7410
174 Points ∼8% +5%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
166 Points ∼8%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
165 Points ∼8% -1%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
68 Points ∼3% -59%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
61 Points ∼3% -63%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Intel Core i3-5005U
6953 Points ∼14% +13%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
6169 Points ∼12%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
5149 Points ∼10% -17%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L
AMD A8-7410
4665 Points ∼9% -24%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE
AMD A8-7410
4428 Points ∼9% -28%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
2256 Points ∼5% -63%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
1978 Points ∼4% -68%
Shading 32Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Intel Core i3-5005U
5601 Points ∼36% +99%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
3223 Points ∼20% +14%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
2819 Points ∼18%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE
AMD A8-7410
2681 Points ∼17% -5%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
2510 Points ∼16% -11%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
2265 Points ∼14% -20%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L
AMD A8-7410
1746 Points ∼11% -38%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
4563 Points ∼15% +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Intel Core i3-5005U
4093 Points ∼13% +4%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
3918 Points ∼13%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L
AMD A8-7410
3456 Points ∼11% -12%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
1583 Points ∼5% -60%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Intel Core i3-5005U
1907 Points ∼41% +46%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
1395 Points ∼30% +7%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
1307 Points ∼28%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L
AMD A8-7410
1205 Points ∼26% -8%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
865 Points ∼19% -34%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
4364 Points ∼16% +26%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
3460 Points ∼13%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
1581 Points ∼28% +17%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
1356 Points ∼24%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
90.06 Points ∼27% +19%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
75.5 Points ∼23%
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Intel Core i3-5005U
75.091 Points ∼23% -1%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE
AMD A8-7410
71.187 Points ∼21% -6%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
58.54 Points ∼18% -22%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
51.115 Points ∼15% -32%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1956 punti
Aiuto
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
HD Graphics 5500, 5005U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
2720 Points ∼46% +39%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
HD Graphics 505, N4200, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
1993 Points ∼33% +2%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE
Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0
1960 Points ∼33% 0%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L
Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
1958 Points ∼33% 0%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
1956 Points ∼33%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
1661 Points ∼28% -15%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
1598 Points ∼27% -18%
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
Valore Minimo di trasferimento: 1.3 MB/s
Valore Massimo di trasferimento: 130.7 MB/s
Valore Medio di trasferimento: 96.1 MB/s
Tempi di accesso: 19.8 ms
Burst Rate: 104 MB/s
Utilizzo CPU: 3.5 %
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
38%
50%
4252%
17%
Write 4k QD32
0.473
0.991
110%
31.08
6471%
0.641
36%
Read 4k QD32
0.921
0.761
-17%
0.861
-7%
94.55
10166%
0.789
-14%
Write 4k
0.283
0.764
170%
1.089
285%
31.52
11038%
0.619
119%
Read 4k
0.372
0.398
7%
0.474
27%
17.21
4526%
0.335
-10%
Write 512
26.71
41.3
55%
24.23
-9%
134.7
404%
34.84
30%
Read 512
32.94
35.11
7%
22.5
-32%
338.1
926%
20.79
-37%
Write Seq
88.49
107.2
21%
96.57
9%
139.2
57%
89.77
1%
Read Seq
92.05
111.3
21%
107.6
17%
484.4
426%
98.34
7%
3DMark 11 Performance
970 punti
Aiuto
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Intel HD Graphics 5500, Intel Core i3-5005U
957 Points ∼2% +6%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410
899 Points ∼2%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE
AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410
782 Points ∼2% -13%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L
AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410
744 Points ∼1% -17%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
624 Points ∼1% -31%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3050
384 Points ∼1% -57%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3060
382 Points ∼1% -58%
basso medio alto ultra
World of Warcraft (2005) 75.852.4fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 34.618.515.9fps
GTA V (2015) 24.620.7fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 26.221fps
XCOM 2 (2016) 9.92.5fps
Far Cry Primal (2016) 105fps
The Division (2016) 12.37fps
Hitman 2016 (2016) 7.24.1fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 7.75.6fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 13.29.3fps
Civilization VI (2016) 18.37fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 41.528.3fps
Titanfall 2 (2016) 17.614.7fps
Dishonored 2 (2016) 7.15.1fps
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 19.811.9fps
For Honor (2017) 14.54.9fps
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 8.82.9fps
BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410
34.6 fps ∼10%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE
AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410
33.7 fps ∼9% -3%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
23.7 fps ∼7% -32%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L
AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410
23 fps ∼6% -34%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3060
18.1 fps ∼5% -48%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3050
17.5 fps ∼5% -49%

Rumorosità

Idle
30.9 / 30.9 / 31 dB(A)
HDD
32.3 dB(A)
DVD
37.3 / dB(A)
Sotto carico
31.8 / 31.9 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 30.4 dB(A)
Carico massimo
 32 °C25.7 °C23.3 °C 
 32.9 °C26.6 °C23.6 °C 
 31.1 °C29.8 °C30.2 °C 
Massima: 32.9 °C
Media: 28.4 °C
23.1 °C23.6 °C27.9 °C
23.5 °C25 °C34.5 °C
25.8 °C26.8 °C33.5 °C
Massima: 34.5 °C
Media: 27.1 °C
Alimentazione (max)  35.4 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.134.834.12531.231.231.23131.936.131.94030.829.930.85030.529.330.56327.728.327.78027.12727.11002625.72612525.624.325.61602523.42520023.923.523.925023.921.523.931525.421.125.440037.620.437.650038.719.438.763041194180044.218.144.2100046.918.246.9125050.817.750.8160059.717.459.7200061.917.761.9250060.517.860.5315056.818.256.8400055.118.155.150005418.254630047.918.447.980004718.4471000047.518.647.51250049.218.449.21600043.718.343.7SPL68.130.568.1N18.11.418.1median 46.9Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GEmedian 18.4median 46.9Delta111.81135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (61 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 20%, worst was 48%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.22 / 0.42 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5.4 / 6.8 / 7.3 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 21.1 / 25.5 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Autonomia della batteria
Navigazione WiFi v1.3 (Edge 38)
3ore 21minuti
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
N3060, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 41 Wh
376 min ∼31% +87%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 33 Wh
329 min ∼27% +64%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
N4200, HD Graphics 505, 36 Wh
321 min ∼27% +60%
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
5005U, HD Graphics 5500, 32 Wh
255 min ∼21% +27%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
A8-7410, Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), 24 Wh
201 min ∼17%

Pro

+ silenzioso
+ si scalda poco
+ molto spazio di archiviazione
+ 8 GB di memoria
+ AC Wi-Fi

Contro

- Pannello TN lucido
- autonomia breve
- solo un anno di garanzia
- solo Fast-Ethernet only
- manca una USB Type-C
- posizione delle interfacce
In review: Lenovo IdeaPad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Lenovo IdeaPad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

Lenovo con l'IdeaPad 110-15ACL realizza un portatile basic da 15.6". La potenza di calcolo dell'APU soddisfa le esigenze di semplici applicazioni da ufficio e Internet. Il laptop difficilmente si riscalda e lavora sempre in silenzio. Grazie al disco rigido da 1-TB, la capacità di memorizzazione non sarà un problema a breve termine. La sostituzione dell'HDD con un SSD è possibile. Tuttavia, il case deve essere aperto. La tastiera installata è sufficiente per l'uso privato. Lo schermo lucido, con angolo di visuale limitato non vincerà alcun premio, ma offre valori molto accettabili in considerazione del livello di prezzo.

Un laptop ufficio per uso domestico, e che non si distingue dalla massa di laptops low-cost, e che costa 350 euro (~ $ 372).

Non dovrebbe sorprendere che tale prezzo comporti delle restrizioni. Il laptop ha solo una porta Fast-Ethernet. La Gigabit-Ethernet è lo standard attuale. Inoltre, è inclusa una garanzia di un solo anno. Molti concorrenti sono più avanzati offrendo una garanzia di due anni, anche nel settore low-cost. La durata scarsa della batteria dovuta alla sua bassa capacità non dovrebbe essere tralasciata.

Per l'IdeaPad non sarà facile trovare acquirenti in quanto esistono i laptops più forti nella sua fascia di prezzo. Ad esempio, Lenovo ha un'alternativa IdeaPad nelle sua fila, che ha un processore molto più forte Core i3-6100U e un SSD da 128 GB. E costa sempre 350 euro (~ $ 372).

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE - 03/26/2017 v6
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
72 / 98 → 74%
Tastiera
73%
Dispositivo di puntamento
81%
Connettività
36 / 80 → 46%
Peso
62 / 67 → 89%
Batteria
71%
Display
72%
Prestazioni di gioco
50 / 68 → 74%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
50 / 92 → 55%
Temperatura
94%
Rumorosità
93%
Audio
30%
Fotocamera
35 / 85 → 42%
Media
63%
74%
Office - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Portatile Lenovo IdeaPad 110-15ACL (A8-7410, HD)
Sascha Mölck, 2017-04- 5 (Update: 2017-04- 5)