Notebookcheck

Recensione dello Smartohone Honor 20 Lite: Selfie Smartphone con GPU Turbo

Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 08/03/2019

Principale vantaggio la tripla fotocamera AI Honor sfida ancora una volta il mercato attaccando il segmento medio-basso. A meno di 300 euro (~$334), gli acquirenti ricevono una tripla fotocamera come dispositivo principale, 32 MP sul lato anteriore, molto spazio di archiviazione e una modalità turbo per la GPU. In questa recensione, cerchiamo di determinare come si comporta in pratica l'Honor 20 Lite.

Honor 20 Lite (20 Serie)
Processore
HiSilicon Kirin 710
Scheda grafica
ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Memoria
4096 MB 
Schermo
6.21 pollici 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 415 PPI, capacitive, IPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 115 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: Jack audio da 3.5 mm, Lettore schede: microSD (FAT, FAT32, exFAT, fino a 1 TB), 1 Lettore impronte digitali, Sensori: Accelerometro, sensore di prossimità, bussola, Micro-USB
Rete
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G GSM (850/900/1.800/1.900), 3G UMTS (850/900/1.900/2.100), 4G LTE FDD (1/3/5/7/8/20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 8 x 154.8 x 73.6
Batteria
3400 mAh polimeri di litio
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 24 MPix 24MP (f/1.8) + 8MP (F/2.2) + 8MP (F/2.4), PDAF
Fotocamera Secondaria: 32 MPix f/2.0, 0.8µm
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: 2 casse, Tastiera: onscreen, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, Caricabatterie USB, cavo Micro-USB, custodia protettiva, strumento SIM, EMUI 9.0.1, 24 Monate Mesi Garanzia, Valore SAR (testa): 0,61 W/kg, valore SAR (corpo): 1,07 W/kg
Peso
164 gr, Alimentazione: 65 gr
Prezzo
300 Euro
Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

 

Honor 20 Lite
Honor 20 Lite
Honor 20 Lite
Honor 20 Lite
Honor 20 Lite
Honor 20 Lite
Honor 20 Lite

Confronto Dimensioni

160.1 mm 71.2 mm 8.7 mm 181 g155.2 mm 73.4 mm 8 mm 160 g154.8 mm 73.6 mm 8 mm 164 g147.5 mm 70.5 mm 7.45 mm 155 g144.4 mm 69.2 mm 7.9 mm 140 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola One Vision
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9609, 128 GB eMMC Flash
315 (min: 296, max: 330) MBit/s ∼100% +488%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
311 (min: 214, max: 346) MBit/s ∼99% +480%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=418)
223 MBit/s ∼71% +316%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Mali-G71 MP2, 7904, 64 GB eMMC Flash
222 (min: 203, max: 243) MBit/s ∼70% +314%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
167 (min: 108, max: 214) MBit/s ∼53% +212%
Honor 20 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
53.6 (min: 44, max: 57) MBit/s ∼17%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola One Vision
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9609, 128 GB eMMC Flash
285 (min: 216, max: 312) MBit/s ∼100% +436%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
279 (min: 229, max: 303) MBit/s ∼98% +424%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Mali-G71 MP2, 7904, 64 GB eMMC Flash
268 (min: 244, max: 288) MBit/s ∼94% +404%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
221 (min: 157, max: 243) MBit/s ∼78% +315%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=418)
212 MBit/s ∼74% +298%
Honor 20 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
53.2 (min: 47, max: 58) MBit/s ∼19%
GPS - Honor 20 Lite
GPS - Honor 20 Lite
GPS - Honor 20 Lite
GPS - Honor 20 Lite
GPS - Honor 20 Lite
GPS - Honor 20 Lite
GPS - Garmin Edge 520
GPS - Garmin Edge 520
GPS - Garmin Edge 520
GPS - Garmin Edge 520
GPS - Garmin Edge 520
GPS - Garmin Edge 520

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
Honor 20 Lite - Grafico di test
Honor 20 Lite - Grafico di test
Honor 20 Lite - Grafico di test (dettaglio)
465
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
460
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
464
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
454
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 470 cd/m² Media: 456.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.2 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 94 %
Al centro con la batteria: 455 cd/m²
Contrasto: 784:1 (Nero: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.43 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 5.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.248
Honor 20 Lite
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.21
Samsung Galaxy A40
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5.9
Motorola One Vision
IPS, 2520x1080, 6.3
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.21
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5.97
Screen
-28%
6%
45%
36%
Brightness middle
455
358
-21%
626
38%
427
-6%
583
28%
Brightness
456
370
-19%
564
24%
415
-9%
577
27%
Brightness Distribution
94
94
0%
84
-11%
84
-11%
97
3%
Black Level *
0.58
0.41
29%
0.2
66%
Contrast
784
1527
95%
2135
172%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.43
7.4
-67%
5.7
-29%
1.95
56%
1.6
64%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.81
12.5
-84%
10.5
-54%
4.47
34%
3.9
43%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.4
4
26%
7.8
-44%
2.3
57%
2.7
50%
Gamma
2.248 98%
2.084 106%
2.13 103%
2.07 106%
2.27 97%
CCT
7336 89%
7078 92%
8662 75%
6414 101%
6267 104%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Per ridurre la luminosità dello schermo, alcuni portatili accendono e spengono la retroilluminazione in rapida successione - un metodo chiamato Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). Questa frequenza di ciclo a livello ideale non dovrebbe essere percepibile dall'occhi umano. Se tale frequenza è troppo bassa, gli utenti con occhi sensibili potrebbero stancarsi gli occhi o avere mal di testa o anche notare uno sfarfallio.
flickering dello schermo / PWM rilevato 100 Hz ≤ 15 % settaggio luminosita'

Il display sfarfalla a 100 Hz (Probabilmente a causa dell'uso di PWM) Flickering rilevato ad una luminosita' di 15 % o inferiore. Non dovrebbe verificarsi flickering o PWM sopra questo valore di luminosita'.

La frequenza di 100 Hz è molto bassa, quindi il flickering potrebbe causare stanchezza agli occhi e mal di testa con un utilizzo prolungato.

In confronto: 51 % di tutti i dispositivi testati non utilizza PWM per ridurre la luminosita' del display. Se è rilevato PWM, una media di 9428 (minimo: 43 - massimo: 142900) Hz è stata rilevata.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti possono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con tempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
32 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 16 ms Incremento
↘ 16 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 82 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (25.1 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
58 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 27 ms Incremento
↘ 31 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.9 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 93 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (40 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2631 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
3722 Points ∼51% +41%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4866 Points ∼67% +85%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
3133 Points ∼43% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
7282 Points ∼100% +177%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2631 - 4083, n=9)
3500 Points ∼48% +33%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=317)
4565 Points ∼63% +74%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5335 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4105 Points ∼69% -23%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5273 Points ∼88% -1%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5426 Points ∼91% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5975 Points ∼100% +12%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5266 - 5615, n=9)
5457 Points ∼91% +2%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=375)
4601 Points ∼77% -14%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1537 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1329 Points ∼71% -14%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1601 Points ∼85% +4%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1539 Points ∼82% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1875 Points ∼100% +22%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1523 - 1614, n=9)
1561 Points ∼83% +2%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=377)
1374 Points ∼73% -11%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5829 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5293 Points ∼77% -9%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6812 Points ∼100% +17%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5855 Points ∼86% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
6832 Points ∼100% +17%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5803 - 7141, n=9)
5669 Points ∼83% -3%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=373)
5046 Points ∼74% -13%
Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7388 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
6923 Points ∼78% -6%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8902 Points ∼100% +20%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7004 Points ∼79% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
8346 Points ∼94% +13%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (7004 - 9424, n=9)
8073 Points ∼91% +9%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=541)
5537 Points ∼62% -25%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2336 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2061 Points ∼87% -12%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2103 Points ∼89% -10%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2272 Points ∼96% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2338 Points ∼99% 0%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2272 - 2336, n=2)
2304 Points ∼97% -1%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (2051 - 15735, n=56)
2369 Points ∼100% +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1220 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
604 Points ∼26% -50%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1249 Points ∼54% +2%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1121 Points ∼48% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1907 Points ∼82% +56%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1121 - 1220, n=2)
1171 Points ∼50% -4%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (341 - 14536, n=56)
2333 Points ∼100% +91%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1365 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
717 Points ∼35% -47%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1373 Points ∼67% +1%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1263 Points ∼62% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1988 Points ∼97% +46%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1365 - 1365, n=4)
657 (min: 1365, max: 1365) Points ∼32% -52%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (419 - 14786, n=59)
2039 Points ∼100% +49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2109 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1691 Points ∼67% -20%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2045 Points ∼82% -3%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2006 Points ∼80% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points ∼100% +19%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1851 - 2789, n=10)
2337 Points ∼93% +11%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=386)
1836 Points ∼73% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
829 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
549 Points ∼26% -34%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1210 Points ∼56% +46%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
770 Points ∼36% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points ∼100% +159%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (470 - 1194, n=10)
823 Points ∼38% -1%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=386)
1605 Points ∼75% +94%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
958 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
646 Points ∼29% -33%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1331 Points ∼60% +39%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
892 Points ∼40% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points ∼100% +131%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (563 - 1351, n=10)
957 Points ∼43% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=389)
1492 Points ∼67% +56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2124 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1710 Points ∼68% -19%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1979 Points ∼79% -7%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1887 Points ∼75% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points ∼100% +18%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1656 - 2723, n=10)
2351 Points ∼94% +11%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=401)
1813 Points ∼72% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1233 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
823 Points ∼38% -33%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1712 Points ∼78% +39%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1065 Points ∼49% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points ∼98% +74%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (740 - 1378, n=10)
1217 Points ∼56% -1%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=401)
2189 Points ∼100% +78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1360 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
930 Points ∼42% -32%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1765 Points ∼80% +30%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1179 Points ∼53% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points ∼100% +63%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (844 - 1534, n=10)
1361 Points ∼61% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=402)
1863 Points ∼84% +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2378 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1675 Points ∼67% -30%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2504 Points ∼100% +5%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2246 Points ∼90% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points ∼99% +4%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1924 - 2716, n=10)
2444 Points ∼98% +3%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=462)
1774 Points ∼71% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
710 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
539 Points ∼27% -24%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1200 Points ∼61% +69%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
692 Points ∼35% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points ∼100% +179%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (457 - 856, n=10)
732 Points ∼37% +3%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=464)
1337 Points ∼68% +88%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
841 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
635 Points ∼31% -24%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1357 Points ∼65% +61%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
818 Points ∼39% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points ∼100% +146%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (550 - 990, n=10)
865 Points ∼42% +3%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=472)
1275 Points ∼62% +52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2441 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1687 Points ∼68% -31%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2282 Points ∼92% -7%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2307 Points ∼93% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points ∼100% +2%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1907 - 2654, n=10)
2437 Points ∼98% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=495)
1682 Points ∼68% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
667 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
702 Points ∼35% +5%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1730 Points ∼87% +159%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
744 Points ∼38% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points ∼100% +197%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (568 - 1327, n=10)
1021 Points ∼52% +53%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=495)
1806 Points ∼91% +171%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
795 Points ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
807 Points ∼39% +2%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1828 Points ∼88% +130%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
876 Points ∼42% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points ∼100% +161%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (673 - 1490, n=10)
1167 Points ∼56% +47%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=503)
1551 Points ∼75% +95%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
12321 Points ∼55%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
22441 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13686 Points ∼61%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (11158 - 22668, n=8)
15042 Points ∼67%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=652)
13700 Points ∼61%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13821 Points ∼32%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
24388 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
43514 Points ∼100%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12426 - 22605, n=8)
20033 Points ∼46%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (7573 - 162695, n=652)
20162 Points ∼46%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13457 Points ∼46%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23927 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
29316 Points ∼100%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12120 - 22168, n=8)
18433 Points ∼63%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (8513 - 83518, n=653)
16700 Points ∼57%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
39 fps ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
25 fps ∼34% -36%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
40 fps ∼54% +3%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
34 fps ∼46% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
74 fps ∼100% +90%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (33 - 39, n=9)
37.8 fps ∼51% -3%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=683)
35.2 fps ∼48% -10%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
36 fps ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
23 fps ∼40% -36%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36 fps ∼62% 0%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
32 fps ∼55% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +61%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (31 - 36, n=9)
34.9 fps ∼60% -3%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=686)
27.2 fps ∼47% -24%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21 fps ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13 fps ∼36% -38%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
24 fps ∼67% +14%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
19 fps ∼53% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
36 fps ∼100% +71%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (17 - 21, n=9)
20.3 fps ∼56% -3%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=602)
19.5 fps ∼54% -7%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
12 fps ∼36% -37%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
21 fps ∼64% +11%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
17 fps ∼52% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +74%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (16 - 19, n=9)
18.4 fps ∼56% -3%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=607)
18 fps ∼55% -5%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
14 fps ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
8.1 fps ∼31% -42%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼54% 0%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
13 fps ∼50% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
26 fps ∼100% +86%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12 - 14, n=9)
13.7 fps ∼53% -2%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=463)
15.9 fps ∼61% +14%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
13 fps ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
7.4 fps ∼31% -43%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13 fps ∼54% 0%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
12 fps ∼50% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +85%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (11 - 13, n=9)
12.6 fps ∼53% -3%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=466)
15.3 fps ∼64% +18%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.2 fps ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2.9 fps ∼32% -31%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5 fps ∼55% +19%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
4.1 fps ∼45% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
9.1 fps ∼100% +117%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2.2 - 7, n=9)
4.22 fps ∼46% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=166)
8.92 fps ∼98% +112%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.6 fps ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1.8 fps ∼29% -31%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.2 fps ∼52% +23%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2.6 fps ∼42% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5.8 fps ∼94% +123%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2.6 - 3.5, n=9)
2.76 fps ∼45% +6%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=166)
6.19 fps ∼100% +138%
Normal Tier Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.4 fps ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4.2 fps ∼30% -34%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.1 fps ∼58% +27%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.9 fps ∼49% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14 fps ∼100% +119%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4.6 - 6.9, n=9)
5.93 fps ∼42% -7%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=167)
13.5 fps ∼96% +111%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7 fps ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4.7 fps ∼29% -33%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.3 fps ∼58% +33%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.4 fps ∼40% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
16 fps ∼100% +129%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4.6 - 7, n=9)
6.31 fps ∼39% -10%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=167)
14.8 fps ∼93% +111%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.7 fps ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5.2 fps ∼35% -32%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.3 fps ∼62% +21%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7.7 fps ∼51% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
15 fps ∼100% +95%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (6.9 - 7.7, n=9)
7.57 fps ∼50% -2%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=392)
10.7 fps ∼71% +39%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.8 fps ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4.6 fps ∼35% -32%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7.8 fps ∼60% +15%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.8 fps ∼52% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13 fps ∼100% +91%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (6.4 - 7.1, n=9)
6.74 fps ∼52% -1%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=396)
9.7 fps ∼75% +43%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
131614 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
103205 Points ∼58% -22%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
139138 Points ∼78% +6%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
124870 Points ∼70% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
179353 Points ∼100% +36%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (124870 - 140188, n=9)
134298 Points ∼75% +2%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=286)
131662 Points ∼73% 0%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1024 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
974 Points ∼83% -5%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1168 Points ∼100% +14%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1051 Points ∼90% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1172 Points ∼100% +14%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (982 - 1212, n=9)
1101 Points ∼94% +8%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=616)
747 Points ∼64% -27%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1462 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1114 Points ∼32% -24%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1942 Points ∼56% +33%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1465 Points ∼42% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
3453 Points ∼100% +136%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1450 - 1489, n=9)
1466 Points ∼42% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=616)
1965 Points ∼57% +34%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3096 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1935 Points ∼59% -37%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2588 Points ∼79% -16%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2823 Points ∼86% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2969 Points ∼91% -4%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2823 - 4360, n=9)
3267 Points ∼100% +6%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=616)
1473 Points ∼45% -52%
System (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5238 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
3788 Points ∼64% -28%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4474 Points ∼75% -15%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
4826 Points ∼81% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5932 Points ∼100% +13%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4826 - 5568, n=9)
5248 Points ∼88% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=616)
2887 Points ∼49% -45%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2220 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy A40
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1679 Points ∼58% -24%
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2264 Points ∼78% +2%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2140 Points ∼74% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2906 Points ∼100% +31%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2140 - 2445, n=9)
2273 Points ∼78% +2%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=620)
1437 Points ∼49% -35%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74)
51.398 Points ∼100% +1%
Motorola One Vision (Chrome)
51.084 Points ∼99% 0%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)
51.061 Points ∼99%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710 (47 - 55.1, n=8)
50.1 Points ∼97% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)
42.7 Points ∼83% -16%
Media della classe Smartphone (12 - 273, n=516)
39.1 Points ∼76% -23%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
37.214 Points ∼100% +24%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710 (30 - 32.1, n=4)
31 Points ∼83% +3%
Motorola One Vision (Chrome)
30.916 Points ∼83% +3%
Media della classe Smartphone (12.9 - 108, n=92)
30.8 Points ∼83% +3%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74)
30.18 Points ∼81% +1%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)
30.008 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)
22.65 Points ∼61% -25%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
37.5 runs/min ∼100% +14%
Media della classe Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=82)
34.6 runs/min ∼92% +5%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)
33 runs/min ∼88%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710 (31.2 - 33, n=3)
32 runs/min ∼85% -3%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chome 74)
31.16 runs/min ∼83% -6%
Motorola One Vision (Chrome)
29.9 runs/min ∼80% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)
24.1 runs/min ∼64% -27%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
72 Points ∼100% +16%
Motorola One Vision (Chrome)
68 Points ∼94% +10%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74)
63 Points ∼88% +2%
Media della classe Smartphone (19 - 161, n=147)
63 Points ∼88% +2%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710 (58 - 69, n=8)
62.3 Points ∼87% 0%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)
62 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)
52 Points ∼72% -16%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
13562 Points ∼100% +41%
Motorola One Vision (Chrome)
9807 Points ∼72% +2%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74)
9695 Points ∼71% +1%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)
9591 Points ∼71%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710 (9041 - 10288, n=9)
9547 Points ∼70% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)
7798 Points ∼57% -19%
Media della classe Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=677)
6359 Points ∼47% -34%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Media della classe Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=697)
10720 ms * ∼100% -121%
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73)
4975.8 ms * ∼46% -3%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)
4852.6 ms * ∼45%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74)
4250.7 ms * ∼40% +12%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710 (3999 - 4853, n=9)
4247 ms * ∼40% +12%
Motorola One Vision (Chrome)
4216 ms * ∼39% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
2911.8 ms * ∼27% +40%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Honor 20 LiteSamsung Galaxy A40Motorola One VisionHuawei P Smart Plus 2019Xiaomi Mi 9 SEMedia 128 GB eMMC FlashMedia della classe Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-5%
55%
-2%
49%
2%
-26%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
66.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
68.76 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
66.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
65.9 (58.8 - 73.5, n=13)
-1%
48.5 (9.5 - 87.1, n=409)
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
75.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
81.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
78.11 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
76.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
77.6 (72.3 - 85.9, n=13)
3%
66.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=409)
-12%
Random Write 4KB
73.1
13.2
-82%
126.63
73%
77.3
6%
21.86
-70%
35.4 (8.48 - 127, n=15)
-52%
20.6 (0.14 - 250, n=725)
-72%
Random Read 4KB
38.7
75.7
96%
108.15
179%
40.3
4%
115.83
199%
68.5 (20.7 - 108, n=15)
77%
45.4 (1.59 - 175, n=725)
17%
Sequential Write 256KB
200.9
99.6
-50%
192.17
-4%
152.8
-24%
190.1
-5%
172 (90 - 201, n=15)
-14%
93 (2.99 - 503, n=725)
-54%
Sequential Read 256KB
288.1
295
2%
499.45
73%
295.4
3%
492.48
71%
286 (144 - 499, n=15)
-1%
262 (12.1 - 1468, n=725)
-9%
Carico massimo
 43.9 °C39.4 °C39.2 °C 
 45.1 °C39.1 °C39.4 °C 
 43.9 °C39.7 °C38.6 °C 
Massima: 45.1 °C
Media: 40.9 °C
34 °C36.1 °C40.7 °C
34.8 °C37 °C41.6 °C
35.9 °C38.6 °C42.5 °C
Massima: 42.5 °C
Media: 37.9 °C
Alimentazione (max)  37.6 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) La temperatura media del lato superiore sotto carico massimo e' di 40.9 °C / 106 F, rispetto alla media di 33.1 °C / 92 F per i dispositivi di questa classe Smartphone.
(-) La temperatura massima sul lato superiore è di 45.1 °C / 113 F, rispetto alla media di 35.5 °C / 96 F, che varia da 22.4 a 51.7 °C per questa classe Smartphone.
(±) Il lato inferiore si riscalda fino ad un massimo di 42.5 °C / 109 F, rispetto alla media di 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle, la temperatura media del lato superiore è di 34.2 °C / 94 F, rispetto alla media deld ispositivo di 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.949.12543.643.73138.343.54038.344.55041.244.56334.140.2802733.110028.634.812527.929.116026.131.820025.143.12502245.131520.554.740020.559.350020.661.463018.666.380018.170.8100018.574.4125017.970.4160018.670.3200017.869.8250017.568.8315016.967.1400016.866.550001771.563001771.8800017.269.51000017.1721250017.154.21600017.356.9SPL74.766.430.381.9N34.418.71.453median 18.1median 66.5Delta2.710.3434739.139.832.935.738.838.342.238.732.433.626.728.625.936.929.230.824.930.720.141.719.142.718.952.418.55719.561.117.167.616.170.916.272.515.67216.468.51767.116.363.615.36015.471.515.274.615.271.615.468.715.565.915.45215.548.671.367.173.666.728.781.826.720.828.218.51.250.3median 16.3median 63.62.410.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor 20 LiteHuawei P Smart Plus 2019
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor 20 Lite analisi audio

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 analisi audio

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.6 / 2.2 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 6 / 9.1 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor 20 Lite
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A40
3100 mAh
Motorola One Vision
3500 mAh
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
3400 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
 
Media della classe Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
0%
7%
15%
42%
-1%
14%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.8
11%
0.75
17%
0.8
11%
0.53
41%
0.948 (0.8 - 1.3, n=9)
-5%
0.878 (0.2 - 3.4, n=751)
2%
Idle Average *
1.6
1.4
12%
2.14
-34%
1.2
25%
1.18
26%
2.11 (1.2 - 2.5, n=9)
-32%
1.732 (0.6 - 6.2, n=750)
-8%
Idle Maximum *
2.2
2.3
-5%
2.27
-3%
2.3
-5%
1.2
45%
2.44 (2.2 - 3.6, n=9)
-11%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=751)
8%
Load Average *
6
7.4
-23%
4.36
27%
4.5
25%
3.04
49%
4.66 (4.06 - 6, n=9)
22%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=745)
32%
Load Maximum *
9.1
8.6
5%
6.48
29%
7.3
20%
4.83
47%
7.38 (6.13 - 9.1, n=9)
19%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=745)
35%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11ore 25minuti
Honor 20 Lite
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A40
3100 mAh
Motorola One Vision
3500 mAh
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
3400 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
WiFi v1.3
685
643
-6%
778
14%
523
-24%
510
-26%

Pro

+ buona macchina fotografica anteriore
+ buona durata della batteria
+ lo spazio può essere ampliato fino a 1 TB

Contro

- nessuna porta USB di tipo C
- Wi-Fi lento
- contrasto e valore del nero mediocre

Giudizio - Buona fotocamera e Wi-Fi scarso

Recensione dello smartphone Honor 20 Lite. Dispositivo di test fornito da:
Recensione dello smartphone Honor 20 Lite. Dispositivo di test fornito da:

Nel nostro test, l'Honor 20 Lite si è presentato come un solido smartphone di fascia media. Mentre il livello di prestazioni è solo mediocre rispetto a dispositivi simili, la grande memoria interna e la comoda tripla fotocamera sono sicuramente buoni argomenti per un acquisto. Inoltre, la durata della batteria è lunga e gli utenti possono espandere la memoria interna fino a un terabyte. Il 20 Lite non ha un vero e proprio punto di forza, anche se non ha molta concorrenza all'interno della sua classe di dispositivi quando si tratta della sua robusta fotocamera frontale da 32 MP.

    L'Honor 20 Lite brilla con una fotocamera frontale da 32 MP ma ha il Wi-Fi più lento.

Lo schermo dell'Honor 20 Lite ha una luminosità media; il rapporto di contrasto e il valore del nero sono mediocri nel migliore dei casi rispetto alla concorrenza. Inoltre, la lenta connessione Wi-Fi è in grado di comunicare solo sulla banda dei 2,4 GHz. Dal momento che l'NFC è disponibile e per coloro che preferiscono navigare utilizzando la rete mobile e LTE così come scattare selfies ad risoluzione, l'Honor 20 Lite può ancora essere lo smartphone Android giusto.

Honor 20 Lite - 07/26/2019 v6
Mike Wobker

Chassis
84%
Tastiera
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositivo di puntamento
87%
Connettività
39 / 60 → 65%
Peso
91%
Batteria
94%
Display
85%
Prestazioni di gioco
46 / 63 → 74%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
63 / 70 → 90%
Temperatura
85%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
65 / 91 → 71%
Fotocamera
73%
Media
75%
85%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione dello Smartohone Honor 20 Lite: Selfie Smartphone con GPU Turbo
Mike Wobker, 2019-08- 3 (Update: 2019-08- 3)