Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Portatile Toshiba Portégé X30 (i7-7600U, 256 GB)

Campione dei pesi piuma? Il Toshiba Portégé X30 ha molte features con il case più leggero possibile. Riuscirà l'X30 a competere con altri pesi piuma, o andrà ko?

Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) (Portege X30 Serie)
Processore
Intel Core i7-7600U, Dual-core, hyperthreaded
Scheda grafica
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel HD Graphics 620 21.20.16.4550
Memoria
16384 MB 
, Single-Channel, DDR4-2400 / PC4-19200
Schermo
13.3 pollici 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, multitouch 10 punti, Toshiba TOS508F, IPS, lucido: no
Scheda madre
Intel Kaby Lake-U + iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Harddisk
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
, 225 GB libera
Scheda audio
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Porte di connessione
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen 2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Connessioni Audio: Combo microphone / headphone, Lettore schede: microSD, 1 Lettore impronte digitali, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: scanner retina infrarossi
Rete
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac)
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 15.9 x 315 x 226.1
Batteria
48 Wh ioni di litio
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: 2x 2W, harman/kardon, Tastiera: Chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, Toshiba eco Utility, Toshiba Password Utility, Toshiba Service Station, 36 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
1.043 kg, Alimentazione: 353 gr
Prezzo
2109 usd
Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

 

331 mm 227 mm 19 mm 1.4 kg323.5 mm 217.1 mm 15.95 mm 1.1 kg325 mm 229 mm 10.4 mm 1.1 kg315 mm 226.1 mm 15.9 mm 1 kg280.5 mm 196.5 mm 13.1 mm 920 g
Left: Kensington Lock, USB 3.0 Type-A, combo mic/line out
Left: Kensington Lock, USB 3.0 Type-A, combo mic/line out
Right: microSD card, 2x USB 3.1 Type-C w/ Thunderbolt 3, HDMI
Right: microSD card, 2x USB 3.1 Type-C w/ Thunderbolt 3, HDMI
Front: status LEDs
Front: status LEDs
Rear: ventilation
Rear: ventilation
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
 
186.1 MB/s ∼100% +194%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
 
73.67 MB/s ∼40% +17%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
 
63.2 MB/s ∼34%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
 
61.2 MB/s ∼33% -3%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
 
219.8 MB/s ∼100% +145%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
 
91.23 MB/s ∼42% +2%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
 
89.6 MB/s ∼41%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
 
82.88 MB/s ∼38% -7%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Broadcom 802.11ac
660 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
647 MBit/s ∼98%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
644 MBit/s ∼98% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
634 MBit/s ∼96% -2%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
634 MBit/s ∼96% -2%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
485 MBit/s ∼73% -25%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Broadcom 802.11ac
689 MBit/s ∼100% +41%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
663 MBit/s ∼96% +36%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
589 MBit/s ∼85% +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
580 MBit/s ∼84% +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
495 MBit/s ∼72% +1%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
488 MBit/s ∼71%
342.6
cd/m²
334.6
cd/m²
345.1
cd/m²
320.5
cd/m²
332.6
cd/m²
316.8
cd/m²
298.1
cd/m²
312.6
cd/m²
302.9
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 345.1 cd/m² Media: 322.9 cd/m² Minimum: 18.02 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 86 %
Al centro con la batteria: 332.6 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1188:1 (Nero: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
94% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Toshiba TOS508F, IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
B140HAN03_1, IPS, 14, 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
LEN40A9 (R140NWF5 R1), IPS, 14, 1920x1080
Apple MacBook 12 2017
APPA027, LED IPS, 12, 2304x1440
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
CMN1374, IPS UWVA, 13.3, 1920x1080
Response Times
-10%
-4%
-5%
-18%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
36.8 (18.8, 18)
41.6 (20.4, 21.2)
-13%
40.8 (22.8, 18)
-11%
40.8 (19.6, 21.2)
-11%
46 (26, 20)
-25%
Response Time Black / White *
29.6 (17.2, 12.4)
31.6 (18.8, 12.8)
-7%
28.8 (14.8, 14)
3%
29.2 (15.8, 13.4)
1%
33 (21, 12)
-11%
PWM Frequency
219.3 (99)
116000
Screen
-31%
-60%
-30%
Brightness middle
332.6
311
-6%
271.6
-18%
404
21%
Brightness
323
288
-11%
264
-18%
382
18%
Brightness Distribution
86
85
-1%
88
2%
91
6%
Black Level *
0.28
0.24
14%
0.24
14%
0.35
-25%
Contrast
1188
1296
9%
1132
-5%
1154
-3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.6
5.5
-112%
6.1
-135%
5.37
-107%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.7
9
-34%
28.6
-327%
9.46
-41%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.5
6.2
-148%
3.4
-36%
6.44
-158%
Gamma
2.12 104%
2.02 109%
2.12 104%
2.52 87%
CCT
6720 97%
5950 109%
6077 107%
6738 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62
55.96
-10%
38
-39%
58
-6%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94
85.77
-9%
60
-36%
89
-5%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-21% / -27%
-32% / -51%
-5% / -5%
-24% / -28%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti possono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con tempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
29.6 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 17.2 ms Incremento
↘ 12.4 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 71 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (25.4 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
36.8 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 18.8 ms Incremento
↘ 18 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.9 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 31 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono simili alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (40.6 ms).

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Per ridurre la luminosità dello schermo, alcuni portatili accendono e spengono la retroilluminazione in rapida successione - un metodo chiamato Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). Questa frequenza di ciclo a livello ideale non dovrebbe essere percepibile dall'occhi umano. Se tale frequenza è troppo bassa, gli utenti con occhi sensibili potrebbero stancarsi gli occhi o avere mal di testa o anche notare uno sfarfallio.
flickering dello schermo / PWM non rilevato

In confronto: 52 % di tutti i dispositivi testati non utilizza PWM per ridurre la luminosita' del display. Se è rilevato PWM, una media di 9679 (minimo: 43 - massimo: 142900) Hz è stata rilevata.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Core i7-7560U
153 Points ∼70% +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel Core i7-7500U
143 Points ∼66% +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
143 Points ∼66% +13%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel Core i7-7500U
140 Points ∼64% +11%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel Core i7-7600U
126 Points ∼58%
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Intel Core m3-7Y32
120 Points ∼55% -5%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
369 Points ∼8% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel Core i7-7500U
360 Points ∼8% +6%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel Core i7-7600U
341 Points ∼8%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Core i7-7560U
336 Points ∼8% -1%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel Core i7-7500U
314 Points ∼7% -8%
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Intel Core m3-7Y32
265 Points ∼6% -22%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel Core i7-7600U
1.68 Points ∼69%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
1.59 Points ∼65% -5%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel Core i7-7500U
1.35 Points ∼55% -20%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
4.13 Points ∼15% +8%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel Core i7-7600U
3.82 Points ∼14%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel Core i7-7500U
3.45 Points ∼13% -10%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel Core i7-7600U
6130 Points ∼57%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel Core i7-7500U
5613 Points ∼52% -8%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel Core i7-7600U
12177 Points ∼24%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel Core i7-7500U
11223 Points ∼23% -8%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel Core i7-7600U
525.9 s * ∼6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
446.9 s * ∼5% +15%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
560 Seconds * ∼2% -3%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel Core i7-7600U
542 Seconds * ∼2%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8631
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
12177
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6130
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
31.6 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.82 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.68 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
35.2 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
341 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
126 Points
Aiuto
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
5053 Points ∼78% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4999 Points ∼77% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4978 Points ∼76% +1%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4910 Points ∼75%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK)
4890 Points ∼75% 0%
Apple MacBook 12 2017
HD Graphics 615, 7Y32, Apple SSD AP0256
3946 Points ∼61% -20%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK)
5083 Points ∼53% +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4910 Points ∼52% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4874 Points ∼51% +7%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4655 Points ∼49% +2%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4561 Points ∼48%
Apple MacBook 12 2017
HD Graphics 615, 7Y32, Apple SSD AP0256
3904 Points ∼41% -14%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4025 Points ∼66% +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3987 Points ∼65% +13%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK)
3902 Points ∼64% +10%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3789 Points ∼62% +7%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3543 Points ∼58%
Apple MacBook 12 2017
HD Graphics 615, 7Y32, Apple SSD AP0256
3078 Points ∼51% -13%
PCMark 7 Score
5667 punti
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3543 punti
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4561 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4910 punti
Aiuto
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Apple SSD AP0256
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
19%
8%
-39%
-3%
Write 4k QD32
535.7
495.6
-7%
499.4
-7%
370.1
-31%
416
-22%
Read 4k QD32
625.5
601.2
-4%
580.1
-7%
521.3
-17%
497.1
-21%
Write 4k
143.6
172.2
20%
159.2
11%
12.78
-91%
140.2
-2%
Read 4k
40.9
60.97
49%
60.7
48%
9.721
-76%
57.47
41%
Write 512
762.9
1098
44%
855.8
12%
579.3
-24%
911.3
19%
Read 512
857.6
814
-5%
830.5
-3%
658.1
-23%
753
-12%
Write Seq
1213
1383
14%
1213
0%
898.5
-26%
1088
-10%
Read Seq
1270
1827
44%
1399
10%
954.8
-25%
1090
-14%
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Sequential Read: 1270 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1213 MB/s
512K Read: 857.6 MB/s
512K Write: 762.9 MB/s
4K Read: 40.9 MB/s
4K Write: 143.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 625.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 535.7 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
1838 Points ∼8% +50%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1653 Points ∼7% +35%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7300U
1494 Points ∼7% +22%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1413 Points ∼6% +15%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
1225 Points ∼5%
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y32
1124 Points ∼5% -8%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
2124 Points ∼4% +47%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1641 Points ∼3% +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7300U
1578 Points ∼3% +9%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1562 Points ∼3% +8%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
1446 Points ∼3%
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y32
1227 Points ∼2% -15%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
1369 Points ∼3% +62%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1093 Points ∼3% +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7300U
1044 Points ∼3% +23%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
948 Points ∼2% +12%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
847 Points ∼2%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
11232 Points ∼6% +59%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
8971 Points ∼5% +27%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7300U
8725 Points ∼5% +23%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
8104 Points ∼4% +15%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
7068 Points ∼4%
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y32
6863 Points ∼4% -3%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
47546 Points ∼7% +30%
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
36544 Points ∼5%
3DMark 11 Performance
1577 punti
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
52149 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5812 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score
780 punti
Aiuto

Rumorosità

Idle
28.4 / 28.4 / 28.4 dB(A)
Sotto carico
33.2 / 37.9 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light    BK Precision 732A (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 28.4 dB(A)
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Apple MacBook 12 2017
HD Graphics 615, 7Y32, Apple SSD AP0256
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK)
Noise
-5%
-1%
-9%
-3%
off /ambiente *
28.4
29.3
-3%
27.8
2%
30.4
-7%
29.9
-5%
Idle Minimum *
28.4
29.3
-3%
27.8
2%
30.4
-7%
29.9
-5%
Idle Average *
28.4
29.3
-3%
27.8
2%
30.4
-7%
29.9
-5%
Idle Maximum *
28.4
32.2
-13%
27.8
2%
30.4
-7%
30.3
-7%
Load Average *
33.2
34.3
-3%
34.8
-5%
40
-20%
33.9
-2%
Load Maximum *
37.9
39.3
-4%
42
-11%
40
-6%
34.9
8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Carico massimo
 33 °C40.6 °C35.4 °C 
 27.4 °C34.2 °C32 °C 
 26.4 °C27.2 °C26 °C 
Massima: 40.6 °C
Media: 31.4 °C
32 °C40 °C35 °C
29.8 °C36.2 °C32 °C
27.8 °C29 °C28.8 °C
Massima: 40 °C
Media: 32.3 °C
Alimentazione (max)  41 °C | Temperatura della stanza 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini
(+) La temperatura media del lato superiore sotto carico massimo e' di 31.4 °C / 89 F, rispetto alla media di 29.4 °C / 85 F per i dispositivi di questa classe Office.
(±) La temperatura massima sul lato superiore è di 40.6 °C / 105 F, rispetto alla media di 33.9 °C / 93 F, che varia da 21.2 a 62.5 °C per questa classe Office.
(±) Il lato inferiore si riscalda fino ad un massimo di 40 °C / 104 F, rispetto alla media di 36.4 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle, la temperatura media del lato superiore è di 26.7 °C / 80 F, rispetto alla media deld ispositivo di 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (+1 °C / 1.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.2382537.234.43135.835.44035.334.75033.732.26332.533.78032.63310031.231.41253031.316028.737.320028.349.925027.458.831527.261.740026.860.550026.160.663025.458.980024.965.6100024.462.9125023.962160023.367.8200023.366.3250023.367.4315023.261.7400022.965.150002359.963002362.480002367.31000023.269.31250023.165.11600023.161SPL3677N2.640.8median 23.9median 61.7Delta1.96.131.635.231.633.138.433.144.138.544.136.632.136.629.129.329.129.126.629.127.425.727.425.926.425.92726.12733.923.733.933.322.733.339.321.639.34620.84653.52053.551.319.451.35018.85050.418.350.452.617.652.65817.8586117.56163.117.563.164.817.464.867.317.867.367.717.967.767.118.167.165.118.365.16418.46463.618.463.661.718.361.758.118.358.17630.476331.433median 58median 18.3median 5810.61.910.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseToshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) analisi audio

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.04 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HP Spectre 13-v131ng analisi audio

(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 0.7 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.6 / 7.6 / 8.2 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 23.8 / 28 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Apple MacBook 12 2017
7Y32, HD Graphics 615, Apple SSD AP0256, LED IPS, 2304x1440, 12
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS UWVA, 1920x1080, 13.3
Power Consumption
-24%
-20%
29%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
4.6
3.84
17%
4.8
-4%
2
57%
3.6
22%
Idle Average *
7.6
6.3
17%
6.6
13%
5.4
29%
6.4
16%
Idle Maximum *
8.2
8.6
-5%
7
15%
6.6
20%
9.2
-12%
Load Average *
23.8
41.9
-76%
39.2
-65%
22
8%
34
-43%
Load Maximum *
28
48.7
-74%
44.8
-60%
20
29%
34.4
-23%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
14ore 58minuti
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
7ore 10minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
2ore 01minuti
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001)
7600U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
7300U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh
Apple MacBook 12 2017
7Y32, HD Graphics 615, 41.4 Wh
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
7500U, HD Graphics 620, 38 Wh
Autonomia della batteria
15%
24%
26%
-21%
Reader / Idle
898
1252
39%
1062
18%
718
-20%
WiFi v1.3
430
496
15%
487
13%
540
26%
394
-8%
Load
121
110
-9%
172
42%
77
-36%

Pro

+ design bello
+ materiali premium
+ chassis robusto (eccetto il display)
+ incredibilmente sottile e leggero
+ colori precisi
+ lettore impronte e scanner iride veloci
+ 2x Thunderbolt 3
+ resta relativamente fresco

Contro

- display si flette facilmente
- attira le ditate
- prestazioni CPU
Recensione: Toshiba Portégé X30. Fornito daToshiba
Recensione: Toshiba Portégé X30. Fornito daToshiba

Toshiba ha creato un buon contendente. Il Portégé X30 è un portento di ingegneria; in un case molto sottile c'è davvero tanto. Due porte Thunderbolt 3 aiutano l'I/O. L'X30 offre abbastanza porte davvero utili. Ma preferiamo la soluzione dell'X1 Carbon, nonostante peso e dimensioni maggiori. Gli utenti potrebbero anche preferire una tastiera superiore e la manutenzione dell'X1, rende difficile la scelta tra Toshiba e Lenovo.

Il peso contenuto si fa sentire sulla robustezza dello chassis. La tastiera e il pannello inferiore quasi non si flettono, cosa che impressiona. Tuttavia la cover si flette se si applica pressione; e può essere un problema alla lunga. La tastiera è mediocre con un layout frustrante e accumula ditate. Ma la principale pecca sono le prestazioni del processore. Il Core i7-7600U è molto meglio sulla carta che nel concreto. Notiamo throttling (per controllare le temperature), e limitazione della CPU L'X30 è più lento dei concorrenti nei benchmarks ma comunque nell'utilizzo quotidiano va bene.

Nel complesso il Toshiba Portégé X30 è un portatile eccellente da portare ing giro e per gli utenti business che viaggiano molto. Le dotazioni I/O, lo schermo, e lo chassis sono i punti di forza di questo delizioso dispositivo. così come lo scanner dell'iride e i tre anni di garanzia.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

 

 

Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) - 06/27/2017 v6
Sam Medley

Chassis
91 / 98 → 93%
Tastiera
75%
Dispositivo di puntamento
92%
Connettività
67 / 80 → 84%
Peso
75 / 20-67 → 100%
Batteria
89%
Display
88%
Prestazioni di gioco
59 / 68 → 86%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
88 / 92 → 96%
Temperatura
93%
Rumorosità
96%
Audio
70%
Fotocamera
50 / 85 → 59%
Media
79%
88%
Office - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Portatile Toshiba Portégé X30 (i7-7600U, 256 GB)
Sam Medley, 2017-06-30 (Update: 2017-06-30)