Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Convertibile HP Pavilion x360 14t (7200U, 940MX, FHD)

Home-Convertibile. Il convertibile HP da 14" monta un display IPS con contrasto elevato, un veloce SSD, e molto spazio di archiviazione. Il lato negativo è il prezzo di oltre $1000, tutt'altro che un affare.

HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng (Pavilion x360 Serie)
Processore
Intel Core i5-7200U
Scheda grafica
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB, Core: 1004-1202 MHz, Memoria: 1001 MHz, DDR3, 64-bit bus, ForceWare 385.28, Optimus
Memoria
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2400, single-channel, uno slot (usato)
Schermo
14 pollici 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, capacitive, 10 punti, Chi Mei, IPS, lucido: si
Scheda madre
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Harddisk
Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP, 128 GB 
, + WDC WD10SPCX (1 TB, 5,400 rpm), 1017 GB libera
Scheda audio
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Porte di connessione
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Connessioni Audio: audio combo, Lettore schede: SD, Sensori: accelerometro, TPM 2.0
Rete
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 19.9 x 334.8 x 226.9
Batteria
41.5 Wh ioni di litio
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: stereo, Tastiera: chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, McAfee LiveSafe (trial version), MS Office 365 (trial version), 12 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
1.72 kg, Alimentazione: 332.4 gr
Prezzo
899 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Connectivity

left: power button, lock, audio combo port, volume rocker
left: power button, lock, audio combo port, volume rocker
right: SD card reader, 3x USB 3.1 Gen. 1 (1x Type-C, 2x Type-A), HDMI, power
right: SD card reader, 3x USB 3.1 Gen. 1 (1x Type-C, 2x Type-A), HDMI, power
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
59.7 MB/s ∼74% -26%
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33 MB/s ∼41% -59%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87.9 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85.3 MB/s ∼97% -3%
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
38.8 MB/s ∼44% -56%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
495 MBit/s ∼100% +60%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
347 MBit/s ∼70% +12%
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
310 MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
665 MBit/s ∼100% +91%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
349 MBit/s ∼52% 0%
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
349 MBit/s ∼52%
234
cd/m²
228
cd/m²
228
cd/m²
248
cd/m²
252
cd/m²
233
cd/m²
239
cd/m²
241
cd/m²
230
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 252 cd/m² Media: 237 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 90 %
Al centro con la batteria: 240 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1200:1 (Nero: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.29 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 7.48 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
61% sRGB (Argyll) 40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.45
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3
Response Times
-68%
-37%
-30%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41 (23, 18)
53 (20, 33)
-29%
36 (15, 21)
12%
56 (18, 38)
-37%
Response Time Black / White *
22 (14, 10)
39 (12, 27)
-77%
27 (6, 21)
-23%
27 (8, 19)
-23%
PWM Frequency
25000 (50)
350 (60)
-99%
50 (50)
-100%
Screen
2%
26%
12%
Brightness middle
252
243
-4%
368
46%
245
-3%
Brightness
237
248
5%
350
48%
233
-2%
Brightness Distribution
90
91
1%
87
-3%
87
-3%
Black Level *
0.21
0.32
-52%
0.29
-38%
0.21
-0%
Contrast
1200
759
-37%
1269
6%
1167
-3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
7.29
5.44
25%
5.26
28%
4.2
42%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
17.55
9.73
45%
8.78
50%
8.75
50%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.48
4.74
37%
5.87
22%
3.94
47%
Gamma
2.45 98%
2.38 101%
2.42 99%
2.66 90%
CCT
6953 93%
7799 83%
6998 93%
6096 107%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
40
39.6
-1%
60
50%
38
-5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
61
62.5
2%
92
51%
59
-3%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-33% / -14%
-6% / 11%
-9% / 5%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 25000 Hz ≤ 50 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 25000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 25000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9953 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms Incremento
↘ 10 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.3 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23 ms Incremento
↘ 18 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.1 ms).
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5020
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
11503
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
3924
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
127 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
335 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
66.37 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Aiuto
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
130 Points ∼22% +2%
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
127 Points ∼22%
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
Intel Core i5-7200U
125 Points ∼21% -2%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
Intel Core i3-6100U
96 Points ∼16% -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
335 Points ∼16%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
332 Points ∼15% -1%
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
Intel Core i5-7200U
326 Points ∼15% -3%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
Intel Core i3-6100U
240 Points ∼11% -28%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
5020 Points ∼57%
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
Intel Core i5-7200U
4942 Points ∼56% -2%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
11503 Points ∼23%
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
Intel Core i5-7200U
11323 Points ∼23% -2%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
Intel Core i5-7200U
6914 Points ∼22% +7%
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
6484 Points ∼21%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
Intel Core i5-7200U
3209 Points ∼69% +10%
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
2912 Points ∼62%
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
Intel Core i5-7200U
7327 Points ∼27% +6%
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
6895 Points ∼25%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
7199 Points ∼28%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
3707 Points ∼62%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
Intel Core i5-7200U
215.07 Points ∼64% 0%
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
214.66 Points ∼64%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
Intel Core i3-6100U
90.86 Points ∼27% -58%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3435 punti
Aiuto
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
3665 Points ∼61% +7%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Radeon R5 M430, 7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
3550 Points ∼59% +3%
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
GeForce 940MX, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
3435 Points ∼57%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Hynix HFS128G39TND
3224 Points ∼54% -6%
Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
Sequential Read: 519 MB/s
Sequential Write: 328.2 MB/s
512K Read: 408.1 MB/s
512K Write: 170.2 MB/s
4K Read: 35.29 MB/s
4K Write: 95.51 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 398.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 161.2 MB/s
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
21%
4%
Write 4k QD32
161.2
246.3
53%
232.4
44%
Read 4k QD32
398.4
368.7
-7%
199.3
-50%
Write 4k
95.51
106.7
12%
87
-9%
Read 4k
35.29
35.66
1%
24
-32%
Write 512
170.2
274.5
61%
294.2
73%
Read 512
408.1
408
0%
351.7
-14%
Write Seq
328.2
476.5
45%
419.9
28%
Read Seq
519
517.5
0%
478.4
-8%
3DMark 11 Performance
2629 punti
Aiuto
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
2543 Points ∼5%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
AMD Radeon R5 M430, Intel Core i5-7200U
1643 Points ∼3% -35%
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1569 Points ∼3% -38%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U
1213 Points ∼2% -52%
basso medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 91.851.742.214.9fps
Prey (2017) 58.321.918.215.6fps
Rocket League (2017) 8731.320.7fps
Dirt 4 (2017) 6926.914.29.3fps
Team Fortress 2 (2017) 81.377.76738.7fps
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 40.515.211.97.8fps
F1 2017 (2017) 43211713fps
Ark Survival Evolved (2017) 25.87.3fps

Rumorosità

Idle
31.2 / 31.2 / 31.7 dB(A)
Sotto carico
38.4 / 42.1 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 30 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.534.641.637.437.52536.535.436.132.736.53135.436.335.331.735.44031.631.231.431.131.65031.832.129.830.831.86333.138.332.333.933.18028.329.829.729.128.310030.131.230.229.330.112526.528.426.424.226.516027.328.826.824.827.320025.928.725.625.525.925025.125.223.821.925.131524.725.923.523.324.740024.724.122.32124.750025.624.621.520.825.663025.924.520.92025.9800292720.519.229100030.627.220.418.330.6125031.528.419.217.731.5160031.628.318.517.131.6200032.328.918.316.532.3250034.128.917.816.634.1315032.326.517.616.232.3400029.524.517.516.329.5500025.921.717.416.325.9630023.520.417.316.223.5800020.519.117.316.220.51000019.219.317.316.419.21250018.819.317.416.318.81600020.62217.816.720.6SPL42.138.431.23042.1N3.72.91.61.43.7median 25.9HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ngmedian 25.9median 19.2median 17.7median 25.9Delta3.13.33.22.73.1hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
Carico massimo
 44.4 °C42.5 °C35.7 °C 
 44.7 °C38.4 °C34.2 °C 
 32.4 °C28.2 °C29.2 °C 
Massima: 44.7 °C
Media: 36.6 °C
30.7 °C47 °C50.8 °C
30.5 °C39 °C48 °C
27.6 °C27.9 °C32.5 °C
Massima: 50.8 °C
Media: 37.1 °C
Alimentazione (max)  45.1 °C | Temperatura della stanza 23.8 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
heatmap top (load)
heatmap top (load)
heatmap bottom (load)
heatmap bottom (load)
heatmap top (idle)
heatmap top (idle)
heatmap bottom (idle)
heatmap bottom (idle)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.442.32532.737.53131.739.54031.138.65030.841.36333.9448029.143.210029.34512524.245.816024.847.620025.550.225021.952.831523.3624002163.650020.865.86302069.380019.266.4100018.365.9125017.763.6160017.164.8200016.566.1250016.666.9315016.265.7400016.363.2500016.363.1630016.262.5800016.265.91000016.466.61250016.360.71600016.755.3SPL3077.3N1.443median 17.7HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ngmedian 63.6Delta2.74.935.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

 Frequency diagram (checkboxes selectable/deselectable!)

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.26 / 0.58 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.2 / 7.2 / 9.8 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 44 / 61 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Autonomia della batteria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 40)
6ore 13minuti
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
702 min ∼43% +88%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
6100U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh
463 min ∼28% +24%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
7200U, Radeon R5 M430, 35 Wh
373 min ∼23% 0%
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
7200U, GeForce 940MX, 41.5 Wh
373 min ∼23%

Pro

+ pannello IPS
+ display FHD
+ SSD + HDD
+ molto spazio di archiviazione
+ USB Type-C (USB 3.1 Gen. 2)
+ ac Wi-Fi

Contro

- scarsa luminosità del display
- manca l'ethernet
- autonomia mediocre
- solo un anno di garanzia

Giudizio complessivo

HP Pavilion x360 14t. Modello fornito da notebooksbilliger.de
HP Pavilion x360 14t. Modello fornito da notebooksbilliger.de

L'HP Pavilion x360 è un convertibile da 14". E' ben dotato per le esigenze delle applicazioni da ufificio ed internet. Grazie alla GPU dedicata, riesce anche a gestire i giochi.

L'HP Pavilion x360 14t è pensato principalmente per l'utilizzo domestico.

L'intero sistema è apparso molto veloce con il suo scattante SSD, e l'hard disk da 1 TB offre molto spazio. Entrambi i dispositivi possono essere sostituiti, con un parziale smontaggio del case.

La tastiera è decente e va bene per chi scrive molto. Il pannello FHD IPS ha ampi angoli di visuale e contrasto elevato, sfortunatamente la luminosità massima è limitata. Un dispositivo che si presume utilizzare spesso in giro dovrebbe avere qualcosa in più riguardo la luminosità.

L'autonomia è soltanto mediocre. Dopo tutti, è un dispositivo da 14". Anche un solo anno di garanzia è poco. Per questo prezzo, avremmo preferito due anni.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng - 08/29/2017 v6
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
77 / 98 → 79%
Tastiera
77%
Dispositivo di puntamento
87%
Connettività
45 / 80 → 57%
Peso
66 / 35-78 → 73%
Batteria
88%
Display
78%
Prestazioni di gioco
64 / 68 → 94%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
85 / 87 → 97%
Temperatura
89%
Rumorosità
87%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Fotocamera
42 / 85 → 49%
Media
73%
81%
Convertible - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Convertibile HP Pavilion x360 14t (7200U, 940MX, FHD)
Sascha Mölck, 2017-08-31 (Update: 2017-08-31)