Notebookcheck

Recensione del Laptop Porsche Design Ultra One: un SSD rumoroso che depone male

Mike Wobker, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, Felicitas Krohn (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 11/13/2019

L'assenza delle ventole si fa sentire. È risaputo che i prodotti con il marchio "Porsche Design" non offrono necessariamente un buon rapporto qualità-prezzo. Finché l'hardware e la lavorazione sono di alta qualità, questo fattore non è fastidioso per chi dispone di un generoso portafoglio. IL Porsche Design Ultra One, tuttavia, ha due stranezze che interferiscono seriamente con sessioni di lavoro più lunghe. La nostra recensione mostrerà di cosa si tratta.

Porsche Design Ultra One
Processore
Intel Core i7-8500Y
Scheda grafica
Intel UHD Graphics 615
Memoria
16384 MB 
, dual-channel
Schermo
15.6 pollici 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, capacitive, BOE06FB, IPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
FORESEE P902F001TB, 1024 GB 
, , 915 GB libera
Scheda audio
Conexant CX8400 @ Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Porte di connessione
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 HDMI, Connessioni Audio: jack audio combinato da 3.5 mm, Lettore schede: microSD, 1 Lettore impronte digitali
Rete
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 15 x 358 x 248
Batteria
45.6 Wh polimeri di litio
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 2.1 MP, 16:9 (1920x1080)
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: stereo, Tastiera: chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, 24 Mesi Garanzia, senza ventola
Peso
1.5 kg, Alimentazione: 272 gr
Prezzo
1995 Euro
Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

 

PunteggioDataModelloPesoAltezzaDimensioneRisoluzioneMiglior Prezzo
80%11/2019Porsche Design Ultra One
8500Y, UHD Graphics 615
1.5 kg15 mm15.6"1920x1080
01/2019HP Spectre Folio 13-ak0020ng
8500Y, UHD Graphics 615
1.5 kg15.4 mm13.3"1920x1080
84%05/2019VAIO A12-92993
8500Y, UHD Graphics 615
1.1 kg24 mm12.5"1920x1080
83%11/2019Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
8265U, UHD Graphics 620
2 kg23 mm15.6"1920x1080
81%10/2019HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
8565U, Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.6 kg19 mm15.6"3840x2160
83%11/2019Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
3580U, Vega 9
1.5 kg14.7 mm15"2496x1664
Porsche Design Ultra One
Porsche Design Ultra One
Porsche Design Ultra One
Porsche Design Ultra One
Porsche Design Ultra One
Porsche Design Ultra One
Porsche Design Ultra One

Confronto Dimensioni

376.5 mm 254.5 mm 23 mm 2 kg371 mm 251 mm 19 mm 1.6 kg358 mm 248 mm 15 mm 1.5 kg339.5 mm 244 mm 14.7 mm 1.5 kg320.1 mm 234.5 mm 15.4 mm 1.5 kg305.5 mm 211.9 mm 24 mm 1.1 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Porsche Design Ultra One
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
78.1 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
72.9 MB/s ∼93% -7%
Media della classe Office
  (10.2 - 191, n=280)
62.6 MB/s ∼80% -20%
VAIO A12-92993
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
28.8 MB/s ∼37% -63%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
84.4 MB/s ∼100% +1%
Porsche Design Ultra One
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
83.6 MB/s ∼99%
Media della classe Office
  (9.5 - 255, n=255)
78.9 MB/s ∼93% -6%
VAIO A12-92993
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
29.8 MB/s ∼35% -64%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3
Broadcom 802.11ac
730 MBit/s ∼100% +63%
Porsche Design Ultra One
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
447 (min: 252, max: 514) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3
Broadcom 802.11ac
710 MBit/s ∼100% +25%
Porsche Design Ultra One
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
570 (min: 419, max: 629) MBit/s ∼80%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø447 (252-514)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø570 (419-629)
239
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
227
cd/m²
224
cd/m²
237
cd/m²
207
cd/m²
204
cd/m²
211
cd/m²
187
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
BOE06FB
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 253 cd/m² Media: 221 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 74 %
Al centro con la batteria: 232 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1354:1 (Nero: 0.175 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
86% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
Porsche Design Ultra One
BOE06FB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
VAIO A12-92993
InfoVision IVO04E6, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
N156HCE-EAA, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AU Optronics AUO30EB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
Sharp LQ150P1JX51, IPS, 2496x1664, 15
Response Times
-12%
-1%
-30%
-16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42 (22, 20)
52.8 (24.4, 28.4)
-26%
42.8 (22.8, 20)
-2%
68.8 (33.2, 35.6)
-64%
47.2 (23.2, 24)
-12%
Response Time Black / White *
31 (18, 13)
30.4 (15.6, 14.8)
2%
30.8 (18, 12.8)
1%
29.6
5%
36.8 (20.4, 16.4)
-19%
PWM Frequency
990.1 (99)
24510 (40)
21370 (51)
Screen
7%
-20%
26%
18%
Brightness middle
237
315
33%
247
4%
451
90%
416.9
76%
Brightness
221
294
33%
228
3%
434
96%
389
76%
Brightness Distribution
74
89
20%
81
9%
89
20%
86
16%
Black Level *
0.175
0.21
-20%
0.18
-3%
0.25
-43%
0.4
-129%
Contrast
1354
1500
11%
1372
1%
1804
33%
1042
-23%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.7
4.4
6%
5.9
-26%
4.4
6%
2.75
41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.7
7.1
27%
22.9
-136%
6.7
31%
6.64
32%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.9
4.8
2%
5.1
-4%
5
-2%
1.8
63%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.02 109%
2.21 100%
2.31 95%
2.09 105%
CCT
6688 97%
7307 89%
6398 102%
7717 84%
6646 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
56
44
-21%
41.2
-26%
63
13%
63.4
13%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
86
69.5
-19%
64.1
-25%
97
13%
99.4
16%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.9
4.7
1.8
0.71
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-3% / 4%
-11% / -17%
-2% / 17%
1% / 13%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti possono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con tempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
31 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 18 ms Incremento
↘ 13 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 79 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (24.8 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
42 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 22 ms Incremento
↘ 20 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.9 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 55 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono simili alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (39.4 ms).

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Per ridurre la luminosità dello schermo, alcuni portatili accendono e spengono la retroilluminazione in rapida successione - un metodo chiamato Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). Questa frequenza di ciclo a livello ideale non dovrebbe essere percepibile dall'occhi umano. Se tale frequenza è troppo bassa, gli utenti con occhi sensibili potrebbero stancarsi gli occhi o avere mal di testa o anche notare uno sfarfallio.
flickering dello schermo / PWM non rilevato

In confronto: 51 % di tutti i dispositivi testati non utilizza PWM per ridurre la luminosita' del display. Se è rilevato PWM, una media di 9338 (minimo: 43 - massimo: 142900) Hz è stata rilevata.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
Porsche Design Ultra One Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel Core i7-8500Y: Ø246 (242.99-252.74)
VAIO A12-92993 Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel Core i7-8500Y: Ø232 (221.39-245.57)
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø492 (488.36-508.63)
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø489 (485.76-508.49)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U, AMD Ryzen 5 3580U: Ø662 (563.52-691.26)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
Intel Core i7-8565U
165 Points ∼76% +25%
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
Intel Core i5-8265U
160 Points ∼73% +21%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U
139 Points ∼64% +5%
Porsche Design Ultra One
Intel Core i7-8500Y
132 Points ∼61%
Media Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (126 - 132, n=4)
130 Points ∼60% -2%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
126 Points ∼58% -5%
Media della classe Office
  (20 - 199, n=538)
112 Points ∼51% -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U
693 Points ∼16% +181%
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
Intel Core i5-8265U
521 (min: 471.69, max: 492.04) Points ∼12% +111%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
Intel Core i7-8565U
494 (min: 492.26, max: 519.15) Points ∼11% +100%
Media della classe Office
  (36 - 1050, n=545)
345 Points ∼8% +40%
Media Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (227 - 271, n=4)
248 Points ∼6% 0%
Porsche Design Ultra One
Intel Core i7-8500Y
247 Points ∼6%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
227 Points ∼5% -8%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
132 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
247 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
40.74 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Aiuto
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
Vega 9, 3580U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
3778 Points ∼32% +83%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
Radeon Pro WX 3200, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
2905 Points ∼24% +41%
Media della classe Office
  (320 - 3884, n=155)
2658 Points ∼22% +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G
2067 Points ∼17% 0%
Porsche Design Ultra One
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, FORESEE P902F001TB
2060 Points ∼17%
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
1978 Points ∼17% -4%
Media Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (1791 - 2060, n=4)
1927 Points ∼16% -6%
Productivity
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
Vega 9, 3580U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
6102 Points ∼63% +10%
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6026 Points ∼62% +9%
Media Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (5164 - 6026, n=4)
5615 Points ∼58% +2%
Porsche Design Ultra One
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, FORESEE P902F001TB
5526 Points ∼57%
Media della classe Office
  (1266 - 7964, n=155)
5490 Points ∼57% -1%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
Radeon Pro WX 3200, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3998 Points ∼41% -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G
2941 Points ∼30% -47%
Essentials
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
Vega 9, 3580U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
7861 Points ∼70% +8%
Porsche Design Ultra One
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, FORESEE P902F001TB
7257 Points ∼64%
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7195 Points ∼64% -1%
Media della classe Office
  (2683 - 9790, n=155)
6983 Points ∼62% -4%
Media Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (6709 - 7257, n=4)
6976 Points ∼62% -4%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
Radeon Pro WX 3200, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5223 Points ∼46% -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G
5073 Points ∼45% -30%
Score
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
Vega 9, 3580U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
4056 Points ∼52% +30%
Media della classe Office
  (803 - 4597, n=156)
3276 Points ∼42% +5%
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3161 Points ∼41% +1%
Porsche Design Ultra One
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, FORESEE P902F001TB
3122 Points ∼40%
Media Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (2884 - 3161, n=4)
3028 Points ∼39% -3%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
Radeon Pro WX 3200, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
2817 Points ∼36% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G
2247 Points ∼29% -28%
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3493 Points ∼57% +27%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
Vega 9, 3580U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
3348 Points ∼55% +21%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
Radeon Pro WX 3200, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3257 Points ∼53% +18%
Media della classe Office
  (1169 - 4770, n=410)
3058 Points ∼50% +11%
Media Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (2588 - 3493, n=4)
2894 Points ∼47% +5%
Porsche Design Ultra One
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, FORESEE P902F001TB
2758 Points ∼45%
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G
2747 Points ∼45% 0%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2758 punti
Aiuto
Porsche Design Ultra One
FORESEE P902F001TB
VAIO A12-92993
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
Media FORESEE P902F001TB
 
Media della classe Office
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
74%
36%
61%
2%
0%
-3%
Write 4K
109.3
113.9
4%
115.3
5%
156
43%
99.04
-9%
109
0%
96 (0.217 - 204, n=160)
-12%
Read 4K
43.56
46.8
7%
43.34
-1%
45.73
5%
35.63
-18%
43.6
0%
33.7 (0.176 - 166, n=160)
-23%
Write Seq
518.1
1868
261%
1014
96%
1158
124%
706.2
36%
518
0%
712 (21.4 - 2714, n=159)
37%
Read Seq
1118
2226
99%
1481
32%
1132
1%
1044
-7%
1118
0%
999 (74 - 2827, n=159)
-11%
Write 4K Q32T1
310.4
313.4
1%
495.4
60%
369.2
19%
326.6
5%
310
0%
269 (0.222 - 701, n=161)
-13%
Read 4K Q32T1
345.6
284.6
-18%
332.6
-4%
573
66%
270
-22%
346
0%
289 (0.647 - 773, n=161)
-16%
Write Seq Q32T1
925.9
1880.5
103%
1653.8
79%
1969
113%
819.6
-11%
926
0%
915 (56.5 - 3280, n=161)
-1%
Read Seq Q32T1
1431
3401.9
138%
1746.1
22%
3138
119%
2028
42%
1431
0%
1633 (78.6 - 3561, n=161)
14%
Write 4K Q8T8
410.2
1033.2
864 (4.69 - 2067, n=16)
Read 4K Q8T8
526.7
891.8
901 (247 - 1525, n=16)
AS SSD
156%
144%
203%
29%
0%
-43%
Score Total
1076
3462
222%
3420
218%
3976
270%
1434
33%
1076
0%
1357 (21 - 5169, n=365)
26%
Score Write
372
1042
180%
1132
204%
1755
372%
488
31%
372
0%
456 (8 - 2668, n=365)
23%
Score Read
473
1638
246%
1528
223%
1474
212%
639
35%
473
0%
602 (6 - 2251, n=365)
27%
Access Time Write *
0.263
0.029
89%
0.036
86%
0.026
90%
0.11
58%
0.263
-0%
1.068 (0.021 - 34.1, n=393)
-306%
Access Time Read *
0.453
0.04
91%
0.063
86%
0.039
91%
0.056
88%
0.453
-0%
1.485 (0.025 - 32, n=390)
-228%
4K-64 Write
196.24
767.22
291%
926.34
372%
1445.94
637%
339.93
73%
196
0%
302 (0.23 - 2280, n=394)
54%
4K-64 Read
304.23
1316.36
333%
1343.59
342%
1210.64
298%
492.01
62%
304
0%
448 (0.34 - 2072, n=394)
47%
4K Write
100.19
142.48
42%
120.22
20%
137.63
37%
96.76
-3%
100
0%
74.6 (0.21 - 182, n=394)
-26%
4K Read
40.63
56.79
40%
45.72
13%
55.3
36%
34.98
-14%
40.6
0%
30 (0.4 - 112, n=394)
-26%
Seq Write
753.77
1327.81
76%
852
13%
1715.24
128%
514.48
-32%
754
0%
502 (41.5 - 2531, n=395)
-33%
Seq Read
1285.13
2650.04
106%
1383
8%
2082.88
62%
1122.12
-13%
1285
0%
838 (42.5 - 2978, n=395)
-35%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
115% / 122%
90% / 99%
132% / 143%
16% / 18%
0% / 0%
-23% / -26%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

FORESEE P902F001TB
Sequential Read: 993.1 MB/s
Sequential Write: 672.3 MB/s
512K Read: 598.2 MB/s
512K Write: 506.8 MB/s
4K Read: 28.84 MB/s
4K Write: 85.93 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 312.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 231.1 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9, AMD Ryzen 5 3580U
4380 Points ∼100% +218%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, Intel Core i7-8565U
4256 Points ∼97% +209%
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1722 Points ∼39% +25%
Porsche Design Ultra One
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
1376 Points ∼31%
Media della classe Office
  (185 - 5332, n=662)
1323 Points ∼30% -4%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
1185 Points ∼27% -14%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (821 - 1376, n=7)
1161 Points ∼27% -16%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, Intel Core i7-8565U
3088 Points ∼100% +216%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9, AMD Ryzen 5 3580U
2789 Points ∼90% +186%
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1143 Points ∼37% +17%
Media della classe Office
  (138 - 4109, n=481)
1017 Points ∼33% +4%
Porsche Design Ultra One
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
976 Points ∼32%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
964 Points ∼31% -1%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (563 - 976, n=7)
820 Points ∼27% -16%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9, AMD Ryzen 5 3580U
19255 Points ∼100% +160%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, Intel Core i7-8565U
18952 Points ∼98% +156%
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
8935 Points ∼46% +21%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
7568 Points ∼39% +2%
Porsche Design Ultra One
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
7409 Points ∼38%
Media della classe Office
  (1208 - 27117, n=527)
7057 Points ∼37% -5%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (4521 - 7568, n=7)
6506 Points ∼34% -12%
3DMark 11 Performance
1503 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5528 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score
881 punti
Aiuto
BioShock Infinite
1366x768 High Preset
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
Intel Core i7-8565U, AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
81.55 fps ∼100% +302%
Media della classe Office
  (4.43 - 128, n=347)
27.2 fps ∼33% +34%
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
24 fps ∼29% +18%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
22.5 fps ∼28% +11%
Porsche Design Ultra One
Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
20.28 fps ∼25%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (13.3 - 22.5, n=7)
18 fps ∼22% -11%
1366x768 Medium Preset
Media della classe Office
  (5.6 - 145, n=368)
31.5 fps ∼100% +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
31 fps ∼98% +8%
Porsche Design Ultra One
Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
28.6 fps ∼91%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
26.5 fps ∼84% -7%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (15.8 - 28.6, n=7)
22.3 fps ∼71% -22%
1280x720 Very Low Preset
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
117.9 fps ∼100% +135%
Media della classe Office
  (12.2 - 208, n=374)
56.2 fps ∼48% +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
56 fps ∼47% +12%
Porsche Design Ultra One
Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
50.17 fps ∼43%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
49.1 fps ∼42% -2%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (27.5 - 50.2, n=7)
39.2 fps ∼33% -22%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
Intel Core i7-8565U, AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
48 (min: 43.5) fps ∼100% +216%
Media della classe Office
  (5.5 - 69, n=45)
28.4 fps ∼59% +87%
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
18.6 (min: 17.3) fps ∼39% +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
18 (min: 16.7) fps ∼38% +18%
HP Spectre Folio 13-ak0020ng
Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
15.4 fps ∼32% +1%
Porsche Design Ultra One
Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
15.2 (min: 13.7) fps ∼32%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (11.3 - 15.4, n=4)
13.9 fps ∼29% -9%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
13.6 (min: 12.4) fps ∼28% -11%
1366x768 med (1/3)
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
Intel Core i7-8565U, AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
87 (min: 76.7) fps ∼100% +197%
Media della classe Office
  (9.7 - 89.8, n=53)
45.6 fps ∼52% +56%
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
39.4 (min: 35.4) fps ∼45% +34%
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
36.7 (min: 31.7) fps ∼42% +25%
Porsche Design Ultra One
Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
29.3 (min: 24.2) fps ∼34%
HP Spectre Folio 13-ak0020ng
Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
27.3 fps ∼31% -7%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
26.3 (min: 21.6) fps ∼30% -10%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (17.4 - 29.3, n=4)
25.1 fps ∼29% -14%
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
Intel Core i7-8565U, AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
98 (min: 85.8) fps ∼100% +63%
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
67 (min: 59.5) fps ∼68% +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
60.4 (min: 54.3) fps ∼62% 0%
Media della classe Office
  (21.3 - 131, n=53)
66.2 fps ∼68% +10%
Porsche Design Ultra One
Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
60.1 (min: 52.8) fps ∼61%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
56.6 (min: 49.9) fps ∼58% -6%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (52.6 - 60.1, n=4)
56.2 fps ∼57% -6%
HP Spectre Folio 13-ak0020ng
Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
55.3 fps ∼56% -8%
Anno 1800
1920x1080 Medium Graphics Quality (DX11)
Media della classe Office
  (5.22 - 26.7, n=5)
11.6 fps ∼100% +122%
Porsche Design Ultra One
Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
5.22 fps ∼45%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 615
 
5.22 fps ∼45% 0%
1280x720 Low Graphics Quality (DX11)
Media della classe Office
  (8.1 - 52.8, n=8)
21.4 fps ∼100% +42%
Porsche Design Ultra One
Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
15.09 fps ∼71%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (9.7 - 15.1, n=2)
12.4 fps ∼58% -18%
basso medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 50.17 28.6 20.28 7.56 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 60.1 29.3 15.2 13.7 fps
Anno 1800 (2019) 15.09 5.22 fps

Rumorosità

Idle
30.4 / 30.4 / 30.4 dB(A)
Sotto carico
30.8 / 30.4 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 30.4 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.433.334.433.4253933.637.4393136.939.440.136.94033.334.332.333.35032.532.231.332.56327.530.528.427.58026.427.426.826.410025.625.727.325.612525.325.425.825.316024.324.623.724.320022.922.722.622.925022.522.722.222.531521.521.920.921.540020.720.420.220.750019.920.119.519.963019.519.319.219.580018.918.918.218.9100018.218.51818.2125017.918.41817.9160018.217.817.518.2200018.117.617.518.1250018.417.617.718.4315018.417.817.818.4400018.4181818.4500018.318.11818.3630018.418.118.218.4800018.418.218.418.41000018.818.118.418.81250018.718.118.118.71600018.918.218.218.9SPL30.830.630.430.8N1.51.51.41.5median 18.8median 18.4median 18.2median 18.8Delta1.61.921.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoisePorsche Design Ultra One
Carico massimo
 47.8 °C40.7 °C27.2 °C 
 33.8 °C32.8 °C25.9 °C 
 26.2 °C27.2 °C24.1 °C 
Massima: 47.8 °C
Media: 31.7 °C
27.9 °C35.1 °C42 °C
25.9 °C31.6 °C34 °C
24.6 °C27.1 °C28.2 °C
Massima: 42 °C
Media: 30.7 °C
Alimentazione (max)  32.8 °C | Temperatura della stanza 23.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) La temperatura media del lato superiore sotto carico massimo e' di 31.7 °C / 89 F, rispetto alla media di 29.4 °C / 85 F per i dispositivi di questa classe Office.
(-) La temperatura massima sul lato superiore è di 47.8 °C / 118 F, rispetto alla media di 34 °C / 93 F, che varia da 21.2 a 62.5 °C per questa classe Office.
(±) Il lato inferiore si riscalda fino ad un massimo di 42 °C / 108 F, rispetto alla media di 36.4 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle, la temperatura media del lato superiore è di 25.4 °C / 78 F, rispetto alla media deld ispositivo di 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.9 °C / 1.6 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.234.432.22537.637.437.63146.840.146.84035.332.335.35035.931.335.96331.128.431.18031.526.831.510042.127.342.112552.125.852.116053.523.753.520048.122.648.125047.422.247.431557.120.957.140064.220.264.250060.919.560.96306019.26080058.418.258.4100061.91861.9125059.31859.3160064.317.564.3200066.117.566.1250064.317.764.3315058.417.858.4400058.91858.9500063.31863.3630063.118.263.1800059.918.459.91000057.518.457.51250060.218.160.21600064.518.264.5SPL74.330.474.3N34.61.434.6median 59.9median 18.2median 59.9Delta4.124.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoisePorsche Design Ultra OneApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Porsche Design Ultra One analisi audio

(-) | not very loud speakers (66.14 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz analisi audio

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.32 / 0.38 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.6 / 7.6 / 9.7 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 22 / 28.7 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
3580U, Vega 9, 45 Wh
546 min ∼21% +30%
VAIO A12-92993
8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, 23.4 Wh
431 min ∼16% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE
8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
429 min ∼16% +2%
Porsche Design Ultra One
8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, 45.6 Wh
419 min ∼16%
Media della classe Office
  (105 - 1104, n=356)
417 min ∼16% 0%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
8565U, Radeon Pro WX 3200, 56 Wh
415 min ∼16% -1%
Autonomia della batteria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6ore 59minuti

Pro

+ case stabile
+ valore nero molto buono
+ buon contrasto
+ prestazioni costanti

Contro

- rapporto prezzo/prestazioni poco omogeneo
- schermo molto riflettente
- l'SSD produce un rumore sgradevole

Giudizio Complessivo - vari punti deboli compromenttono il Porsche Design Ultra One

Recensione del computer portatile Porsche Design Ultra One. Dispositivo di test gentilmente fornito da: Porsche Design
Recensione del computer portatile Porsche Design Ultra One. Dispositivo di test gentilmente fornito da: Porsche Design

Il Porsche Design Ultra One è molto costoso. A fronte del prezzo elevato, questo portatile fanless offre un case molto stabile, uno schermo touch, una memoria di 16 GB e un SSD da 1 TB. Le prestazioni sono sufficienti per l'uso quotidiano in ufficio e soddisfano le nostre aspettative per l'hardware. Dispositivi come il VAIO A12-92993 o l'HP Spectre Folio 13-ak0020ng hanno già intrapreso una strada simile, e sono stati accolti bene dagli acquirenti.

    Porsche Design avrebbe dovuto installare un display antiriflesso e un SSD di alta qualità nell'Ultra One per rendere il prezzo effettivamente giustificato.

Il design e la silenziosità sono probabilmente i punti di forza dell'Ultra One. Tuttavia, il laptop non riesce chiaramente in relazione a quest'ultimo punto. Come già accennato nella recensione, l'SSD integrato produce un rumore così sgradevole che lavorare con il dispositivo è fastidioso anche per gli utenti con orecchie meno sensibili. Inoltre, c'è il display altamente riflettente, che è fastidioso per gli occhi. Pertanto, due punti importanti rendono l'uso del Porsche Design Ultra One così difficile che il prezzo non risulta giustificato in alcun modo.

Porsche Design Ultra One - 11/12/2019 v7
Mike Wobker

Chassis
82 / 98 → 84%
Tastiera
79%
Dispositivo di puntamento
88%
Connettività
45 / 80 → 56%
Peso
69 / 20-75 → 89%
Batteria
74%
Display
76%
Prestazioni di gioco
43 / 78 → 55%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
73 / 95 → 77%
Temperatura
92%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
60%
Fotocamera
33 / 85 → 39%
Media
70%
80%
Office - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione del Laptop Porsche Design Ultra One: un SSD rumoroso che depone male
Mike Wobker, 2019-11-13 (Update: 2019-11-13)