Notebookcheck

Recensione breve dello Smartphone Motorola Moto Z2 Force

Manuel Masiero (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 01/20/2018

Antiproiettile? Il Motorola Moto Z2 Force è uno smartphone high-end e l'ultimo membro della famiglia Moto Z ed è, come ci aspettavamo, compatibile con i Moto Mods. In aggiunta, monta uno ShatterShield: una tecnologia per display che dovrebbe renderlo completamente infragibile.

Motorola Moto Z2 Force
Scheda grafica
Memoria
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4
Schermo
5.5 pollici 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 534 PPI, QHD 1440p Super AMOLED display, ShatterShield, OLED, lucido: si
Harddisk
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 46.2 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1, Connessioni Audio: jack da 3,5-mm via USB-C dongle, Lettore schede: microSD fino a 2 TB, 1 Lettore impronte digitali, NFC, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: lettore impronte, accelerometro, giroscopio, magnetometro, barometro, sensore prossimità, ultrasonic, monitor audio, 2x2 MIMO, USB-OTG, Moto-Mods
Rete
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2 (Android 7.1.1), 5.0 (nach Upgrade auf Android 8.0), GSM (850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1,900, 2,100 MHz), LTE (B1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 46), Download up to 1000 MBit/s, Upload up to 75 MBit/s, Nano-SIM, head SAR 0,405 W/kg, body SAR 1,450 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 5.99 x 155.8 x 76
Batteria
2730 mAh polimeri di litio
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 12 MPix f/2.0, IMX386, colore + 12 MP, f/2.0, IMX386, b/w, 1.25 µm, rilevazione profondità ed effetti, autofocus (PDAF), laser autofocus, dual LED flash (CCT), videos fino a [email protected]
Fotocamera Secondaria: 5 MPix f/2.2 apertura, 85° angolare, modalità notturna automatica, software per miglioramento immagine
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: cassa frontale, Tastiera: tastiera virtuale, cavo USB-C to USB-A, adattatore audio USB-C to 3.5-mm, caricatore 15 W (5V, 3A), guida rapida, tool SIM, 24 Mesi Garanzia, senza ventola
Peso
143 gr, Alimentazione: 35 gr
Prezzo
799 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
914 MBit/s ∼100% +60%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
657 MBit/s ∼72% +15%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
573 MBit/s ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
503 MBit/s ∼55% -12%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
394 MBit/s ∼43% -31%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
338 MBit/s ∼37% -41%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
703 MBit/s ∼100% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
653 MBit/s ∼93% +11%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
639 MBit/s ∼91% +9%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
587 MBit/s ∼83%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
374 MBit/s ∼53% -36%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
225 MBit/s ∼32% -62%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force: overview
Motorola Moto Z2 Force: overview
Motorola Moto Z2 Force: intersection
Motorola Moto Z2 Force: intersection
Motorola Moto Z2 Force: turning point
Motorola Moto Z2 Force: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: overview
Garmin Edge 500: overview
Garmin Edge 500: intersection
Garmin Edge 500: intersection
Garmin Edge 500: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: turning point

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
507
cd/m²
512
cd/m²
532
cd/m²
508
cd/m²
511
cd/m²
538
cd/m²
521
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
573
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 573 cd/m² Media: 526.1 cd/m² Minimum: 8.91 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 88 %
Al centro con la batteria: 511 cd/m²
Contrasto: ∞:1 (Nero: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.11
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
OLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
OLED, 2160x1080, 6
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.3
HTC U11
Super LCD5, 2560x1440, 5.5
LG V30
OLED, 2880x1440, 6
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
35%
21%
16%
-11%
34%
Brightness middle
511
629
23%
530
4%
482
-6%
432
-15%
559
9%
Brightness
526
636
21%
536
2%
472
-10%
428
-19%
538
2%
Brightness Distribution
88
94
7%
93
6%
90
2%
87
-1%
90
2%
Black Level *
0.33
0.38
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.3
1.7
60%
2.6
40%
3.2
26%
4.18
3%
1.3
70%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.6
3.6
62%
5.1
47%
5.4
44%
8.53
11%
2.7
72%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.7
2.4
35%
2.7
27%
2.2
41%
5.3
-43%
1.8
51%
Gamma
2.11 114%
2.15 112%
2.04 118%
2.22 108%
2.33 103%
2.25 107%
CCT
7075 92%
6337 103%
6206 105%
6581 99%
7487 87%
6797 96%
Contrast
1461
1471

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 245.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8882 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms Incremento
↘ 2.4 ms Calo
Lo schermo ha mostrato valori di risposta molto veloci nei nostri tests ed è molto adatto per i gaming veloce.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.9 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms Incremento
↘ 2.8 ms Calo
Lo schermo ha mostrato valori di risposta molto veloci nei nostri tests ed è molto adatto per i gaming veloce.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.4 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
179595 Points ∼78%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
177341 Points ∼77% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
173997 Points ∼75% -3%
HTC U11
175032 Points ∼76% -3%
LG V30
173749 Points ∼75% -3%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
218158 Points ∼95% +21%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
6998 Points ∼68%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6932 Points ∼67% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
5096 Points ∼49% -27%
HTC U11
6828 Points ∼66% -2%
LG V30
5603 Points ∼54% -20%
Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
8553 Points ∼83%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8439 Points ∼82% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
6084 Points ∼59% -29%
HTC U11
8295 Points ∼81% -3%
LG V30
6854 Points ∼67% -20%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
1300 Points ∼77%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1234 Points ∼73% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
1235 Points ∼73% -5%
HTC U11
1221 Points ∼72% -6%
LG V30
1009 Points ∼59% -22%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
6144 Points ∼66%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3657 Points ∼40% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
6121 Points ∼66% 0%
HTC U11
5976 Points ∼65% -3%
LG V30
5949 Points ∼64% -3%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3652 Points ∼76%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4142 Points ∼86% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3095 Points ∼65% -15%
HTC U11
2085 Points ∼43% -43%
LG V30
2091 Points ∼44% -43%
System (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
5918 Points ∼58%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
5244 Points ∼51% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
5308 Points ∼52% -10%
HTC U11
5570 Points ∼54% -6%
LG V30
4238 Points ∼41% -28%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3625 Points ∼84%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3147 Points ∼73% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3338 Points ∼77% -8%
HTC U11
3034 Points ∼70% -16%
LG V30
2702 Points ∼63% -25%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8572 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
8310 Points ∼58%
HTC U11
8281 Points ∼58%
LG V30
8016 Points ∼56%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
6711 Points ∼23%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6792 Points ∼24% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
6744 Points ∼23% 0%
HTC U11
6443 Points ∼22% -4%
LG V30
6078 Points ∼21% -9%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
10558 Points ∼37% +57%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
1911 Points ∼32%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1898 Points ∼32% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2028 Points ∼34% +6%
HTC U11
1906 Points ∼32% 0%
LG V30
1900 Points ∼32% -1%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
4263 Points ∼72% +123%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
2986 Points ∼81%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2871 Points ∼78% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2346 Points ∼64% -21%
HTC U11
2841 Points ∼77% -5%
LG V30
2931 Points ∼80% -2%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2109 Points ∼57% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3991 Points ∼74%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2844 Points ∼53% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2661 Points ∼49% -33%
HTC U11
3883 Points ∼72% -3%
LG V30
3903 Points ∼72% -2%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
3069 Points ∼57% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3713 Points ∼78%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2850 Points ∼60% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2584 Points ∼55% -30%
HTC U11
3590 Points ∼76% -3%
LG V30
3635 Points ∼77% -2%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2781 Points ∼59% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3071 Points ∼84%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2896 Points ∼80% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2342 Points ∼64% -24%
HTC U11
2832 Points ∼78% -8%
LG V30
2808 Points ∼77% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
6035 Points ∼73%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3353 Points ∼40% -44%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3928 Points ∼47% -35%
HTC U11
5877 Points ∼71% -3%
LG V30
5895 Points ∼71% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
4969 Points ∼78%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3239 Points ∼51% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3414 Points ∼54% -31%
HTC U11
4744 Points ∼74% -5%
LG V30
4738 Points ∼74% -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
21239 Points ∼27%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22629 Points ∼29% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
22829 Points ∼29% +7%
HTC U11
20140 Points ∼25% -5%
LG V30
14601 Points ∼18% -31%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
25641 Points ∼32% +21%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
55485 Points ∼12%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
34008 Points ∼7% -39%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
36807 Points ∼8% -34%
HTC U11
55725 Points ∼12% 0%
LG V30
55271 Points ∼12% 0%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
113380 Points ∼24% +104%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
40848 Points ∼20%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
30590 Points ∼15% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
32399 Points ∼15% -21%
HTC U11
40014 Points ∼19% -2%
LG V30
34139 Points ∼16% -16%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
64405 Points ∼31% +58%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
105 fps ∼6%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
112 fps ∼7% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
105 fps ∼6% 0%
HTC U11
91 fps ∼5% -13%
LG V30
113 fps ∼7% +8%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
166.9 fps ∼10% +59%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
60 fps ∼13%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
60 fps ∼13% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
59 fps ∼13% -2%
HTC U11
58 fps ∼13% -3%
LG V30
60 fps ∼13% 0%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
119.4 fps ∼26% +99%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
54 fps ∼10%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
54 fps ∼10% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
51 fps ∼9% -6%
HTC U11
51 fps ∼9% -6%
LG V30
59 fps ∼11% +9%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
71 fps ∼13% +31%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
36 fps ∼10%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
56 fps ∼15% +56%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
38 fps ∼10% +6%
HTC U11
29 fps ∼8% -19%
LG V30
35 fps ∼10% -3%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
79.2 fps ∼22% +120%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
40 fps ∼7%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
37 fps ∼7% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
42 fps ∼8% +5%
HTC U11
33 fps ∼6% -17%
LG V30
40 fps ∼7% 0%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
49 fps ∼9% +23%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
22 fps ∼13%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
38 fps ∼22% +73%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
23 fps ∼13% +5%
HTC U11
15 fps ∼9% -32%
LG V30
19 fps ∼11% -14%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
56.4 fps ∼32% +156%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
25 fps ∼6%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21 fps ∼5% -16%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
25 fps ∼6% 0%
HTC U11
24 fps ∼6% -4%
LG V30
24 fps ∼6% -4%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
15 fps ∼13%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22 fps ∼19% +47%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
13 fps ∼11% -13%
HTC U11
13 fps ∼11% -13%
LG V30
13 fps ∼11% -13%

Legenda

 
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 10 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
HTC U11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 8 Plus Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
223.5 Points ∼100% +235%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
69.57 Points ∼31% +4%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
69.51 Points ∼31% +4%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)
66.689 Points ∼30%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
56.63 Points ∼25% -15%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
52.9 Points ∼24% -21%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
35209 Points ∼100% +172%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
13265 Points ∼38% +3%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)
12929 Points ∼37%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
11781 Points ∼33% -9%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
10506 Points ∼30% -19%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
10406 Points ∼30% -20%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
3630 ms * ∼100% -14%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
3590.6 ms * ∼99% -13%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)
3175.3 ms * ∼87%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
2760.3 ms * ∼76% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
1876.8 ms * ∼52% +41%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
719.7 ms * ∼20% +77%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
362 Points ∼100% +125%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
162 Points ∼45% +1%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)
161 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
159 Points ∼44% -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
158 Points ∼44% -2%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
138 Points ∼38% -14%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Motorola Moto Z2 ForceHuawei Mate 10 ProSamsung Galaxy Note 8HTC U11LG V30
AndroBench 3-5
25%
-16%
-11%
-30%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
54.67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.27 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
46.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-15%
47.2
-14%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
77.37 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-12%
68.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-11%
62.8
-19%
Random Write 4KB
78.62
164.45
109%
14.55
-81%
79.97
2%
10.21
-87%
Random Read 4KB
148.76
132.27
-11%
122.48
-18%
91.45
-39%
78.17
-47%
Sequential Write 256KB
213.61
208.72
-2%
205.85
-4%
206.41
-3%
193.22
-10%
Sequential Read 256KB
696.35
732.46
5%
796.96
14%
717.33
3%
669.48
-4%
Dead Trigger 2
 SettaggiValore
 high60 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettaggiValore
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Carico massimo
 31.8 °C33.5 °C34.5 °C 
 32.1 °C33.9 °C34.8 °C 
 32.1 °C33.9 °C35 °C 
Massima: 35 °C
Media: 33.5 °C
34.9 °C34.2 °C32.8 °C
34.5 °C34.2 °C32.6 °C
35.4 °C35 °C33.4 °C
Massima: 35.4 °C
Media: 34.1 °C
Alimentazione (max)  23.9 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.245.92532.943.63137.237.84031.746.75039.643.66328.333.38027.334.810026.931.112526.733.11602439.220020.946.425020.949.531519.55440018.561.450017.567.963017.570.680015.770.6100015.870.3125016.671.9160015.873.9200015.475.5250015.57431501672.5400015.872.350001672.9630016.372.4800016.372.91000016.274.31250016.473.31600016.465.9SPL28.684.8N1.161.7median 16.4Motorola Moto Z2 Forcemedian 70.6Delta2.18.935.237.832.934.237.235.631.737.139.64028.327.927.32626.924.326.723.72433.420.941.220.951.919.551.218.560.317.55617.555.915.755.115.865.716.669.515.874.215.47715.574.91673.315.870.41670.816.373.116.372.916.273.516.468.816.455.828.684.41.154.7median 16.4Huawei Mate 10 Promedian 65.72.110.831.631.325.427.225.326.132.925.133.624.531.62628.4242728.220.828.22234.521.348.320.852.321.257.619.460.119.563.917.767.117.965.517.868.617.372.117.474.616.776.217.278.418.281.117.977.417.672.817.775.417.877.917.970.918.167.118.258.13086.91.369.1median 17.9Samsung Galaxy Note 8median 67.11.310.7hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Motorola Moto Z2 Force audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Mate 10 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy Note 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.21 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.52 / 0.84 / 0.85 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 2.71 / 7.2 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
2730 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3300 mAh
HTC U11
3000 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2691 mAh
Power Consumption
-43%
-46%
-77%
-41%
-99%
Idle Minimum *
0.52
0.85
-63%
0.73
-40%
0.73
-40%
0.72
-38%
0.72
-38%
Idle Average *
0.84
1.15
-37%
1.44
-71%
1.96
-133%
1.37
-63%
2.45
-192%
Idle Maximum *
0.85
1.23
-45%
1.53
-80%
1.98
-133%
1.41
-66%
2.52
-196%
Load Average *
2.71
4.12
-52%
4.56
-68%
4.82
-78%
3.46
-28%
3.84
-42%
Load Maximum *
7.2
8.42
-17%
5.09
29%
7.15
1%
7.83
-9%
9.02
-25%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
27ore 10minuti
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8ore 51minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13ore 31minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
5ore 54minuti
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
2730 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3300 mAh
HTC U11
3000 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2691 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3000 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
22%
-23%
-24%
10%
1%
23%
Reader / Idle
1630
1744
7%
1134
-30%
1250
-23%
1914
17%
2085
28%
1589
-3%
H.264
811
929
15%
662
-18%
498
-39%
822
1%
733
-10%
946
17%
WiFi v1.3
531
818
54%
474
-11%
560
5%
774
46%
657
24%
749
41%
Load
354
398
12%
246
-31%
212
-40%
267
-25%
211
-40%
477
35%

Pro

+ prestazioni molto buone
+ schermo infrangibile
+ possibilità di upgrade e miglioramenti tramite Moto Mods
+ aggiornamento Android 8.0 annunciato
+ Wi-Fi molto veloce
+ schermo WQHD OLED luminoso
+ decente fotocamera
+ resta relativamente fresco
+ decente qualità della cassa
+ ampia autonomia
+ ricarica rapida

Contro

- display scratches very easily
- case isn't waterproof
- audio jack only via adapter
- hybrid dual SIM slot
- poor camera performance under low-light conditions
- PWM flickering
- throttling under maximum load
Recensione: Motorola Moto Z2 Force. Modello fornito da Lenovo Germany.
Recensione: Motorola Moto Z2 Force. Modello fornito da Lenovo Germany.

Non ci sono dubbi, il Moto Z2 Force è un eccezionale smartphone high-end con molti pro e qualche pecca. Innanzitutto: gaming e performance, velocità Wi-Fi, luminoso display WQHD OLED, e schermo infrangibile, di positivo. Android 8.0, già disponibile in alcuni paesi, è un update atteso e predispone il dispositivo al futuro.

Essendo parte della famiglia Moto Z, il Moto Z2 Force sfrutta i Moto Mods che sono facili da usare e possono aggiungere utili ed incredibili features. Ovviamente accessori di terze parti sono più economici, ma la facilità d'uso dei Moto Mod è eccezionale. E diversamente dagli accessori di altri produttori i Moto Mods non sono specifici per un modello, ma possono essere usati su molti smartphones Motorola. Se avete già qualche Moto Mods e cercate un nuovo smartphone per usarli, perché non pensare anche al più economico Moto Z2 Play di fascia media? 

Il Motorola Moto Z2 Force è virtualmente indistruttibile e offre ottime prestazioni. Tra tutte le cose ci ha dato fastidio la propensione del display a graffiarsi.

Sfortunatamente, non possiamo raccomandare il Moto Z2 Force senza almeno qualche avvertimento. Il punto di forza di questo eccezionale smartphone - il vetro infrangibile - è anche il principale punto debole: si graffia facilmente. Diversamente da alcuni concorrenti, come il Huawei Mate 10 Pro, lo Z2 Force non ha una certificazione IP67 e quindi non è resistente a polvere ed acqua. La fotocamera ha funzionato molto bene con condizioni di luce ideale, sebbene non sia riuscita ad impressionare con luce scarsa nonostante il sensore dual che è stato progettato per migliorare le foto con scarsità di luce.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

 

 

Motorola Moto Z2 Force - 01/15/2018 v6
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
86%
Tastiera
74 / 75 → 99%
Dispositivo di puntamento
89%
Connettività
47 / 60 → 78%
Peso
93%
Batteria
93%
Display
85%
Prestazioni di gioco
64 / 63 → 100%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
71 / 70 → 100%
Temperatura
94%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
73 / 91 → 80%
Fotocamera
81%
Media
81%
89%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve dello Smartphone Motorola Moto Z2 Force
Manuel Masiero, 2018-01-20 (Update: 2018-01-20)