Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Tablet Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4

Andreas Kilian (traduzione a cura di G.DeLuca), 11/24/2016

Evoluzione. Il successore del MediaPad M2 del 2015 è arrivato: benvenuto al MediaPad M3. Il nuovo modello dovrebbe avere valori simili al precedessore, ma ha un pannello più grande e con risoluzione maggiore, un processore più potente ed un sensore per le impronte digitali. Vediamo cosa ha da offrire Huawei nella nostra recensione.

Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (MediaPad Serie)
Processore
Scheda grafica
Memoria
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4
Schermo
8.4 pollici 16:10, 2560x1600 pixel 359 PPI, IPS, Angoli di visuale 80°/80°/80°/80° (alto/basso/sinistra/destra), Colori: 16 milioni di colori, Contrasto: 1,500:1, Luminosità: 400 nits, lucido: si
Harddisk
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23.04 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: jack cuffie da 3.5 mm, Lettore schede: microSD fino a 128 GB, 1 Lettore impronte digitali, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: Accelerometro e sensore Hall, giroscopio, bussola, USB-OTG, Wi-Fi Direct
Rete
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 7.3 x 215.5 x 124.2
Batteria
19.5 Wh, 5100 mAh polimeri di litio
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 8 MPix (Auto-focus f/2.0, 1080p-Video @ 30 fps)
Fotocamera Secondaria: 8 MPix (Fixfokus f/2.0, 1080p-Video @ 30 fps)
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Stereo, Tastiera: virtuale, alimentatore, cavo USB, tool slot, copertura protettiva per il display, EMUI 4.1, Tablet-Manager, HiCare, Microsoft Apps, Facebook, Shazam, News Republic, Twitter, Booking.com, Instagram, 24 Mesi Garanzia, senza ventola
Peso
310 gr, Alimentazione: 61 gr
Prezzo
349 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
515 MBit/s ∼100% +146%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
326 MBit/s ∼63% +56%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
209 MBit/s ∼41%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
121 MBit/s ∼23% -42%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
435 MBit/s ∼100% +108%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
264 MBit/s ∼61% +26%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
209 MBit/s ∼48%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
112 MBit/s ∼26% -46%
MediaPad M3 – Route
MediaPad M3 – Route
MediaPad M3 – Underpass
MediaPad M3 – Underpass
MediaPad M3 – Turning point
MediaPad M3 – Turning point
Garmin Edge 500 – Route
Garmin Edge 500 – Route
Garmin Edge 500 – Underpass
Garmin Edge 500 – Underpass
Garmin Edge 500 – Turning point
Garmin Edge 500 – Turning point

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
438
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
460
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
468
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 468 cd/m² Media: 445.3 cd/m² Minimum: 7.78 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 90 %
Al centro con la batteria: 460 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1022:1 (Nero: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.2 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.33
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4
Huawei MediaPad M2
IPS LCD, 1920x1200, 8
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
Super AMOLED, 2048x1536, 8
Xiaomi MiPad 2
IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9
Apple iPad Mini 4
IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9
Screen
Brightness
445
445
0%
364
-18%
348
-22%
402
-10%
421
-5%
Brightness Distribution
90
92
2%
88
-2%
88
-2%
91
1%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.45
0.47
-4%
0.57
-27%
0.4
11%
0.58
-29%
Contrast
1022
985
-4%
677
-34%
1063
4%
709
-31%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.2
6.25
-1%
3.3
47%
1.67
73%
4.98
20%
2.15
65%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.5
6.16
5%
1.7
74%
1.75
73%
5.2
20%
2.72
58%
Gamma
2.33 103%
2.43 99%
2.42 99%
2.27 106%
2.65 91%
2.29 105%
CCT
8056 81%
7921 82%
6397 102%
6361 102%
7249 90%
7012 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
95.4

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 60 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 875 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 30860) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms Incremento
↘ 23 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (27.3 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms Incremento
↘ 43 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (44.3 ms).
Geekbench 4
Compute RenderScript Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
3144 Points ∼41%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
3121 Points ∼41% -1%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5277 Points ∼20%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
2691 Points ∼10% -49%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1726 Points ∼31%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1480 Points ∼27% -14%
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
86735 Points ∼47%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
71734 Points ∼39% -17%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
73083 Points ∼40% -16%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5204 Points ∼64%
Huawei MediaPad M2
4358 Points ∼54% -16%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
6018 Points ∼74% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
5564 Points ∼68% +7%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
5279 Points ∼65% +1%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1022 Points ∼66%
Huawei MediaPad M2
754 Points ∼49% -26%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
873 Points ∼57% -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
952 Points ∼62% -7%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
952 Points ∼62% -7%
Apple iPad Mini 4
1059 Points ∼69% +4%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1302 Points ∼15%
Huawei MediaPad M2
820 Points ∼10% -37%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1651 Points ∼19% +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
876 Points ∼10% -33%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1609 Points ∼19% +24%
Apple iPad Mini 4
2668 Points ∼31% +105%
System (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
3581 Points ∼54%
Huawei MediaPad M2
1870 Points ∼28% -48%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
2076 Points ∼32% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
2764 Points ∼42% -23%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1921 Points ∼29% -46%
Apple iPad Mini 4
3132 Points ∼48% -13%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1800 Points ∼55%
Huawei MediaPad M2
1093 Points ∼33% -39%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1475 Points ∼45% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
1044 Points ∼32% -42%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1419 Points ∼43% -21%
Apple iPad Mini 4
1681 Points ∼51% -7%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
29 fps ∼2%
Huawei MediaPad M2
15 fps ∼1% -48%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
34 fps ∼3% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
24 fps ∼2% -17%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
32 fps ∼2% +10%
Apple iPad Mini 4
47.8 fps ∼4% +65%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
23 fps ∼5%
Huawei MediaPad M2
14 fps ∼3% -39%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
27 fps ∼6% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
29 fps ∼6% +26%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
13 fps ∼3% -43%
Apple iPad Mini 4
37 fps ∼8% +61%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
13 fps ∼2%
Huawei MediaPad M2
7.8 fps ∼1% -40%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
15 fps ∼3% +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
10.4 fps ∼2% -20%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
8.4 fps ∼2% -35%
Apple iPad Mini 4
21.5 fps ∼4% +65%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
9 fps ∼4%
Huawei MediaPad M2
7.8 fps ∼3% -13%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
11 fps ∼5% +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
11 fps ∼5% +22%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
6.3 fps ∼3% -30%
Apple iPad Mini 4
15.3 fps ∼7% +70%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
7.7 fps ∼2%
Huawei MediaPad M2
0 fps ∼0% -100%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
9.5 fps ∼2% +23%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
13 fps ∼3% +69%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
4.2 fps ∼2%
Huawei MediaPad M2
0 fps ∼0% -100%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
6.1 fps ∼3% +45%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
6.3 fps ∼4% +50%
3DMark
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.1 Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2322 Points ∼91%
Huawei MediaPad M2
1019 Points ∼40% -56%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1450 Points ∼57% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
1559 Points ∼61% -33%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1572 Points ∼62% -32%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.1 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
832 Points ∼15%
Huawei MediaPad M2
55 Points ∼1% -93%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
781 Points ∼15% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
612 Points ∼11% -26%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1261 Points ∼23% +52%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.1 (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
970 Points ∼25%
Huawei MediaPad M2
70 Points ∼2% -93%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
870 Points ∼22% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
707 Points ∼18% -27%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1319 Points ∼34% +36%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
15538 Points ∼22%
Huawei MediaPad M2
10447 Points ∼15% -33%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
11568 Points ∼17% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
17240 Points ∼25% +11%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
20142 Points ∼29% +30%
Apple iPad Mini 4
9844 Points ∼14% -37%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
22141 Points ∼5%
Huawei MediaPad M2
11984 Points ∼3% -46%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
22306 Points ∼5% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
20006 Points ∼4% -10%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
27537 Points ∼6% +24%
Apple iPad Mini 4
25254 Points ∼6% +14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
20230 Points ∼10%
Huawei MediaPad M2
11605 Points ∼6% -43%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
18491 Points ∼9% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
19317 Points ∼10% -5%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
25460 Points ∼13% +26%
Apple iPad Mini 4
18737 Points ∼10% -7%

Legenda

 
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M2 HiSilicon Kirin 930, ARM Mali-T628 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956, Qualcomm Adreno 510, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE Samsung Exynos 5433 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP6, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi MiPad 2 Intel Atom x5-Z8500, Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad Mini 4 Apple A8, PowerVR GX6450, 64 GB SSD
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54)
2822.9 ms * ∼5%
Huawei MediaPad M2 (Android 5.1)
11543.5 ms * ∼19% -309%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A (Chrome 53)
3803.2 ms * ∼6% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE (Chrome 45)
6512 ms * ∼11% -131%
Xiaomi MiPad 2 (Chrome 48)
4420.4 ms * ∼7% -57%
Apple iPad Mini 4 (Safari iOS 9)
2557 ms * ∼4% +9%
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54)
11404 Points ∼23%
Huawei MediaPad M2 (Android 5.1)
3866 Points ∼8% -66%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A (Chrome 53)
8349 Points ∼17% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE (Chrome 45)
7097 Points ∼14% -38%
Xiaomi MiPad 2 (Chrome 48)
7994 Points ∼16% -30%
Apple iPad Mini 4 (Safari iOS 9)
9962 Points ∼20% -13%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54)
136 Points ∼24%
Huawei MediaPad M2 (Android 5.1)
67 Points ∼12% -51%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A (Chrome 53)
103 Points ∼18% -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE (Chrome 45)
79 Points ∼14% -42%
Apple iPad Mini 4 (Safari iOS 9)
144 Points ∼25% +6%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54)
53.7 Points ∼17%
Huawei MediaPad M2 (Android 5.1)
23 Points ∼7% -57%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A (Chrome 53)
45.9 Points ∼14% -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE (Chrome 45)
40.298 Points ∼13% -25%
Xiaomi MiPad 2 (Chrome 48)
43.039 Points ∼13% -20%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inchHuawei MediaPad M2Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001ASamsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTEXiaomi MiPad 2Apple iPad Mini 4
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
23.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
20.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-12%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
61.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
39.62 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-36%
Random Write 4KB
31.35
13.44
-57%
6.91
-78%
9.68
-69%
13.96
-55%
Random Read 4KB
32.04
25.09
-22%
52.02
62%
25.53
-20%
24.42
-24%
Sequential Write 256KB
117.15
40.72
-65%
116.62
0%
47.45
-59%
56.37
-52%
Sequential Read 256KB
249.68
144.99
-42%
252.3
1%
248.34
-1%
147.85
-41%
BaseMark OS II
Memory
2212
1235
-44%
1590
-28%
593
-73%
1379
-38%
902
-59%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettaggiValore
 high20 fps
 very low29 fps
in confronto
Lenovo Moto E3 (min)
 MT6735P, Mali-T720
11
   ...
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
 400 MSM8928, Adreno 305
18
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405
20
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
20
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
20
Honor 5X
 616 MSM8939v2, Adreno 405
21
   ...
HTC 10 (max)
 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
48
Dead Trigger 2
 SettaggiValore
 high44 fps
in confronto
Motorola Moto X Play (min)
 615 MSM8939, Adreno 405
20
   ...
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
 410 APQ8016, Adreno 306
35
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405
35
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
44
Huawei P9 Lite
 Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2
49
Sony Xperia X
 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
50
   ...
Huawei Mate 9 (max)
 Kirin 960, Mali-G71 MP8
60
Carico massimo
 31.5 °C31.7 °C34.4 °C 
 32.6 °C32 °C34 °C 
 33 °C32.2 °C34.8 °C 
Massima: 34.8 °C
Media: 32.9 °C
29.8 °C30.9 °C31.4 °C
29.7 °C30.5 °C31.7 °C
29.7 °C31.4 °C32.9 °C
Massima: 32.9 °C
Media: 30.9 °C
Alimentazione (max)  31.8 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
MediaPad M3 Wärmebild
MediaPad M3 Wärmebild
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.638.82525.437.23125.328.94032.930.85033.641.76331.632.88028.429.21002722.612520.828.61602242.920021.349.925020.851.131521.260.140019.46750019.570.463017.771.480017.972.6100017.875.5125017.375.3160017.475.5200016.775.3250017.277.8315018.281.7400017.979.3500017.670.9630017.765.9800017.867.71000017.962.71250018.151.91600018.247.7SPL3088N1.369.4median 17.9Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inchmedian 67.7Delta1.312.331.640.525.431.725.333.432.935.333.649.431.63428.426.22727.120.827.82234.821.343.120.849.121.254.719.458.219.56617.765.317.967.317.872.317.370.617.468.316.767.317.272.718.270.817.974.117.676.517.779.317.87917.973.118.160.418.252.33085.71.362.7median 17.9Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001Amedian 67.31.311.3hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 29% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 17%, average was 23%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 18% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 17%, average was 23%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.38 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.51 / 3.64 / 3.68 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 6.95 / 9.11 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5100 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M2
4.800 mAh
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
4680 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
4000 mAh
Xiaomi MiPad 2
6190 mAh
Apple iPad Mini 4
5124 mAh
Power Consumption
14%
14%
-13%
-44%
13%
Idle Minimum *
1.51
1.4
7%
1.01
33%
2
-32%
3.33
-121%
0.8
47%
Idle Average *
3.64
3.3
9%
2.71
26%
3.6
1%
5.01
-38%
3.6
1%
Idle Maximum *
3.68
3.4
8%
2.75
25%
4
-9%
5.19
-41%
3.9
-6%
Load Average *
6.95
5.5
21%
7.28
-5%
8.2
-18%
8.32
-20%
6.1
12%
Load Maximum *
9.11
7
23%
10.02
-10%
9.9
-9%
9.33
-2%
8
12%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
18ore 30minuti
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
9ore 06minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9ore 43minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
4ore 28minuti
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5100 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M2
4.800 mAh
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
4680 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
4000 mAh
Xiaomi MiPad 2
6190 mAh
Apple iPad Mini 4
5124 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
22%
-4%
10%
-23%
8%
Reader / Idle
1110
1546
39%
1147
3%
1399
26%
1488
34%
Load
268
343
28%
263
-2%
265
-1%
242
-10%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
546
525
-4%
470
-14%
442
-19%
421
-23%
539
-1%
H.264
583
727
25%
574
-2%
780
34%
643
10%

Pro

+ buona costruzione
+ robusto case in metallo
+ slot microSD
+ funzionalità USB OTG
+ display luminoso e con alta risoluzione
+ lettore impronte digitali
+ buone casse stereo
+ scarse emissioni di calore
+ ottime performance browser
+ protezione schermo inclusa

Contro

- La GPU va in difficoltà con i giochi pesanti
- solo Micro USB 2.0
- manca il flash LED
- mancano le cuffie
- manca l'NFC
In Review: Huawei MediaPad M3 (BTV-W09). Test model provided by Huawei Germany.
In Review: Huawei MediaPad M3 (BTV-W09). Test model provided by Huawei Germany.

L'Huawei MediaPad M2 è stato un dispositivo affidabile con pochi punti deboli. Il produttore ha continuato su questa strada ed ha realizzato una nuova generazione sulle solide fondamenta del predecessore. Con il suo robusto case in metallo e le buone casse, questo comodo tablet rispecchia per molti versi il suo predecessore. Tuttavia, Huawei ha fatto dei miglioramenti strategici: la fotocamera principale ed il SoC sono pià potente e il display IPS ha una risoluzione superiore. Purtroppo, queste due aggiunte hanno dei lati negativi: i giochi sono sono sempre fluidi con risoluzione nativa e la batteria (nonostante l'ampia capacità da 300 mAh) si scarica più velocemente rispetto al passato. Per fortuna, il tablet offre una buona autonomia per la navigazione del web (WLAN battery test). Abbiamo apprezzato l'aggiunta di un lettore di impronte digitali in quanto facilita lo sblocco del dispositivo.

Il MediaPad M3 è un maneggevole tablet, con poche pecche. Grazie alla buona costruzione, al pannello luminoso e con risoluzione elevata e alle buone prestazioni browser, questo tablet può aiutare molto nel quotidiano.

Se non siete ancora convinti, raccomandiamo di provare a guardare il Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0. Questo tablet offre un display con elevato contrasto AMOLED in formato 4:3. Tuttavia, il tablet non offre una fotocamera frontale di buona qualità.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch - 11/16/2016 v5.1
Andreas Kilian

Chassis
87%
Tastiera
72 / 80 → 90%
Dispositivo di puntamento
88%
Connettività
43 / 65 → 66%
Peso
86 / 88 → 96%
Batteria
91%
Display
83%
Prestazioni di gioco
42 / 68 → 61%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
58 / 76 → 76%
Temperatura
92%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
71 / 91 → 78%
Fotocamera
65 / 85 → 76%
Media
75%
87%
Tablet - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

> Notebookcheck Italiano > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Tablet Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4
Andreas Kilian, 2016-11-24 (Update: 2016-11-24)