Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Tablet Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite 8

Sam Medley (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 10/01/2017

Mini Me(diaPad). La variante 8" del MediaPad M3 Lite ha molte luci ed ombre dell'ecosistema Android. Nonostante le specifiche di fascia media, l'M3 è una buona macchina. E' questo il tablet compatto da prendere?

Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 (MediaPad Serie)
Processore
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
Scheda grafica
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Memoria
3072 MB 
Schermo
8 pollici 16:10, 1920x1200 pixel 283 PPI, 10-point Multitouch, IPS, IPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: Combination , 1 Lettore impronte digitali, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: acceleration, gyroscope, compass, USB-OTG
Rete
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 7.5 x 213.3 x 123.3
Batteria
18.6 Wh, 4800 mAh ioni di litio
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 8 MPix
Fotocamera Secondaria: 2 MPix
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Dual stereo speakers, Tastiera: Virtual, Charger, USB-A to micro USB cable, SIM tool, EMUI 5.1, 12 Mesi Garanzia, senza ventola
Peso
310 gr
Prezzo
200 USD

 

Bottom: speaker, micro USB, microphone
Bottom: speaker, micro USB, microphone
Right side: microSD card tray, power button, volume buttons
Right side: microSD card tray, power button, volume buttons
Top: combo audio jack, speaker
Top: combo audio jack, speaker
Left side: nothing
Left side: nothing
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
615 MBit/s ∼100% +1340%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
326 MBit/s ∼53% +663%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
209 MBit/s ∼34% +389%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
802.11a/b/g/n
99.3 MBit/s ∼16% +133%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
42.7 MBit/s ∼7%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
569 MBit/s ∼100% +1159%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
264 MBit/s ∼46% +484%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
209 MBit/s ∼37% +362%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
802.11a/b/g/n
86 MBit/s ∼15% +90%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
45.2 MBit/s ∼8%

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3Scene 4
click per caricare le immagini
402.5
cd/m²
414.9
cd/m²
416.5
cd/m²
401.7
cd/m²
409.1
cd/m²
399.3
cd/m²
381.7
cd/m²
397.6
cd/m²
393.8
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 416.5 cd/m² Media: 401.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4.02 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 92 %
Al centro con la batteria: 409.1 cd/m²
Contrasto: 731:1 (Nero: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.2
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
IPS, IPS, 8, 1920x1200
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
10-point Multitouch, IPS, 8, 1280x800
Apple iPad Mini 4
Retina Display, IPS, 7.9, 2048x1536
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
IPS, 8.4, 2560x1600
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Super AMOLED, 9.7, 2048x1526
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
IPS, 7, 1280x800
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
IPS, 7.9, 2048x1536
Response Times
-16%
-89%
86%
-112%
-29%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
27.2 (14, 13.2)
35.2 (16.4, 18.8)
-29%
59 (16, 43)
-117%
4 (2, 2)
85%
69 (45, 24)
-154%
31 (14, 17)
-14%
Response Time Black / White *
22.4 (12.4, 10)
22.8 (11.6, 11.2)
-2%
36 (13, 23)
-61%
3.2 (2, 1.2)
86%
38 (22, 16)
-70%
32 (15, 17)
-43%
PWM Frequency
221.2 (100)
Screen
-21%
16%
-1%
35%
6%
11%
Brightness
402
412
2%
421
5%
445
11%
468
16%
344
-14%
364
-9%
Brightness Distribution
92
91
-1%
91
-1%
90
-2%
82
-11%
92
0%
88
-4%
Black Level *
0.56
0.39
30%
0.58
-4%
0.45
20%
0.37
34%
0.57
-2%
Contrast
731
1074
47%
709
-3%
1022
40%
968
32%
677
-7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.1
8.5
-107%
2.15
48%
6.2
-51%
1.8
56%
5.3
-29%
3.3
20%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.3
10.3
-94%
2.72
49%
6.5
-23%
1.2
77%
4.7
11%
1.7
68%
Gamma
2.2 109%
2.6 92%
2.29 105%
2.33 103%
2.11 114%
2.44 98%
2.42 99%
CCT
7603 85%
6216 105%
7012 93%
8056 81%
6500 100%
7222 90%
6397 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
82.32
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.06
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-19% / -19%
16% / 16%
-45% / -23%
61% / 52%
-53% / -24%
-9% / 1%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
22.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms Incremento
↘ 10 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms Incremento
↘ 13.2 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 55 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9304 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 247500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
144426 Points ∼63% +213%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
86735 Points ∼38% +88%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
71734 Points ∼31% +56%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
46126 Points ∼20%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
34714 Points ∼15% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
22854 Points ∼10% -50%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
2331 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
1754 Points ∼57%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
867 Points ∼28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
3196 Points ∼46%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
656 Points ∼9%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
115 Points ∼2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
2702 Points ∼53%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
781 Points ∼15%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
143 Points ∼3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
2100 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
1724 Points ∼56%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
1398 Points ∼45%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
880 Points ∼28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
4772 Points ∼39%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
1423 Points ∼12%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
1021 Points ∼8%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
192 Points ∼2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
3426 Points ∼51%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
1418 Points ∼21%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
1153 Points ∼17%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
232 Points ∼3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
2322 Points ∼77% +75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
1798 Points ∼59% +36%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
1450 Points ∼48% +10%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
1324 Points ∼44%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
878 Points ∼29% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
2943 Points ∼55% +1019%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
832 Points ∼15% +216%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
781 Points ∼15% +197%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
263 Points ∼5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
121 Points ∼2% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
2578 Points ∼66% +706%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
970 Points ∼25% +203%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
870 Points ∼22% +172%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
320 Points ∼8%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
150 Points ∼4% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
2261 Points ∼75% +70%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
1811 Points ∼60% +36%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
1385 Points ∼46% +4%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
1332 Points ∼44%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
881 Points ∼29% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
4626 Points ∼60% +760%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
1310 Points ∼17% +143%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
997 Points ∼13% +85%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
538 Points ∼7%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
193 Points ∼2% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
3438 Points ∼69% +455%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
1326 Points ∼27% +114%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
1139 Points ∼23% +84%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
620 Points ∼12%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
234 Points ∼5% -62%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
21886 Points ∼30% +136%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
15538 Points ∼22% +68%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
11568 Points ∼16% +25%
Apple iPad Mini 4
Apple A8
9844 Points ∼14% +6%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
9274 Points ∼13% 0%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
9264 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
7790 Points ∼11% -16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
34002 Points ∼7% +235%
Apple iPad Mini 4
Apple A8
25254 Points ∼6% +148%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
22306 Points ∼5% +119%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
22141 Points ∼5% +118%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
10163 Points ∼2%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
5435 Points ∼1% -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
3146 Points ∼1% -69%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
30277 Points ∼15% +204%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
20230 Points ∼10% +103%
Apple iPad Mini 4
Apple A8
18737 Points ∼10% +88%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
18491 Points ∼9% +86%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
9948 Points ∼5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
5986 Points ∼3% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
3626 Points ∼2% -64%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
6998 Points ∼10%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
1914 Points ∼0%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
2282 Points ∼1%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
6992 Points ∼4%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
3352 Points ∼0%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
3790 Points ∼0%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
92 fps ∼7% +441%
Apple iPad Mini 4
Apple A8
47.8 fps ∼4% +181%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
34 fps ∼3% +100%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
29 fps ∼2% +71%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
17 fps ∼1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
9.9 fps ∼1% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
4.2 fps ∼0% -75%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
59 fps ∼13% +269%
Apple iPad Mini 4
Apple A8
37 fps ∼8% +131%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
27 fps ∼6% +69%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
23 fps ∼5% +44%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
17 fps ∼4% +6%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
16 fps ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
6.5 fps ∼1% -59%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
48 fps ∼9% +596%
Apple iPad Mini 4
Apple A8
21.5 fps ∼4% +212%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
15 fps ∼3% +117%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
13 fps ∼2% +88%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
6.9 fps ∼1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
3.6 fps ∼1% -48%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
34 fps ∼9% +347%
Apple iPad Mini 4
Apple A8
15.3 fps ∼4% +101%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
11 fps ∼3% +45%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
9 fps ∼2% +18%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
7.6 fps ∼2%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
7.1 fps ∼2% -7%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
32 fps ∼8% +553%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
9.5 fps ∼2% +94%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
7.7 fps ∼2% +57%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
4.9 fps ∼1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
2.3 fps ∼1% -53%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
19 fps ∼11% +313%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
6.1 fps ∼3% +33%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
5 fps ∼3% +9%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
4.6 fps ∼3%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
4.2 fps ∼2% -9%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
19 fps ∼5% +604%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
5.4 fps ∼2% +100%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
4.8 fps ∼1% +78%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
2.7 fps ∼1%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
13 fps ∼0% +420%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
4 fps ∼0% +60%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
3.1 fps ∼0% +24%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
2.5 fps ∼0%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 battery life
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
393 min ∼51%
Computer Vision score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
3105 Points ∼67% +48%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
2105 Points ∼46%
Storage score
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
9462 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
2884 Points ∼20% -70%
Work 2.0 performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
5432 Points ∼78% +45%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
3744 Points ∼54%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
2907 Points ∼42% -22%
Work performance score
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
6018 Points ∼71% +24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
5608 Points ∼66% +16%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
5204 Points ∼62% +7%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
4843 Points ∼57%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
4125 Points ∼49% -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
3095 Points ∼37% -36%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Apple iPad Mini 4
Apple A8
1059 Points ∼69% +51%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
1022 Points ∼66% +46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
1007 Points ∼65% +43%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
873 Points ∼57% +24%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
702 Points ∼46%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
593 Points ∼38% -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
521 Points ∼34% -26%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
4941 Points ∼57% +536%
Apple iPad Mini 4
Apple A8
2668 Points ∼31% +243%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
1651 Points ∼19% +112%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
1302 Points ∼15% +68%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
777 Points ∼9%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
334 Points ∼4% -57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
150 Points ∼2% -81%
Memory
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
2212 Points ∼50% +81%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
1931 Points ∼44% +58%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
1590 Points ∼36% +30%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
1224 Points ∼28%
Apple iPad Mini 4
Apple A8
902 Points ∼20% -26%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
736 Points ∼17% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
431 Points ∼10% -65%
System
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
3581 Points ∼54% +81%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
3505 Points ∼53% +77%
Apple iPad Mini 4
Apple A8
3132 Points ∼48% +58%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
2076 Points ∼32% +5%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
1980 Points ∼30%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
1152 Points ∼18% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
923 Points ∼14% -53%
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
2409 Points ∼64% +125%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
HiSilicon Kirin 950
1800 Points ∼47% +68%
Apple iPad Mini 4
Apple A8
1681 Points ∼44% +57%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
1475 Points ∼39% +38%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
1072 Points ∼28%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
640 Points ∼17% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Spreadtrum SC7731
345 Points ∼9% -68%
Geekbench 4.1
Compute RenderScript Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
7063 Points ∼82%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
4187 Points ∼17% +48%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
2821 Points ∼11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
1683 Points ∼7% -40%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
1745 Points ∼29% +160%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
670 Points ∼11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
628 Points ∼11% -6%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Mali-400 MP2, SC7731, 8 GB eMMC Flash
15533.8 ms * ∼26% -23%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Adreno 505, 435, 16 GB eMMC Flash
12635 ms * ∼21%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11817.6 ms * ∼20% +6%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3803.2 ms * ∼6% +70%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2822.9 ms * ∼5% +78%
Apple iPad Mini 4
PowerVR GX6450, A8, 64 GB SSD
2557 ms * ∼4% +80%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2244.4 ms * ∼4% +82%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11404 Points ∼23% +274%
Apple iPad Mini 4
PowerVR GX6450, A8, 64 GB SSD
9962 Points ∼20% +227%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9531 Points ∼19% +213%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8349 Points ∼17% +174%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Adreno 505, 435, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3049 Points ∼6%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
2826 Points ∼6% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Mali-400 MP2, SC7731, 8 GB eMMC Flash
2300 Points ∼5% -25%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.7 Points ∼0% +204%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
45.9 Points ∼0% +160%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
42.73 Points ∼0% +142%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
19.519 Points ∼0% +10%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Adreno 505, 435, 16 GB eMMC Flash
17.68 Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Mali-400 MP2, SC7731, 8 GB eMMC Flash
14.5 Points ∼0% -18%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPad Mini 4
PowerVR GX6450, A8, 64 GB SSD
144 Points ∼19% +109%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
136 Points ∼18% +97%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
132 Points ∼18% +91%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
103 Points ∼14% +49%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Adreno 505, 435, 16 GB eMMC Flash
69 Points ∼9%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
57 Points ∼8% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
Mali-400 MP2, SC7731, 8 GB eMMC Flash
40 Points ∼5% -42%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
16 GB eMMC Flash
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
16 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
8 GB eMMC Flash
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
32 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
25%
104%
106%
-23%
53%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
14.6
34.15
134%
23.52
61%
58.56
301%
18.4
26%
20.61
41%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
87.7
51.06
-42%
61.65
-30%
76.39
-13%
21.41
-76%
39.62
-55%
Random Write 4KB
7.64
11.51
51%
31.35
310%
13.13
72%
9.55
25%
6.91
-10%
Random Read 4KB
35
21.55
-38%
32.04
-8%
45.82
31%
21.95
-37%
52.02
49%
Sequential Write 256KB
38.01
47.23
24%
117.15
208%
87.6
130%
28.95
-24%
116.62
207%
Sequential Read 256KB
135.09
159.08
18%
249.68
85%
288.58
114%
65.94
-51%
252.3
87%
Carico massimo
 33 °C36.2 °C37 °C 
 32.2 °C33.6 °C34.8 °C 
 31.8 °C32.6 °C35 °C 
Massima: 37 °C
Media: 34 °C
37 °C42.2 °C36.2 °C
35.2 °C35.2 °C34.2 °C
34.6 °C35 °C34.2 °C
Massima: 42.2 °C
Media: 36 °C
Alimentazione (max)  34 °C | Temperatura della stanza 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.2372538.3393136.838.8403737.45033.936.16333.934.98032.635.910032.23612530.336.216028.937.520028.639.325028.341.53152845.340026.74750026506302551.280024.753.6100024.159.5125023.563.7160023.263.920002361.8250022.764.6315022.367.3400022.566.2500022.365.5630022.161.4800022.165.5100002264.6125002257.71600021.949.1SPL35.675.8N2.634median 23.5Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8median 57.7Delta2.79.931.73832.431.73430.331.33427.824.131.727.828.627.22628.63838.639.43827.430.336.227.427.525.828.627.524.723.625.424.72622.521.32626.822.523.326.834.52422.534.54628.122.44656.136.121.356.160.241.518.460.26548.117.56568.452.117.568.469.853.317.269.873.556.516.873.574.658.317.374.676.959.417.476.975.558.916.675.572.154.417.372.172.754.917.672.774.255.917.674.27455.917.77480.662.617.480.682.464.617.782.472.254.317.972.262.544.218.162.55435.718.15487.870.229.887.871.624.61.371.6median 69.8Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016median 53.3median 17.7median 69.81210.31.612hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 2.3 / 2.92 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.02 / 6 / 6.64 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 7.34 / 9.6 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
435, Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1200, 8
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1280x800, 8
Apple iPad Mini 4
A8, PowerVR GX6450, 64 GB SSD, IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
SC7731, Mali-400 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1280x800, 7
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
435, Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Power Consumption
53%
39%
31%
46%
37%
34%
Idle Minimum *
4.02
0.99
75%
0.8
80%
1.51
62%
1.91
52%
1.01
75%
1.45
64%
Idle Average *
6
2.74
54%
3.6
40%
3.64
39%
3.59
40%
2.71
55%
4.44
26%
Idle Maximum *
6.64
2.83
57%
3.9
41%
3.68
45%
4.06
39%
2.75
59%
4.61
31%
Load Average *
7.34
4.51
39%
6.1
17%
6.95
5%
4.29
42%
7.28
1%
6.21
15%
Load Maximum *
9.6
5.69
41%
8
17%
9.11
5%
4.31
55%
10.02
-4%
6.33
34%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
23ore 02minuti
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
14ore 37minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
8ore 00minuti
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
435, Adreno 505, 18.6 Wh
Apple iPad Mini 4
A8, PowerVR GX6450, 19 Wh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, Mali-T720,  Wh
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4, 19.5 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530,  Wh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016
SC7731, Mali-400 MP2, 14.8 Wh
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
650 MSM8956, Adreno 510, 18 Wh
Autonomia della batteria
-27%
6%
-34%
1%
-17%
-36%
Reader / Idle
1382
1488
8%
2032
47%
1110
-20%
1903
38%
1353
-2%
1147
-17%
WiFi v1.3
877
539
-39%
770
-12%
546
-38%
760
-13%
619
-29%
470
-46%
Load
480
242
-50%
393
-18%
268
-44%
375
-22%
379
-21%
263
-45%

No Pro / Contra Data found for specs ID 282252

Recensione: Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite 8. Modello offerto da Huawei.
Recensione: Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite 8. Modello offerto da Huawei.

Il MediaPad M3 Lite 8 era stato progettato per essere un piccolo dispositivo da portare in giro. Con lo schermo con colori buoni e luminoso e con una ampia autonomia, e si colloca perfettamente in questa categoria. Il tablet è eccellente per utenti occasionali che cercano un tablet ben progettato per la loro navigazione web e per i media. Le buone fotocamere sono un'eccellente aggiunta. Il dispositivo però ha scarse prestazioni gaming, poco spazio di archiviazione, inutile bloatware, e velocità wireless sotto la media. Coloro che cercano potenza ed i giocatori saranno delusi da questo tablet, ma la maggioranza lo troverà accettabile per vedere video e per gaming leggero.

Il fattore decisivo sarà inevitabilmente il prezzo. Al di là della qualità di costruzione, la versione solo WiFi non offre molto di più rispetto alla concorrenza più economica. Con USD $199, potrebbe essere fuori portata per coloro che vogliono un tablet solo per YouTube e cose simili. Ci sono opzioni migliori, come il Samsung Galaxy Tab A 7, che parte da circa $50 in meno. L'Asus Zenpad 3 8.0 offre maggiore potenza, uno schermo con densità maggiore, e costa meno di $50 in più. Tuttavia, lo Huawei MediaPad spesso riesce a vendere bene; in questo momento Amazon lo vende per $170. Questo lo rende più attraente.

I consumers in cerca di un tablet per navigazione web e multimedia che non badano alla plastica economica possono prendere il considerazione lo Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite 8. Tuttavia, dovranno accettare compromessi nel gaming e per le prestazioni CPU. Detto questo, il MediaPad M3 Lite 8 è bello, ed attira più per l'aspetto che per la potenza. 

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

 

 

Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 - 09/27/2017 v6
Sam Medley

Chassis
86%
Tastiera
74 / 80 → 92%
Dispositivo di puntamento
96%
Connettività
36 / 65 → 55%
Peso
86 / 88 → 96%
Batteria
98%
Display
84%
Prestazioni di gioco
20 / 68 → 30%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
40 / 76 → 53%
Temperatura
91%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
73 / 91 → 80%
Fotocamera
69 / 85 → 81%
Media
73%
86%
Tablet - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Tablet Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite 8
Sam Medley, 2017-10- 1 (Update: 2017-10- 1)