Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Portatile MSI GL72 6QF Xotic PC Edition

Schermo grande, prezzo basso. L'MSI GT72 potrebbe essere un modello ammiraglia, ma ci sono molte opzioni mainstream per lo stesso produttore: abbiamo provato il GL72 a partire da meno di $1000 USD con scheda grafica GTX 960M per vedere come si colloca nel mercato gaming economici.

MSI GL72 6QF (GL72 Serie)
Scheda grafica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M - 2048 MB, Core: 1097 MHz, Memoria: 5410 MHz, 354.35, Optimus
Memoria
16384 MB 
, DDR4 SDRAM, 1196.5 MHz, 14-14-14-35, Dual-Channel
Schermo
17.3 pollici 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, TN, ID: CMN1735, Name: Chi Mei N173HGE-E11, lucido: no
Scheda madre
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Harddisk
Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe, 256 GB 
, Secondario: WDC WD10JPVX-22J3T0
Scheda audio
Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Connessioni Audio: microfono 3.5 mm, cuffie 3.5 mm, Lettore schede: SD (XC/HC)
Rete
Qualcomm Atheros AR8171/8175 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000MBit), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 37 x 420 x 287
Batteria
43 Wh polimeri di litio
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Quattro casse, Tastiera: Chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, guida rapida, garanzia, Nahimic, MSI System Control Manager, MSI Afterburner, 12 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
2.8 kg, Alimentazione: 460 gr
Prezzo
1000 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: Optical drive, USB 2.0, SD reader, AC adapter
Right: Optical drive, USB 2.0, SD reader, AC adapter
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: Kensington Lock, Gigabit Ethernet, 2x USB 3.0, HDMI-out, Mini-DisplayPort, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen. 1, 3.5 mm microphone, 3.5 mm earphones
Left: Kensington Lock, Gigabit Ethernet, 2x USB 3.0, HDMI-out, Mini-DisplayPort, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen. 1, 3.5 mm microphone, 3.5 mm earphones
173.9
cd/m²
181.5
cd/m²
170.9
cd/m²
173
cd/m²
194.7
cd/m²
163.3
cd/m²
203.6
cd/m²
207.2
cd/m²
182.5
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Massima: 207.2 cd/m² Media: 183.4 cd/m² Minimum: 9.8 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 79 %
Al centro con la batteria: 194.7 cd/m²
Contrasto: 788:1 (Nero: 0.247 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.44 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 11.36 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
95.3% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
MSI GL72 6QF
17.3, 1920x1080
Asus GL771JW-T7082H
17.3, 1920x1080
MSI GE72-2QDi716H11
17.3, 1920x1080
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV
17.3, 1920x1080
Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4
17.3, 1920x1080
Response Times
21%
-18%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
45.6 (23.6, 22)
37 (14, 23)
19%
58 (30, 28)
-27%
Response Time Black / White *
25.6 (8.4, 17.2)
20 (4, 16)
22%
28 (7, 21)
-9%
PWM Frequency
980.4 (99)
Screen
29%
19%
30%
44%
Brightness middle
194.7
343
76%
255
31%
337
73%
346
78%
Brightness
183
333
82%
246
34%
303
66%
326
78%
Brightness Distribution
79
92
16%
80
1%
85
8%
88
11%
Black Level *
0.247
0.38
-54%
0.2
19%
0.26
-5%
0.32
-30%
Contrast
788
903
15%
1275
62%
1296
64%
1081
37%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
11.44
7
39%
10.01
12%
5.92
48%
4.01
65%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
18.78
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
11.36
4.33
62%
10.5
8%
7.55
34%
3.58
68%
Gamma
2.12 104%
2.12 104%
2.25 98%
2.42 91%
2.23 99%
CCT
12948 50%
6111 106%
12631 51%
7270 89%
6426 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60.8
59
-3%
62
2%
56
-8%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
95.3
94
-1%
85
-11%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
29% / 29%
19% / 19%
26% / 28%
13% / 30%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
25.6 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 8.4 ms Incremento
↘ 17.2 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 44 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono simili alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (25.6 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
45.6 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 23.6 ms Incremento
↘ 22 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.9 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 71 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (41 ms).

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
flickering dello schermo / PWM rilevato 980.4 Hz ≤ 99 % settaggio luminosita'

Il display sfarfalla a 980.4 Hz (Probabilmente a causa dell'uso di PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 980.4 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8929 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit (ordina per valore)
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
144 Points ∼66%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
166 Points ∼76% +15%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
GeForce GTX 960M, 5700HQ, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
144 Points ∼66% 0%
Eurocom Shark 4
GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO m.2 120GB
136 Points ∼62% -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
GeForce GTX 860M, 4700HQ, Western Digital WD10S21X SSHD 1TB + 8GB SSD-Cache
125 Points ∼57% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit (ordina per valore)
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
683 Points ∼16%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
865 Points ∼20% +27%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
GeForce GTX 960M, 5700HQ, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
719 Points ∼16% +5%
Eurocom Shark 4
GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO m.2 120GB
596 Points ∼14% -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
GeForce GTX 860M, 4700HQ, Western Digital WD10S21X SSHD 1TB + 8GB SSD-Cache
490 Points ∼11% -28%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit (ordina per valore)
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
1.58 Points ∼65%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
1.91 Points ∼78% +21%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
GeForce GTX 960M, 5700HQ, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
1.68 Points ∼69% +6%
Eurocom Shark 4
GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO m.2 120GB
1.59 Points ∼65% +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
GeForce GTX 860M, 4700HQ, Western Digital WD10S21X SSHD 1TB + 8GB SSD-Cache
1.46 Points ∼60% -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit (ordina per valore)
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
7.52 Points ∼28%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
9.56 Points ∼35% +27%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
GeForce GTX 960M, 5700HQ, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
7.96 Points ∼29% +6%
Eurocom Shark 4
GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO m.2 120GB
6.45 Points ∼24% -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
GeForce GTX 860M, 4700HQ, Western Digital WD10S21X SSHD 1TB + 8GB SSD-Cache
5.29 Points ∼20% -30%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m (ordina per valore)
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
230.455 s * ∼3%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
178.464 s * ∼2% +23%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
GeForce GTX 960M, 5700HQ, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
206.294 s * ∼2% +10%
Eurocom Shark 4
GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO m.2 120GB
246.964 s * ∼3% -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
GeForce GTX 860M, 4700HQ, Western Digital WD10S21X SSHD 1TB + 8GB SSD-Cache
323 s * ∼4% -40%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - --- (ordina per valore)
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
551.698 Seconds * ∼2%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
498.33 Seconds * ∼2% +10%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
GeForce GTX 960M, 5700HQ, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
573.691 Seconds * ∼3% -4%
Eurocom Shark 4
GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO m.2 120GB
545.423 Seconds * ∼2% +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
GeForce GTX 860M, 4700HQ, Western Digital WD10S21X SSHD 1TB + 8GB SSD-Cache
569.349 Seconds * ∼3% -3%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6813
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
20439
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5521
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
46.56 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.52 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.58 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
54.53 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
683 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
144 Points
Aiuto
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2 (ordina per valore)
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
5090 Points ∼78%
Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
4660 Points ∼72% -8%
Asus GL771JW-T7082H
GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung SSD XP941 MZHPU256HCGL
4980 Points ∼76% -2%
MSI GE72-6QF8H11
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NU
5009 Points ∼77% -2%
Creative Score Accelerated v2 (ordina per valore)
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
4734 Points ∼50%
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
4810 Points ∼50% +2%
Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
4320 Points ∼45% -9%
Asus GL771JW-T7082H
GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung SSD XP941 MZHPU256HCGL
4555 Points ∼48% -4%
MSI GE72-6QF8H11
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NU
4371 Points ∼46% -8%
Home Score Accelerated v2 (ordina per valore)
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
3903 Points ∼64%
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
3880 Points ∼64% -1%
Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
3751 Points ∼62% -4%
Asus GL771JW-T7082H
GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung SSD XP941 MZHPU256HCGL
3758 Points ∼62% -4%
MSI GE72-6QF8H11
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NU
3633 Points ∼60% -7%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3903 punti
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4734 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5090 punti
Aiuto
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
Asus GL771JW-T7082H
GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung SSD XP941 MZHPU256HCGL
MSI GE72-6QF8H11
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NU
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
MSI GT72S 6QF
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF NVMe (RAID 0)
AS SSD
-49%
-82%
-103%
10%
Copy Game MB/s
1140.04
749.83
-34%
267.3
-77%
265.39
-77%
1209.49
6%
Copy Program MB/s
491.06
372.7
-24%
163.4
-67%
170.08
-65%
542.98
11%
Copy ISO MB/s
1519.7
749.1
-51%
315.3
-79%
339.24
-78%
1943.93
28%
Score Total
2340
1177
-50%
892
-62%
769
-67%
2568
10%
Score Write
501
354
-29%
262
-48%
285
-43%
688
37%
Score Read
1248
553
-56%
424
-66%
322
-74%
1281
3%
Access Time Write *
0.032
0.06
-88%
0.06
-88%
0.188
-488%
0.039
-22%
Access Time Read *
0.04
0.085
-113%
0.17
-325%
0.111
-178%
0.051
-28%
4K-64 Write
296.41
216.2
-27%
161
-46%
218.48
-26%
462.56
56%
4K-64 Read
998.17
418.96
-58%
352
-65%
258.95
-74%
983.86
-1%
4K Write
115.18
65.11
-43%
70.8
-39%
33.45
-71%
97.82
-15%
4K Read
46.38
23.79
-49%
21
-55%
15.09
-67%
42.98
-7%
Seq Write
897.33
727.84
-19%
458.1
-49%
332.92
-63%
1279.19
43%
Seq Read
2038.64
1107.09
-46%
508.7
-75%
483.58
-76%
2543.81
25%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
Valore Minimo di trasferimento: 1012.5 MB/s
Valore Massimo di trasferimento: 1090.5 MB/s
Valore Medio di trasferimento: 1082.9 MB/s
Tempi di accesso: 0 ms
Burst Rate: 309 MB/s
Utilizzo CPU: 1.1 %
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined (ordina per valore)
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
5861 Points ∼32%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
10625 Points ∼59% +81%
Aorus X3 Plus v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
8099 Points ∼45% +38%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5439 Points ∼30% -7%
Asus N752VX-GC131T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
3682 Points ∼20% -37%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
GeForce 940M, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
1801 Points ∼10% -69%
1280x720 Performance Physics (ordina per valore)
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
9099 Points ∼49%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
11011 Points ∼59% +21%
Aorus X3 Plus v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
8717 Points ∼47% -4%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
8464 Points ∼46% -7%
Asus N752VX-GC131T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
6776 Points ∼36% -26%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
GeForce 940M, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
3738 Points ∼20% -59%
1280x720 Performance GPU (ordina per valore)
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
5825 Points ∼11%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
12967 Points ∼25% +123%
Aorus X3 Plus v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
9615 Points ∼19% +65%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5220 Points ∼10% -10%
Asus N752VX-GC131T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
4457 Points ∼9% -23%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
GeForce 940M, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
2366 Points ∼5% -59%
1280x720 Performance (ordina per valore)
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
6161 Points ∼20%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
12364 Points ∼40% +101%
Aorus X3 Plus v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
9297 Points ∼30% +51%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5562 Points ∼18% -10%
Asus N752VX-GC131T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
4596 Points ∼15% -25%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
GeForce 940M, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
2423 Points ∼8% -61%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Combined (ordina per valore)
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
1804 Points ∼15%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
3748 Points ∼31% +108%
Aorus X3 Plus v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
2737 Points ∼22% +52%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
1678 Points ∼14% -7%
Asus N752VX-GC131T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
1033 Points ∼8% -43%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
GeForce 940M, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
462 Points ∼4% -74%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics (ordina per valore)
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
9655 Points ∼36%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
12752 Points ∼47% +32%
Aorus X3 Plus v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
9800 Points ∼36% +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
9559 Points ∼35% -1%
Asus N752VX-GC131T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
9499 Points ∼35% -2%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
GeForce 940M, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
3937 Points ∼15% -59%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics (ordina per valore)
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
4705 Points ∼12%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
9963 Points ∼25% +112%
Aorus X3 Plus v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
7335 Points ∼18% +56%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4290 Points ∼11% -9%
Asus N752VX-GC131T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
3174 Points ∼8% -33%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
GeForce 940M, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
1589 Points ∼4% -66%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score (ordina per valore)
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
4340 Points ∼16%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
8793 Points ∼33% +103%
Aorus X3 Plus v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
6489 Points ∼24% +50%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
3998 Points ∼15% -8%
Asus N752VX-GC131T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
2866 Points ∼11% -34%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
GeForce 940M, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
1376 Points ∼5% -68%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Physics (ordina per valore)
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
6805 Points ∼17%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
9187 Points ∼23% +35%
Aorus X3 Plus v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
6934 Points ∼18% +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
7057 Points ∼18% +4%
Asus N752VX-GC131T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
6747 Points ∼17% -1%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
GeForce 940M, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
2745 Points ∼7% -60%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics (ordina per valore)
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
33474 Points ∼18%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
62938 Points ∼34% +88%
Aorus X3 Plus v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
46213 Points ∼25% +38%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
25748 Points ∼14% -23%
Asus N752VX-GC131T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
21500 Points ∼12% -36%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
GeForce 940M, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
8549 Points ∼5% -74%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score (ordina per valore)
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
17891 Points ∼31%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
27362 Points ∼47% +53%
Aorus X3 Plus v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
20458 Points ∼35% +14%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
16208 Points ∼28% -9%
Asus N752VX-GC131T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
14469 Points ∼25% -19%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
GeForce 940M, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
5816 Points ∼10% -67%
3DMark 11 Performance
6161 punti
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
94088 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
17891 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score
4340 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
2169 punti
Aiuto
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
51.6 fps ∼100% +102%
Gigabyte P55W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe
37.1 fps ∼72% +45%
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
25.6 fps ∼50%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
21.2 fps ∼41% -17%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
60.4 fps ∼100% +75%
Gigabyte P55W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe
44.6 fps ∼74% +29%
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
34.6 fps ∼57%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
23.8 fps ∼39% -31%
Asus N552VX-FY103T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
21 fps ∼35% -39%
BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
92.4 fps ∼100% +85%
Gigabyte P55W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe
69.7 fps ∼75% +40%
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
49.9 fps ∼54%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
44.1 fps ∼48% -12%
Asus N552VX-FY103T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
27.7 fps ∼30% -44%
1366x768 High Preset
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
205.5 fps ∼100% +71%
Gigabyte P55W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe
133.1 fps ∼65% +11%
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
120.2 fps ∼58%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
106.9 fps ∼52% -11%
Asus N552VX-FY103T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
84.3 fps ∼41% -30%
Metro: Last Light
1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
70.6 fps ∼100% +106%
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
34.3 fps ∼49%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
30.9 fps ∼44% -10%
1366x768 High (DX11) AF:16x
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
125.8 fps ∼100% +59%
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
79 fps ∼63%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
55.7 fps ∼44% -29%
Fallout 4
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
59.7 fps ∼100% +126%
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
26.4 fps ∼44%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
24.2 fps ∼41% -8%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB
73.8 fps ∼100% +120%
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
33.6 fps ∼46%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
31 fps ∼42% -8%
basso medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 133.5120.249.9fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 109.47934.3fps
Thief (2014) 69.358.829.7fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 6533fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 59.233.626.4fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 64.834.625.6fps
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
Asus G771JM-T7025H
GeForce GTX 860M, 4710HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
MSI GE72-6QF8H11
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NU
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
Lenovo Ideapad Y700-17 80QK7709PB
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB
Noise
11%
7%
-1%
5%
5%
off /ambiente *
29.3
Idle Minimum *
35.3
30.9
12%
30
15%
32
9%
32.6
8%
31.4
11%
Idle Average *
35.4
31.3
12%
30.2
15%
33
7%
32.6
8%
31.4
11%
Idle Maximum *
35.4
32.3
9%
33
7%
37
-5%
33.4
6%
34.3
3%
Load Average *
40.9
37.3
9%
40.4
1%
44
-8%
36.5
11%
41.3
-1%
Load Maximum *
45
39.5
12%
46.2
-3%
49
-9%
48
-7%
44
2%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Rumorosità

Idle
35.3 / 35.4 / 35.4 dB(A)
DVD
39.9 / dB(A)
Sotto carico
40.9 / 45 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 29.3 dB(A)
Carico massimo
 43 °C47.2 °C42.8 °C 
 37.6 °C46.4 °C29.8 °C 
 32.2 °C38.6 °C24 °C 
Massima: 47.2 °C
Media: 38 °C
45.4 °C42 °C49 °C
24.8 °C30.2 °C34.4 °C
25.2 °C28.6 °C31.8 °C
Massima: 49 °C
Media: 34.6 °C
Alimentazione (max)  45.4 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 41.7 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38.6 °C / 101.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-9.9 °C / -17.8 F).
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
Asus GL771JW-T7082H
GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung SSD XP941 MZHPU256HCGL
MSI GE72-6QF8H11
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NU
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
Lenovo Ideapad Y700-17 80QK7709PB
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB
Power Consumption
28%
4%
17%
41%
28%
Idle Minimum *
22.1
8.8
60%
16.7
24%
11
50%
5.8
74%
4.3
81%
Idle Average *
28.3
14.8
48%
23
19%
17
40%
9
68%
13.8
51%
Idle Maximum *
29.8
24.3
18%
31.7
-6%
22
26%
14.7
51%
19.8
34%
Load Average *
87
88.8
-2%
97.4
-12%
96
-10%
85
2%
115.9
-33%
Load Maximum *
134.1
111.2
17%
141.4
-5%
164
-22%
121.5
9%
123.5
8%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.74 / 1.28 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 22.1 / 28.3 / 29.8 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 87 / 134.1 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI GL72 6QF
43 Wh
Asus GL771JW-T7082H
56 Wh
MSI GE72-6QF8H11
51 Wh
Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV
88 Wh
Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4
53 Wh
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
60 Wh
Autonomia della batteria
111%
31%
170%
89%
150%
Reader / Idle
238
601
153%
403
69%
702
195%
410
72%
688
189%
WiFi v1.3
107
271
153%
154
44%
358
235%
254
137%
334
212%
Load
61
78
28%
49
-20%
109
79%
96
57%
91
49%
Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
3ore 58minuti
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
1ore 47minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
1ore 01minuti

Pro

+ basse temperatura core sotto carico
+ elevate prestazioni CPU e GPU
+ economico considerato l'hardware
+ accessibilità relativamente facile
+ USB 3.1 Type-C Gen. 1
+ drive ottico modulare
+ ampia copertura sRGB
+ SSD NVMe

Contro

- scarsa riproduzione dei bassi; manca un subwoofer dedicato
- temperatura del colore fredda di base
- manca il supporto nativo Thunderbolt 3
- tastiera e touchpad si scaldano
- bassa luminosità del display
- manca l'illuminazione della tastiera
- scarsa autonomia
- nessuna opzione IPS
- ventola rumorosa
In review: MSI GL72 6QF. Test model provided by Xotic PC.
In review: MSI GL72 6QF. Test model provided by Xotic PC.

Il vantaggio principale dell'MSI GL72 è nel suo prezzo di appena $1000 USD. Considerato questo, avrete una potente CPU Core i7-6700HQ, una GPU GTX 960M, un SSD NVMe, drive ottico modulare, e componenti interni accessibili per problemi o upgrading di supporti o RAM. Temperature Core e performance sono entrambi eccellenti per i titoli attuali a 1080p e con un ragionevole overclocking della GPU via MSI Afterburner.

Si notano i punti dove ci sono stati i tagli: a parte l'assenza della retroilluminazione dei tasti, la retroilluminazione del display è sotto la media ed il pannello TN necessita di calibrazione. Le casse non hanno bassi e l'autonomia è breve anche per un portatile gaming. La rumorosità della ventola è elevata e si sente sempre con carichi contenuti e non ci sono opzioni di upgrade in quanto GPU e CPU sono integrate. Lo chassis è spesso e non ha un bel design.

Se il budget è limitato, gli utenti possono considerare il GL72 per le solide prestazioni core gaming. Per il resto, il sistema è rumoroso e limitato in termini di batteria ed utilizzo all'aperto.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

MSI GL72 6QF - 03/16/2016 v5
Allen Ngo

Chassis
72 / 98 → 73%
Tastiera
79%
Dispositivo di puntamento
81%
Connettività
78 / 81 → 96%
Peso
58 / 10-66 → 86%
Batteria
59%
Display
76%
Prestazioni di gioco
86%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
94%
Temperatura
89 / 95 → 94%
Rumorosità
70 / 90 → 78%
Audio
50%
Media
74%
80%
Gaming - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Portatile MSI GL72 6QF Xotic PC Edition
Allen Ngo, 2016-03-30 (Update: 2016-03-30)