Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Portatile Lenovo X62

Douglas Black, 04/12/2017

Un classico rinnovato? L'X62 è il successore del subnotebook Lenovo X61. Aggiornato con un chipset di quinta generazione Intel ed un raro formato di display 4:3 SXGA+ IPS, riesce l'X62 ad ereditare gli elevati standards ThinkPad e competere con la concorrenza? O è una delisione per gli appassionati che farà desiderare il passato?

 X62
Processore
Scheda grafica
Intel HD Graphics 5500, Core: 850 MHz, Memoria: 800 MHz, Shared Memory
Memoria
8192 MB 
, SK Hynix HMT351S6EFR8C-PB
Schermo
12.1 pollici 4:3, 1400x1050 pixel 145 PPI, IPS Flexview HV121P01-100, lucido: no
Scheda madre
Intel Broadwell-U PCH-LP (Baseline)
Harddisk
,  GB 
, SATA 3 SSD 120GB
Scheda audio
Intel Broadwell PCH-LP - High Definition Audio Controller
Rete
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260 (a/b/g/n/ac)
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 35.5 x 268.7 x 212
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Altre caratteristiche
6 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
1.2 kg, Alimentazione: 230 gr
Prezzo
730 Euro

 

Left: USB 3.1, mini-DP, mini-HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, SD Card
Left: USB 3.1, mini-DP, mini-HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, SD Card
Right: AC-in, 2x USB 2.0, 3.5mm Audio In, 3.5mm Audio Out
Right: AC-in, 2x USB 2.0, 3.5mm Audio In, 3.5mm Audio Out
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 7280
77 MB/s ∼100% +839%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
62.2 MB/s ∼81% +659%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
22.8 MB/s ∼30% +178%
X62
8.2 (min: 3.6) MB/s ∼11%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 7280
90.92 MB/s ∼100% +536%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
88 MB/s ∼97% +515%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
27.02 MB/s ∼30% +89%
X62
14.3 MB/s ∼16%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
671 MBit/s ∼100% +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
645 MBit/s ∼96% +24%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
641 MBit/s ∼96% +23%
X62
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260
522 MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
530 MBit/s ∼100% +25%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
512 MBit/s ∼97% +20%
X62
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260
425 MBit/s ∼80%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
297 MBit/s ∼56% -30%
148.5
cd/m²
162
cd/m²
149.5
cd/m²
165.2
cd/m²
168.3
cd/m²
155.8
cd/m²
154.8
cd/m²
160.6
cd/m²
150.9
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 168.3 cd/m² Media: 157.3 cd/m² Minimum: 26.2 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 88 %
Contrasto: 306:1 (Nero: 0.55 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.1 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 0.7 | - Ø
54.2% sRGB (Argyll) 35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.19
X62
IPS Flexview HV121P01-100, , 12.1, 1400x1050
Dell XPS 13-9343
SHP1421, IPS, 13.3, 3200x1800
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Innolux N125HCE-GN1, IPS LED, 12.5, 1920x1080
Dell Latitude 7280
AUO236D , IPS, 12.5, 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
LP133WF2-SPL78, IPS, LED, 13.3, 1920x1080
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
APPA027, IPS, 12, 2304x1440
Response Times
19%
24%
24%
18%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
59.6 (16.8, 42.8)
40.8 (21.2, 19.6)
32%
32.4 (12.4, 20)
46%
43.6 (20.8, 22.8)
27%
41.2 (15.6, 25.6)
31%
Response Time Black / White *
32 (18, 14)
30.4 (16.4, 14)
5%
31.2 (9.2, 22)
2%
25.2 (12.8, 12.4)
21%
30.4 (6.8, 23.6)
5%
PWM Frequency
26040 (50)
30860 (90)
Screen
43%
-38%
-29%
-14%
59%
Brightness
157
372
137%
281
79%
301
92%
307
96%
358
128%
Brightness Distribution
88
77
-12%
94
7%
88
0%
89
1%
88
0%
Black Level *
0.55
0.178
68%
0.25
55%
0.32
42%
0.36
35%
0.47
15%
Contrast
306
2063
574%
1132
270%
970
217%
850
178%
823
169%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.1
5.92
3%
6.1
-0%
5.9
3%
5.1
16%
1.6
74%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
0.7
4.79
-584%
6
-757%
5.1
-629%
3.9
-457%
1
-43%
Gamma
2.19 110%
2.42 99%
2.05 117%
2.33 103%
2.17 111%
2.26 106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
35
63
80%
42.26
21%
42
20%
38.24
9%
61.6
76%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
54.2
96.4
78%
65.43
21%
65
20%
59.75
10%
82.2
52%
CCT
7013 93%
6832 95%
6816 95%
6829 95%
6680 97%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
43% / 43%
-10% / -27%
-3% / -19%
5% / -6%
39% / 51%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms Incremento
↘ 14 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
59.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.8 ms Incremento
↘ 42.8 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected100 % brightness setting
168.3 cd/m² brightness

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6272 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
 
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Core i7-7600U
164 Points ∼84%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
145 Points ∼74%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼66%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
Intel Core m7-6Y75
110 Points ∼56%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
91 Points ∼47%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
90 Points ∼46%
Dell XPS 13-9343
Intel Core i5-5200U
88 Points ∼45%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Core i7-7600U
351 Points ∼16% +60%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
351 Points ∼16% +60%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel Core i5-7200U
330 Points ∼15% +51%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
Intel Core m7-6Y75
251 Points ∼12% +15%
X62
Intel Core i5-5200U
219 (min: 217) Points ∼10%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
218 Points ∼10% 0%
Dell XPS 13-9343
Intel Core i5-5200U
217 Points ∼10% -1%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Core i7-7600U
1.87 Points ∼85%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
1.67 Points ∼76%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
Intel Core m7-6Y75
1.17 Points ∼53%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
1 Points ∼45%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
0.95 Points ∼43%
Dell XPS 13-9343
Intel Core i5-5200U
0.98 Points ∼44%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Core i7-7600U
3.89 Points ∼16%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
3.87 Points ∼16%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
Intel Core m7-6Y75
2.53 Points ∼11%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
2.35 Points ∼10%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
2.29 Points ∼10%
Dell XPS 13-9343
Intel Core i5-5200U
2.33 Points ∼10%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
4835 Points ∼54% +7%
X62
Intel Core i5-5200U
4511 Points ∼51%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
3353 Points ∼38% -26%
Dell XPS 13-9343
Intel Core i5-5200U
2656 Points ∼30% -41%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
11109 Points ∼22% +18%
X62
Intel Core i5-5200U
9419 Points ∼19%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
7355 Points ∼15% -22%
Dell XPS 13-9343
Intel Core i5-5200U
7208 Points ∼14% -23%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
793 s * ∼9%
Dell XPS 13-9343
Intel Core i5-5200U
642.757 s * ∼8%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Core i7-7600U
482 s * ∼6%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
3995 Seconds * ∼18%
Dell XPS 13-9343
Intel Core i5-5200U
744 Seconds * ∼3%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Core i7-7600U
526 Seconds * ∼2%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4511
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
9419
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6054
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
219 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
30.62 fps
Aiuto
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 7280
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB
4957 Points ∼76% +32%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
4838 Points ∼74% +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
4660 Points ∼72% +24%
X62
HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
3748 Points ∼58%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Apple SSD AP0256
3636 Points ∼56% -3%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
3550 Points ∼54% -5%
Dell XPS 13-9343
HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
3225 Points ∼50% -14%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 7280
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB
4662 Points ∼50% +39%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
4583 Points ∼49% +37%
X62
HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
3349 Points ∼36%
Dell XPS 13-9343
HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
3288 Points ∼35% -2%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
3705 Points ∼62% +27%
Dell Latitude 7280
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB
3667 Points ∼61% +25%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
3575 Points ∼60% +22%
X62
HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
2928 Points ∼49%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Apple SSD AP0256
2651 Points ∼44% -9%
Dell XPS 13-9343
HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
2582 Points ∼43% -12%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
2550 Points ∼43% -13%
PCMark 7 Score
4729 punti
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2928 punti
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3349 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3748 punti
Aiuto
X62
Dell XPS 13-9343
Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
Apple SSD AP0256
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
Dell Latitude 7280
SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
129%
134%
258%
100%
236%
Write 4k QD32
137.7
326.3
137%
223.9
63%
418.3
204%
183
33%
443.1
222%
Read 4k QD32
107.1
354
231%
271.9
154%
495.3
362%
344.4
222%
578
440%
Write 4k
34.1
79.3
133%
24.87
-27%
124.5
265%
59.51
75%
138.5
306%
Read 4k
11.43
34.76
204%
16.28
42%
35.27
209%
30.23
164%
31.96
180%
Write 512
144.6
395.5
174%
736.6
409%
527.8
265%
323.2
124%
517.6
258%
Read 512
462.1
371.9
-20%
671.5
45%
857.5
86%
370.1
-20%
628.9
36%
Write Seq
154.4
424.2
175%
660.1
328%
984.6
538%
477.4
209%
652.5
323%
Read Seq
512.3
489.6
-4%
820.9
60%
1190
132%
470.8
-8%
1143
123%
Sequential Read: 512.3 MB/s
Sequential Write: 154.4 MB/s
512K Read: 462.1 MB/s
512K Write: 144.6 MB/s
4K Read: 11.43 MB/s
4K Write: 34.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 107.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 137.7 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
X62
Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
1294 Points ∼8%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1219 Points ∼8% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1176 Points ∼7% -9%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
1104 Points ∼7% -15%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75
1091 Points ∼7% -16%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1508 Points ∼3% +39%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
1442 Points ∼3% +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1426 Points ∼3% +32%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75
1202 Points ∼2% +11%
X62
Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
1082 Points ∼2%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
819 Points ∼2% +4%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75
789 Points ∼2% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
789 Points ∼2% +1%
X62
Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
784 Points ∼2%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
7032 Points ∼4% +7%
X62
Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
6591 Points ∼4%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75
6497 Points ∼4% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
6483 Points ∼4% -2%
3DMark 06 Standard
7382 punti
3DMark 11 Performance
1220 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
4912 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score
729 punti
Aiuto

Rumorosità

Idle
31.8 / 31.8 / 31.8 dB(A)
Sotto carico
34.1 / 40.8 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 28.8 dB(A)
X62
HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
Dell XPS 13-9343
HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
Dell Latitude 7280
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
Noise
-1%
5%
8%
9%
off / environment *
28.8
29
-1%
29.4
-2%
29.1
-1%
Idle Minimum *
31.8
30.2
5%
29
9%
29.4
8%
29.1
8%
Idle Average *
31.8
30.3
5%
29
9%
29.4
8%
29.1
8%
Idle Maximum *
31.8
30.4
4%
30.4
4%
30
6%
29.1
8%
Load Average *
34.1
34.4
-1%
34.1
-0%
30.6
10%
31.9
6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
37.45
Load Maximum *
40.8
48
-18%
37.6
8%
32.7
20%
31.9
22%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Carico massimo
 29 °C27.4 °C24 °C 
 29.8 °C28.8 °C24 °C 
 39.4 °C28.8 °C23.6 °C 
Massima: 39.4 °C
Media: 28.3 °C
27 °C29 °C34.6 °C
26.6 °C32.6 °C37 °C
25.2 °C31.4 °C44.2 °C
Massima: 44.2 °C
Media: 32 °C
Alimentazione (max)  41.4 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20 °C | Raytek Raynger ST
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.234.22532.9343132.633.74033.4345031.9326332.432.38031.132.210031.131.212529.629.116028.230.120028.630.425026.630.331526.834.540025.942.55002552.563024.85780024.657.8100024.960.8125024.266.2160023.974.6200023.671.8250023.269.3315023.269400023.568.8500023.470630023.368.4800023.266.21000023.359.51250023.256.11600023.554SPL36.180.8N2.642.5median 24.2 X62median 57.8Delta1.614.835.331.434.433.431.731.229.829.328.228.525.9282628.824.627.224.528.62328.222.83121.437.220.147.719.551.818.9501851.317.454.817.353.516.654.616.652.916.453.416.454.216.35416.653.216.958.816.958.917.354.517.350.917.252.217.15029.366.81.221.3median 17.3Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00median 52.22.16hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
X62 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (52 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.9% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 20%, worst was 48%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.58 / 0.72 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 9.09 / 13.9 / 13.99 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 23.8 / 39.7 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
X62
5200U, HD Graphics 5500, , , 1400x1050, 12.1
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
7500U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK, IPS, LED, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X220T 4298-2YG
2620M, HD Graphics 3000, Seagate Momentus Thin ST320LT000-9VL142, , 1366x768, 12.5
Power Consumption
32%
-32%
Idle Minimum *
9.09
3.16
65%
7.4
19%
Idle Average *
13.9
5.9
58%
12.2
12%
Idle Maximum *
13.99
6.5
54%
13.2
6%
Load Average *
23.8
30.6
-29%
53.1
-123%
Load Maximum *
39.7
35.8
10%
68.3
-72%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
   32WHr Battery
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
1ore 53minuti
Navigazione WiFi
2ore 15minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
2ore 51minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
0ore 55minuti
Note: These battery runtimes were measured with a 32WHr battery with 4% wear.
   91WHr extended battery (original CCFL backlight, 100% brightness)
Navigazione WiFi
5ore 35minuti
X62
5200U, HD Graphics 5500,  Wh
Dell XPS 13-9343
5200U, HD Graphics 5500, 52 Wh
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 41.4 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 46 Wh
Dell Latitude 7280
7600U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
7500U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
Autonomia della batteria
397%
278%
447%
732%
378%
Reader / Idle
113
912
707%
1023
805%
1553
1274%
904
700%
WiFi
135
580
330%
Load
55
140
155%
208
278%
104
89%
159
189%
85
55%
WiFi v1.3
554
324
682
475

Pro

+ unico
+ display 4:3 (?)
+ robusto
+ design compatto
+ leggero
+ tastiera + TrackPoint
+ ThinkLight
+ manutenzione semplice
+ prestazioni relativamente buone

Contro

- display scuro e che consuma molto
- display 4:3 (?)
- chassis che riutilizza quello dell'X61
- manca il TrackPad
- poggiapolsi sinistro che si scalda
- audio scarso
In review: X62 (Generation 3) provided by 51nb.com
In review: X62 (Generation 3) provided by 51nb.com

L'X62 usa il solido e compatto chassis del 2007 X61 e prova a modernizzarsi per le attività di lavoro quotidiane. Per la maggior parte, possiamo dire che l'X62 ci rimanda al 51nb per gli aspetti positivi: lo chassis è un classico ThinkPad, la tastiera non si flette ed è piacevole da usare, e le prestazioni della CPU di quinta generazione Broadwell ULV sono alla pari con portatili simili. Tuttavia, il display—sebbene con eccellente risoluzione 1400 x 1050 per un 12.1"—è scuro anche per gli standards ThinkPad. Potete comprare un kit upgrade retroilluminazione LED opzionale, ma cosa US$50. Il fatto che il display debba essere sempre a luminosità massima impatta sull'autonomia, e quindi una ampia batteria da 8-celle 75WHr diventa una necessità.

L'X62 è assolutamente unico e si colloca in un posto tutto suo. Non è un portatile per tutti, e per raggiungere il potenziale massimo bisogna aggiungere il kit di upgrade retroilluminazione LED.

L'X62 è una dichiarazione d'amore ai classici ThinkPads, ThinkLights, e display 4:3. La necessità del kit lo rende adatto agli hobbisti e colodo che sono appassionati. Tuttavia, pensiamo che vada bene, in quanto potrebbe diventare un dispositivo per collezionisti. L'X62 (senza RAM, HDD, batteria o adattatore) costa ben US$750 per il modello i5. In futuro vedremo se l'X62, adotterà una retroilluminazione LED come standard e unità batteria ed adattatore.

Se siete interesati all'X62 o altre creazioni 51nb, potete vedere il loro sito inglese per contattarli.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

 

 

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Portatile Lenovo X62
Douglas Black, 2017-04-12 (Update: 2017-04-12)