Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Portatile HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA

Nino Ricchizzi (traduzione a cura di G.DeLuca), 11/06/2016

Cambio generazionale. Prestazioni migliori, finalmente un display Full-HD ed un dispositivo di archiviazione più veloce rendono il nuovo portatile HP un vero tuttofare da ufficio. Nonostante queste nuove features, il dispositivo eredita alcuni svantaggi.

HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA (250 Serie)
Processore
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2 cores (TDP 15 W)
Scheda grafica
Intel HD Graphics 520, Core: 1000 MHz, Memoria: 1067 MHz, 20.19.15.4390
Memoria
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2134 / PC4-17000
Schermo
15.6 pollici 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics AUO38ED, TN, lucido: no
Scheda madre
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Harddisk
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G, 256 GB 
, formato M.2
Scheda audio
Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Porte di connessione
2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Connessioni Audio: audio combo, Lettore schede: SD
Rete
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Drive ottico
hp DVDRW DU8A6SH
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 24 x 384 x 255
Batteria
41 Wh ioni di litio, removibile, 4 celle
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: VGA 640 x 480
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: casse stereo, Tastiera: Chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: no, 12 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
2.104 kg, Alimentazione: 279 gr
Prezzo
600 Euro

 

The new HP 250 G5 consists of  ...
... a very simple ...
... plastic case.
The aluminum look  ...
... makes the case look nicer.
An all-round device ...
... in the low-budget segment.

Size Comparison

rear
rear
right: SD card slot, 1x USB 2.0, DVD drive, Kensington Lock
right: SD card slot, 1x USB 2.0, DVD drive, Kensington Lock
left: power-in, VGA-out, Ethernet port, HDMI-out, 1x USB 3.0, 1x USB 2.0, audio combo
left: power-in, VGA-out, Ethernet port, HDMI-out, 1x USB 3.0, 1x USB 2.0, audio combo
front
front
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
155.7 MB/s ∼100% +557%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
23.7 MB/s ∼15%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
22.7 MB/s ∼15% -4%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
27.5 MB/s ∼100%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (jseb)
234 MBit/s ∼100% +87%
Dell Latitude 14 3470
Atheros AR5BWB222 Wireless Network Adapter
165 MBit/s ∼71% +32%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (jseb)
125 MBit/s ∼53%
Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
91.6 MBit/s ∼39% -27%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
274 MBit/s ∼100% +208%
Dell Latitude 14 3470
Atheros AR5BWB222 Wireless Network Adapter
143 MBit/s ∼52% +61%
Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
99.9 MBit/s ∼36% +12%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (jseb)
89 MBit/s ∼32%
HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (jseb)
79 MBit/s ∼29% -11%
228
cd/m²
227
cd/m²
217
cd/m²
223
cd/m²
219
cd/m²
207
cd/m²
243
cd/m²
224
cd/m²
209
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 243 cd/m² Media: 221.9 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 85 %
Al centro con la batteria: 222 cd/m²
Contrasto: 562:1 (Nero: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12.67 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 13.82 | - Ø
55% sRGB (Argyll) 35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.63
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
AU Optronics AUO38ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
ChiMei N156BGE-E32, , 1366x768, 15.6
Dell Latitude 15-3570
LG Philips LGD04AF / 156WHU, , 1366x768, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE
LG LP156WF6-SPK1, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-36%
-31%
-13%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40 (20, 20)
52 (28, 24)
-30%
37 (13, 24)
7%
39.2 (18.8, 20.4)
2%
Response Time Black / White *
22 (6, 16)
31 (14, 17)
-41%
37 (20, 17)
-68%
28 (12.4, 15.6)
-27%
PWM Frequency
1000
Screen
2%
-9%
24%
Brightness
222
200
-10%
211
-5%
250
13%
Brightness Distribution
85
83
-2%
88
4%
92
8%
Black Level *
0.39
0.43
-10%
0.62
-59%
0.29
26%
Contrast
562
491
-13%
326
-42%
903
61%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
12.67
10.53
17%
12.35
3%
8.49
33%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
13.82
11.85
14%
13.46
3%
8.11
41%
Gamma
2.63 91%
2.25 107%
2.44 98%
2.37 101%
CCT
15633 42%
13758 47%
15217 43%
6300 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
35
39
11%
39
11%
37.07
6%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
55
61
11%
61
11%
57.94
5%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-17% / -5%
-20% / -14%
6% / 17%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms Incremento
↘ 16 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms Incremento
↘ 20 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6668 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points ∼59% 0%
Dell Latitude 15-3570
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points ∼59% 0%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points ∼59%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Core i5-6200U
87 Points ∼45% -25%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
290 Points ∼14% +1%
Dell Latitude 15-3570
Intel Core i5-6200U
290 Points ∼14% +1%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Core i5-6200U
288 Points ∼13%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Core i5-6200U
261 Points ∼12% -9%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
116 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
288 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
36.66 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Aiuto
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 15-3570
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
4477 Points ∼69% +3%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
4343 Points ∼67%
Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
3861 Points ∼59% -11%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 15-3570
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
3337 Points ∼56% +1%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
3317 Points ∼56%
Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
2886 Points ∼48% -13%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABF050
2834 Points ∼47% -15%
PCMark 7 Score
4213 punti
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3317 punti
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3605 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4343 punti
Aiuto
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Toshiba MQ01ABF050
Dell Latitude 15-3570
Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE
WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-90%
-42%
-89%
Write 4k QD32
228.5
0.769
-100%
23.3
-90%
1.036
-100%
Read 4k QD32
141.3
0.675
-100%
93.53
-34%
1.367
-99%
Write 4k
88.01
0.782
-99%
21.31
-76%
1.022
-99%
Read 4k
20.99
0.375
-98%
19.06
-9%
0.488
-98%
Write 512
289.4
38.3
-87%
134.1
-54%
55.33
-81%
Read 512
321.2
33
-90%
308.5
-4%
39.65
-88%
Write Seq
322.1
95.72
-70%
137.7
-57%
111.7
-65%
Read Seq
508.9
104.7
-79%
453.2
-11%
113.6
-78%
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
Sequential Read: 508.9 MB/s
Sequential Write: 322.1 MB/s
512K Read: 321.2 MB/s
512K Write: 289.4 MB/s
4K Read: 20.99 MB/s
4K Write: 88.01 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 141.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 228.5 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i5-6200U
1518 Points ∼3% +21%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1347 Points ∼3% +7%
Dell Latitude 15-3570
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1273 Points ∼2% +1%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1257 Points ∼2%
Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1225 Points ∼2% -3%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1162 Points ∼2% -8%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i5-6200U
874 Points ∼2%
Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
652 Points ∼2%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
6963 Points ∼4% +10%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
6314 Points ∼4%
Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
6126 Points ∼4% -3%
Dell Latitude 15-3570
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
5909 Points ∼4% -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i5-6200U
4897 Points ∼3% -22%
3DMark 11 Performance
1393 punti
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
45395 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5123 punti
Aiuto
BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
43.2 fps ∼100% +1%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
42.6 fps ∼99%
Dell Latitude 15-3570
36.5 fps ∼84% -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE
35.9 (min: 20.77) fps ∼83% -16%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
30 fps ∼69% -30%

Legenda

 
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel Core i5-6200U, Intel HD Graphics 520, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
 
Dell Latitude 15-3570 Intel Core i5-6200U, Intel HD Graphics 520, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
 
Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE Intel Core i5-6200U, Intel HD Graphics 520, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
 
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Intel Core i5-6200U, Intel HD Graphics 520, Toshiba MQ01ABF050
 
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Intel Core i5-6200U, AMD Radeon R5 M330, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
basso medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 42.65.5fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 30.62214.54.8fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 65.734.119.79.3fps

Rumorosità

Idle
34.5 / 34.5 / 34.5 dB(A)
DVD
37.3 / dB(A)
Sotto carico
39 / 38.3 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 31.6 dB(A)
 21.9 °C22.7 °C20.2 °C 
 21.5 °C22.9 °C20.1 °C 
 21.6 °C21.1 °C22.1 °C 
Massima: 22.9 °C
Media: 21.6 °C
21.2 °C22.4 °C22.6 °C
20.6 °C22 °C22.1 °C
20.5 °C21.1 °C22.2 °C
Massima: 22.6 °C
Media: 21.6 °C
Alimentazione (max)  32.6 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.938.140.92542.335.842.33140.134.840.14040.233.640.25042.132.942.16343.635.243.68043.630.743.61004528.94512545.627.845.616047.426.547.42005027.65025054.224.954.231559.72559.740060.12360.150063.322.663.363070.121.470.18007121.171100062.920.262.9125062.619.962.6160065.419.565.4200069.719.269.7250068.919.668.9315073.819.373.840007619.376500071.319.371.3630073.219.373.2800071.519.271.51000070.418.970.41250069.118.669.11600068.718.968.7SPL83.132.483.1N55.81.855.8median 68.7HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EAmedian 19.9median 68.7Delta6.42.86.435.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 21%, worst was 48%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.28 / 0.46 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.6 / 6 / 6.4 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 26 / 28.1 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
6200U, HD Graphics 520, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
6200U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba MQ01ABF050, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
Dell Latitude 15-3570
6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE
6200U, HD Graphics 520, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0, AH-IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
-57%
-14%
-26%
Idle Minimum *
3.6
5.8
-61%
4.9
-36%
5
-39%
Idle Average *
6
12.6
-110%
7.2
-20%
7.9
-32%
Idle Maximum *
6.4
12.8
-100%
7.5
-17%
8.6
-34%
Load Average *
26
27.6
-6%
25.4
2%
27.5
-6%
Load Maximum *
28.1
30
-7%
28
-0%
33.7
-20%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
10ore 34minuti
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
5ore 47minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5ore 13minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
1ore 49minuti
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh
Dell Latitude 15-3570
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 65 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 48 Wh
Autonomia della batteria
-9%
54%
4%
Reader / Idle
634
1024
62%
698
10%
H.264
313
277
-12%
WiFi v1.3
347
315
-9%
542
56%
406
17%
Load
109
157
44%
109
0%

Pro

+ display matto
+ prestazioni di sistema
+ display Full-HD
+ temperature

Contro

- display con tendenza al blu
- ventola sempre attiva
- rumorosità della ventola
- manutenzione difficile
- manca la RAM dual channel
In review: HP 250 G5. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: HP 250 G5. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

HP presenta un economico tuttofare per le quotidiane applicazioni da ufficio, per l'università e per attività basilari business. Grazie a molte configurazioni, potete trovare un prodotto buono per ogni tipo di budget. Cosa potete aspettarvi in questa fascia di prezzo? Il case ha un design semplice e quasi completamente in plastica. Almeno il produttore prova a dare un aspetto migliore con un look in allumino. I dispositivi si input sono sufficienti per le normali attività da ufficio e in linea con lo standard di questa fascia di prezzo. Speriamo in una corsa dei tasti più lunga e una sensazione meno spugnosa per la prossima generazione. In aggiunta, i tasti del touchpad potrebbero essere più silenziosi. Il recentissimo display Full HD è nuovo in questa generazione. Sfortunatamente, mostra una evidente tinta blu e la sua luminosità dovrebbe essere maggiore. Possiamo lodare le prestazioni dell'HP 250 G5. Un SSD ed un processore Core i5 rendono piacevole il lavoro. Solo una cosa non ci piace: l'Upgrading è purtroppo complicato. Un altro punto a favore sono le temperature. In cambio il controllo della ventola andrebbe migliorato.

Nel complesso HP realizza un pacchetto bilanciato in questa quinta generazione.

Se avete esigenze di autonomia, potete leggere la nostra recensione Dell Latitude 3570. Un pannello high-quality potrebbe invece essere una ragione per scegliere il Lenovo ThinkPad L560.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA - 10/26/2016 v5.1
Nino Ricchizzi

Chassis
73 / 98 → 75%
Tastiera
71%
Dispositivo di puntamento
75%
Connettività
46 / 80 → 57%
Peso
62 / 67 → 89%
Batteria
84%
Display
75%
Prestazioni di gioco
66 / 68 → 97%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
81 / 92 → 88%
Temperatura
97%
Rumorosità
70%
Audio
53%
Fotocamera
50 / 85 → 59%
Media
69%
75%
Office - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Portatile HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Nino Ricchizzi, 2016-11- 6 (Update: 2016-11- 6)