Recensione breve del Convertibile Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA (i5-8250U, SSD, FHD)

Name: Recensione breve del Convertibile Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA (i5-8250U, SSD, FHD)
Item: Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T
Rating: 79
Author: Sascha Mölck

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 02/25/2018

Convertible / 2-in-1 Kaby Lake Touchscreen Windows

Display scuro. L'Asus VivoBook Flip 15 monta una potente CPU quad-core, un veloce SSD, tastiera illuminata, e un touchscreen con supporto per la penna Asus opzionale. Nonostante il prezzo di circa $900, non mancano le pecche.

Dispositivo di test fornito da cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

I nostri Top 10
» Top 10 Portatili Multimedia
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming Leggeri
» Top 10 Portatili da Ufficio e Business economici
» Top 10 Portatili Premium da Ufficio/Business
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 300 Euro
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 500 Euro
» Top 10 dei Portatili Workstation
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibili
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Smartphones

Size Comparison

HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx

Connectivity

left side: Kensington lock, USB 2.0 (Type-A), SD card reader, volume rocker, power button

right side: audio combo jack, 3x USB 3.1 Gen 1 (1x Type-C, 2x Type-A), HDMI, mains

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx	67.8 MB/s ∼100% +199%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	60.5 MB/s ∼89% +167%
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	26.5 MB/s ∼39% +17%
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	22.7 MB/s ∼33%
Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	22.5 MB/s ∼33% -1%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	87 MB/s ∼100% +240%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx	79.17 MB/s ∼91% +209%
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	31 MB/s ∼36% +21%
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	25.6 MB/s ∼29%
Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	24 MB/s ∼28% -6%

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	518 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4	489 MBit/s ∼94% -6%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: B822	473 MBit/s ∼91% -9%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	352 MBit/s ∼68% -32%
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	178 MBit/s ∼34% -66%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	670 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4	604 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: B822	438 MBit/s ∼65% -35%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	314 MBit/s ∼47% -53%
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	313 MBit/s ∼47% -53%


236 cd/m²	229 cd/m²	246 cd/m²
218 cd/m²	229 cd/m²	233 cd/m²
188 cd/m²	192 cd/m²	221 cd/m²

Distribuzione della luminosità

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Massima: 246 cd/m² Media: 221.3 cd/m² Minimum: 12.6 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 76 %
Al centro con la batteria: 232 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1527:1 (Nero: 0.15 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.03 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 5.56 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
59% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.64

ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6	HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6	Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6	HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6	Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 a-Si TFT-LCD, LCM, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times		7%	3%	-8%	3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	44 (22, 22)	30.8 (14, 16.8) 30%	55 (20, 35) -25%	55 (23, 32) -25%	42 (22, 20) 5%
Response Time Black / White *	29 (15, 14)	33.6 (18, 15.6) -16%	20 (4, 16) 31%	26 (10, 16) 10%	29 (15, 13) -0%
PWM Frequency		201.6 (99)		50 (20)
Screen		-14%	-2%	-29%	14%
Brightness middle	229	230.2 1%	244 7%	205 -10%	221 -3%
Brightness	221	222 0%	242 10%	191 -14%	224 1%
Brightness Distribution	76	88 16%	93 22%	74 -3%	89 17%
Black Level *	0.15	0.2 -33%	0.25 -67%	0.3 -100%	0.12 20%
Contrast	1527	1151 -25%	976 -36%	683 -55%	1842 21%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	5.03	5.7 -13%	4.94 2%	7.2 -43%	4.12 18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	8.89	20.8 -134%	7.3 18%	12.7 -43%	6.41 28%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	5.56	2.6 53%	4.93 11%	6.86 -23%	3.4 39%
Gamma	2.64 ^83%	2.2 ^100%	2.7 ^81%	2.27 ^97%	2.54 ^87%
CCT	7015 ^93%	6109 ^106%	7401 ^88%	6983 ^93%	6893 ^94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	37	37.5 1%	40 8%	38 3%	37 0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	59	57.9 -2%	63 7%	59 0%	58 -2%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)		-4% / -10%	1% / -1%	-19% / -25%	9% / 12%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

flickering dello schermo / PWM non rilevato

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8929 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

ℹ

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.

↔ Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
29 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato	↗ 15 ms Incremento
29 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato	↘ 14 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers. In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 68 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore. Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (25.6 ms).
↔ Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
44 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato	↗ 22 ms Incremento
44 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato	↘ 22 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers. In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.9 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 64 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore. Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono simili alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (41 ms).

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5546

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

21990

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

8702

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

144 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

724 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

45.7 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Aiuto

... in confronto

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 Intel Core i7-8550U	170 Points ∼78% +18%
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T Intel Core i5-8250U	144 Points ∼66%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	137 Points ∼63% -5%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng Intel Core i5-7200U	126 Points ∼58% -12%
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 Intel Core i5-7200U	126 Points ∼58% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T Intel Core i5-8250U	724 Points ∼17%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	574 Points ∼13% -21%
Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 Intel Core i7-8550U	558 Points ∼13% -23%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng Intel Core i5-7200U	326 Points ∼7% -55%
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 Intel Core i5-7200U	326 Points ∼7% -55%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 Intel Core i7-8550U	6494 Points ∼60% +17%
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T Intel Core i5-8250U	5546 Points ∼51%
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 Intel Core i5-7200U	4976 Points ∼46% -10%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng Intel Core i5-7200U	4787 Points ∼44% -14%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	4103 Points ∼38% -26%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T Intel Core i5-8250U	21990 Points ∼44%
Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 Intel Core i7-8550U	18269 Points ∼37% -17%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	14400 Points ∼29% -35%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng Intel Core i5-7200U	11328 Points ∼23% -48%
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 Intel Core i5-7200U	11078 Points ∼22% -50%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T Intel Core i5-8250U	13130 Points ∼42%
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 Intel Core i5-7200U	6439 Points ∼21% -51%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng Intel Core i5-7200U	6297 Points ∼20% -52%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T Intel Core i5-8250U	3183 Points ∼68%
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 Intel Core i5-7200U	2893 Points ∼62% -9%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng Intel Core i5-7200U	2812 Points ∼60% -12%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T Intel Core i5-8250U	12068 Points ∼44%
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 Intel Core i5-7200U	6795 Points ∼25% -44%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng Intel Core i5-7200U	6425 Points ∼23% -47%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T Intel Core i5-8250U	4003 Points ∼69%
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 Intel Core i5-7200U	3632 Points ∼63% -9%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng Intel Core i5-7200U	3484 Points ∼60% -13%

Geekbench 4.1/4.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T Intel Core i5-8250U	12607 Points ∼35%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T Intel Core i5-8250U	4095 Points ∼65%

JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 Intel Core i7-8550U (Edge 41.16299.15.0)	286.26 Points ∼86% +19%
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T Intel Core i5-8250U (Edge 41)	240.76 Points ∼72%
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 Intel Core i5-7200U (Edge 38)	219.95 Points ∼66% -9%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng Intel Core i5-7200U (Edge 38)	212.03 Points ∼64% -12%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx AMD Ryzen 5 2500U (Edge 40.15063.674.0)	203.88 Points ∼61% -15%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3587 punti
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4722 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4689 punti
Aiuto

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8550U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	4100 Points ∼67% +14%
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002	3587 Points ∼59%
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 HD Graphics 620, 7200U, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G)	3446 Points ∼57% -4%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx Vega 8, 2500U, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	3385 Points ∼56% -6%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng HD Graphics 620, 7200U, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0	3173 Points ∼52% -12%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002

Sequential Read: 458.5 MB/s

Sequential Write: 337.2 MB/s

512K Read: 319.1 MB/s

512K Write: 186 MB/s

4K Read: 28.39 MB/s

4K Write: 56.57 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 321.1 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 128.5 MB/s

	Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002	Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G)	HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0	Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		22%	-89%	121%
Write 4k QD32	128.5	209.2 63%	1.098 -99%	331.1 158%
Read 4k QD32	321.1	314.5 -2%	0.844 -100%	289.3 -10%
Write 4k	56.57	54.98 -3%	1.047 -98%	134.4 138%
Read 4k	28.39	28.9 2%	0.357 -99%	35.61 25%
Write 512	186	322.7 73%	48.12 -74%	608.9 227%
Read 512	319.1	293 -8%	31.37 -90%	935.3 193%
Write Seq	337.2	465.3 38%	102 -70%	598.8 78%
Read Seq	458.5	502.5 10%	102.4 -78%	1187 159%

3DMark 11 Performance		1765 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		7624 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score		906 punti
Aiuto

... in confronto

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8550U	7043 Points ∼14% +338%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	3602 Points ∼7% +124%
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	1608 Points ∼3%
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1422 Points ∼3% -12%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1355 Points ∼3% -16%

	basso	medio	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	49.9	27.6	22.6	7.9	fps

Rumorosità

Idle		30.9 / 30.9 / 30.9 dB(A)
Sotto carico		34.2 / 34.2 dB(A)

	30 dB silenzioso 40 dB(A) udibile 50 dB(A) rumoroso
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza) Rumorosità ambientale: 30.2 dB(A)

Carico massimo

Idle


24.7 °C	32.2 °C	27.4 °C
24.4 °C	36 °C	30.1 °C
24.3 °C	27 °C	28 °C

Massima: 36 °C
Media: 28.2 °C


32 °C	32.8 °C	25.1 °C
37 °C	35.4 °C	25.4 °C
28.1 °C	28.4 °C	25.1 °C

Massima: 37 °C
Media: 29.9 °C

Alimentazione (max) 46.8 °C | Temperatura della stanza 23.3 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 30.4 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.8 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.4 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.2 °C / 84.6 F (+1.2 °C / 2.2 F).

Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.3 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente

Off / Standby	0.3 / 0.28 Watt
Idle	3.9 / 7.2 / 9.5 Watt
Sotto carico	36.8 / 33.1 Watt


Leggenda: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Autonomia della batteria


NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 41)		5ore 58minuti

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx 2500U, Vega 8, 55.8 Wh	398 min ∼15% +11%
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 7200U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh (Edge 38)	394 min ∼15% +10%
Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 48 Wh (Edge 41.16299.15.0)	373 min ∼14% +4%
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T 8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh (Edge 41)	358 min ∼14%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng 7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh (Edge 38)	348 min ∼13% -3%

Pro

+ display IPS ad elevato contrasto

+ risoluzione FHD

+ resta abbastanza fresco

+ SSD + HDD

+ molto spazio di archiviazione

+ AC Wi-Fi

+ USB Type-C

+ tastiera illuminata

+ supporto per penna opzionale

Contro

- display scuro

- autonomia mediocre

- unità base non molto solida

- webcam scarsa

Asus Vivobook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T. Modello fornito da cyberport.

Il VivoBook Flip 15 è un convertibile sottile e compatto da 15.6" molto adatto ad applicazioni da ufficio ed internet grazie al processore ULV quad-core. Resta fresco indipendentemente dal carico e molto silenzioso per la maggior parte del tempo.

E' abbastanza scattante grazie al veloce SSD, ed il suo hard disk da 1 TB 2.5" offre molto spazio. Entrambi i drives possono essere sostituiti o aggiornati, sebbene sia necessario aprire il case in quanto manca una cover di manutenzione.

La tastiera è decente per l'utilizzo domestico ed ha una buona retroilluminazione. L'autonomia, come rilevato nel test Wi-Fi è mediocre. Al massimo ci sono 30 minuti extra teoricamente possibili con una batteria nuova e non degradata, il che non influisce sul punteggio finale del portatile.

Il touchscreen IPS ha un buon contrasto ed ampi angoli di visuale. Tuttavia, la luminosità massima è troppo bassa. Un portatile con il prezzo di un VivoBook deve essere più luminoso. Oltre all'input con le dita, il touchscreen supporta anche la penna opzionale Asus ($50).

Prezzo e prestazioni sono sproporzionati tra loro.

Nel complesso, il portatile ha troppe pecche considerando un prezzo di ben $900: il display è troppo scuro, la tastiera si flette, e l'autonomia è mediocre nella migliore delle ipotesi. A peggiorare le cose il dispositivo ha un solo modulo di memoria in modalità single-channel, pertanto non è veloce come potrebbe essere con la presenza di due moduli. La connettività è abbastanza ortodossa - una porta Thunderbolt 3 sarebbe stata sicuramente gradita. Infine, ma non per ultimo, con un prezzo di $900 l'Asus Pen dovrebbe essere inclusa.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T - 2018-02-0102/01/2018 v6
Sascha Mölck

Chassis

76 / 98 → 78%

Tastiera

80%

Dispositivo di puntamento

83%

Connettività

51 / 80 → 64%

Peso

61 / 35-78 → 61%