Notebookcheck

Recensione Breve del portatile Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK

Sascha Mölck, 09/12/2016

Nella media. Questo tuttofare da 15,6" Lenovo ha un prezzo relativamente alto per le features medie che offre. Il case e lo schermo sono punti deboli che influenzano il punteggio.

Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK (Ideapad 310 Serie)
Processore
Scheda grafica
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX - 2048 MB, Core: 965-993 MHz, Memoria: 900 MHz, DDR3, ForceWare 372.70, Optimus
Memoria
6144 MB 
, DDR4-2132, Dual-Channel, uno slot RAM (occupato), 4 GB saldati
Schermo
15.6 pollici 16:9, 1366x768 pixel 100 PPI, LG Philips LP156WHU-TPG1, TN LED, lucido: si
Scheda madre
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Harddisk
WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0, 1000 GB 
, 5400 rpm, 850 GB libera
Scheda audio
Conexant CX20751/2 @ Intel Skylake High Definition Audio Controller
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Connessioni Audio: Audio combo, Lettore schede: SD, TPM 2.0
Rete
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0
Drive ottico
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE0N
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 22.9 x 379 x 260
Batteria
31 Wh ioni di litio
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD Webcam
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Stereo, Tastiera: Chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: no, Lenovo Photo Master, Cyberlink Power2Go 8,Lenovo PowerDVD 12, McAfee LiveSafe Internet Security (trial), MS Office 365 (trial), 24 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
2.2 kg, Alimentazione: 210 gr
Prezzo
699 Euro

 

Size comparison

Connectivity

Left side: power outlet, VGA, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.0, audio combo, memory card reader
Left side: power outlet, VGA, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.0, audio combo, memory card reader
Right side: 2x USB 2.0, DVD burner, Slot for a cable lock
Right side: 2x USB 2.0, DVD burner, Slot for a cable lock
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo E51-80 80QB0008GE
68 MB/s ∼100% +312%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
57.8 MB/s ∼85% +250%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T
22.2 MB/s ∼33% +35%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
19.8 MB/s ∼29% +20%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
16.7 MB/s ∼25% +1%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
16.5 MB/s ∼24%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
11.2 MB/s ∼16% -32%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
89.2 MB/s ∼100% +243%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
33.2 MB/s ∼37% +28%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T
27.7 MB/s ∼31% +7%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
26 MB/s ∼29%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
25.6 MB/s ∼29% -2%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
10.2 MB/s ∼11% -61%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
331 MBit/s ∼100% +20%
Lenovo Ideapad 510S-13ISK
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
313 MBit/s ∼95% +13%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
276 MBit/s ∼83%
Dell Latitude 14 3470
Atheros AR5BWB222 Wireless Network Adapter
165 MBit/s ∼50% -40%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
334 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
327 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Lenovo Ideapad 510S-13ISK
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
240 MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Dell Latitude 14 3470
Atheros AR5BWB222 Wireless Network Adapter
143 MBit/s ∼43% -57%
204
cd/m²
190
cd/m²
182
cd/m²
216
cd/m²
200
cd/m²
180
cd/m²
218
cd/m²
214
cd/m²
182
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 218 cd/m² Media: 198.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 83 %
Al centro con la batteria: 200 cd/m²
Contrasto: 714:1 (Nero: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.63 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 11.19 | - Ø
56% sRGB (Argyll) 35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 1.78
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
TN LED, 1366x768
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
TN LED, 1920x1080
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
TN LED, 1920x1080
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
TN LED, 1366x768
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
TN, 1366x768
Response Times
-34%
-34%
482%
109%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
27
45
-67%
43
-59%
42
-56%
22
19%
Response Time Black / White *
22
22
-0%
24
-9%
24
-9%
20
9%
PWM Frequency
50
806
1512%
200
300%
Screen
-9%
-11%
-7%
-18%
Brightness
198
196
-1%
221
12%
203
3%
236
19%
Brightness Distribution
83
76
-8%
84
1%
83
0%
85
2%
Black Level *
0.28
0.34
-21%
0.49
-75%
0.49
-75%
0.44
-57%
Contrast
714
588
-18%
486
-32%
449
-37%
570
-20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
10.63
11.54
-9%
11.19
-5%
8.95
16%
14.58
-37%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
11.19
12.98
-16%
11.53
-3%
10.59
5%
16.8
-50%
Gamma
1.78 135%
2.58 93%
2.41 100%
2.51 96%
2.33 103%
CCT
11258 58%
14060 46%
13057 50%
12049 54%
27039 24%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
35
36
3%
38
9%
41
17%
35
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
56
56
0%
60
7%
65
16%
56
0%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-22% / -14%
-23% / -15%
238% / 127%
46% / 17%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 50 Hz80 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 4396 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms Incremento
↘ 11 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (27.1 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms Incremento
↘ 20 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (43.7 ms).
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4984
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
10803
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
2632
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
131 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
312 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
47.72 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Aiuto
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo E51-80 80QB0008GE
Intel Core i7-6500U
131 Points ∼59% 0%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U
131 Points ∼59%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T
Intel Core i5-6200U
117 Points ∼52% -11%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
108 Points ∼48% -18%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
Intel Core i3-5005U
81 Points ∼36% -38%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
AMD FX-8800P
78 Points ∼35% -40%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD A10-8700P
74 Points ∼33% -44%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo E51-80 80QB0008GE
Intel Core i7-6500U
312 Points ∼17% 0%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U
312 Points ∼17%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T
Intel Core i5-6200U
293 Points ∼16% -6%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
257 Points ∼14% -18%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
AMD FX-8800P
207 Points ∼11% -34%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
Intel Core i3-5005U
206 Points ∼11% -34%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD A10-8700P
195 Points ∼10% -37%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U (Edge 38.14393.0.0)
212.34 Points ∼1%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T
Intel Core i5-6200U (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
196.28 Points ∼1% -8%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
173.24 Points ∼1% -18%
Lenovo E51-80 80QB0008GE
Intel Core i7-6500U (IE 11)
127.82 Points ∼1% -40%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD A10-8700P (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
109.87 Points ∼1% -48%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3497 punti
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3825 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4281 punti
Aiuto
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo E51-80 80QB0008GE
Radeon R5 M330, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
3509 Points ∼59% 0%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0
3497 Points ∼59%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256G32MND
3483 Points ∼58% 0%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
3237 Points ∼54% -7%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
Radeon R8 M365DX, FX-8800P, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX
2806 Points ∼47% -20%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
GeForce 920M, 5005U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
2752 Points ∼46% -21%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
Radeon R6 M340DX, A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
2485 Points ∼42% -29%
WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0
Valore Minimo di trasferimento: 50.7 MB/s
Valore Massimo di trasferimento: 79.3 MB/s
Valore Medio di trasferimento: 70.8 MB/s
Tempi di accesso: 16.8 ms
Burst Rate: 160 MB/s
Utilizzo CPU: 6.8 %
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-2%
-17%
-3%
-30%
Write 4k QD32
1.245
1.312
5%
0.892
-28%
1.287
3%
0.646
-48%
Read 4k QD32
1.125
1.126
0%
0.847
-25%
1.116
-1%
0.694
-38%
Write 4k
1.188
1.261
6%
0.895
-25%
1.29
9%
0.72
-39%
Read 4k
0.44
0.415
-6%
0.451
3%
0.522
19%
0.374
-15%
Write 512
55.64
53.66
-4%
42.75
-23%
42.22
-24%
27.54
-51%
Read 512
39.02
36.71
-6%
36.46
-7%
38.12
-2%
31.7
-19%
Write Seq
113.3
108.9
-4%
95.89
-15%
99.56
-12%
93.37
-18%
Read Seq
115.9
110.7
-4%
96.35
-17%
101
-13%
105.6
-9%
3DMark 11 Performance
1983 punti
Aiuto
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
AMD Radeon R8 M365DX, AMD FX-8800P
3819 Points ∼7% +108%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD Radeon R6 M340DX, AMD A10-8700P
2681 Points ∼5% +46%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2273 Points ∼4% +24%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
1835 Points ∼4%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i5-5200U
1834 Points ∼4% 0%
Lenovo E51-80 80QB0008GE
AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i7-6500U
1756 Points ∼3% -4%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
1747 Points ∼3% -5%
Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE
NVIDIA GeForce 920M, Intel Core i7-5500U
1731 Points ∼3% -6%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
NVIDIA GeForce 920M, Intel Core i3-5005U
1666 Points ∼3% -9%
basso medio alto ultra
Crysis 3 (2013) 3822.215.9fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 76.941.834.8fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 42.932.418.4fps
Sims 4 (2014) 171.463.434.1fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) 35.222.612.4fps
Alien: Isolation (2014) 58.938.819.9fps
F1 2014 (2014) 96794625fps
Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014) 45.429.216.4fps
Battlefield Hardline (2015) 65.144.615.6fps
GTA V (2015) 60.752.512.5fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 22.113.6fps
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 6043.615.4fps
Mad Max (2015) 26.214.6fps
Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 (2015) 40.222.3fps
Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015) 18.815.9fps
XCOM 2 (2016) 25.68.9fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 13.77.3fps
Doom (2016) 29.524.1fps
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) 34.920.5fps
BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
48.3 fps ∼15% +16%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
43.1 fps ∼14% +3%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
41.8 fps ∼13%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
NVIDIA GeForce 920M, Intel Core i3-5005U
35.31 fps ∼11% -16%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i5-5200U
28.1 fps ∼9% -33%
Lenovo E51-80 80QB0008GE
AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i7-6500U
26.6 fps ∼8% -36%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD Radeon R6 M340DX, AMD A10-8700P
26.1 fps ∼8% -38%
Sims 4 - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Dell Inspiron 17-5758
NVIDIA GeForce 920M, Intel Core i7-5500U
73 fps ∼40% +15%
Lenovo B70-80 80MR0006GE
NVIDIA GeForce 920M, Intel Core i5-5200U
68.5 fps ∼37% +8%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
63.4 fps ∼34%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD Radeon R6 M340DX, AMD A10-8700P
37.5 fps ∼20% -41%
Battlefield Hardline - 1366x768 Medium Graphics Quality (DX11)
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
56.5 fps ∼29% +27%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
44.6 fps ∼23%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD Radeon R6 M340DX, AMD A10-8700P
33 fps ∼17% -26%
Dell Inspiron 17-5758
NVIDIA GeForce 920M, Intel Core i7-5500U
30 fps ∼15% -33%

Rumorosità

Idle
32.6 / 32.6 / 33.8 dB(A)
Sotto carico
40.2 / 40.4 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 31.2 dB(A)
Carico massimo
 38.3 °C36.2 °C26.4 °C 
 38.6 °C34.7 °C26.2 °C 
 35.3 °C32.3 °C27.6 °C 
Massima: 38.6 °C
Media: 32.8 °C
25.6 °C40.5 °C38.8 °C
26 °C33.1 °C42 °C
27.3 °C30.1 °C33.6 °C
Massima: 42 °C
Media: 33 °C
Alimentazione (max)  38 °C | Temperatura della stanza 22.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.629.535.62533.433.633.43135.834.335.84031.130.631.15030.732.430.76328.828.928.88028.628.428.610030.526.430.512537.826.537.816044.224.544.220047.124.447.125053.923.153.931560.822.660.840063.121.263.150061.720.461.763064.219.664.280064.419.464.4100064.41964.4125064.618.564.6160067.618.267.6200068.418.668.4250067.718.567.7315069.718.669.7400068.818.868.8500063.118.863.1630065.618.865.6800070.718.970.71000071.418.871.41250069.318.769.31600059.118.659.1SPL79.531.279.5N46.61.646.6median 64.4Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISKmedian 18.9median 64.4Delta6.71.46.735.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 0.5 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 7 / 8 / 8.4 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 38.8 / 52.8 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Autonomia della batteria
Navigazione WiFi v1.3 (Edge 38.14393.0.0)
5ore 32minuti
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T
6200U, GeForce 940MX, 38 Wh (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
408 min ∼34% +23%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
5005U, GeForce 920M, 44 Wh (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
367 min ∼31% +11%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
5200U, Radeon R5 M330, 41 Wh (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
342 min ∼29% +3%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
6500U, GeForce 920MX, 31 Wh (Edge 38.14393.0.0)
332 min ∼28%
Lenovo E51-80 80QB0008GE
6500U, Radeon R5 M330, 31 Wh (IE 11)
279 min ∼23% -16%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
A10-8700P, Radeon R6 M340DX, 32 Wh (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
183 min ∼15% -45%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G
FX-8800P, Radeon R8 M365DX, 37 Wh
168 min ∼14% -49%

Pro

+ silenzioso
+ relativamente fresco
+ molto spazio di archiviazione
+ cover manutenzione
+ buone prestazioni con le applicazioni
+ gaming-ready

Contro

- schermo scuro con angoli di visuale scarsi
- manca la porta USB-C
- case debole
In review: Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK (80SM006AGE). Test model provided by Lenovo Germany.
In review: Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK (80SM006AGE). Test model provided by Lenovo Germany.

Lenovo realizza un portatile da 15,6" multimedia. L'Ideapad 310-15ISK ha prestazioni sufficienti per la maggioranza degli utenti. Il processore Core i7 può risultare anche un po' eccessivo, considerando il resto del portatile. Inoltre, questa CPU rende costoso questo modello. Raccomandiamo ai potenziali acquirenti di prendere un modello Core i5 dell'Ideapad, in quanto si adatta meglio alla GPU GeForce 920MX del portatile.

Quest'ultima rende i giochi fluidi. Tuttavia, i giochi pensanti, come Rise of the Tomb Raider, non funzionano al meglio su questo portatile. Il laptop non è troppo rumoroso e non si scalda molto. Grazie all'HDD da 1 TB, avrete abbastanza spazio. Le due cover di manutenzione del portatile consentono di smontare facilmente l'hard disk.

La tastiera ha una buona resistenza dei tasti. E' adatta all'utilizzo domestico. L'autonomia della batteria è decente ma lo schermo è scarso. Nonostante il contrasto buoni, la luminosità è troppo bassa. Inoltre, gli angoli di visuale sono scarsi a causa del pannello TN che utilizza Lenovo.

E' difficile raccomandare l'Ideapad 310-15ISK, in quanto il produttore non ha inserito alcun motivo valido. Il portatile non è economico, e il rapporto prezzo-performance non è adeguato. Per questo prezzo, ci aspetteremmo una GPU GeForce 940MX ed un veloce SSD, invece di un HDD da 1 TB. Inoltre, lo schermo dovrebbe avere caratteristiche nettamente migliori. Per aumentare l'appeal di questo modello, Lenovo dovrà ridurre significativamente il prezzo.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK - 09/08/2016 v5.1
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
73 / 98 → 75%
Tastiera
75%
Dispositivo di puntamento
81%
Connettività
44 / 81 → 55%
Peso
62 / 67 → 89%
Batteria
85%
Display
68%
Prestazioni di gioco
60 / 85 → 70%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
78 / 92 → 84%
Temperatura
92%
Rumorosità
83 / 95 → 87%
Audio
40%
Fotocamera
40 / 85 → 47%
Media
68%
74%
Multimedia - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione Breve del portatile Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Sascha Mölck, 2016-09-12 (Update: 2016-09-12)