Recensione breve del Portatile Lenovo IdeaPad 310-15IKB

Name: Recensione breve del Portatile Lenovo IdeaPad 310-15IKB
Item: Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
Rating: 77
Author: Benjamin Herzig

Benjamin Herzig (traduzione a cura di G.DeLuca), 12/14/2016

Laptop / Notebook Kaby Lake Windows

Mediocre. Lenovo prova ad emergere dalla massa dei portatili economici disponibili per 600 Euro (~$633) o meno. Vedremo cosa ha di offrire di nuovo l'IdeaPad 310-15IKB nella nostra recensione.

Dispositivo di test fornito da campuspoint.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

The bottom of the laptop with the maintenance flaps closed.

The right side of the keyboard has a number pad.

I nostri Top 10
» Top 10 Portatili Multimedia
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming Leggeri
» Top 10 Portatili da Ufficio e Business economici
» Top 10 Portatili Premium da Ufficio/Business
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 300 Euro
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 500 Euro
» Top 10 dei Portatili Workstation
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibili
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Smartphones

Size Comparison

Medion Akoya P6670 HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK

Right: 2x USB 2.0, ODD slot, Kensington lock

Left: DC-In, VGA, Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.0, 3.5 mm jack, SD-card reader

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5	107.8 MB/s ∼100% +367%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB	23.1 MB/s ∼21%
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261	19.1 MB/s ∼18% -17%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5	250.6 MB/s ∼100% +906%
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261	26.1 MB/s ∼10% +5%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB	24.9 MB/s ∼10%

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	634 MBit/s ∼100% +98%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (jseb)	341 MBit/s ∼54% +6%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	321 MBit/s ∼51%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	510 MBit/s ∼100% +79%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (jseb)	307 MBit/s ∼60% +8%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	285 MBit/s ∼56%


188 cd/m²	188 cd/m²	184 cd/m²
185 cd/m²	185 cd/m²	182 cd/m²
181 cd/m²	181 cd/m²	179 cd/m²

Distribuzione della luminosità

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Massima: 188 cd/m² Media: 183.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 95 %
Al centro con la batteria: 185 cd/m²
Contrasto: 661:1 (Nero: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.07 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 8.83 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
57% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 36.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.47

ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB BOE NT156FHM-N31, , 1920x1080, 15.6	Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE BOE HF NV156FHM-N42, , 1920x1080, 15.6	Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ AU Optronics B173HTN01.1, , 1920x1080, 17.3	HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA AU Optronics AUO38ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6	Medion Akoya P6670 LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK3, , 1920x1080, 15.6	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK LG Philips LP156WHU-TPG1, , 1366x768, 15.6
Response Times		-50%	-4%	1%	-2%	16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	43 (21, 22)	51 (18, 33) -19%	42 (21, 21) 2%	40 (20, 20) 7%	42 (18, 24) 2%	27 (7, 20) 37%
Response Time Black / White *	21 (5, 16)	38 (8, 30) -81%	23 (6, 17) -10%	22 (6, 16) -5%	22 (6, 16) -5%	22 (11, 11) -5%
PWM Frequency		50 (10)	1000 (90)		50	50 (80)
Screen		36%	30%	-19%	2%	-6%
Brightness middle	185	291 57%	353 91%	219 18%	287 55%	200 8%
Brightness	184	265 44%	320 74%	222 21%	269 46%	198 8%
Brightness Distribution	95	86 -9%	82 -14%	85 -11%	74 -22%	83 -13%
Black Level *	0.28	0.23 18%	0.38 -36%	0.39 -39%	0.65 -132%	0.28 -0%
Contrast	661	1265 91%	929 41%	562 -15%	442 -33%	714 8%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	8.07	4.78 41%	5.07 37%	12.67 -57%	5.42 33%	10.63 -32%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	14.83	9.51 36%	10.12 32%	20.99 -42%	9.54 36%	15.69 -6%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	8.83	3.49 60%	13.38 -52%	13.82 -57%	5.14 42%	11.19 -27%
Gamma	2.47 ^89%	2.58 ^85%	2.69 ^82%	2.63 ^84%	2.48 ^89%	1.78 ^124%
CCT	10628 ^61%	6013 ^108%	15991 ^41%	15633 ^42%	6952 ^93%	11258 ^58%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	36.2	40 10%	60.1 66%	35 -3%	36 -1%	35 -3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	57	64 12%	91.6 61%	55 -4%	57 0%	56 -2%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)		-7% / 22%	13% / 24%	-9% / -16%	0% / 2%	5% / -2%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

ℹ

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.

↔ Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
21 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms Incremento
21 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
↔ Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21 ms Incremento
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

flickering dello schermo / PWM non rilevato

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8777 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Intel Core i7-7500U	148 Points ∼71% +15%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Intel Core i7-6500U	131 Points ∼63% +2%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points ∼62%
Medion Akoya P6670 Intel Core i5-6200U	117 Points ∼57% -9%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel Core i5-6200U	116 Points ∼56% -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Intel Core i7-7500U	338 Points ∼11% +9%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Intel Core i7-6500U	312 Points ∼10% 0%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB Intel Core i5-7200U	311 Points ∼10%
Medion Akoya P6670 Intel Core i5-6200U	291 Points ∼9% -6%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel Core i5-6200U	288 Points ∼9% -7%

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

44.4 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.7 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

311 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

129 Points

Aiuto

... in confronto

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Liteonit CV3-DE256	3778 Points ∼62% +9%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	3497 Points ∼57% +1%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Hynix HFS128G3MND	3457 Points ∼57%
Medion Akoya P6670 GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Phison S11-128G	3396 Points ∼56% -2%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	3317 Points ∼54% -4%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0	2854 Points ∼47% -17%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3457 punti
Aiuto

	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB Hynix HFS128G3MND	Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Liteonit CV3-DE256	HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	Medion Akoya P6670 Phison S11-128G	Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
AS SSD		24%	-1%	15%	75%
Score Write	229	301 31%	306 34%	388 69%	327 43%
Score Read	378	426 13%	206 -46%	461 22%	870 130%
Access Time Write *	0.116	0.066 43%	0.157 -35%	0.321 -177%	0.035 70%
Access Time Read *	0.117	0.127 -9%	0.111 5%	0.174 -49%	0.055 53%
4K-64 Write	145.36	203.69 40%	198.78 37%	271.85 87%	197.7 36%
4K-64 Read	302.88	345.55 14%	137.4 -55%	371.33 23%	722.85 139%
4K Write	63.57	59.67 -6%	75.28 18%	77.2 21%	91.98 45%
4K Read	24.49	32.4 32%	19.37 -21%	40.83 67%	29.52 21%
Seq Write	200.63	377.79 88%	316.85 58%	385.19 92%	372.76 86%
Seq Read	511.25	479.81 -6%	495.76 -3%	492.16 -4%	1179.3 131%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Hynix HFS128G3MND

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 540.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 213.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 240.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 198.8 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 475.5 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 207.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 15.4 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 69.4 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Medion Akoya P6670 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	2516 Points ∼5% +68%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	2436 Points ∼5% +62%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i7-6500U	1835 Points ∼4% +22%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1502 Points ∼3%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1257 Points ∼2% -16%

3DMark 11 Performance		1621 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		5728 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score		825 punti
Aiuto

... in confronto

	basso	medio	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	54.08	31.21	25.79		fps
Company of Heroes 2 (2013)	24.62	18.7			fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	19.8				fps

Rumorosità

Idle		30.6 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB(A)
Sotto carico		36.8 / 38.2 dB(A)

	30 dB silenzioso 40 dB(A) udibile 50 dB(A) rumoroso
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza) Rumorosità ambientale: 29 dB(A)

Carico massimo

Idle


29.7 °C	28.9 °C	24 °C
34.1 °C	30.8 °C	24 °C
30.2 °C	28.1 °C	24.2 °C

Massima: 34.1 °C
Media: 28.2 °C


24.6 °C	31.6 °C	26.9 °C
24.2 °C	30.4 °C	35.6 °C
23.9 °C	28 °C	33 °C

Massima: 35.6 °C
Media: 28.7 °C

Alimentazione (max) 37.5 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20.1 °C | Fluke 62 Max

Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente

Off / Standby	0.32 / 0.46 Watt
Idle	3.5 / 6.1 / 7 Watt
Sotto carico	31.2 / 42.9 Watt


Leggenda: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB 7200U, HD Graphics 620, Hynix HFS128G3MND, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6	Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE 7500U, GeForce 940MX, Liteonit CV3-DE256, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6	HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA 6200U, HD Graphics 520, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6	Medion Akoya P6670 6200U, GeForce 940MX, Phison S11-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK 6500U, GeForce 920MX, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
Power Consumption		-22%	12%	-49%	-40%
Idle Minimum *	3.5	3.9 -11%	3.6 -3%	6.7 -91%	7 -100%
Idle Average *	6.1	7.4 -21%	6 2%	9.2 -51%	8 -31%
Idle Maximum *	7	9.5 -36%	6.4 9%	9.7 -39%	8.4 -20%
Load Average *	31.2	41 -31%	26 17%	40.6 -30%	38.8 -24%
Load Maximum *	42.9	48 -12%	28.1 34%	58 -35%	52.8 -23%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria

Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)		10ore 12minuti
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge)		3ore 50minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)		1ore 21minuti

	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB 7200U, HD Graphics 620, 30 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE 7500U, GeForce 940MX, 30 Wh	HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh	Medion Akoya P6670 6200U, GeForce 940MX, 44 Wh	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK 6500U, GeForce 920MX, 31 Wh
Autonomia della batteria		20%	30%	22%	44%
Reader / Idle	612		634 4%
WiFi v1.3	230	275 20%	347 51%	280 22%	332 44%
Load	81		109 35%
H.264			313

Pro

+ economico

+ tastiera relativamente buona

+ emissioni quasi assenti

+ molto spazio di archiviazione

Contro

- case economico con vari punti deboli

- manca USB Type-C

- tastiera non illuminata

- scarsi i controlli del touchpad

- lento l'SD-card reader

- throttling sotto carico

- hard drive rumoroso

- batteria molto piccola

In review: Lenovo IdeaPad 310-15IKB. Test model provided by campuspoint.de

Il Lenovo IdeaPad 310-15IKB punta ad essere un tuttofare multimedia e da ufficio. Tuttavia, per essere un vero portatile multimedia, ha bisogno di uno schermo migliore e di una GPU più potente. D'altro canto, il portatile è un buon dispositivo da ufficio con qualche punto debole. Se vi piace lavorare in silenzio, questo modello non fa per voi, in quanto l'HDD dell'IdeaPad ha una rumorosità costante. Questo problema può essere risolto cambiando l'HDD con un SSD. I tasti del mouse sono altrettanto fastidiosi da usare, ma la tastiera è affidabile. Non è possibile usarlo all'aperto a causa del display scarso e della batteria piccola.

Alla fine del test, non abbiamo molti argomenti per raccomandare l'IdeaPad. E' effettivamente nella media e non emerge dalla massa.

Perché dovreste comprare l'IdeaPad 310-15IKB? Il motivo principale è il prezzo. Questo portatile è più economico rispetto al altri concorrenti. Tuttavia, d'altro canto, conviene spendere di più ed avere un pannello IPS nettamente migliore. Questo è un aspetto particolarmente importante, in quando la scarsa qualità del nostro schermo è uno dei principali punti deboli.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB - 2016-11-2911/29/2016 v5.1
Benjamin Herzig

Chassis

73 / 98 → 74%

Tastiera

78%

Dispositivo di puntamento

81%

Connettività

40 / 80 → 50%

Peso

62 / 20-67 → 89%

Batteria

74%

Display

73%

Prestazioni di gioco

57 / 68 → 84%

Prestazioni Applicazioni

87 / 92 → 94%

Temperatura

95%

Rumorosità

87%

Audio

50%

Fotocamera

47 / 85 → 56%

Media

69%

77%

Office - Media ponderata

Recensione breve del Portatile Lenovo IdeaPad 310-15IKB

Size Comparison

Tempi di risposta del Display

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Pro

Contro

Pricecompare