Notebookcheck

Recensione breve dello Smartphone Motorola Moto E4

Florian Wimmer (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 09/13/2017

Removibile. In questo caso la consideriamo una cosa positiva, in quanto la batteria può essere rimossa nel Moto E4. Lo smartphone è anche abbastanza economico ed offre un lettore di impronte digitali. Vediamo se la concorrenza deve temere qualcosa.

Lenovo Moto E4 (Moto E Serie)
Processore
Scheda grafica
Memoria
2048 MB 
Schermo
5 pollici 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 294 PPI, IPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: 3,5mm-Audioport, Lettore schede: microSD bis 32 GB, 1 Lettore impronte digitali, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: Beschleunigungssensor, Annäherungssensor, USB-OTG
Rete
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B38/​B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 8.9 x 144 x 72.9
Batteria
10.6 Wh, 2800 mAh ioni di litio, removibile
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 8 MPix f/​2.2, Kontrast-AF, LED-Blitz, Videos @720p/​30fps
Fotocamera Secondaria: 5 MPix f/​2.2
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Lautsprecher an der Unterkante, Tastiera: virtuelles Keyboard, Ladegerät, USB-Kabel, 24 Mesi Garanzia, LTE Cat.4 (150 MBit/s Download, 50 MBit/s Upload); SAR-Wert: 0,553 W/kg (Kopf), 1,27 W/kg (Körper), senza ventola
Peso
151 gr, Alimentazione: 56 gr
Prezzo
159 Euro

 

Motorola Moto E4
Motorola Moto E4
Motorola Moto E4
Motorola Moto E4
Motorola Moto E4
Motorola Moto E4
Motorola Moto E4
Motorola Moto E4

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG K8 2017
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.1 MBit/s ∼100% +26%
Gigaset GS170
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.4 MBit/s ∼91% +15%
Lenovo Moto E3
Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash
47 MBit/s ∼87% +9%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, 7570 Quad, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.9 MBit/s ∼87% +9%
Huawei Y6 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
43.6 MBit/s ∼81% +1%
Lenovo Moto E4
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
43.1 MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, 7570 Quad, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.5 MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Gigaset GS170
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.9 MBit/s ∼93% +8%
Lenovo Moto E3
Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash
49.3 MBit/s ∼92% +7%
LG K8 2017
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.2 MBit/s ∼92% +7%
Huawei Y6 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 MBit/s ∼91% +6%
Lenovo Moto E4
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.1 MBit/s ∼86%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – woods
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – woods
GPS Motorola Moto E4 – overview
GPS Motorola Moto E4 – overview
GPS Motorola Moto E4 – crossroads
GPS Motorola Moto E4 – crossroads
GPS Motorola Moto E4 – woods
GPS Motorola Moto E4 – woods

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
Picture taken of reference card
Picture taken of reference card
Detail of reference card
Detail of reference card
ColorChecker: The target color is displayed in the bottom half of each field.
ColorChecker: The target color is displayed in the bottom half of each field.
511
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
468
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 511 cd/m² Media: 474 cd/m² Minimum: 7.21 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 87 %
Al centro con la batteria: 488 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1627:1 (Nero: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.4 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | - Ø
96.2% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.27
Lenovo Moto E4
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Huawei Y6 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
PLS, 1280x720, 5
Gigaset GS170
IPS, 1280x720, 5
LG K8 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Lenovo Moto E3
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Screen
35%
8%
-47%
-31%
-18%
Brightness
474
432
-9%
494
4%
418
-12%
351
-26%
420
-11%
Brightness Distribution
87
90
3%
89
2%
92
6%
93
7%
91
5%
Black Level *
0.3
0.13
57%
0.35
-17%
0.45
-50%
0.49
-63%
0.41
-37%
Contrast
1627
3369
107%
1434
-12%
929
-43%
731
-55%
1063
-35%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.4
4.8
11%
4.6
15%
9.7
-80%
7.1
-31%
5.4
-0%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.5
3.2
42%
2.5
55%
11.3
-105%
6.5
-18%
7
-27%
Gamma
2.27 106%
2.23 108%
2.29 105%
2.27 106%
2.12 113%
2.13 113%
CCT
7397 88%
7090 92%
6351 102%
10414 62%
8166 80%
8318 78%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6262 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms Incremento
↘ 17 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms Incremento
↘ 11 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
30856 Points ∼14%
Huawei Y6 2017
40981 Points ∼18% +33%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
35669 Points ∼16% +16%
Gigaset GS170
30144 Points ∼13% -2%
LG K8 2017
30924 Points ∼14% 0%
Lenovo Moto E3
20542 Points ∼9% -33%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
2674 Points ∼39%
Huawei Y6 2017
3487 Points ∼51% +30%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
3436 Points ∼50% +28%
Gigaset GS170
2600 Points ∼38% -3%
LG K8 2017
2986 Points ∼44% +12%
Lenovo Moto E3
2087 Points ∼31% -22%
Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
3518 Points ∼42%
Huawei Y6 2017
4607 Points ∼56% +31%
Gigaset GS170
3344 Points ∼40% -5%
LG K8 2017
4673 Points ∼56% +33%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
617 Points ∼40%
Huawei Y6 2017
734 Points ∼48% +19%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
662 Points ∼43% +7%
Gigaset GS170
558 Points ∼36% -10%
LG K8 2017
616 Points ∼40% 0%
Lenovo Moto E3
528 Points ∼34% -14%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
208 Points ∼2%
Huawei Y6 2017
386 Points ∼4% +86%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
252 Points ∼3% +21%
Gigaset GS170
210 Points ∼2% +1%
LG K8 2017
436 Points ∼5% +110%
Lenovo Moto E3
177 Points ∼2% -15%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
576 Points ∼13%
Huawei Y6 2017
1288 Points ∼29% +124%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1055 Points ∼24% +83%
Gigaset GS170
610 Points ∼14% +6%
LG K8 2017
634 Points ∼14% +10%
Lenovo Moto E3
401 Points ∼9% -30%
System (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
1077 Points ∼16%
Huawei Y6 2017
1354 Points ∼21% +26%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1395 Points ∼21% +30%
Gigaset GS170
1170 Points ∼18% +9%
LG K8 2017
1191 Points ∼18% +11%
Lenovo Moto E3
817 Points ∼12% -24%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
531 Points ∼14%
Huawei Y6 2017
839 Points ∼22% +58%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
704 Points ∼19% +33%
Gigaset GS170
538 Points ∼14% +1%
LG K8 2017
371 Points ∼10% -30%
Lenovo Moto E3
418 Points ∼11% -21%
Geekbench 4.1
Compute RenderScript Score (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
938 Points ∼11%
Huawei Y6 2017
1238 Points ∼15% +32%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1135 Points ∼13% +21%
LG K8 2017
1203 Points ∼14% +28%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
1532 Points ∼8%
Huawei Y6 2017
1903 Points ∼10% +24%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1858 Points ∼10% +21%
Gigaset GS170
1595 Points ∼9% +4%
LG K8 2017
1737 Points ∼9% +13%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
530 Points ∼11%
Huawei Y6 2017
680 Points ∼14% +28%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
634 Points ∼13% +20%
Gigaset GS170
581 Points ∼12% +10%
LG K8 2017
642 Points ∼13% +21%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
783 Points ∼26%
Huawei Y6 2017
971 Points ∼32% +24%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
923 Points ∼31% +18%
Gigaset GS170
772 Points ∼26% -1%
LG K8 2017
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
85 Points ∼2%
Huawei Y6 2017
143 Points ∼3% +68%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
63 Points ∼1% -26%
Gigaset GS170
74 Points ∼1% -13%
LG K8 2017
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
106 Points ∼3%
Huawei Y6 2017
176 Points ∼5% +66%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
79 Points ∼2% -25%
Gigaset GS170
93 Points ∼2% -12%
LG K8 2017
Points ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Moto E3
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
774 Points ∼26%
Huawei Y6 2017
967 Points ∼32% +25%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
925 Points ∼31% +20%
Gigaset GS170
781 Points ∼26% +1%
LG K8 2017
622 Points ∼21% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
126 Points ∼2%
Huawei Y6 2017
221 Points ∼3% +75%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
92 Points ∼1% -27%
Gigaset GS170
227 Points ∼3% +80%
LG K8 2017
31 Points ∼0% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
155 Points ∼3%
Huawei Y6 2017
267 Points ∼5% +72%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
115 Points ∼2% -26%
Gigaset GS170
152 Points ∼3% -2%
LG K8 2017
39 Points ∼1% -75%
Lenovo Moto E3
Points ∼0% -100%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
8266 Points ∼11%
Huawei Y6 2017
11088 Points ∼15% +34%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
11426 Points ∼16% +38%
Gigaset GS170
8178 Points ∼11% -1%
LG K8 2017
6656 Points ∼9% -19%
Lenovo Moto E3
7156 Points ∼10% -13%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
3168 Points ∼1%
Huawei Y6 2017
6184 Points ∼1% +95%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
3725 Points ∼1% +18%
Gigaset GS170
3167 Points ∼1% 0%
LG K8 2017
2546 Points ∼1% -20%
Lenovo Moto E3
2694 Points ∼1% -15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
3671 Points ∼2%
Huawei Y6 2017
6858 Points ∼3% +87%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
4381 Points ∼2% +19%
Gigaset GS170
3666 Points ∼2% 0%
LG K8 2017
2951 Points ∼1% -20%
Lenovo Moto E3
3127 Points ∼2% -15%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
6 fps ∼0%
Huawei Y6 2017
11 fps ∼1% +83%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
6.8 fps ∼1% +13%
Gigaset GS170
6 fps ∼0% 0%
LG K8 2017
3.4 fps ∼0% -43%
Lenovo Moto E3
5 fps ∼0% -17%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
11 fps ∼2%
Huawei Y6 2017
17 fps ∼4% +55%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
11 fps ∼2% 0%
Gigaset GS170
11 fps ∼2% 0%
LG K8 2017
6.4 fps ∼1% -42%
Lenovo Moto E3
9 fps ∼2% -18%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
2.2 fps ∼0%
Huawei Y6 2017
3.9 fps ∼1% +77%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
2.6 fps ∼0% +18%
Gigaset GS170
2.2 fps ∼0% 0%
LG K8 2017
1.3 fps ∼0% -41%
Lenovo Moto E3
1.8 fps ∼0% -18%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
4.8 fps ∼1%
Huawei Y6 2017
8.1 fps ∼2% +69%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
5.4 fps ∼1% +13%
Gigaset GS170
4.8 fps ∼1% 0%
LG K8 2017
3.7 fps ∼1% -23%
Lenovo Moto E3
4 fps ∼1% -17%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
1.4 fps ∼0%
Huawei Y6 2017
2.5 fps ∼1% +79%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1.7 fps ∼0% +21%
Gigaset GS170
1.4 fps ∼0% 0%
LG K8 2017
fps ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Moto E3
1.2 fps ∼0% -14%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Lenovo Moto E4
14 fps ∼8%
Huawei Y6 2017
6 fps ∼3% -57%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
3.8 fps ∼2% -73%
Gigaset GS170
3.4 fps ∼2% -76%
LG K8 2017
fps ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Moto E3
2.9 fps ∼2% -79%

Legenda

 
Lenovo Moto E4 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y6 2017 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset GS170 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K8 2017 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425, Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto E3 Mediatek MT6735P, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
17.643 Points ∼100% +21%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
17.17 Points ∼97% +18%
LG K8 2017 (Chrome 57)
17.124 Points ∼97% +18%
Lenovo Moto E4 (Chrome 60)
14.57 Points ∼83%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)
14.342 Points ∼81% -2%
Lenovo Moto E3 (Chrome 56)
12.43 Points ∼70% -15%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
3092 Points ∼100% +36%
LG K8 2017 (Chrome 57)
3052 Points ∼99% +34%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
2921 Points ∼94% +29%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)
2284 Points ∼74% +1%
Lenovo Moto E4 (Chrome 60)
2270 Points ∼73%
Lenovo Moto E3 (Chrome 56)
2077 Points ∼67% -9%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Moto E4 (Chrome 60)
17184.6 ms * ∼100%
Lenovo Moto E3 (Chrome 56)
16744 ms * ∼97% +3%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)
16722.7 ms * ∼97% +3%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
12791 ms * ∼74% +26%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
12254.8 ms * ∼71% +29%
LG K8 2017 (Chrome 57)
10742 ms * ∼63% +37%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
65 Points ∼100% +35%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
60 Points ∼92% +25%
Lenovo Moto E4 (Chrome 60)
48 Points ∼74%
Lenovo Moto E3 (Chrome 56)
38 Points ∼58% -21%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Lenovo Moto E4Huawei Y6 2017Samsung Galaxy J3 2017Gigaset GS170LG K8 2017Lenovo Moto E3
AndroBench 3-5
-0%
2%
-26%
39%
-41%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
44.9
26.4
-41%
59.6
33%
21.34 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-52%
52.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
16%
17.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-61%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
65.4
48.4
-26%
70.3
7%
37.41 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-43%
78.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
20%
29.78 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-54%
Random Write 4KB
29.2
20.54
-30%
9.5
-67%
10.45
-64%
12.5
-57%
8
-73%
Random Read 4KB
18.7
25.93
39%
24
28%
18.34
-2%
41.6
122%
16
-14%
Sequential Write 256KB
45.3
66.88
48%
51
13%
44.79
-1%
84.6
87%
37.3
-18%
Sequential Read 256KB
187.6
202.55
8%
177.7
-5%
197.86
5%
270.8
44%
141.4
-25%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettaggiValore
 high13 fps
 very low29 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettaggiValore
 high30 fps
Carico massimo
 33.8 °C31.5 °C30.5 °C 
 35 °C32 °C30.9 °C 
 34.7 °C32 °C30.9 °C 
Massima: 35 °C
Media: 32.4 °C
31.4 °C32.3 °C33 °C
31.8 °C33 °C33.9 °C
32 °C33 °C34.5 °C
Massima: 34.5 °C
Media: 32.8 °C
Alimentazione (max)  37.1 °C | Temperatura della stanza 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.129.231.12527.128.627.13128.328.728.34032.734.632.75028.227.728.26326.124.826.18026.531.526.510026.133.826.112531.228.331.216023.522.923.520027.521.127.525035.42035.431545.82045.840054.32254.350062.822.962.86306819.36880071.118.371.1100073.618.373.6125072.717.972.7160075.716.475.720007516.575250075.316.775.3315075.616.275.6400074.316.174.3500072.816.272.8630072.816.172.8800071.416.171.41000074.316.174.31250071.51671.51600061.316.161.3SPL85.629.985.6N62.31.462.3median 71.4Lenovo Moto E4median 17.9median 71.4Delta13.32.813.329.629.929.627.928.927.928.83028.836.647.836.630.534.230.525.726.325.724.528.524.528.131.728.138.536.238.530.423.430.436.121.736.14020.74043.919.643.947.52147.553.820.253.859.818.759.864.718.864.765.717.665.767.117.667.169.516.869.570.116.370.172.816.472.873.916.173.975.916.275.973.81673.870.315.970.370.216.170.273.61673.668.815.868.853.815.953.883.429.983.452.11.452.1median 65.7Huawei Y6 2017median 17.6median 65.711.52.711.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Lenovo Moto E4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Huawei Y6 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.11 / 0.23 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.87 / 2.38 / 2.47 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 2.63 / 3.86 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Moto E4
2800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
2400 mAh
Gigaset GS170
2500 mAh
LG K8 2017
2500 mAh
Lenovo Moto E3
2800 mAh
Power Consumption
3%
14%
13%
17%
Idle Minimum *
0.87
0.82
6%
0.54
38%
0.65
25%
0.79
9%
Idle Average *
2.38
1.94
18%
1.56
34%
1.6
33%
1.7
29%
Idle Maximum *
2.47
2.06
17%
1.6
35%
1.62
34%
1.72
30%
Load Average *
2.63
3.31
-26%
3.18
-21%
2.97
-13%
2.65
-1%
Load Maximum *
3.86
3.89
-1%
4.42
-15%
4.34
-12%
3.16
18%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
21ore 42minuti
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
8ore 42minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10ore 08minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
5ore 16minuti
Lenovo Moto E4
2800 mAh
Huawei Y6 2017
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
2400 mAh
Gigaset GS170
2500 mAh
LG K8 2017
2500 mAh
Lenovo Moto E3
2800 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
13%
20%
-15%
2%
7%
Reader / Idle
1302
1522
17%
1425
9%
1325
2%
H.264
608
693
14%
819
35%
649
7%
WiFi v1.3
522
654
25%
722
38%
442
-15%
594
14%
621
19%
Load
316
302
-4%
305
-3%
280
-11%
315
0%

Pro

+ batteria removibile
+ slot dedicato microSD
+ resiste alle pressioni
+ molte bande LTE
+ sensore impronte
+ Android puro
+ display luminoso, contrasto buono
+ si scalda poco
+ decente qualità voce

Contro

- la cover è molto stretta
- la cover posteriore si flette facilmente
- patches di sicurezza obsolete
- WLAN lento
- GPS abbastanza impreciso
- immagini della fotocamera sfocate in parte
- consumi elevati
Recensione: Lenovo Moto E4. Modello fornito da Lenovo Germany.
Recensione: Lenovo Moto E4. Modello fornito da Lenovo Germany.

Il Moto E4 è uno smartphone economico che ha alcune highlights, come il lettore di impronte, Android puro, e batteria removibile. Se non ritenete importante la fotocamera di uno smartphone e non usate molto il GPS, allora avrete le tipiche prestazioni di questa fascia di prezzo in tutte le altre aree: la qualità voce è decente, le performance adeguate, e l'autonomia buona.

Rispetto al predecessore, il prezzo superiore è giustificato dal case in metallo, dalle prestazioni superiori, e dallo spazio di archiviazione aggiuntivo. Il mentivo per cui i telefoni entry-level in particolare costano qualche eruo in più quest'anno dipende dai chips di archiviazione che oggi sono molto costoso. Il Moto E3, ad esempio, offriva una autonomia superiore, il che lo rendeva molto appetibile. E come potranno notare tutti, il Moto E4 Plus: è molto più grande e pesante, e la batteria non è removibile, ma ha anche una capacità superiore. Rispetto al Moto E4, le performance sono quasi le stesse. Per coloro che ne vogliono sapere di più possono leggere la nostra recensione del Moto E4 Plus.

il Moto E4 è un solido smartphone entry-level che ha solo piccole pecche ed ha la batteria removibile e il sensore per le impronte digitali. Tuttavia, la fotocamera non dovrebbe essere molto importante per l'acquirente, in quanto la qualità delle foto è abbastanza scarsa.

Quando comprate uno smartphone, dovreste sempre valutare le features importanti per voi. Se batteria removibile e sensore delle impronte rientrano tra le cose importanti, allora il Moto E4 è sicuramente da considerare. Ma coloro che sperano in una autonomia maggiore dovrebbero considerare il Samsung Galaxy J3, che ha lo stesso prezzo del Moto E4. L'Huawei Y6 offre maggiori prestazioni per lo stesso prezzo.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Lenovo Moto E4 - 09/08/2017 v6
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
86%
Tastiera
64 / 75 → 86%
Dispositivo di puntamento
91%
Connettività
36 / 60 → 60%
Peso
92%
Batteria
91%
Display
85%
Prestazioni di gioco
6 / 63 → 10%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
30 / 70 → 43%
Temperatura
92%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
57 / 91 → 63%
Fotocamera
55%
Media
68%
80%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve dello Smartphone Motorola Moto E4
Florian Wimmer, 2017-09-13 (Update: 2017-09-13)