Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Tablet Fujitsu Stylistic V535 (Z3795,128 GB, LTE)

Nino Ricchizzi, 07/31/2017

Rinforzato per il lavoro duro. Con queste parole, Fujitsu lancia il tablet Stylistic V535. Questo 8.3" ha molte features di comunicazione, molta memoria, e una CPU da 64-bit. Le specifiche sono eccellenti. Tuttavia, la realtà è un'altra: il raffreddamento passivo rovina i piani.

Fujitsu Stylistic V535 (Stylistic Serie)
Scheda grafica
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) - 4096 MB, Core: 778 MHz
Memoria
4096 MB 
, dual channel
Schermo
8.3 pollici 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 265 PPI, capacitive multi-touch, LG Philips LGD0000, IPS, lucido: si
Scheda madre
Bay Trail Host Bridge
Harddisk
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Porta Docking, Connessioni Audio: audio combo, Lettore schede: MicroSD, NFC, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: sensore accelerazione, giroscopio, bussola
Rete
Broadcom 802.11 abgn Wireless SDIO Adapter (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4, modulo 4G/LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 12.5 x 227.8 x 150.1
Batteria
17.7 Wh, 4425 mAh polimeri di litio, removibile, 2 celle
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: fotocamera frontale 2 MP
Fotocamera Principale: 2 MPix
Fotocamera Secondaria: 8 MPix auto focus, flash
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: casse stereo, 24 Mesi Garanzia, senza ventola, gommato
Peso
550 gr, Alimentazione: 90 gr
Prezzo
1300 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
586 MBit/s ∼100% +1263%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
577 MBit/s ∼98% +1242%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Broadcom 802.11 abgn Wireless SDIO Adapter
43 MBit/s ∼7%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
618 MBit/s ∼100% +1407%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
440 MBit/s ∼71% +973%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Broadcom 802.11 abgn Wireless SDIO Adapter
41 MBit/s ∼7%
292
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
313
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
344
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
302
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 344 cd/m² Media: 309.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.2 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 83 %
Al centro con la batteria: 284 cd/m²
Contrasto: 717:1 (Nero: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.98 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.26 | - Ø
72% sRGB (Argyll) 47% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.42
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
LG Philips LGD0000, , 1920x1080, 8.3
Panasonic Toughpad FZ-B2
1280x800, 7
HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA
OspresCR PO, , 1280x800, 8
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
MS 9001, , 1920x1200, 8
Panasonic ToughPad FZ-M1
LFP14, , 1280x800, 7
Response Times
-32%
4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
29 (13, 16)
26 (9, 17)
10%
28 (10, 18)
3%
Response Time Black / White *
19 (10, 9)
33 (13, 20)
-74%
18 (5, 13)
5%
PWM Frequency
378 (40)
Screen
-94%
18%
-13%
-26%
Brightness
310
498
61%
333
7%
255
-18%
528
70%
Brightness Distribution
83
85
2%
91
10%
85
2%
86
4%
Black Level *
0.48
0.32
33%
0.11
77%
0.2
58%
0.77
-60%
Contrast
717
1688
135%
3155
340%
1395
95%
729
2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.98
23.34
-683%
5.45
-83%
7.64
-156%
5.55
-86%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.26
6.82
-109%
10.63
-226%
6.22
-91%
7.04
-116%
Gamma
2.42 99%
2.21 109%
1.34 179%
2.17 111%
2.46 98%
CCT
6106 106%
6334 103%
6404 101%
6798 96%
6323 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
47
52
11%
49
4%
41
-13%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
72
80
11%
71
-1%
64
-11%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-94% / -94%
-7% / 8%
-5% / -10%
-26% / -26%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms Incremento
↘ 9 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms Incremento
↘ 16 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6272 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel Core m7-6Y75
119 Points ∼61% +213%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
88 Points ∼45% +132%
Panasonic ToughPad FZ-M1
Intel Core i5-4302Y
65 Points ∼33% +71%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Intel Atom Z3795
38 Points ∼19%
Dell Venue 11 Pro 5130-9356
Intel Atom Z3795
37 Points ∼19% -3%
HP ElitePad 1000 G2
Intel Atom Z3795
36 Points ∼18% -5%
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
Intel Atom x5-Z8500
35 Points ∼18% -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel Core m7-6Y75
234 Points ∼11% +98%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
206 Points ∼10% +75%
Panasonic ToughPad FZ-M1
Intel Core i5-4302Y
185 Points ∼9% +57%
HP ElitePad 1000 G2
Intel Atom Z3795
134 Points ∼6% +14%
Dell Venue 11 Pro 5130-9356
Intel Atom Z3795
131 Points ∼6% +11%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Intel Atom Z3795
118 Points ∼5%
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
Intel Atom x5-Z8500
73 Points ∼3% -38%
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
2976 Points ∼50% +161%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2426 Points ∼41% +113%
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, Hynix HCG8E 64 GB
1426 Points ∼24% +25%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3795, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1139 Points ∼19%
HP Pro Tablet 10 EE G1
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1106 Points ∼19% -3%
HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3736F, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1104 Points ∼18% -3%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1139 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
1227 punti
Aiuto
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
128 GB eMMC Flash
HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA
64 GB eMMC Flash
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
Hynix HCG8E 64 GB
Panasonic ToughPad FZ-M1
Samsung MZNTE128HMGR-000SO
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-3%
-18%
442%
Write 4k QD32
13.97
10.39
-26%
10
-28%
135.8
872%
Read 4k QD32
29.17
38.77
33%
26.2
-10%
364.4
1149%
Write 4k
12.04
8.719
-28%
8.2
-32%
92.6
669%
Read 4k
15.75
17.4
10%
13.6
-14%
34.19
117%
Write 512
42.27
63.46
50%
43.9
4%
137.8
226%
Read 512
156.3
118
-25%
101.9
-35%
422.7
170%
Write Seq
61.07
55.32
-9%
58.4
-4%
138
126%
Read Seq
164.3
114.8
-30%
125.9
-23%
502.8
206%
128 GB eMMC Flash
Sequential Read: 164.3 MB/s
Sequential Write: 61.07 MB/s
512K Read: 156.3 MB/s
512K Write: 42.27 MB/s
4K Read: 15.75 MB/s
4K Write: 12.04 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 29.17 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 13.97 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8500
305 Points ∼1% +60%
HP ElitePad 1000 G2
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Atom Z3795
197 Points ∼0% +3%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Atom Z3795
191 Points ∼0%
Lenovo ThinkPad 10
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Atom Z3795
181 Points ∼0% -5%
HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Atom Z3736F
175 Points ∼0% -8%
Dell Venue 11 Pro 5130-9356
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Atom Z3795
173 Points ∼0% -9%
3DMark 11 Performance
218 punti
Aiuto
basso medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 8.43.5fps
Carico massimo
 32.2 °C34 °C40.8 °C 
 34.2 °C32.6 °C42.5 °C 
 33.3 °C33.9 °C40.9 °C 
Massima: 42.5 °C
Media: 36 °C
42.9 °C33.9 °C32.3 °C
44.9 °C34.1 °C33 °C
42.5 °C34 °C31.3 °C
Massima: 44.9 °C
Media: 36.5 °C
Alimentazione (max)  47.9 °C | Temperatura della stanza 23.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.435.340.42533.934.633.93134.732.234.74034.532.334.55036.43136.46337.429.837.48037.427.237.410038.527.338.512540.325.240.316040.82440.820042.123.942.125045.422.845.431548.922.148.940052.220.852.25005520.35563057.819.557.880061.41961.4100063.217.763.2125066.617.466.6160068.816.868.8200069.316.869.3250069.816.669.8315068.416.668.4400066.816.666.8500065.616.665.6630061.316.761.3800055.716.755.71000064.816.964.81250067.716.967.71600061.516.861.5SPL78.529.978.5N39.71.339.7median 61.4Fujitsu Stylistic V535median 17.4median 61.4Delta8.82.38.835.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Fujitsu Stylistic V535 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 1.7 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.9 / 7.4 / 7.5 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 11.8 / 8.9 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Z3795, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 17.7 Wh
Panasonic Toughpad FZ-B2
N2930, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 24 Wh
HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA
Z3736F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 18 Wh
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
Z8500, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 18.3 Wh
Panasonic ToughPad FZ-M1
4302Y, HD Graphics 4200, 22 Wh
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
252
300
19%
491
95%
320
27%
246
-2%
Autonomia della batteria
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
4ore 12minuti

Pro

+ solida qualità di costruzione
+ display Full HD
+ molti accessori opzionali
+ Windows 64-bit

Contro

- si scalda in idle
- elevato utilizzo CPU in idle
- manca un display matto
- prestazioni Wi-Fi scarse
- autonomia breve
Recensione: Fujitsu V535. Modello di test fornito da Fujitsu Germany.
Recensione: Fujitsu V535. Modello di test fornito da Fujitsu Germany.

Un tablet per elevate esigenze industriali. Il Fujitsu Tablet Stylistic V535 punta a coloro che vogliono un tablet affidabile per ambienti ostili. Per ottenere il risultato, questo tablet da 8,3" supera molti standards come il test MIL STD 810. Inoltre, il produttore, offre accessori per vari scenari di utilizzo, ad esempio una soluzione docking, una custodia rinforzata, e cinghie. Il modello di test offre molte opzioni di comunicazione, ma il Wi-Fi è molto lento. Sfortunatamente, il display resta dietro le attese. Non raggiunge la luminosità dichiarata di 400 cd/m². Essendo un dispositivo industriale sarà usato anche all'aperto, e la luminosità potrebbe scoraggiarne l'acquisto.

Ci hanno deluso anche le performance: il modello di test è spesso lento.Ritardi e stuttering non mancano. Il sistema Windows è troppo per lo Stylistic. Questo si riflette anche sulle temperature. Un incremento che si nota anche in idle e con temperatura ambientale di 23°. La batteria si sostituisce facilmente e dura oltre 4 ore.

Lo Stylistic V535 è adatto per coloro che vogliono un tablet da lavoro con molte features di comunicazione e sistema operativo Windows.

Tuttavia, bisogna considerare la concorrenza: il Panasonic Toughpad ha un display matto più luminoso e un sistema operativo Android.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Fujitsu Stylistic V535 - 07/24/2017 v6
Nino Ricchizzi

Chassis
86%
Tastiera
0 / 80 → 
Dispositivo di puntamento
Connettività
39 / 65 → 59%
Peso
82 / 88 → 88%
Batteria
76%
Display
86%
Prestazioni di gioco
11 / 68 → 15%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
30 / 76 → 40%
Temperatura
70%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
30 / 91 → 33%
Fotocamera
76 / 85 → 90%
Media
62%
73%
Tablet - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Tablet Fujitsu Stylistic V535 (Z3795,128 GB, LTE)
Nino Ricchizzi, 2017-07-31 (Update: 2017-07-31)