Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Portatile Nexoc G739 (Clevo N870HK1)

Andreas Osthoff, 04/12/2017

Grande portatile gaming entry-level. Il Nexoc G739 è un portatile da 17.3" con un potente Kaby Lake Core-i7 e la nuova GPU Pascal GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. Ma l'aspetto negativo che contrasta le buone prestazioni riguarda le elevate emissioni.

Nexoc G739
Processore
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz
Scheda grafica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) - 4096 MB, Core: 1493 MHz, Memoria: 3500 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 378.92, Optimus
Memoria
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2400, Dual-Channel, 2/2 slots occupati, max. 32 GB
Schermo
17.3 pollici 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 127 PPI, CMN1738, IPS, Full HD, lucido: no
Scheda madre
Intel HM175
Harddisk
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
, m.2-SSD Typ 2280 PCIe 3.0 x4 + Seagate Mobile ST1000LM035, 1TB HDD @5400 rpm, 2.5"
Scheda audio
Realtek ALC269
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Connessioni Audio: jack cuffie da 3.5 mm, jack microfono da 3.5 mm, Lettore schede: 6-in-1 (MMC, RSMMC, SD, Mini SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 Lettore impronte digitali, TPM 2.0
Rete
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 27 x 419 x 289
Batteria
62 Wh ioni di litio, batteria 6 celle
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 2.0 MP
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Stereo, Sound Blaster Cinema 3, Tastiera: Chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, alimentatore da 120 Watt, DVD con drivers, Control Center, MS Office (trial version), 24 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
2.865 kg, Alimentazione: 464 gr
Prezzo
1360 EUR

 

Size Comparison

Front: no connections
Front: no connections
Right: head phones, microphone, USB 2.0, USB 3.0
Right: head phones, microphone, USB 2.0, USB 3.0
Links: Kensington Lock, power supply, RJ45-LAN, 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2, HDMI, USB Typ-C (Gen1), USB 3.0, SD-card reader
Links: Kensington Lock, power supply, RJ45-LAN, 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2, HDMI, USB Typ-C (Gen1), USB 3.0, SD-card reader
Back: no connections
Back: no connections
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Nexoc G739
78 MB/s ∼100%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
76.3 MB/s ∼98% -2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
73 MB/s ∼94% -6%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
72.6 MB/s ∼93% -7%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
26 MB/s ∼33% -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Omen 17-w100ng
87 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Nexoc G739
87 MB/s ∼100%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
85.8 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
84.6 MB/s ∼97% -3%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
28 MB/s ∼32% -68%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
674 MBit/s ∼100% +52%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
666 MBit/s ∼99% +50%
Nexoc G739
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
443 MBit/s ∼66%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
345 MBit/s ∼51% -22%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
543 MBit/s ∼100% +40%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
524 MBit/s ∼97% +35%
Nexoc G739
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
388 MBit/s ∼71%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
294 MBit/s ∼54% -24%
277
cd/m²
324
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
308
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 324 cd/m² Media: 304.2 cd/m² Minimum: 27 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 85 %
Al centro con la batteria: 312 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1357:1 (Nero: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.19 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.72 | - Ø
91% sRGB (Argyll) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.29
Nexoc G739
CMN1738, 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
LP173WF4-SPF3, 1920x1080, 17.3
HP Omen 17-w100ng
LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GE72 7RE-046
N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3, 1920x1080, 17.3
Response Times
12%
17%
54%
17%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
45 (20, 25)
33.2 (14.4, 18.8)
26%
35 (14, 21)
22%
27 (13, 14)
40%
38 (12, 26)
16%
Response Time Black / White *
28 (7, 21)
28.8 (7.6, 21.2)
-3%
25 (4, 21)
11%
9 (6, 3)
68%
23 (5, 18)
18%
PWM Frequency
450 (90)
Screen
-26%
-8%
-16%
-40%
Brightness
304
337
11%
331
9%
230
-24%
312
3%
Brightness Distribution
85
91
7%
84
-1%
86
1%
91
7%
Black Level *
0.23
0.58
-152%
0.32
-39%
0.24
-4%
0.5
-117%
Contrast
1357
602
-56%
1069
-21%
1054
-22%
652
-52%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.19
4.5
-7%
4.35
-4%
5.01
-20%
6.3
-50%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.72
3.3
11%
3.73
-0%
7.26
-95%
7.37
-98%
Gamma
2.29 105%
2.15 112%
2.23 108%
2.09 115%
2.37 101%
CCT
7104 91%
6103 107%
6801 96%
6329 103%
7116 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
55.7
-6%
57
-3%
76
29%
55
-7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
75.7
-17%
86
-5%
100
10%
83
-9%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-7% / -19%
5% / -3%
19% / -2%
-12% / -29%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms Incremento
↘ 21 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.9 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms Incremento
↘ 25 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (43 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 450 Hz90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 450 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 450 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 58 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 5559 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.82 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.15 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
69.37 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
161 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
743 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
105.81 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Aiuto
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼100%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
151 Points ∼94% -6%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
145 Points ∼90% -10%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points ∼83% -17%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
132 Points ∼82% -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
743 Points ∼100%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
741 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
732 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points ∼91% -9%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
464 Points ∼62% -38%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼100%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.72 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.65 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points ∼82% -18%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
1.49 Points ∼82% -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.15 Points ∼100%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.14 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.1 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points ∼92% -8%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
5.32 Points ∼65% -35%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
5252 Points ∼100% 0%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5243 Points ∼100%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4809 Points ∼92% -8%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
4711 Points ∼100% +10%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4670 Points ∼99% +9%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4270 Points ∼91%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
4088 Points ∼87% -4%
PCMark 7 - Score
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
6331 Points ∼100%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
5990 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
5810 Points ∼92% -8%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4114 Points ∼65% -35%
PCMark 7 Score
6331 punti
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4270 punti
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5420 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5243 punti
Aiuto
Nexoc G739
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
HP Omen 17-w100ng
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-60%
-70%
-51%
-96%
Write 4k QD32
544.4
234.9
-57%
170.8
-69%
212.9
-61%
1.186
-100%
Read 4k QD32
635.7
247.6
-61%
141.6
-78%
372.5
-41%
1.106
-100%
Write 4k
154.5
76.8
-50%
76.14
-51%
112.9
-27%
1.146
-99%
Read 4k
60.74
24.7
-59%
20.25
-67%
22.7
-63%
0.602
-99%
Write 512
826.7
346.6
-58%
172.4
-79%
481.4
-42%
63.33
-92%
Read 512
856.5
336.1
-61%
315.5
-63%
455.1
-47%
44.85
-95%
Write Seq
1192
419.1
-65%
180.2
-85%
495.7
-58%
130.6
-89%
Read Seq
1666
475.7
-71%
495
-70%
539.6
-68%
134.6
-92%
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Sequential Read: 1666 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1192 MB/s
512K Read: 856.5 MB/s
512K Write: 826.7 MB/s
4K Read: 60.74 MB/s
4K Write: 154.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 635.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 544.4 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14642 Points ∼100% +46%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14317 Points ∼98% +43%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
10186 Points ∼70% +2%
Nexoc G739
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
10008 Points ∼68%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
7360 Points ∼50% -26%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11326 Points ∼100% +41%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11311 Points ∼100% +41%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
8086 Points ∼71% +1%
Nexoc G739
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
8027 Points ∼71%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
5784 Points ∼51% -28%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
5421 Points ∼48% -32%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
79107 Points ∼100% +52%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
74982 Points ∼95% +44%
Nexoc G739
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
51987 Points ∼66%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
49223 Points ∼62% -5%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
35884 Points ∼45% -31%
3DMark 11 Performance
9687 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22876 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6950 punti
3DMark Time Spy Score
2519 punti
Aiuto
Battlefield 1
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
79 fps ∼100% +56%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
78.5 fps ∼99% +55%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
50.8 fps ∼64% 0%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
50.8 fps ∼64%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
41.1 fps ∼52% -19%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
87.4 fps ∼100% +57%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
86.6 fps ∼99% +55%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
56.7 fps ∼65% +2%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
55.7 fps ∼64%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
46.5 fps ∼53% -17%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
27.6 fps ∼100%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
26.9 fps ∼97% -3%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
19.7 fps ∼71% -29%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
50.4 fps ∼100%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
48.7 fps ∼97% -3%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
29.1 fps ∼58% -42%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
40.7 fps ∼100%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
39.7 fps ∼98% -2%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
31.2 fps ∼77% -23%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
47.6 fps ∼100%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
47.4 fps ∼100% 0%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
37.1 fps ∼78% -22%
For Honor
1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
46.1 fps ∼100%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
45.8 (min: 33) fps ∼99% -1%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:8x
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
62.9 (min: 51) fps ∼100% +1%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
62.1 fps ∼99%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
99.1 fps ∼100% +37%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
98.9 fps ∼100% +36%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
72.5 fps ∼73%
basso medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 72.5fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 89.850.427.6fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 84.247.640.7fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 79.255.750.8fps
For Honor (2017) 65.862.146.1fps

Rumorosità

Idle
31 / 32 / 38 dB(A)
HDD
31 dB(A)
Sotto carico
44 / 50 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 30 dB(A)
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Noise
-0%
-6%
-1%
5%
off / environment *
30
28.8
4%
31
-3%
30
-0%
30.5
-2%
Idle Minimum *
31
33.9
-9%
35
-13%
34
-10%
31.4
-1%
Idle Average *
32
33.9
-6%
36
-13%
35
-9%
31.4
2%
Idle Maximum *
38
37.8
1%
37
3%
36
5%
31.5
17%
Load Average *
44
42.7
3%
44
-0%
41
7%
40.9
7%
Load Maximum *
50
47.4
5%
54
-8%
49
2%
46.2
8%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Carico massimo
 48.5 °C50.6 °C43.3 °C 
 48.7 °C50.1 °C44 °C 
 42.5 °C42.8 °C31.3 °C 
Massima: 50.6 °C
Media: 44.6 °C
46.5 °C50 °C50.8 °C
45.8 °C48.9 °C40.9 °C
37 °C39.2 °C39.4 °C
Massima: 50.8 °C
Media: 44.3 °C
Alimentazione (max)  51 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Heat
19%
2%
0%
-8%
Maximum Upper Side *
50.6
37.7
25%
41.5
18%
45.8
9%
53.1
-5%
Maximum Bottom *
50.8
36.3
29%
45.5
10%
45.2
11%
44.9
12%
Idle Upper Side *
28.7
25.7
10%
31.8
-11%
31.7
-10%
32.9
-15%
Idle Bottom *
27.1
24.4
10%
29.6
-9%
29.9
-10%
33.4
-23%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.839.42531.632.43133.328.2403433.95034.132.16329.628.98032.831.710029.729.912527.6251602625.320024.227.425024.235.531521.647.740021.749.150021.450.963019.251.880018.157.8100018.266.8125018.16816001866.9200017.764.7250017.861.2315017.566.3400017.865.1500017.663.3630017.855800017.758.51000017.849.91250017.953.51600017.755.4SPL30.776N1.532.9median 18.1Nexoc G739median 55Delta2.211.336.839.132.432.930.731.229.530.328.630.628.13126.932.425.132.624.231.323.347.122.557.521.661.720.859.819.95919.660.218.971.718.268.817.964.117.764.617.162.917.165.81767.51768.11768.517.371.41775.617.373.817.667.917.560.317.561.229.981.51.352.1median 17.7Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045Tmedian 64.11.85.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Nexoc G739 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 18%, worst was 34%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 18%, worst was 34%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.6 / 1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 7 / 14 / 23 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 82 / 163 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Power Consumption
16%
-40%
-27%
-32%
Idle Minimum *
7
6.2
11%
17
-143%
14
-100%
15.6
-123%
Idle Average *
14
12.2
13%
22
-57%
20
-43%
20.2
-44%
Idle Maximum *
23
14.8
36%
29
-26%
25
-9%
21.4
7%
Load Average *
82
84.9
-4%
72
12%
82
-0%
90
-10%
Load Maximum *
163
120.7
26%
141
13%
135
17%
147
10%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
10ore 13minuti
Navigazione WiFi v1.3 (Edge 38.14393.0.0)
4ore 48minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5ore 22minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
2ore 08minuti
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, 62 Wh
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, 48 Wh
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ, 95.8 Wh
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, 51.4 Wh
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, 76 Wh
Autonomia della batteria
-30%
6%
-38%
-27%
Reader / Idle
613
515
-16%
543
-11%
353
-42%
H.264
322
313
-3%
195
-39%
262
-19%
WiFi v1.3
288
261
-9%
363
26%
184
-36%
250
-13%
Load
128
45
-65%
145
13%
87
-32%

Grazie al potente  hardware, il Nexoc G739 è un buon portatile entry-level. La scheda grafica si armonizza bene con il display Full-HD, che è sufficientemente luminoso bright e per il resto decente. Ma in molte altre aree, ad esempio connessioni e dispositivi di input, il dispositivo è mediocre.

In termini di performance, il Nexoc G739 non mostra alcuna debolezza e gestisca anche i giochi pesanti, ma le emissioni del Clevo-N870HK1 Barebones possono essere migliorate.

I punti deboli includono temperature e rumorosità. Il case dovrebbe offrire spazio per un sistema di raffreddamento più potente, e le piccole ventole sono rumorose oltre al fatto che si scalda abbastanza. Bisogna migliorare anche le connessioni (manca una Thunderbolt), ed inserire gaming features come G-Sync.

Nel complesso, il Nexoc G739 non è male come portatile gaming, ma uno sguardo alla concorrenza no fa male.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Pro

+ accesso a tutti i componenti
+ display FHD IPS con contrasto elevato
+ tastiera illuminata
+ buone performance
+ unità base stabile

Contro

- elevate temperature del case sotto sforzo
- ventola rumorosa con lavori 3D
- alimentatore sottodimensionato
- casse scarse
- manca la Thunderbolt 3
Nexoc G739. Test device provided by Nexoc Germany.
Nexoc G739. Test device provided by Nexoc Germany.

Thanks to the powerful hardware, the Nexoc G739 is a capable entry-level notebook. The graphics card harmonizes well with the Full-HD display, which is sufficiently bright and otherwise achieves decent results as well. But in many other areas, such as for example the connections, casing, and input devices, the test device is only average.

In terms of the performance, the Nexoc G739 does not show any weaknesses and handles also demanding games, but the emissions of the Clevo-N870HK1 Barebones could be improved.

The weak points clearly include the temperature and noise generation. The casing would offer sufficient space for a stronger cooling system, but both small fans make a lot of noise and the casing gets very warm as well. There is also need for improvements in the connectors (no Thunderbolt), and we looked for particular gaming features such as G-Sync here in vain as well.

Overall, the Nexoc G739 sure is not a bad gaming notebook, but a look at the competition cannot hurt.

Nexoc G739 - 04/01/2017 v6
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
76 / 98 → 78%
Tastiera
81%
Dispositivo di puntamento
75%
Connettività
60 / 81 → 74%
Peso
57 / 66 → 85%
Batteria
81%
Display
87%
Prestazioni di gioco
89%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
96%
Temperatura
82 / 95 → 86%
Rumorosità
72 / 90 → 80%
Audio
64%
Fotocamera
50 / 85 → 59%
Media
75%
82%
Gaming - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Portatile Nexoc G739 (Clevo N870HK1)
Andreas Osthoff, 2017-04-12 (Update: 2017-04-12)