Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Portatile HP Pavilion 15 (i5-8250U, 940MX, FHD)

Sascha Mölck (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 01/04/2018

Display deludente. Il Pavilion 15 offre un processore ULV quad-core, una scheda grafica dedicata GeForce, ed un SSD. Il principale punto debole di questo dispositivo è il display.

HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng (Pavilion 15 Serie)
Processore
Intel Core i5-8250U
Scheda grafica
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB, Core: 1004-1176 MHz, Memoria: 1001 MHz, DDR3, connessione 64-bit, ForceWare 388.71, Optimus
Memoria
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2666, single channel, due slots di archiviazione (uno occupato)
Schermo
15.6 pollici 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics, TN LED, lucido: no
Scheda madre
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Harddisk
SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1006, 256 GB 
, 200 GB libera
Scheda audio
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Porte di connessione
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Connessioni Audio: audio combo, Lettore schede: SD, TPM 2.0
Rete
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Drive ottico
Slimtype DVD A DA8AESH
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 22.5 x 378 x 252.1
Batteria
41.7 Wh, 3615 mAh ioni di litio, 11.55 V
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: stereo, Tastiera: chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, McAfee LiveSafe (versione trial), MS Office 365 (versione trial), 12 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
1.82 kg, Alimentazione: 459 gr
Prezzo
799 Euro

 

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80.2 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26 MB/s ∼32% -68%
HP 15-bs103ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.6 MB/s ∼29% -71%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
17.4 MB/s ∼22% -78%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86.9 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
28.8 MB/s ∼33% -67%
HP 15-bs103ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.2 MB/s ∼31% -69%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25.6 MB/s ∼29% -71%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
554 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
541 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
HP 15-bs103ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
311 MBit/s ∼56% -44%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE
Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
285 MBit/s ∼51% -49%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
680 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
611 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
HP 15-bs103ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
345 MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE
Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
333 MBit/s ∼49% -51%
207
cd/m²
223
cd/m²
217
cd/m²
207
cd/m²
234
cd/m²
236
cd/m²
239
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
234
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 274 cd/m² Media: 230.1 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 76 %
Al centro con la batteria: 200 cd/m²
Contrasto: 688:1 (Nero: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12.19 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 13.99 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
56% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.32
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng
TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE
TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP 15-bs103ng
TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Screen
-3%
32%
-7%
Brightness middle
234
227
-3%
248
6%
241
3%
Brightness
230
207
-10%
237
3%
235
2%
Brightness Distribution
76
81
7%
79
4%
84
11%
Black Level *
0.34
0.44
-29%
0.21
38%
0.43
-26%
Contrast
688
516
-25%
1181
72%
560
-19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
12.19
11.52
5%
4.98
59%
13.62
-12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
20.81
19.97
4%
8.41
60%
22.81
-10%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
13.99
12.01
14%
4.26
70%
15.19
-9%
Gamma
2.32 103%
2.23 108%
2.37 101%
2.13 113%
CCT
15863 41%
13330 49%
7149 91%
17407 37%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36
38
6%
38
6%
35
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
56
59
5%
58
4%
55
-2%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10727 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8 ms Incremento
↘ 5 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24 ms Incremento
↘ 21 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.6 ms).
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5567
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
17505
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
5060
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
146 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
556 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
66.83 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Aiuto
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
146 Points ∼71%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
Intel Core i5-8250U
145 Points ∼70% -1%
Dell Vostro 15 5568
Intel Core i7-7500U
144 Points ∼70% -1%
HP 15-bs103ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
141 Points ∼68% -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE
Intel Core i5-7200U
126 Points ∼61% -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
Intel Core i5-8250U
560 Points ∼19% +1%
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
556 Points ∼19%
HP 15-bs103ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
507 Points ∼17% -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE
Intel Core i5-7200U
329 Points ∼11% -41%
Dell Vostro 15 5568
Intel Core i7-7500U
324 Points ∼11% -42%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
5567 Points ∼51%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
Intel Core i5-8250U
5542 Points ∼51% 0%
HP 15-bs103ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
5517 Points ∼51% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE
Intel Core i5-7200U
5000 Points ∼46% -10%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP 15-bs103ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
18070 Points ∼36% +3%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
Intel Core i5-8250U
17505 Points ∼35% 0%
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
17505 Points ∼35%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE
Intel Core i5-7200U
11955 Points ∼24% -32%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
Intel Core i5-8250U
13553 Points ∼44% +7%
HP 15-bs103ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
12913 Points ∼41% +2%
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
12646 Points ∼41%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE
Intel Core i5-7200U
6761 Points ∼22% -47%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
Intel Core i5-8250U
3416 Points ∼73% +7%
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
3185 Points ∼68%
HP 15-bs103ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
3180 Points ∼68% 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE
Intel Core i5-7200U
3140 Points ∼67% -1%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
Intel Core i5-8250U
13486 Points ∼49% +12%
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
12057 Points ∼44%
HP 15-bs103ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
11840 Points ∼43% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE
Intel Core i5-7200U
7340 Points ∼27% -39%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
Intel Core i5-8250U
4162 Points ∼72% +4%
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
4010 Points ∼69%
HP 15-bs103ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
3975 Points ∼69% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE
Intel Core i5-7200U
3791 Points ∼66% -5%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
Intel Core i5-8250U
14207 Points ∼49% +12%
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
12644 Points ∼44%
HP 15-bs103ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
12304 Points ∼43% -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE
Intel Core i5-7200U
7636 Points ∼26% -40%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
Intel Core i5-8250U
4266 Points ∼72% +4%
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
4115 Points ∼69%
HP 15-bs103ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
4077 Points ∼69% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE
Intel Core i5-7200U
3899 Points ∼66% -5%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng
Intel Core i5-8250U (Edge 41)
255.71 Points ∼77%
HP 15-bs103ng
Intel Core i5-8250U (Edge 41)
255.24 Points ∼76% 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
Intel Core i5-8250U (Edge 40)
248.01 Points ∼74% -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE
Intel Core i5-7200U (Edge 40)
215 Points ∼64% -16%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3683 punti
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4825 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4812 punti
Aiuto
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Hynix HFS128G39TND
3935 Points ∼100% +7%
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng
GeForce 940MX, 8250U, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1006
3683 Points ∼94%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE
GeForce 940MX, 7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G3BTND
3677 Points ∼93% 0%
HP 15-bs103ng
Radeon 520, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
3622 Points ∼92% -2%
SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1006
Sequential Read: 475.4 MB/s
Sequential Write: 453.5 MB/s
512K Read: 345.2 MB/s
512K Write: 299.1 MB/s
4K Read: 27.8 MB/s
4K Write: 54.17 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 250.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 181.8 MB/s
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng
GeForce 940MX, 8250U, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1006
Dell Vostro 15 5568
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Transcend MTS400 256 GB M.2 TS256GMTS400
Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE
GeForce 940MX, 7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G3BTND
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Hynix HFS128G39TND
HP 15-bs103ng
Radeon 520, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-7%
9%
-7%
31%
Write 4k QD32
181.8
73.12
-60%
260.4
43%
131.6
-28%
266.6
47%
Read 4k QD32
250.9
193.9
-23%
346.1
38%
345
38%
295.2
18%
Write 4k
54.17
65.18
20%
78.25
44%
84.83
57%
94.6
75%
Read 4k
27.8
31.81
14%
31.47
13%
30.81
11%
38.81
40%
Write 512
299.1
255.8
-14%
259.4
-13%
130.6
-56%
398.4
33%
Read 512
345.2
376.6
9%
314.5
-9%
324.8
-6%
443.7
29%
Write Seq
453.5
391.1
-14%
259.3
-43%
131.5
-71%
466.2
3%
Read Seq
475.4
534.5
12%
466.4
-2%
481.5
1%
504.4
6%
3DMark 11 Performance
2647 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
8384 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1539 punti
Aiuto
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U
4742 Points ∼100% +92%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
2918 Points ∼62% +18%
Dell Vostro 15 5568
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
2511 Points ∼53% +2%
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-8250U
2471 Points ∼52%
HP 15-bs103ng
AMD Radeon 520, Intel Core i5-8250U
1877 Points ∼40% -24%
basso medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 89.251.741.914.5fps
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 44.813.610.89.5fps
BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 High Preset
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Hynix HFS128G39TND
89.5 fps ∼100% +114%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE
GeForce 940MX, 7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G3BTND
59.7 fps ∼67% +42%
Dell Vostro 15 5568
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Transcend MTS400 256 GB M.2 TS256GMTS400
52 fps ∼58% +24%
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng
GeForce 940MX, 8250U, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1006
41.9 fps ∼47%
HP 15-bs103ng
Radeon 520, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
23.4 fps ∼26% -44%

Rumorosità

Idle
30.9 / 30.9 / 31 dB(A)
Sotto carico
37.2 / 36.8 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 30.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203537.133.934.4352535.136.833.83935.1314347.740.542.2434032.936.934.335.432.95032.534.730.837.832.56328.630.828.829.628.68028.129.925.928.828.11002630.72528.32612525.627.725.825.625.616024.225.123.523.324.220023.624.323.222.723.625023.22422.321.523.231521.622.420.820.821.640023.323.620.420.423.350022.822.119.819.322.86302223.220.118.52280023.223.519.418.223.2100025.425.719.117.925.4125027.527.319.317.927.5160027.127.218.117.727.1200028.629.218.217.828.6250027.2281817.727.2315023.12318.318.123.1400022.122.718.618.222.150002121.518.518.321630020.120.618.618.520.180001919.618.818.6191000018.919.218.818.618.9125001919.718.818.4191600020.422.519.118.520.4SPL36.837.23130.636.8N2.42.51.51.42.4median 23.2HP Pavilion 15-cc107ngmedian 23.5median 19.1median 18.5median 23.2Delta2.41.91.41.82.4hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
Carico massimo
 37.9 °C42.3 °C32 °C 
 34.6 °C39.3 °C26.8 °C 
 28.5 °C26.1 °C24.8 °C 
Massima: 42.3 °C
Media: 32.5 °C
33.4 °C40 °C34.8 °C
25.1 °C32 °C34 °C
23.4 °C24.6 °C25.6 °C
Massima: 40 °C
Media: 30.3 °C
Alimentazione (max)  41.5 °C | Temperatura della stanza 22.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
The maximum temp on the upper side is 42.3 °C, compared to the average of 35.9 °C ranging from 21.1 °C to 71 °C for class Multimedia.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.434.432.4253639363140.642.240.6403435.4345036.737.836.76331.129.631.18026.628.826.610026.328.326.312528.625.628.616036.923.336.920039.622.739.625036.821.536.831551.220.851.240065.720.465.750064.219.364.263063.518.563.580065.118.265.1100068.217.968.2125070.917.970.9160067.317.767.3200069.417.869.4250067.917.767.9315069.218.169.2400070.418.270.450006718.367630066.418.566.4800063.618.663.61000067.418.667.41250067.818.467.8160005818.558SPL79.930.679.9N46.91.446.9median 65.7HP Pavilion 15-cc107ngmedian 18.5median 65.7Delta8.81.88.835.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.24 / 0.38 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.8 / 5.8 / 7.5 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 54 / 56 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Autonomia della batteria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 41)
6ore 35minuti
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
49.7 Wh (Edge 40)
511 min ∼100% +29%
HP 15-bs103ng
41.6 Wh (Edge 41)
473 min ∼93% +20%
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng
41.7 Wh (Edge 41)
395 min ∼77%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE
30 Wh (Edge 40)
279 min ∼55% -29%

Pro

+ display matto
+ risoluzione Full HD
+ difficilmente si scalda
+ SSD
+ lettore di schede veloce
+ WLAN AC
+ tastiera retroilluminata

Contro

- display scuro con contrasto basso ed angoli di visuale limitati
- solo un anno di garanzia
- manutenzione difficile
L'HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng, fornito da cyberport
L'HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng, fornito da cyberport

Con il Pavilion 15-cc107ng, HP ha realizzato un tuttofare da 15.6". Il processore ULV quad-core offre prestazioni più che sufficienti per i normali scenari di utilizzo. La scheda grafica dedicata consente l'utilizzo limitato di alcuni giochi. Tuttavia, è dura per i giochi più recenti, e per questo scenario, HP avrebbe dovuto usare una scheda grafica più potente come una GPU GeForce MX150.

Con il Pavilion 15-cc107ng, HP offre un solido tuttofare per casa, che avrebbe meritato un display migliore.

Il portatile si scalda poco e di solito resta silenzioso. Un veloce SSD consente di avere un sistema scattante. La tastiera ha fatto una impressione decente ed è adatta anche a chi scrive molto. La presenza della retroilluminazione è un fattore positivo. Il tutto è completato da una buona autonomia.

Il display non vincerà alcun premio. HP usa un modello scuro e con contrasto basso con angoli di visuale instabili. Il prezzo richiesto dovrebbe offrire di più, almeno un modello IPS più luminoso e con contrasto migliore. Inoltre non abbiamo apprezzato che la garanzia sia di un solo anno, invece che due.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng - 01/01/2018 v6
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
75 / 98 → 77%
Tastiera
78%
Dispositivo di puntamento
88%
Connettività
51 / 81 → 62%
Peso
65 / 20-67 → 96%
Batteria
89%
Display
75%
Prestazioni di gioco
65 / 85 → 76%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
89 / 92 → 96%
Temperatura
93%
Rumorosità
91 / 95 → 96%
Audio
50%
Fotocamera
40 / 85 → 47%
Media
73%
81%
Multimedia - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Portatile HP Pavilion 15 (i5-8250U, 940MX, FHD)
Sascha Mölck, 2018-01- 4 (Update: 2018-01- 4)