Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Portatile Lenovo IdeaPad 320s (4415U, HD610)

Mike Wobker (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 10/21/2017

Semplice ed economico. Lenovo ha presentato l'IdeaPad 320S, un economico portatile entry-level. Abbiamo testato una delle configurazioni minori a disposizione e vi mostreremo quanto vi potete aspettare da un portatile che costa meno di $500.

Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB (IdeaPad 320s Serie)
Processore
Intel Pentium 4415U
Scheda grafica
Intel HD Graphics 610
Memoria
4096 MB 
Schermo
14 pollici 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 157 PPI, BOE06F3, IPS, lucido: no
Harddisk
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR, 128 GB 
, 85 GB libera
Scheda audio
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Connessioni Audio: kombinierter Audioanschluss, Lettore schede: SD
Rete
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth Bluetooth 4.1
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 19.3 x 327.4 x 236.5
Batteria
30 Wh polimeri di litio, Autonomia della batteria (dichiarata dal produttore): 12 ore
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD 1280x720
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Stereo, Tastiera: Chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: no, 24 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
1.458 kg, Alimentazione: 157 gr
Prezzo
400 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Connectivity

right: SD card reader, 1x USB 2.0, 1x Kensington Lock
right: SD card reader, 1x USB 2.0, 1x Kensington Lock
left: power supply, 1x HDMI, 1x USB 3.0, 1x USB Type-C, combined audio jack
left: power supply, 1x HDMI, 1x USB 3.0, 1x USB Type-C, combined audio jack
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79.2 MB/s ∼100%
Acer Aspire 1 A114-31-C472
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
72 MB/s ∼91% -9%
Asus X510UA-BR305T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.7 MB/s ∼34% -66%
HP 17-x066ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
22.2 MB/s ∼28% -72%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB
88 MB/s ∼100%
Acer Aspire 1 A114-31-C472
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86.4 MB/s ∼98% -2%
Asus X510UA-BR305T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
38.7 MB/s ∼44% -56%
HP 17-x066ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
29.4 MB/s ∼33% -67%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
521 MBit/s ∼100% +89%
Asus X510UA-BR305T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
517 MBit/s ∼99% +87%
Acer Aspire 1 A114-31-C472
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
340 MBit/s ∼65% +23%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
276 MBit/s ∼53%
HP 17-x066ng
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
96 MBit/s ∼18% -65%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus X510UA-BR305T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
667 MBit/s ∼100% +96%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
650 MBit/s ∼97% +91%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
340 MBit/s ∼51%
Acer Aspire 1 A114-31-C472
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
144 MBit/s ∼22% -58%
HP 17-x066ng
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
93 MBit/s ∼14% -73%
267
cd/m²
270
cd/m²
248
cd/m²
266
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
249
cd/m²
233
cd/m²
240
cd/m²
234
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 274 cd/m² Media: 253.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 85 %
Al centro con la batteria: 274 cd/m²
Contrasto: 884:1 (Nero: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.74 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.61 | - Ø
61% sRGB (Argyll) 39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.14
Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB
BOE06F3, , 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
Lenovo NT156WHM-N42, , 1366x768, 15.6
Asus X510UA-BR305T
Chi Mei N156BGA-EA3, , 1366x768, 15.6
Acer Aspire 1 A114-31-C472
CMN N140BGA_EA3, , 1366x768, 14
HP 17-x066ng
AU Optronics B173HW01 V0, , 1920x1080, 17.3
Response Times
2%
2347%
79%
13%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42 (21, 21)
46 (24, 22)
-10%
49 (28, 21)
-17%
40 (20, 20)
5%
38 (21, 17)
10%
Response Time Black / White *
31 (16, 15)
13 (8, 5)
58%
14 (12, 4)
55%
16 (11, 5)
48%
26 (15, 11)
16%
PWM Frequency
352 (90)
200 (90)
-43%
25000 (20)
7002%
1000 (100)
184%
Screen
-58%
-31%
-36%
13%
Brightness
253
233
-8%
215
-15%
187
-26%
310
23%
Brightness Distribution
85
73
-14%
90
6%
82
-4%
87
2%
Black Level *
0.31
0.59
-90%
0.51
-65%
0.34
-10%
0.33
-6%
Contrast
884
410
-54%
443
-50%
606
-31%
1003
13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.74
10.9
-90%
6.21
-8%
10.01
-74%
4.58
20%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.61
13.07
-184%
7.06
-53%
11.11
-141%
6.18
-34%
Gamma
2.14 112%
2.37 101%
2.35 102%
2.43 99%
2.34 103%
CCT
7281 89%
13123 50%
8321 78%
12726 51%
6076 107%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
39
35
-10%
39
0%
56
44%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
61
55
-10%
62
2%
86
41%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-28% / -41%
1158% / 762%
22% / -4%
13% / 13%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms Incremento
↘ 15 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms Incremento
↘ 21 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 352 Hz90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 352 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 352 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 56 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8105 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CalMAN - gray scales
CalMAN - gray scales
CalMAN - color accuracy
CalMAN - color accuracy
CalMAN - saturation
CalMAN - saturation
viewing angles
viewing angles
screen bleeding
screen bleeding
outdoor use
outdoor use
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
Intel Core i5-7200U
125 Points ∼63% +34%
Asus X510UA-BR305T
Intel Core i3-7100U
100 Points ∼50% +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB
Intel Pentium 4415U
93 Points ∼47%
HP 17-x066ng
Intel Core i3-6006U
70 Points ∼35% -25%
Acer Aspire 1 A114-31-C472
Intel Celeron N3450
48 Points ∼24% -48%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
Intel Core i5-7200U
316 Points ∼15% +33%
Asus X510UA-BR305T
Intel Core i3-7100U
260 Points ∼12% +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB
Intel Pentium 4415U
238 Points ∼11%
HP 17-x066ng
Intel Core i3-6006U
208 Points ∼10% -13%
Acer Aspire 1 A114-31-C472
Intel Celeron N3450
144 Points ∼7% -39%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
93 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
238 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
24.36 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Aiuto
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3714 Points ∼62% +40%
Asus X510UA-BR305T
HD Graphics 620, 7100U, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
3313 Points ∼55% +25%
HP 17-x066ng
HD Graphics 520, 6006U, WDC WD10JPVX-08JC3T5
2801 Points ∼47% +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB
HD Graphics 610, 4415U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
2657 Points ∼44%
Acer Aspire 1 A114-31-C472
HD Graphics 500, N3450, Hynix HBG4a2 32 GB eMMC
1864 Points ∼31% -30%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2657 punti
Aiuto
Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Asus X510UA-BR305T
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
Acer Aspire 1 A114-31-C472
Hynix HBG4a2 32 GB eMMC
HP 17-x066ng
WDC WD10JPVX-08JC3T5
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
151%
-91%
-56%
-92%
Write 4k QD32
124.8
428.7
244%
0.967
-99%
35.02
-72%
0.959
-99%
Read 4k QD32
320.9
473.6
48%
1.047
-100%
29.93
-91%
1.039
-100%
Write 4k
79.02
148.8
88%
0.438
-99%
28.62
-64%
0.96
-99%
Read 4k
28.11
59.65
112%
0.326
-99%
24.06
-14%
0.395
-99%
Write 512
138.5
782.9
465%
61.74
-55%
132.1
-5%
45.98
-67%
Read 512
482.2
1155
140%
29.55
-94%
233.9
-51%
33.8
-93%
Write Seq
792.2
1217
54%
84.21
-89%
147.9
-81%
98.24
-88%
Read Seq
991.2
1589
60%
89.38
-91%
275.7
-72%
98.55
-90%
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
Sequential Read: 991.2 MB/s
Sequential Write: 792.2 MB/s
512K Read: 482.2 MB/s
512K Write: 138.5 MB/s
4K Read: 28.11 MB/s
4K Write: 79.02 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 320.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 124.8 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1401 Points ∼3% +74%
Asus X510UA-BR305T
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i3-7100U
1363 Points ∼3% +70%
HP 17-x066ng
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U
1177 Points ∼2% +46%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB
Intel HD Graphics 610, Intel Pentium 4415U
804 Points ∼2%
Acer Aspire 1 A114-31-C472
Intel HD Graphics 500, Intel Celeron N3450
433 Points ∼1% -46%
3DMark 11 Performance
898 punti
Aiuto
basso medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 27.4416.034.43fps

Rumorosità

Idle
31.1 / 31.1 / 31.1 dB(A)
Sotto carico
34.8 / 33.7 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.634.23635.534.62534.535.633.338.634.53138.741.742.648.238.74032.736.735.835.632.75033.632.633.63433.66330.230.831.732.230.2802728.529.128.22710026.126.727.92726.112526.126.62824.326.116025.225.124.623.225.220023.624.424.222.823.625022.623.423.722.322.631521.72421.721.521.74002122.321.520.22150020.422.421.219.220.463019.422.620.718.919.480019.523.421.718.419.5100019.725.423.917.919.7125019.124.526.41819.1160018.123.621.817.618.1200018.623.821.717.518.6250018.424.62217.918.4315018.122.620.21818.1400018.420.119.118.218.4500018.619.91918.518.6630018.719.618.818.618.7800018.718.918.818.818.71000018.818.918.918.718.812500191919.118.9191600019.319.519.419.119.3SPL31.234.833.730.731.2N1.62.221.51.6median 19.3Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKBmedian 23.4median 21.7median 18.8median 19.3Delta1.41.62.21.81.4hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
Carico massimo
 30 °C34.3 °C28 °C 
 28.9 °C30.9 °C26 °C 
 23.9 °C24.3 °C22 °C 
Massima: 34.3 °C
Media: 27.6 °C
26.6 °C30.1 °C27.9 °C
22.8 °C29.5 °C28.1 °C
21.9 °C23.4 °C23.3 °C
Massima: 30.1 °C
Media: 26 °C
Alimentazione (max)  35 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.535.533.5253538.6353144.148.244.14038.835.638.85044.83444.86338.532.238.5802928.22910030.22730.212534.224.334.216035.923.235.920039.322.839.325051.222.351.231559.221.559.240061.920.261.950060.519.260.563056.718.956.780070.318.470.3100066.617.966.6125058.71858.7160062.517.662.5200064.917.564.9250063.417.963.4315065.21865.2400059.318.259.3500058.118.558.1630059.818.659.8800060.418.860.4100006118.7611250062.618.962.6160006119.161SPL75.530.775.5N36.31.536.3median 60.4Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKBmedian 18.8median 60.4Delta5.51.85.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 21%, worst was 48%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.28 / 0.36 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.4 / 6.3 / 6.7 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 24.5 / 20.2 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB
4415U, HD Graphics 610, 30 Wh
460 min ∼38%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
430 min ∼36% -7%
Asus X510UA-BR305T
7100U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
425 min ∼35% -8%
HP 17-x066ng
6006U, HD Graphics 520, 41.5 Wh
375 min ∼31% -18%
Acer Aspire 1 A114-31-C472
N3450, HD Graphics 500, 37 Wh
172 min ∼14% -63%
Autonomia della batteria
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
7ore 40minuti

Pro

+ Tastiera buona
+ leggero
+ costruzione stabile

Contro

- luminosità bassa
- nessuna manutenzione possibile
- qualità audio scarsa
Lenovo IdeaPad 320S (4415U, HD610). Modello di test fornito da notebooksbilliger.de
Lenovo IdeaPad 320S (4415U, HD610). Modello di test fornito da notebooksbilliger.de

Il Lenovo IdeaPad 320S è un dispositivo decente per applicazioni semplici. Il design e la connettività sono orientate ad utenti pratici che non vogliono rinunciare a buona qualità quando accettano prestazioni basse. Abbiamo visto portatili peggiori a prezzi simili o superiori.

L'IdeaPad 320S Lenovo è un notebook semplice con prestazioni basse, ma una costruzione buona.

Abbiamo apprezzato in particolare tastiera e display. Il fatto che il dispositivo non possa essere aperto senza rischiare di danneggiare i componenti è fastidioso. Questo limita le opzioni per l'utente e impedisce di pulire la ventola o sostituire il dispositivo di archiviazione.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB - 10/16/2017 v6
Mike Wobker

Chassis
72 / 98 → 74%
Tastiera
74%
Dispositivo di puntamento
61%
Connettività
44 / 80 → 55%
Peso
70 / 67 → 100%
Batteria
90%
Display
85%
Prestazioni di gioco
42 / 68 → 62%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
79 / 92 → 85%
Temperatura
96%
Rumorosità
92%
Audio
63%
Fotocamera
40 / 85 → 46%
Media
70%
80%
Office - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Portatile Lenovo IdeaPad 320s (4415U, HD610)
Mike Wobker, 2017-10-21 (Update: 2017-10-21)