Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Portatile EVGA SC17 GTX 1070

Più potenza, stesse features. L'impressionante overclock-ready SC17 ora è ufficialmente sul treno Pascal, ma continuano a mancare features che mettono il notebook in una posizione di svantaggio nella categoria 17" gaming.

EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 (SC Serie)
Scheda grafica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Core: 1442 MHz, Memoria: 8008 MHz, GDDR5, 369.37
Memoria
32768 MB 
, 1300 MHz, 18-18-18-43, Dual-Channel
Schermo
17.3 pollici 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, IPS, Nome: LQ173D1JW31, ID: SHP145E, lucido: no
Scheda madre
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Harddisk
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, 256 GB 
, Secondario: HGST HTS721010A9E630
Scheda audio
Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller
Porte di connessione
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen 2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Connessioni Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Sensore luminosità
Rete
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 26.6 x 408 x 295.5
Batteria
74.48 Wh, 4900 mAh
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Realtek ALC 255, Tastiera: Chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, PrecisionX Mobile, 24 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
4.131 kg, Alimentazione: 775 gr
Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

 

428 mm 287 mm 49 mm 4.1 kg423 mm 322 mm 40 mm 4.2 kg418 mm 295 mm 39.9 mm 4.2 kg428 mm 305 mm 25 mm 3.2 kg416 mm 279 mm 33 mm 3.3 kg408 mm 295.5 mm 26.6 mm 4.1 kg
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: USB 3.1 Type-C Gen. 2, 2x USB 3.0, 3.5 mm combo audio, Kensington Lock
Right: USB 3.1 Type-C Gen. 2, 2x USB 3.0, 3.5 mm combo audio, Kensington Lock
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: Kensington Lock, AC adapter, Gigabit Ethernet, 1x HDMI 1.4, 2x mDP
Left: Kensington Lock, AC adapter, Gigabit Ethernet, 1x HDMI 1.4, 2x mDP
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
647 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
506 MBit/s ∼100%
346.5
cd/m²
387.2
cd/m²
354.2
cd/m²
366.2
cd/m²
399.1
cd/m²
342.9
cd/m²
353.8
cd/m²
363.3
cd/m²
324.1
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Massima: 399.1 cd/m² Media: 359.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4.07 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 81 %
Al centro con la batteria: 399.1 cd/m²
Contrasto: 998:1 (Nero: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.78 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 86.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.03
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
Aorus X7 v6
B173QTN01.0 (AUO1096), TN LED, 17.3, 2560x1440
MSI GT73VR 6RF
IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
Eurocom Sky X7E2
IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
HP Omen 17-w110ng
LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Response Times
52%
21%
40%
26%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
45.6 (22.8, 22.8)
31 (11, 20)
32%
33.6 (13.2, 20.4)
26%
28 (10, 18)
39%
37 (13, 24)
19%
Response Time Black / White *
35.2 (9.2, 26)
10 (3, 7)
72%
30 (5.2, 24.8)
15%
21.2 (5.2, 16)
40%
24 (4, 20)
32%
PWM Frequency
1042 (29)
Screen
-33%
-12%
-9%
-3%
Brightness middle
399.1
343
-14%
334.8
-16%
332.6
-17%
362
-9%
Brightness
360
312
-13%
316
-12%
329
-9%
342
-5%
Brightness Distribution
81
80
-1%
87
7%
87
7%
87
7%
Black Level *
0.4
0.5
-25%
0.422
-6%
0.314
21%
0.31
22%
Contrast
998
686
-31%
793
-21%
1059
6%
1168
17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.78
7.33
-53%
4.11
14%
5.94
-24%
4.5
6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.65
10.79
-41%
7.8
-2%
8.6
-12%
9.31
-22%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.8
7.6
-100%
5.74
-51%
6.27
-65%
3.48
8%
Gamma
2.03 108%
2.19 100%
2.3 96%
2.2 100%
2.23 99%
CCT
7288 89%
9024 72%
5987 109%
6704 97%
6144 106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
86.9
55
-37%
60.5
-30%
91
5%
55
-37%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
84
-16%
96
-4%
100
0%
84
-16%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
10% / -19%
5% / -7%
16% / -1%
12% / 2%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti possono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con tempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
35.2 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 9.2 ms Incremento
↘ 26 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 91 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (25 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
45.6 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 22.8 ms Incremento
↘ 22.8 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.9 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 72 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (39.8 ms).

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Per ridurre la luminosità dello schermo, alcuni portatili accendono e spengono la retroilluminazione in rapida successione - un metodo chiamato Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). Questa frequenza di ciclo a livello ideale non dovrebbe essere percepibile dall'occhi umano. Se tale frequenza è troppo bassa, gli utenti con occhi sensibili potrebbero stancarsi gli occhi o avere mal di testa o anche notare uno sfarfallio.
flickering dello schermo / PWM rilevato 1042 Hz ≤ 29 % settaggio luminosita'

Il display sfarfalla a 1042 Hz (Probabilmente a causa dell'uso di PWM) Flickering rilevato ad una luminosita' di 29 % o inferiore. Non dovrebbe verificarsi flickering o PWM sopra questo valore di luminosita'.

La frequenza di 1042 Hz è abbastanza alta, quindi la maggioranza degli utenti sensibili al PWM non dovrebbero notare alcun flickering.

In confronto: 51 % di tutti i dispositivi testati non utilizza PWM per ridurre la luminosita' del display. Se è rilevato PWM, una media di 9418 (minimo: 43 - massimo: 142900) Hz è stata rilevata.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6820HK
164 Points ∼75% +8%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
160 Points ∼73% +5%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
152 Points ∼70%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
144 Points ∼66% -5%
Asus R510JX-DM149H
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
138 Points ∼63% -9%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
131 Points ∼60% -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
874 Points ∼20% +24%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6820HK
836 Points ∼19% +18%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
719 Points ∼16% +2%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
706 Points ∼16%
Asus R510JX-DM149H
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
675 Points ∼15% -4%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
566 Points ∼13% -20%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.88 Points ∼77% +12%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
1.72 Points ∼70% +2%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
1.68 Points ∼69% 0%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.68 Points ∼69%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
1.49 Points ∼61% -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6820HK
9.24 Points ∼28% +19%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
8.55 Points ∼26% +10%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
7.96 Points ∼24% +3%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
7.75 Points ∼23%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
6.02 Points ∼18% -22%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
6434 Points ∼59% +14%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6820HK
6405 Points ∼59% +14%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
5632 Points ∼52%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
5567 Points ∼51% -1%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6820HK
24966 Points ∼50% +17%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
23815 Points ∼48% +12%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
21681 Points ∼44% +2%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
21313 Points ∼43%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Asus R510JX-DM149H
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
241.83 s * ∼3% -8%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
224.726 s * ∼3%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
206.294 s * ∼2% +8%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
205.867 s * ∼2% +8%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
573.691 Seconds * ∼3% -0%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
572.296 Seconds * ∼3%
Asus R510JX-DM149H
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
552.397 Seconds * ∼2% +3%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
484.635 Seconds * ∼2% +15%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
11567
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
21313
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5632
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
73.48 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.75 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.68 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
124 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
706 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
152 Points
Aiuto
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5394 Points ∼83% +17%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4816 Points ∼74% +4%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4623 Points ∼71%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
4378 Points ∼67% -5%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
4129 Points ∼63% -11%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
8576 Points ∼81% +10%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
8227 Points ∼78% +6%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
7780 Points ∼74%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
7128 Points ∼68% -8%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
4740 Points ∼45% -39%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4833 Points ∼79% +9%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4579 Points ∼75% +3%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4437 Points ∼73%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
4252 Points ∼70% -4%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
3441 Points ∼56% -22%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4437 punti
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
7780 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4623 punti
Aiuto
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Aorus X7 v6
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
MSI GT73VR 6RF
2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
4%
-30%
11%
-32%
Write 4k QD32
386.8
530.8
37%
441.8
14%
422.1
9%
295.3
-24%
Read 4k QD32
601.1
695.7
16%
425
-29%
693.5
15%
600.2
0%
Write 4k
145.2
155.5
7%
65.68
-55%
144
-1%
153.3
6%
Read 4k
51.61
44.33
-14%
31.37
-39%
51.54
0%
42.7
-17%
Write 512
1254
1103
-12%
915.8
-27%
1561
24%
294.7
-76%
Read 512
1044
966.3
-7%
698.1
-33%
1180
13%
616.2
-41%
Write Seq
1249
1411
13%
916.1
-27%
1576
26%
294.9
-76%
Read Seq
1658
1499
-10%
914.3
-45%
1673
1%
1156
-30%
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Sequential Read: 1658 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1249 MB/s
512K Read: 1044 MB/s
512K Write: 1254 MB/s
4K Read: 51.61 MB/s
4K Write: 145.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 601.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 386.8 MB/s
3DMark
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
4841 Points ∼48% +22%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K
4126 Points ∼41% +4%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
3957 Points ∼39%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
3009 Points ∼30% -24%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
2592 Points ∼26% -34%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
2326 Points ∼23% -41%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
9994 Points ∼50% +24%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
8057 Points ∼41%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
6123 Points ∼31% -24%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
5541 Points ∼28% -31%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
4663 Points ∼23% -42%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
20268 Points ∼50% +18%
MSI GT80-2QES32SR311BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI, 4980HQ
19121 Points ∼47% +12%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
17106 Points ∼42%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K
16685 Points ∼41% -2%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
13018 Points ∼32% -24%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
11957 Points ∼29% -30%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9820 Points ∼24% -43%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
11623 Points ∼51% +22%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K
11482 Points ∼51% +20%
MSI GT80-2QES32SR311BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI, 4980HQ
10313 Points ∼46% +8%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
9550 Points ∼42%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9256 Points ∼41% -3%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
9017 Points ∼40% -6%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
8338 Points ∼37% -13%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
29443 Points ∼58% +31%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K
23990 Points ∼47% +7%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
22427 Points ∼44%
MSI GT80-2QES32SR311BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI, 4980HQ
21901 Points ∼43% -2%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
16946 Points ∼33% -24%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
12890 Points ∼25% -43%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
12731 Points ∼25% -43%
3DMark 11 Performance
16824 punti
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
136715 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
26217 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13287 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
7357 punti
Aiuto
Rise of the Tomb Raider
3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
49.8 fps ∼100% +23%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
40.6 fps ∼82%
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
97.4 fps ∼100% +1%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
96.4 fps ∼99%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
63.5 fps ∼65% -34%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
60.4 fps ∼62% -37%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
55 fps ∼56% -43%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
42.8 fps ∼44% -56%
Guild Wars 2 - 1920x1080 All Maximum / On AA:FX
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
78.8 fps ∼100% +23%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
63.9 fps ∼81%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
52.9 fps ∼67% -17%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
136.8 fps ∼100% +4%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
131.8 fps ∼96%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
106.2 fps ∼78% -19%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
105.5 fps ∼77% -20%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
86.4 fps ∼63% -34%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
69.5 fps ∼51% -47%
Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
117.9 fps ∼100% +3%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
114 fps ∼97%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
88.3 fps ∼75% -23%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
82.1 fps ∼70% -28%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
50.5 fps ∼43% -56%
Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
106.6 fps ∼100% +3%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
103.2 fps ∼97%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
72.4 fps ∼68% -30%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
67.9 fps ∼64% -34%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
58.6 fps ∼55% -43%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
47.5 fps ∼45% -54%
Batman: Arkham Knight
3840x2160 High / On (Interactive Smoke & Paper Debris Off) AA:SM AF:8x
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
52 fps ∼100% +16%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
45 fps ∼87%
1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
89 fps ∼100% +2%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
87 fps ∼98%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
63 fps ∼71% -28%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
62 fps ∼70% -29%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
36 fps ∼40% -59%
Fallout 4
3840x2160 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
51.7 fps ∼100% +17%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
44.3 fps ∼86%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
111.3 fps ∼100% +8%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
102.9 fps ∼92%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
79.3 fps ∼71% -23%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
71.6 fps ∼64% -30%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
57.9 fps ∼52% -44%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
43.5 fps ∼39% -58%
Doom
3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
64.1 fps ∼100% +27%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
50.6 fps ∼79%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
128.9 fps ∼100% +9%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
118.8 fps ∼92%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
96.5 fps ∼75% -19%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
84.3 fps ∼65% -29%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
56 fps ∼43% -53%
Overwatch - 3840x2160 High (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:4x
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
103.1 fps ∼100% +23%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
83.5 fps ∼81%
Mafia 3
3840x2160 High Preset
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
22.1 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 High Preset
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
73.6 fps ∼100% +19%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
62 fps ∼84%
basso medio alto ultra4K
Guild Wars 2 (2012) 63.9fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 131.8fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 114fps
Thief (2014) 103.2fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 8745fps
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 6060fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 102.944.3fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 96.440.6fps
Doom (2016) 118.850.6fps
Overwatch (2016) 83.5fps
Mafia 3 (2016) 6222.1fps

Rumorosità

Idle
33.9 / 33.9 / 33.9 dB(A)
Sotto carico
43.8 / 53.4 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 29.2 dB(A)
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
Noise
-3%
-4%
1%
-1%
4%
off /ambiente *
29.2
30
-3%
29.2
-0%
28.9
1%
30
-3%
29.1
-0%
Idle Minimum *
33.9
33
3%
32
6%
28.9
15%
33
3%
33
3%
Idle Average *
33.9
35
-3%
32
6%
30.6
10%
34
-0%
33.2
2%
Idle Maximum *
33.9
40
-18%
35
-3%
35.7
-5%
35
-3%
33.7
1%
Load Average *
43.8
43
2%
50
-14%
49
-12%
45
-3%
41.7
5%
Load Maximum *
53.4
54
-1%
64
-20%
55
-3%
52
3%
48.2
10%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Carico massimo
 44.2 °C47.6 °C44 °C 
 38.6 °C40.2 °C39.2 °C 
 35.8 °C35.8 °C36.6 °C 
Massima: 47.6 °C
Media: 40.2 °C
49.8 °C53.2 °C47 °C
44.4 °C44.8 °C40.2 °C
38 °C37 °C37 °C
Massima: 53.2 °C
Media: 43.5 °C
Alimentazione (max)  51.2 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20.5 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(-) La temperatura media del lato superiore sotto carico massimo e' di 40.2 °C / 104 F, rispetto alla media di 33.2 °C / 92 F per i dispositivi di questa classe Gaming.
(-) La temperatura massima sul lato superiore è di 47.6 °C / 118 F, rispetto alla media di 39.6 °C / 103 F, che varia da 21.6 a 68.8 °C per questa classe Gaming.
(-) Il lato inferiore si riscalda fino ad un massimo di 53.2 °C / 128 F, rispetto alla media di 42.2 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle, la temperatura media del lato superiore è di 27.3 °C / 81 F, rispetto alla media deld ispositivo di 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.6 °C / 97.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-7.8 °C / -14.1 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.835.22529.733.93130.133.24030.432.15029.830.36332.132.78030.331.810028.133.112526.83416026.840.720025.846.425024.849.131524.553.340025.258.550025.857.363024.857.580025.555.6100024.952.9125025.251.4160023.950.4200022.450.3250021.945.5315021.747400021.652.8500021.354.4630021.251.7800021.148.31000021.151.4125002147160002139.6SPL35.364.6N2.420.1median 24.5median 50.4Delta2.13.835.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseEVGA SC17 GTX 1070Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 analisi audio

(-) | not very loud speakers (64.62 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz analisi audio

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.53 / 6.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 27.3 / 34.9 / 37.6 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 164.4 / 202.5 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3
MSI GT73VR 6RF
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
EVGA SC17
6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
Power Consumption
2%
-13%
25%
11%
Idle Minimum *
27.3
29
-6%
28.9
-6%
19
30%
20.9
23%
Idle Average *
34.9
31
11%
30.6
12%
25
28%
31.7
9%
Idle Maximum *
37.6
38
-1%
33.1
12%
31
18%
32.6
13%
Load Average *
164.4
111
32%
224.4
-36%
90
45%
142.8
13%
Load Maximum *
202.5
253
-25%
302.6
-49%
193
5%
210.5
-4%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
4ore 02minuti
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
2ore 40minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
0ore 55minuti
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 74.48 Wh
Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 94 Wh
MSI GT73VR 6RF
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 75.2 Wh
Eurocom Sky X7E2
6700K, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 89 Wh
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 95 Wh
EVGA SC17
6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, 74.48 Wh
Autonomia della batteria
14%
23%
-9%
81%
32%
Reader / Idle
242
306
26%
137
-43%
432
79%
310
28%
WiFi v1.3
160
182
14%
198
24%
104
-35%
247
54%
206
29%
Load
55
65
18%
83
51%
115
109%
76
38%

Pro

+ relativamente sottile per essere un portatile con grafica GTX 1070
+ design dello chassis sottile ma robusto
+ 4K UHD matto w/ piena copertura sRGB
+ CPU e GPU overclockable

Contro

- barebones; poche opzioni hardware e features di connettività
- moderato ghosting durante il gaming; tempi di risposta lenti
- solo due bays di archiviazione interna; manca il RAID
- ventole di sistema sempre attive
- touchpad con feedback scarso
- mancano tasti dedicati ausiliari
- autonomia breve
In review: EVGA SC17 GTX 1070. Test model provided by EVGA.
In review: EVGA SC17 GTX 1070. Test model provided by EVGA.

L'originale SC17 con GTX 980M si faceva notare perché puntava sull'overclocking e per la solida piattaforma molto più portatile rispetto ad un equivalente, GT72, G752, o Clevo barebone. Ora che la maggioranza dei produttori gaming ha portato i suoi notebooks verso la Pascal, l'ultimo aggiornamento SC17 non offre abbastanza per essere un must buy. I produttori come MSI ed Aorus hanno colto l'opportunità di aggiungere altre features oltre al semplice upgrade della GPU come gli schermi 5 ms/120 Hz, G-Sync, RAID, illuminazione individuale RGB dei tasti, tasti macro ed ausiliari, Thunderbolt 3, ed altro che manca sull'SC17. L'EVGA non ha nemmeno un semplice card reader come il Razer Blade 14 o il Blade Pro 17.

Performance e qualità di costruzione rispecchiano il prezzo premium, ma sta diventando molto difficile scrollarsi di dosso l'etichetta barebone per l'SC17.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 - 11/20/2016 v5.1(old)
Allen Ngo

Chassis
94 / 98 → 96%
Tastiera
85%
Dispositivo di puntamento
67%
Connettività
56 / 81 → 70%
Peso
48 / 10-66 → 68%
Batteria
67%
Display
90%
Prestazioni di gioco
97%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
93%
Temperatura
85 / 95 → 89%
Rumorosità
68 / 90 → 76%
Audio
55%
Fotocamera
45 / 85 → 53%
Media
73%
83%
Gaming - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Portatile EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Allen Ngo, 2016-11-24 (Update: 2016-11-24)