Recensione Breve del Portatile Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ (7500U, 940MX, 512 GB)
Blue Chip? L'ultimo Asus da 14" ibrido non solo è estremamente portatile, ma ha anche una GPU dedicata e features di sicurezza come il TPM. Business o multimedia? Il tentativo dello Zenbook di eliminare la divisione non torna, ma almeno va molto bene per quanto riguarda la mobilità.
I nostri Top 10
» Top 10 Portatili Multimedia
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming Leggeri
» Top 10 Portatili da Ufficio e Business economici
» Top 10 Portatili Premium da Ufficio/Business
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 300 Euro
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 500 Euro
» Top 10 dei Portatili Workstation
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibili
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Smartphones
Size Comparison
| SDCardreader Transfer Speed | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T | |
| iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribuzione della luminosità: 88 %
Al centro con la batteria: 377 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1038:1 (Nero: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.88 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.24 | - Ø
99% sRGB (Argyll) 64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.38
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T Chi Mei CMN14D2 / N140HCE-EN1, , 1920x1080, 14 | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB LG Philips LP133WF4-SPB1 (LGD04EF), , 1920x1080, 13.3 | Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T Chi Mei N140HCE-EN1, , 1920x1080, 14 | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Sharp SHP1453 LQ156M1, , 1920x1080, 15.6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -9% | -7% | -61% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40 (20, 20) | 45 (12, 33) -13% | 44 (24, 20) -10% | 54 (33.2, 20) -35% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28 (17, 11) | 29 (6, 23) -4% | 29 (17, 12) -4% | 52.4 (33.2, 19.2) -87% |
| PWM Frequency | 60 (30) | |||
| Screen | -10% | 1% | -8% | |
| Brightness | 366 | 306 -16% | 368 1% | 392 7% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 81 -8% | 84 -5% | 89 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.3 12% | 0.3 12% | 0.26 24% |
| Contrast | 1038 | 1143 10% | 1270 22% | 1538 48% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 2.88 | 4.73 -64% | 2.84 1% | 4.9 -70% |
| Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 4.24 | 3.29 22% | 4.02 5% | 7.2 -70% |
| Gamma | 2.38 101% | 2.36 102% | 2.42 99% | 2.11 114% |
| CCT | 7380 88% | 6437 101% | 7430 87% | 6911 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 64 | 54 -16% | 56 -12% | 64.2 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 | 83 -16% | 86 -13% | 98.9 0% |
| Media totale (Programma / Settaggio) | -10% /
-9% | -3% /
-0% | -35% /
-18% |
* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli
Tempi di risposta del Display
| ↔ Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms Incremento |  |
| ↘ 11 ms Calo | ||
| Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio | ||
| 40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms Incremento |  |
| ↘ 20 ms Calo | ||
| Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (43 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 58 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 5901 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured. | ||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3913 punti | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4812 punti |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002 | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 143% | -14% | -82% | |
| Write 4k QD32 | 251.1 | 321.4 28% | 257.2 2% | 1.057 -100% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 311.3 | 407.5 31% | 147 -53% | 69.75 -78% |
| Write 4k | 56.85 | 121.5 114% | 79.5 40% | 1.021 -98% |
| Read 4k | 28.34 | 54.75 93% | 22.78 -20% | 10.84 -62% |
| Write 512 | 415 | 1244 200% | 288 -31% | 42.51 -90% |
| Read 512 | 345.6 | 1165 237% | 289 -16% | 101.7 -71% |
| Write Seq | 457.4 | 1472 222% | 323.7 -29% | 74.17 -84% |
| Read Seq | 500.2 | 1577 215% | 497 -1% | 123 -75% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3410UA | |
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3410UA | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2335 punti | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6852 punti | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1373 punti |
| basso | medio | alto | ultra | ||
| Diablo III (2012) | 70.2 | 66.8 | 41.7 | fps | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 27.8 | 17.3 | fps | ||
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 79.7 | 34.1 | 23.3 | fps |
Rumorosità
| Idle |
| 30.8 / 30.8 / 32.4 dB(A) | |||
| Sotto carico |
| 35.1 / 38.4 dB(A) | |||
 | |||||
30 dB silenzioso 40 dB(A) udibile 50 dB(A) rumoroso |
|||||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza) Rumorosità ambientale: 30.8 dB(A) | |||||
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 12% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.97 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.9% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
| Off / Standby | 0.27 / 0.6 Watt |
| Idle | 2.6 / 5.9 / 6.25 Watt |
| Sotto carico |
42 / 46 Watt |
   
| |
Leggenda:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 940 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T 7500U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 14 | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB 7500U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3 | Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T 7500U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 14 | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) 7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 1920x1080, 15.6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -19% | -15% | -109% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.6 | 3.6 -38% | 3.5 -35% | 6.6 -154% |
| Idle Average * | 5.9 | 7.4 -25% | 6.6 -12% | 9 -53% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.25 | 8.7 -39% | 7.1 -14% | 10.7 -71% |
| Load Average * | 42 | 43 -2% | 30 29% | 77.5 -85% |
| Load Maximum * | 46 | 42 9% | 65 -41% | 130 -183% |
* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T 7500U, GeForce 940MX, 50 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB 7500U, GeForce 940MX, 46 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T 7500U, GeForce 940MX, 48 Wh | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) 7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 56 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autonomia della batteria | -36% | -3% | -35% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1292 | 468 -64% | 565 -56% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 527 | 338 -36% | 511 -3% | 334 -37% |
| Load | 97 | 89 -8% | 84 -13% |
Pro
Contro
Ma perché Asus opta per la datata e superata GeForce 940MX? E perché non implementa il suo noto chip to boot? Ricordatevi che la 940MX dello Zenbook è di appena il 30% più veloce rispetto alla Intel HD Graphics 620 integrata. Le sole pretese di essere un “multimedia” si trovano nell'eccellente schermo. Multimedia? Sicuramente no.
Business? Questo certamente. L'Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ è molto più di un compagno business o da ufficio, e non limita le aspirazioni di editing foto non-professionale. Grazie alla sua base sottile, il case da 14" è abbastanza compatto. L'ampia autonomia e le features di sicurezza incluse lo rendono molto portatile. Se non fosse stato per i tasti rumorosi, il dispositivo nel complesso sarebbe stato molto silenzioso. Considerando il tutto, i dispositivi di input dovrebbero piacere a chi scrive molto.
Gli utenti da ufficio e business che cercano un portatile high-quality sono il principale target. I gamers, d'altro canto, sono stati avvisati.
Con prezzi di $1,500 (GV010T) e $1,600 (GV012T), entrambi i modelli UX3430UQ sono troppo costosi. Aspettando un po' probabilmente potremmo ritrovarci con un migliore rapporto prezzo-prestazioni, sono disponibili anche offerte a partire da 1341 euro.
Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T - 07/05/2017 v6
Sven Kloevekorn