Recensione Breve del Portatile Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ (7500U, 940MX, 512 GB)

Name: Recensione Breve del Portatile Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ (7500U, 940MX, 512 GB)
Item: Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T
Rating: 89
Author: Sven Kloevekorn

Sven Kloevekorn, 07/15/2017

Geforce Kaby Lake Notebook Windows

Blue Chip? L'ultimo Asus da 14" ibrido non solo è estremamente portatile, ma ha anche una GPU dedicata e features di sicurezza come il TPM. Business o multimedia? Il tentativo dello Zenbook di eliminare la divisione non torna, ma almeno va molto bene per quanto riguarda la mobilità.

Dispositivo di test fornito da notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

sidebar_1-multi

Size Comparison

Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB

I nostri Top 10
» Top 10 Portatili Multimedia
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming Leggeri
» Top 10 Portatili da Ufficio e Business economici
» Top 10 Portatili Premium da Ufficio/Business
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 300 Euro
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 500 Euro
» Top 10 dei Portatili Workstation
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibili
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Smartphones

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB	68.1 MB/s ∼100% +94%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)	57.3 MB/s ∼84% +63%
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T	35.1 MB/s ∼52%
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T	34 MB/s ∼50% -3%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)	202.8 MB/s ∼100% +402%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB	88 MB/s ∼43% +118%
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T	40.4 MB/s ∼20%
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T	38.6 MB/s ∼19% -4%

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	674 MBit/s ∼100% +34%
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	657 MBit/s ∼97% +31%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	608 MBit/s ∼90% +21%
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	503 MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	666 MBit/s ∼100%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	641 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	614 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	496 MBit/s ∼74% -26%


373 cd/m²	381 cd/m²	377 cd/m²
380 cd/m²	353 cd/m²	377 cd/m²
365 cd/m²	335 cd/m²	357 cd/m²

Distribuzione della luminosità

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Massima: 381 cd/m² Media: 366.4 cd/m² Minimum: 0.36 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 88 %
Al centro con la batteria: 377 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1038:1 (Nero: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.88 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 4.24 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
99% sRGB (Argyll) 64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.38

ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

sidebar_3-multi

	Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T Chi Mei CMN14D2 / N140HCE-EN1, , 1920x1080, 14	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB LG Philips LP133WF4-SPB1 (LGD04EF), , 1920x1080, 13.3	Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T Chi Mei N140HCE-EN1, , 1920x1080, 14	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Sharp SHP1453 LQ156M1, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times		-9%	-7%	-61%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	40 (20, 20)	45 (12, 33) -13%	44 (24, 20) -10%	54 (33.2, 20) -35%
Response Time Black / White *	28 (17, 11)	29 (6, 23) -4%	29 (17, 12) -4%	52.4 (33.2, 19.2) -87%
PWM Frequency			60 (30)
Screen		-12%	2%	-11%
Brightness middle	353	343 -3%	381 8%	400 13%
Brightness	366	306 -16%	368 1%	392 7%
Brightness Distribution	88	81 -8%	84 -5%	89 1%
Black Level *	0.34	0.3 12%	0.3 12%	0.26 24%
Contrast	1038	1143 10%	1270 22%	1538 48%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	2.88	4.73 -64%	2.84 1%	4.9 -70%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	6.61	9.05 -37%	6.5 2%	11 -66%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	4.24	3.29 22%	4.02 5%	7.2 -70%
Gamma	2.38 ^101%	2.36 ^102%	2.42 ^99%	2.11 ^114%
CCT	7380 ^88%	6437 ^101%	7430 ^87%	6911 ^94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	64	54 -16%	56 -12%	64.2 0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	99	83 -16%	86 -13%	98.9 0%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)		-11% / -11%	-3% / 1%	-36% / -20%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

ℹ

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.

↔ Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17 ms Incremento
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.2 ms).
↔ Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20 ms Incremento
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10377 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T Intel Core i7-7500U	147 Points ∼100% +9%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Intel Core i5-7300HQ	146 Points ∼99% +8%
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T Intel Core i7-7500U	135 Points ∼92%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB Intel Core i7-7500U	110 Points ∼75% -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Intel Core i5-7300HQ	508 Points ∼100% +47%
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T Intel Core i7-7500U	346 Points ∼68%
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T Intel Core i7-7500U	331 Points ∼65% -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB Intel Core i7-7500U	293 Points ∼58% -15%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

135 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

346 Points

Aiuto

... in confronto

PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache	4884 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T GeForce 940MX, 7500U, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002	4812 Points ∼99%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	4184 Points ∼86% -13%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T GeForce 940MX, 7500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	3923 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T GeForce 940MX, 7500U, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002	3913 Points ∼100%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache	3659 Points ∼93% -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	3147 Points ∼80% -20%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3913 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4812 punti
Aiuto

	Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		143%	-14%	-82%
Write 4k QD32	251.1	321.4 28%	257.2 2%	1.057 -100%
Read 4k QD32	311.3	407.5 31%	147 -53%	69.75 -78%
Write 4k	56.85	121.5 114%	79.5 40%	1.021 -98%
Read 4k	28.34	54.75 93%	22.78 -20%	10.84 -62%
Write 512	415	1244 200%	288 -31%	42.51 -90%
Read 512	345.6	1165 237%	289 -16%	101.7 -71%
Write Seq	457.4	1472 222%	323.7 -29%	74.17 -84%
Read Seq	500.2	1577 215%	497 -1%	123 -75%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002

Sequential Read: 500.2 MB/s

Sequential Write: 457.4 MB/s

512K Read: 345.6 MB/s

512K Write: 415 MB/s

4K Read: 28.34 MB/s

4K Write: 56.85 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 311.3 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 251.1 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i5-7300HQ	8201 Points ∼100% +273%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	2447 Points ∼30% +11%
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	2197 Points ∼27%
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	2171 Points ∼26% -1%
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	1666 Points ∼20% -24%

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i5-7300HQ	6393 Points ∼100% +315%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	1940 Points ∼30% +26%
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	1540 Points ∼24%
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	1114 Points ∼17% -28%

3DMark 11 Performance		2335 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		6852 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score		1373 punti
Aiuto

... in confronto

	basso	medio	alto	ultra
Diablo III (2012)		70.2	66.8	41.7	fps
The Witcher 3 (2015)	27.8	17.3			fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)		79.7	34.1	23.3	fps

Rumorosità

Idle		30.8 / 30.8 / 32.4 dB(A)
Sotto carico		35.1 / 38.4 dB(A)

	30 dB silenzioso 40 dB(A) udibile 50 dB(A) rumoroso
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza) Rumorosità ambientale: 30.8 dB(A)

Carico massimo

Idle


26.2 °C	26.2 °C	25.4 °C
26 °C	26 °C	25.3 °C
25 °C	24.8 °C	24.7 °C

Massima: 26.2 °C
Media: 25.5 °C


25.8 °C	27 °C	27 °C
25.4 °C	26.2 °C	26.5 °C
25 °C	25.3 °C	25.6 °C

Massima: 27 °C
Media: 26 °C

Alimentazione (max) 30.3 °C | Temperatura della stanza 22.9 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.97 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente

Off / Standby	0.27 / 0.6 Watt
Idle	2.6 / 5.9 / 6.25 Watt
Sotto carico	42 / 46 Watt


Leggenda: min: , med: , max: Voltcraft VC 940

	Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T 7500U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 14	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB 7500U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3	Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T 7500U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 14	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) 7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption		-19%	-15%	-109%
Idle Minimum *	2.6	3.6 -38%	3.5 -35%	6.6 -154%
Idle Average *	5.9	7.4 -25%	6.6 -12%	9 -53%
Idle Maximum *	6.25	8.7 -39%	7.1 -14%	10.7 -71%
Load Average *	42	43 -2%	30 29%	77.5 -85%
Load Maximum *	46	42 9%	65 -41%	130 -183%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria

Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)		21ore 32minuti
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		8ore 47minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)		1ore 37minuti

	Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T 7500U, GeForce 940MX, 50 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB 7500U, GeForce 940MX, 46 Wh	Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T 7500U, GeForce 940MX, 48 Wh	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) 7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 56 Wh
Autonomia della batteria		-36%	-3%	-35%
Reader / Idle	1292	468 -64%		565 -56%
WiFi v1.3	527	338 -36%	511 -3%	334 -37%
Load	97	89 -8%		84 -13%

Pro

+ compatto per essere un 14"

+ case rigido e ben costruito

+ qualità elevata

+ design ambizioso, carino il colore blu

+ 2 adattatori inclusi

+ lettore impronte digitali, TPM 2.0

+ tastiera decente, clickpad molto buono

+ eccellente display

+ molto silenzioso, non è mai fastidioso

+ efficiente

+ autonomia molto buona

Contro

- relativamente costoso

- superfici che accumulano ditate

- la cover non si apre con una sola mano

- card reader molto lento

- SSD con prestazioni basse

- GPU piuttosto lenta

- gli utenti non beneficeranno della 940MX

Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T - review unit courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Ma perché Asus opta per la datata e superata GeForce 940MX? E perché non implementa il suo noto chip to boot? Ricordatevi che la 940MX dello Zenbook è di appena il 30% più veloce rispetto alla Intel HD Graphics 620 integrata. Le sole pretese di essere un “multimedia” si trovano nell'eccellente schermo. Multimedia? Sicuramente no.

Business? Questo certamente. L'Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ è molto più di un compagno business o da ufficio, e non limita le aspirazioni di editing foto non-professionale. Grazie alla sua base sottile, il case da 14" è abbastanza compatto. L'ampia autonomia e le features di sicurezza incluse lo rendono molto portatile. Se non fosse stato per i tasti rumorosi, il dispositivo nel complesso sarebbe stato molto silenzioso. Considerando il tutto, i dispositivi di input dovrebbero piacere a chi scrive molto.

Gli utenti da ufficio e business che cercano un portatile high-quality sono il principale target. I gamers, d'altro canto, sono stati avvisati.

Con prezzi di $1,500 (GV010T) e $1,600 (GV012T), entrambi i modelli UX3430UQ sono troppo costosi. Aspettando un po' probabilmente potremmo ritrovarci con un migliore rapporto prezzo-prestazioni, sono disponibili anche offerte a partire da 1341 euro.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T - 2017-07-0507/05/2017 v6
Sven Kloevekorn

Chassis

89 / 98 → 91%

Tastiera

88%

Dispositivo di puntamento

93%

Connettività

51 / 80 → 64%

Peso

71 / 35-78 → 85%

Batteria

91%

Display

91%

Prestazioni di gioco

63 / 68 → 92%

Prestazioni Applicazioni

87 / 87 → 100%

Temperatura

89 / 91 → 98%

Rumorosità

91%

Audio

63 / 91 → 69%

Fotocamera

61 / 85 → 71%

Media

79%

89%

Subnotebook - Media ponderata