Notebookcheck

Recensione breve dello Smartphone Wileyfox Spark X

Michael Moser, Stefanie Voigt (traduzione a cura di G.DeLuca), 12/14/2016

Competitivo. Wileyfox lancia il suo quinto smartphone, lo Spark X. Offre dual-SIM, LTE ed una grande batteria. Per un telefono da 5.5", ha grandi ambizioni, ed il prezzo è sotto i 200 Euro (~$211).

Wileyfox Spark X (Spark Serie)
Processore
Scheda grafica
Memoria
2048 MB 
Schermo
5.5 pollici 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 267 PPI, capacitive, multitouch 5 punti, IPS, NIT: TYP 420, MIN340 (LCD+TP), Dragontrail-Glass, lucido: si
Harddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 11.29 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: 3.5 mm jack, Lettore schede: microSD (microSDHC fino a 32 GB), Sensore luminosità, Sensori: A-GPS; Accelerometro, sensore prossimità, bussola, OTG
Rete
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM Quadband (850/900/1,800/1,900 MHz), 3G Dualband (900/2,100 MHz), Upload max. 5.76 MB/s; LTE CAT 4 Triband (800/1,800/2,600 MHz), Upload max. 50 MB/s, Download max. 150 MB/s;, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 8.75 x 154.35 x 78.6
Batteria
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh polimeri di litio, removibile, Tempo conversazione 2G (dichiarata dal produttore): 10 ore, Tempo conversazione 3G (dichiarata dal produttore): 3 ore, Standby 2G (dichiarata dal produttore): 352 ore, Standby 3G (dichiarata dal produttore): 290 ore
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 13 MPix Auto-focus, LED flash, CMOS sensor, Video @ 1080p/30fps
Fotocamera Secondaria: 8 MPix sensore CMOS
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: cassa mono, Tastiera: tastiera virtuale QWERTZ, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, cavo USB dati/ricarica, garanzia, guida rapida, Android Version 6.0.1 Marshmallow con Cyanogen 13 UI, 24 Mesi Garanzia,
SAR body value: 1.306 W/[email protected] (CE)SAR head value: 0.632 W/[email protected] (CE)
Dual-SIM, 2x Micro-SIM notification LED (Red/Green) for email, SMS; other notifications, missed calls UKW-Radio
, senza ventola
Peso
163 gr
Prezzo
179.99 Euro
Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

 

Size Comparison

154.3 mm 77.4 mm 9.8 mm 175 g154.35 mm 78.6 mm 8.75 mm 163 g152 mm 78 mm 8.9 mm 197 g148.9 mm 74.9 mm 7.9 mm 139 g144.4 mm 72 mm 9.9 mm 137 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG X Power K220
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.1 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Wileyfox Spark X
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46 MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG X Power K220
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.5 MBit/s ∼100% +11%
Wileyfox Spark X
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.3 MBit/s ∼90%
GPS Garmin Edge – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge – Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge – Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge – Riverside
GPS Garmin Edge – Riverside
GPS Wileyfox Spark X – Overview
GPS Wileyfox Spark X – Overview
GPS Wileyfox Spark X – Crossing
GPS Wileyfox Spark X – Crossing
GPS Wileyfox Spark X – Riverside
GPS Wileyfox Spark X – Riverside

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
534
cd/m²
545
cd/m²
546
cd/m²
543
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
546
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
534
cd/m²
535
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 554 cd/m² Media: 542 cd/m² Minimum: 20.09 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 96 %
Al centro con la batteria: 554 cd/m²
Contrasto: 815:1 (Nero: 0.68 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
Gamma: 2.24
Wileyfox Spark X
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
LG X Power K220
IPS, 1280x720, 5.3
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Blackview R7
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
-2%
-9%
1%
-39%
Brightness middle
554
381
-31%
414
-25%
412
-26%
552
0%
Brightness
542
352
-35%
420
-23%
414
-24%
526
-3%
Brightness Distribution
96
85
-11%
94
-2%
94
-2%
91
-5%
Black Level *
0.68
0.2
71%
0.33
51%
0.42
38%
0.64
6%
Contrast
815
1905
134%
1255
54%
981
20%
863
6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.2
7.3
-40%
8.1
-56%
5.6
-8%
11
-112%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.7
21.2
-98%
13.8
-29%
9.7
9%
20.8
-94%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.8
7.4
-9%
9.6
-41%
6.9
-1%
14.3
-110%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.26 97%
2 110%
2.4 92%
2.21 100%
CCT
7118 91%
8417 77%
7754 84%
8422 77%
12996 50%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti possono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con tempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
30 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 13 ms Incremento
↘ 17 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 73 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (24.9 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
39 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 16 ms Incremento
↘ 23 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.9 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 42 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono simili alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (39.6 ms).

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Per ridurre la luminosità dello schermo, alcuni portatili accendono e spengono la retroilluminazione in rapida successione - un metodo chiamato Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). Questa frequenza di ciclo a livello ideale non dovrebbe essere percepibile dall'occhi umano. Se tale frequenza è troppo bassa, gli utenti con occhi sensibili potrebbero stancarsi gli occhi o avere mal di testa o anche notare uno sfarfallio.
flickering dello schermo / PWM non rilevato

In confronto: 51 % di tutti i dispositivi testati non utilizza PWM per ridurre la luminosita' del display. Se è rilevato PWM, una media di 9270 (minimo: 43 - massimo: 142900) Hz è stata rilevata.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Wileyfox Spark X
32729 Points ∼11%
Blackview R7
50572 Points ∼17% +55%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
30676 Points ∼10% -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28399 Points ∼10% -13%
LG X Power K220
30432 Points ∼10% -7%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Wileyfox Spark X
1700 Points ∼5%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Wileyfox Spark X
611 Points ∼12%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Wileyfox Spark X
835 Points ∼18%
Blackview R7
1155 Points ∼25% +38%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
831 Points ∼18% 0%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
716 Points ∼16% -14%
LG X Power K220
860 Points ∼19% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Wileyfox Spark X
172 Points ∼2%
Blackview R7
518 Points ∼5% +201%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
172 Points ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
42 Points ∼0% -76%
LG X Power K220
165 Points ∼1% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Wileyfox Spark X
209 Points ∼3%
Blackview R7
590 Points ∼7% +182%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
209 Points ∼3% 0%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
53 Points ∼1% -75%
LG X Power K220
201 Points ∼2% -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Wileyfox Spark X
10441 Points ∼12%
Blackview R7
12585 Points ∼15% +21%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
9768 Points ∼11% -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9256 Points ∼11% -11%
LG X Power K220
10103 Points ∼12% -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Wileyfox Spark X
4680 Points ∼1%
Blackview R7
10334 Points ∼2% +121%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4333 Points ∼1% -7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
3858 Points ∼1% -18%
LG X Power K220
4330 Points ∼1% -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Wileyfox Spark X
5334 Points ∼2%
Blackview R7
10762 Points ∼5% +102%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4944 Points ∼2% -7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4432 Points ∼2% -17%
LG X Power K220
4960 Points ∼2% -7%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Wileyfox Spark X
8.4 fps ∼0%
Blackview R7
17 fps ∼0% +102%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
14 fps ∼0% +67%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
5.2 fps ∼0% -38%
LG X Power K220
8.4 fps ∼0% 0%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Wileyfox Spark X
15 fps ∼0%
Blackview R7
17 fps ∼1% +13%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
8.4 fps ∼0% -44%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9.6 fps ∼0% -36%
LG X Power K220
15 fps ∼0% 0%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Wileyfox Spark X
3 fps ∼1%
Blackview R7
4.7 fps ∼1% +57%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
6 fps ∼1% +100%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1.8 fps ∼0% -40%
LG X Power K220
3.1 fps ∼1% +3%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Wileyfox Spark X
6.7 fps ∼2%
Blackview R7
4.7 fps ∼1% -30%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
3 fps ∼1% -55%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4.1 fps ∼1% -39%
LG X Power K220
6.6 fps ∼2% -1%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Wileyfox Spark X
1.9 fps ∼0%
Blackview R7
2.5 fps ∼0% +32%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4.4 fps ∼0% +132%
LG X Power K220
2 fps ∼0% +5%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Wileyfox Spark X
4.8 fps ∼0%
Blackview R7
2.5 fps ∼0% -48%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1.9 fps ∼0% -60%
LG X Power K220
4.1 fps ∼0% -15%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Wileyfox Spark X
3007 Points ∼15%
Blackview R7
4364 Points ∼22% +45%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
3813 Points ∼19% +27%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4283 Points ∼22% +42%
LG X Power K220
3759 Points ∼19% +25%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Wileyfox Spark X
10 Points ∼0%
Blackview R7
10 Points ∼0% 0%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
10 Points ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
551 Points ∼27% +5410%
LG X Power K220
10 Points ∼0% 0%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Wileyfox Spark X
292 Points ∼1%
Blackview R7
655 Points ∼2% +124%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
286 Points ∼1% -2%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
313 Points ∼1% +7%
LG X Power K220
290 Points ∼1% -1%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Wileyfox Spark X
773 Points ∼10%
Blackview R7
1030 Points ∼14% +33%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
450 Points ∼6% -42%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
741 Points ∼10% -4%
LG X Power K220
521 Points ∼7% -33%
System (ordina per valore)
Wileyfox Spark X
1222 Points ∼7%
Blackview R7
1971 Points ∼12% +61%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1090 Points ∼7% -11%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1035 Points ∼6% -15%
LG X Power K220
1092 Points ∼7% -11%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Wileyfox Spark X
227 Points ∼3%
Blackview R7
338 Points ∼4% +49%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
192 Points ∼2% -15%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
603 Points ∼7% +166%
LG X Power K220
200 Points ∼2% -12%

Legenda

 
Wileyfox Spark X Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview R7 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Liquid Zest Plus Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G4 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG X Power K220 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Wileyfox Spark X
3239 Points ∼6%
Blackview R7
3885 Points ∼7% +20%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
2697 Points ∼5% -17%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2773 Points ∼5% -14%
LG X Power K220
2657 Points ∼5% -18%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Wileyfox Spark X
12625 ms * ∼21%
Blackview R7
9748.3 ms * ∼16% +23%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
12910 ms * ∼22% -2%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
12952.9 ms * ∼22% -3%
LG X Power K220
13196 ms * ∼22% -5%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Wileyfox Spark X
20.745 Points ∼6%
Blackview R7
25.349 Points ∼7% +22%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
18.028 Points ∼5% -13%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
17.094 Points ∼5% -18%
LG X Power K220
18.133 Points ∼5% -13%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Wileyfox Spark XBlackview R7Acer Liquid Zest PlusLenovo Moto G4 PlayLG X Power K220
AndroBench 3-5
42%
-7%
55%
-3%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
20.59
11.87
-42%
16.17
-21%
51.1
148%
18.17
-12%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
39.5
15.56
-61%
27.68
-30%
65.5
66%
32.08
-19%
Random Write 4KB
15.57
11.4
-27%
7.95
-49%
28.31
82%
7.32
-53%
Random Read 4KB
12.26
28.02
129%
20.25
65%
17.9
46%
18.78
53%
Sequential Write 256KB
37.91
122.67
224%
39.51
4%
43.95
16%
43.74
15%
Sequential Read 256KB
194.78
247.58
27%
178.65
-8%
144.12
-26%
196.81
1%
Carico massimo
 35.6 °C35.6 °C39.9 °C 
 36.8 °C36.5 °C40.5 °C 
 36.7 °C36.6 °C37.6 °C 
Massima: 40.5 °C
Media: 37.3 °C
34.4 °C33.9 °C35.6 °C
34 °C34.6 °C36.3 °C
32.7 °C35 °C37.2 °C
Massima: 37.2 °C
Media: 34.9 °C
Temperatura della stanza 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) La temperatura media del lato superiore sotto carico massimo e' di 37.3 °C / 99 F, rispetto alla media di 33.1 °C / 92 F per i dispositivi di questa classe Smartphone.
(±) La temperatura massima sul lato superiore è di 40.5 °C / 105 F, rispetto alla media di 35.5 °C / 96 F, che varia da 22.4 a 51.7 °C per questa classe Smartphone.
(+) Il lato inferiore si riscalda fino ad un massimo di 37.2 °C / 99 F, rispetto alla media di 34 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle, la temperatura media del lato superiore è di 33.9 °C / 93 F, rispetto alla media deld ispositivo di 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.638.22525.435.23125.334.44032.932.55033.643.16331.631.68028.429.91002725.612520.826.41602231.420021.333.425020.837.131521.243.240019.446.550019.554.363017.759.480017.965.3100017.869.9125017.369160017.467.9200016.766.6250017.264.9315018.264.2400017.965500017.665.4630017.766.3800017.869.61000017.970.71250018.164.81600018.254.5SPL3078.7N1.341.9median 17.9median 64.8Delta1.310.617.919.719.617.919.618.619.519.617.617.521.317.62019.223.22017.715.620.717.715.516.621.915.517.218.214.417.218.120.315.918.128.930.425.328.91424.611.81414.929.511.914.916.432.413.516.418.934.214.718.922.238.813.422.225.843.914.425.83046.910.63036.853.1836.84056.98.94039.856.39.839.83956.183936.952.68.136.936.553.66.536.535.453.86.435.437.756.46.237.74058.15.74044595.74443.658.65.743.638.6545.838.63246.15.8322437.25.62451.167.620.851.17.121.20.37.1median 35.4median 52.6median 8.1median 35.4810.33.6824.323.124.324.322.32122.722.322.720.322.622.723.723.229.623.721.221.922.221.219.119.32019.117.617.118.517.620.120.12120.130.630.931.930.616.71616.516.718.218.317.318.217.817.618.317.81719.517.31719.529.216.419.527.13917.827.130.643.414.830.63850.915.73842.35616.442.345.66015.845.647.861.713.647.850.963.114.850.950.26312.650.252.264.711.252.252.86510.952.853.4669.753.452.4659.652.448.6619.748.64153.69.44134.147.69.434.129.743.79.429.761.774.426.161.712.828.50.812.8median 38median 50.9median 14.8median 3814.216.82.814.232.435.631.335.231.735.82627.639.436.236.234.228.627.725.425.121.32323.326.122.532.222.440.121.346.418.454.617.563.217.564.317.268.316.871.117.372.817.47216.673.117.37317.672.917.674.117.772.717.473.117.772.917.972.118.173.918.175.829.884.31.357.6median 17.7median 721.61231.653.425.432.925.33032.937.233.640.631.640.428.432.42729.220.823.82222.521.327.720.834.621.240.619.448.919.55517.760.417.969.217.874.917.380.117.477.116.773.717.27518.275.517.974.217.674.917.778.717.882.717.97718.166.818.264.83088.51.371.5median 17.9median 69.21.315.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseWileyfox Spark XLenovo Moto G4 PlayBlackview R7Acer Liquid Zest PlusLG X Power K220
Wileyfox Spark X analisi audio

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.71 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo Moto G4 Play analisi audio

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.6 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Blackview R7 analisi audio

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.8% lower than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (42.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Acer Liquid Zest Plus analisi audio

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.28 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

LG X Power K220 analisi audio

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.16 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.53 / 1.76 / 1.86 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 3.97 / 4.21 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Wileyfox Spark X
3000 mAh
LG X Power K220
4100 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
Blackview R7
3000 mAh
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
5000 mAh
Power Consumption
2%
3%
-115%
-16%
Idle Minimum *
0.53
0.64
-21%
0.68
-28%
1.83
-245%
0.83
-57%
Idle Average *
1.76
1.3
26%
1.58
10%
3.21
-82%
2.06
-17%
Idle Maximum *
1.86
1.34
28%
1.61
13%
3.45
-85%
2.08
-12%
Load Average *
3.97
4.18
-5%
3.36
15%
5.67
-43%
3.53
11%
Load Maximum *
4.21
4.87
-16%
3.91
7%
9.16
-118%
4.49
-7%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
23ore 01minuti
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11ore 15minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12ore 57minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
4ore 24minuti
Wileyfox Spark X
3000 mAh
LG X Power K220
4100 mAh
Blackview R7
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
5000 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
42%
-39%
11%
21%
Reader / Idle
1381
1998
45%
H.264
777
683
-12%
WiFi v1.3
675
987
46%
412
-39%
630
-7%
815
21%
Load
264
365
38%
306
16%

Pro

+ buona autonomia
+ display luminoso
+ batteria removibile
+ design e scelta dei materiali
+ decente costruzione

Contro

- fotocamera scarsa
- performance scarse
- lento
- tasti di comando Android sul display nonostante i bordi spessi
- bassa risoluzione del display
- manca l'adattatore per la ricarica
- modesta qualità voce
In review: Wileyfox Spark X. Test model provided by Wileyfox Germany.
In review: Wileyfox Spark X. Test model provided by Wileyfox Germany.

Wileyfox dice del suo Spark X: "Migliori dimensioni del display e più autonomia rendono questo telefono il vostro compagno multimedia dei sogni". Nel complesso lo Spark X ha punti di forza: l'ampia autonomia, la batteria removibile, la buona costruzione e la scelta dei materiali. Il display, luminoso e vivido è impressionante ed il prezzo basso è allettante. 

Il Wileyfox Spark X si focalizza su alcune features: design stiloso e autonomia della batteria per un prezzo sotto i 180 Euro (~$190). Chiunque cerchi un telefono economico dovrebbe dare uno sguardo al Wileyfox Spark X.

Ma c'è anche molto da criticare di questo telefono economico: prestazioni modeste, tempi di reazione, qualità voce, qualità foto (specialmente con poca luce), assenza di ricaricatore, risoluzione bassa (appena 720p) e problemi di stabilità. Se potete convivere con questi problemi, allora forte questo è il dispositivo che fa per voi. Altrimenti, la concorrenza in questo segmento è ampia e ci sono molte opzioni a disposizione.


Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Wileyfox Spark X - 11/29/2016 v5.1(old)
Michael Moser

Chassis
80%
Tastiera
76 / 75 → 100%
Dispositivo di puntamento
85%
Connettività
39 / 60 → 65%
Peso
91%
Batteria
94%
Display
82%
Prestazioni di gioco
10 / 63 → 15%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
30 / 70 → 42%
Temperatura
88%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
54 / 91 → 59%
Fotocamera
58%
Media
68%
80%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve dello Smartphone Wileyfox Spark X
Michael Moser, 2016-12-14 (Update: 2016-12-14)