Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Tablet Acer Iconia Tab 10

Florian Schaar (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 01/22/2018

Un oggetto prezioso alternativo. L'Acer Iconia Tab 10 si fa notare per le prestazioni sopra la media ed un prezzo ambizioso. Ma riesce a mantenere le promesse? Pochi minuti a contatto con questo dispositivo e avrete una impressione molto positiva.

Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Iconia Tab 10 Serie)
Processore
Scheda grafica
PowerVR GX6250
Memoria
4096 MB 
Schermo
10.1 pollici 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, Capacitive, IPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 52 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, 1 HDMI, Connessioni Audio: 3.5mm, Lettore schede: microSD-Card, Sensori: Accelerometro
Rete
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 8.9 x 267 x 169.2
Batteria
6100 mAh ioni di litio, Autonomia della batteria (dichiarata dal produttore): 8 ore
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 5 MPix
Fotocamera Secondaria: 2 MPix
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: 4, Tastiera: Virtual, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, Stand, 12 Mesi Garanzia, senza ventola
Peso
531 gr, Alimentazione: 76 gr
Prezzo
299 Euro

 

Größenvergleich

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
465 MBit/s ∼100% +77%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
350 MBit/s ∼75% +34%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash
338 MBit/s ∼73% +29%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
262 MBit/s ∼56%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
241 MBit/s ∼52% -8%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
389 MBit/s ∼100% +62%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
263 MBit/s ∼68% +10%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash
258 MBit/s ∼66% +8%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
240 MBit/s ∼62%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
227 MBit/s ∼58% -5%
GPS Acer Iconia
GPS Acer Iconia
GPS Acer Iconia
GPS Acer Iconia
GPS Acer Iconia
GPS Acer Iconia
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
Sharpness under laboratory conditions
Sharpness under laboratory conditions
Sharpness under laboratory conditions
Color accuracy under laboratory conditions
297
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
353
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
322
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
316
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 353 cd/m² Media: 319.6 cd/m² Minimum: 40.24 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 84 %
Al centro con la batteria: 340 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1789:1 (Nero: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 15 | 0.8-23.34 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.7
Gamma: 2.09
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Apple iPad (2017)
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7
Screen
-6%
9%
18%
9%
Brightness middle
340
426
25%
443
30%
435
28%
514
51%
Brightness
320
399
25%
428
34%
413
29%
485
52%
Brightness Distribution
84
91
8%
94
12%
93
11%
88
5%
Black Level *
0.19
0.38
-100%
0.36
-89%
0.25
-32%
0.46
-142%
Contrast
1789
1121
-37%
1231
-31%
1740
-3%
1117
-38%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
15
4.5
70%
3.3
78%
4.4
71%
1.4
91%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4
5.2
-30%
2.9
27%
3.2
20%
2.1
47%
Gamma
2.09 115%
2.23 108%
2.27 106%
2.35 102%
2.22 108%
CCT
6940 94%
6875 95%
6961 93%
7056 92%
6647 98%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9024 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms Incremento
↘ 12.4 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 65 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.5 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.6 ms Incremento
↘ 11.6 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.3 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Apple iPad (2017)
128706 Points ∼56% +63%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
78980 Points ∼35%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
63777 Points ∼28% -19%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
62725 Points ∼28% -21%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
46814 Points ∼21% -41%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
4827 Points ∼47%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
4626 Points ∼45% -4%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
3927 Points ∼38% -19%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3678 Points ∼36% -24%
Work performance score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5843 Points ∼68%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
5648 Points ∼66% -3%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
5438 Points ∼64% -7%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4895 Points ∼57% -16%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Apple iPad (2017)
1213 Points ∼72% +51%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1010 Points ∼60% +26%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
850 Points ∼50% +6%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
803 Points ∼47%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Graphics
Apple iPad (2017)
4569 Points ∼49% +552%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
1015 Points ∼11% +45%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
833 Points ∼9% +19%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
764 Points ∼8% +9%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
701 Points ∼8%
Memory
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1513 Points ∼34% +56%
Apple iPad (2017)
1341 Points ∼30% +39%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
1214 Points ∼27% +25%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
972 Points ∼22% 0%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
968 Points ∼22%
System
Apple iPad (2017)
4680 Points ∼46% +139%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3214 Points ∼31% +64%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2329 Points ∼23% +19%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1957 Points ∼19%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
1902 Points ∼19% -3%
Overall
Apple iPad (2017)
2441 Points ∼64% +140%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1312 Points ∼35% +29%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
1281 Points ∼34% +26%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1016 Points ∼27%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
362 Points ∼10% -64%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3235 Points ∼36% +5%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3081 Points ∼34%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
2242 Points ∼25% -27%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1562 Points ∼17% -49%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
4323 Points ∼17% +74%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3305 Points ∼13% +33%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
2889 Points ∼11% +16%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
2489 Points ∼10%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1541 Points ∼26%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1204 Points ∼20% -22%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
868 Points ∼15% -44%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
662 Points ∼11% -57%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
1991 Points ∼65% +136%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1363 Points ∼44% +62%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
1318 Points ∼43% +56%
Apple iPad (2017)
1098 Points ∼36% +30%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
843 Points ∼27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad (2017)
2519 Points ∼47% +352%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
557 Points ∼10%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
413 Points ∼8% -26%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
381 Points ∼7% -32%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
259 Points ∼5% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Apple iPad (2017)
1957 Points ∼50% +225%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
602 Points ∼15%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
489 Points ∼13% -19%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
464 Points ∼12% -23%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
315 Points ∼8% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
2031 Points ∼66% +80%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1347 Points ∼44% +19%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
1313 Points ∼43% +16%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1128 Points ∼37%
Apple iPad (2017)
1074 Points ∼35% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPad (2017)
4320 Points ∼56% +389%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
884 Points ∼11%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
731 Points ∼9% -17%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
598 Points ∼8% -32%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
518 Points ∼7% -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Apple iPad (2017)
2584 Points ∼52% +178%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
929 Points ∼19%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
852 Points ∼17% -8%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
682 Points ∼14% -27%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
599 Points ∼12% -36%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
15850 Points ∼22% +63%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
15117 Points ∼21% +55%
Apple iPad (2017)
13324 Points ∼19% +37%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
9729 Points ∼14%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
9275 Points ∼13% -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad (2017)
44645 Points ∼9% +281%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
13239 Points ∼3% +13%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
12771 Points ∼3% +9%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11719 Points ∼2%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
10102 Points ∼2% -14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad (2017)
29326 Points ∼15% +162%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
13742 Points ∼7% +23%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
13227 Points ∼7% +18%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11209 Points ∼6%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
9906 Points ∼5% -12%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad (2017)
80.8 fps ∼6% +349%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
23 fps ∼2% +28%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
22 fps ∼2% +22%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
18 fps ∼1%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
17 fps ∼1% -6%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad (2017)
56 fps ∼12% +229%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
21 fps ∼5% +24%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
20 fps ∼4% +18%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
17 fps ∼4%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
14 fps ∼3% -18%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Apple iPad (2017)
40.6 fps ∼7% +378%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.9 fps ∼2% +16%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
9.8 fps ∼2% +15%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.5 fps ∼2%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
7.5 fps ∼1% -12%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad (2017)
28.7 fps ∼8% +246%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.5 fps ∼3% +14%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
9.2 fps ∼3% +11%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.3 fps ∼2%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
6.9 fps ∼2% -17%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad (2017)
28.5 fps ∼7% +375%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
6.4 fps ∼2% +7%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6 fps ∼1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.9 fps ∼1% -18%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
4.8 fps ∼1% -20%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad (2017)
18.5 fps ∼11% +225%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
6 fps ∼3% +5%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5.7 fps ∼3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.7 fps ∼3% -18%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
4.5 fps ∼3% -21%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3.5 fps ∼1% +17%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3 fps ∼1%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
2.6 fps ∼1% -13%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼1% -33%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3.3 fps ∼0% +6%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3.1 fps ∼0%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
2.5 fps ∼0% -19%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼0% -35%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score
Apple iPad (2017)
1061 Points ∼57%
AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
11.8 MB/s ∼7% +35%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.37 MB/s ∼6% +7%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.77 MB/s ∼5%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
8.5 MB/s ∼5% -3%
Random Read 4KB
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
38.8 MB/s ∼22% +183%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
37.3 MB/s ∼22% +172%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
27.72 MB/s ∼16% +102%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
13.7 MB/s ∼8%
Sequential Write 256KB
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
147.67 MB/s ∼69% +60%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
135.5 MB/s ∼63% +47%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
92.38 MB/s ∼43%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
60.3 MB/s ∼28% -35%
Sequential Read 256KB
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
270.1 MB/s ∼33% +55%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
262.2 MB/s ∼32% +51%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
173.7 MB/s ∼21%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
133.5 MB/s ∼16% -23%

Legenda

 
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 Mediatek MT8176, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 Mediatek MT8173, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad (2017) Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 128 GB NVMe
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad (2017)
18148 Points ∼100% +104%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
8897 Points ∼49%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
8570 Points ∼47% -4%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)
4502 Points ∼25% -49%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite (Chrome 58)
3167 Points ∼17% -64%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPad (2017)
205 Points ∼100%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
137 Points ∼67%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)
93 Points ∼45%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite (Chrome 58)
61 Points ∼30%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPad (2017)
128.6 Points ∼100% +172%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
47.337 Points ∼37%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
46.39 Points ∼36% -2%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)
25.761 Points ∼20% -46%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite (Chrome 58)
20.178 Points ∼16% -57%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite (Chrome 58)
11161 ms * ∼100% -197%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)
9236.5 ms * ∼83% -146%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
3975.5 ms * ∼36% -6%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
3756.1 ms * ∼34%
Apple iPad (2017)
1457.7 ms * ∼13% +61%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50Amazon Fire HD 10 2017Lenovo Tab 4 10 PlusHuawei MediaPad M3 Lite
AndroBench 3-5
24%
54%
20%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
56.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
30.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-47%
61.1
8%
56.8
0%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
80.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
55.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-31%
83.9
4%
78.7
-2%
Random Write 4KB
8.77
9.37
7%
11.8
35%
8.5
-3%
Random Read 4KB
13.7
27.72
102%
37.3
172%
38.8
183%
Sequential Write 256KB
92.38
147.67
60%
135.5
47%
60.3
-35%
Sequential Read 256KB
173.7
262.2
51%
270.1
55%
133.5
-23%
Carico massimo
 38.4 °C37.5 °C32.8 °C 
 31.2 °C28.9 °C32.7 °C 
 27.4 °C27 °C29.8 °C 
Massima: 38.4 °C
Media: 31.7 °C
27.7 °C40.6 °C41.5 °C
29.4 °C27.1 °C29.2 °C
29.1 °C27.1 °C26.4 °C
Massima: 41.5 °C
Media: 30.9 °C
Alimentazione (max)  34.8 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.248.22532.941.53137.238.64031.742.35039.6436328.330.48027.329.910026.929.812526.731.6160242920020.943.925020.955.531519.55840018.565.850017.564.163017.563.880015.763.5100015.874.9125016.679.1160015.876.3200015.477.5250015.577.131501672.6400015.867.750001665.2630016.371.3800016.371.41000016.270.61250016.465.71600016.460.7SPL28.686N1.161.2median 16.4Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50median 65.7Delta2.19.328.629.428.62929.52932.429.132.443.936.743.933.726.733.728.926.228.924.824.624.829.124.429.141.927.441.954.720.454.76022.56056.92156.959.620.759.662.622.262.664.921.464.964.418.164.471.119.571.172.819.972.872.619.672.67516.37576.61676.676.715.476.776.615.176.673.515.273.572.414.972.470.715.170.769.615.169.666.315.166.361.81561.851.914.951.985.629.585.662.71.362.7median 66.3Huawei MediaPad M3 Litemedian 18.1median 66.38.42.98.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.59 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.28 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.21 / 5.97 / 6.19 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 9.72 / 9.97 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6100 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
7000 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
6600 mAh
Apple iPad (2017)
8.827 mAh
Power Consumption
29%
42%
36%
-6%
Idle Minimum *
3.21
1.55
52%
1.23
62%
1.45
55%
2.06
36%
Idle Average *
5.97
4.17
30%
3.92
34%
4.44
26%
7.42
-24%
Idle Maximum *
6.19
4.25
31%
4.03
35%
4.61
26%
7.47
-21%
Load Average *
9.72
7.13
27%
5
49%
6.21
36%
9.45
3%
Load Maximum *
9.97
9.63
3%
7.09
29%
6.33
37%
12.31
-23%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
12ore 15minuti
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6ore 27minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
2ore 55minuti
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6100 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
7000 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
6600 mAh
Apple iPad (2017)
8.827 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
43%
78%
89%
77%
Reader / Idle
735
960
31%
1625
121%
1345
83%
1496
104%
WiFi v1.3
387
542
40%
647
67%
802
107%
764
97%
Load
175
274
57%
256
46%
312
78%
225
29%
H.264
585
795
833
845

Pro

+ Processore veloce
+ schermo adeguato
+ 64 GB di memoria
+ 4 GB di RAM
+ prezzo buono considerando le dotazioni tecniche
+ 4 casse
+ connessione HDMI con 4K
+ GPS buono

Contro

- Stabilità
- Materiali
- Design che richiede un po' di tempo per abituarvisi
- Consumi elevati
- Si scalda molto in alcuni punti
- luminosità moderata
- software pubblicitario
Test: The Acer Iconia A3-A50 - fornito da:
Test: The Acer Iconia A3-A50 - fornito da:

Visto singolarmente, l'Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 è un solido tablet, che offre le prestazioni giuste per il suo prezzo. Da questo punto di vista, non ci sono motivi per non comprare il tablet. Il "valore interno" di CPU e GPU è un aspetto positivo e lo differenzia molto rispetto alla concorrenza Android in alcuni benchmark tests. Anche il display e l'uscita audio possono rientrare tra gli aspetti positivi. Tuttavia, ci sono alcune pecche che riguardano il case e lo strano posizionamenti dei pulsanti e delle casse, oltre allo stand in plastica che oscilla. Questi sono problemi che facilmente potrebbero deviarvi verso concorrenti con dotazioni simili, in quanto l'Huawei MediaPad con il suo robusto case in metallo, o il Lenovo Tab 4 con il retro in vetro, non hanno nulla da temere. L'Apple iPad con appena 32 GB di memoria in alcuni casi costa appena 30 Euro (~$35) in più. Tuttavia, supera l'Iconia di molto in termini di performance e calcoli.  

L'Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 sembra cheap, ma i componenti interni sono quelli giusti.

Per rendere competitivo l'Iconia, il prezzo dovrebbe scendere a circa 250 Euro (~$305), il che potrebbe accadere nei prossimi giorni. Così potrebbe subito battere il prezzo della concorrenza. Al di sotto c'è solo l'Amazon Fire HD 10, che è un po' fuori concorrenza con l'utilizzo del software Amazon. L'Huawei MediaPad pure è in offerta a meno di 250 Euro (~$305).

Per quanto riguarda la potenza di calcolo, i competitors Android non sono necessariamente migliori. Solo l'iPad è un vero competitor, ma ha solo 32 GB di memoria e nessuna possibilità di upgrade. La connessione HDMI è una feature unica dell'Iconia. Il 4K, invece sembra essere più fumo. Il dispositivo diventa molto più lento e l'utilizzo dello schermo per un video 4K non è stato un successo durante il test.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 - 01/12/2018 v6
Florian Schaar

Chassis
66%
Tastiera
69 / 80 → 87%
Dispositivo di puntamento
91%
Connettività
38 / 65 → 58%
Peso
83 / 88 → 89%
Batteria
89%
Display
80%
Prestazioni di gioco
27 / 68 → 40%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
51 / 76 → 66%
Temperatura
92%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
74 / 91 → 81%
Fotocamera
30 / 85 → 35%
Media
68%
81%
Tablet - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Tablet Acer Iconia Tab 10
Florian Schaar, 2018-01-22 (Update: 2018-01-22)