Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Portatile Schenker Technologies XMG P407 (Clevo P641HK1)

Sascha Mölck (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 03/31/2017

Portatile per il gaming compatto. Questo dispositivo da 14" Schenker fa girare tutti i giochi in modo fluido sul display matto IPS. Le features sono altrettanto buone, con una combinazione SSD NVMe ed HDD, 16 GB di RAM, ed una buona tastiera. Un modem LTE/UMTS può essere installato se necessario.

Schenker XMG P407
Processore
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz
Scheda grafica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) - 4096 MB, Core: 1493 MHz, Memoria: 3500 MHz, GDDR5, connessione 128-bit, ForceWare 378.49, Optimus
Memoria
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2400, dual-channel, due slots (occupati), max. 32 GB
Schermo
14 pollici 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 157 PPI, LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), IPS, 60 Hz, lucido: no
Scheda madre
Intel HM175
Harddisk
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e, 256 GB 
, + Seagate Barracuda ST1000LM048, 1 TB HDD @ 5400 rpm. Slots: 1x M.2-type 2280 & 1x 2.5-inch
Scheda audio
Realtek ALC892 @ Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Porte di connessione
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen 2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Connessioni Audio: jack cuffie, input microfono, S/PDIF, Lettore schede: SD, SDHC, SDXC, Mini SD, MMC, RSMMC, slot SIM-card
Rete
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 25 x 349 x 247
Batteria
45 Wh ioni di litio, 3 celle
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Fotocamera Principale: 2 MPix
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Stereo, Tastiera: chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, Alimentatore: 120 Watt, Control Center, 24 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
2.118 kg, Alimentazione: 460 gr
Prezzo
1569 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Left side: Mini Displayport 1.4, Mini Displayport 1.2, HDMI, USB 3.1 Gen-1 (Type-A), USB 3.1 Gen-2 (Type-C), microphone input, headphone jack, S/PDIF
Left side: Mini Displayport 1.4, Mini Displayport 1.2, HDMI, USB 3.1 Gen-1 (Type-A), USB 3.1 Gen-2 (Type-C), microphone input, headphone jack, S/PDIF
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Schenker XMG P406
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG P407
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼100%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26 MB/s ∼34% -66%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Schenker XMG P407
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼100%
Schenker XMG P406
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s ∼99% -1%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.7 MB/s ∼32% -68%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
513 MBit/s ∼100% +7%
Schenker XMG P407
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
480 MBit/s ∼94%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (I210-T1)
347 MBit/s ∼68% -28%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
561 MBit/s ∼100% +28%
Schenker XMG P407
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
439 MBit/s ∼78%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (I210-T1)
312 MBit/s ∼56% -29%
278
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
277
cd/m²
254
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
277
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 315 cd/m² Media: 281.6 cd/m² Minimum: 25 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 80 %
Al centro con la batteria: 298 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1104:1 (Nero: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.42 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.11 | - Ø
82% sRGB (Argyll) 54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.5
Schenker XMG P407
LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), 1920x1080, 14
Schenker XMG P406
LG Philips 140WF1 (LGD040A), 1920x1080, 14
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), 1920x1080, 14
Gigabyte P34W v5
2560x1440, 14
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Chi Mei N156HGE-EAL, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-15%
2%
9%
-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
47
56
-19%
47
-0%
41.2
12%
44
6%
Response Time Black / White *
27
30
-11%
26
4%
25.4
6%
29
-7%
PWM Frequency
198
Screen
2%
-0%
-0%
-52%
Brightness
282
266
-6%
277
-2%
270
-4%
234
-17%
Brightness Distribution
80
81
1%
84
5%
83
4%
79
-1%
Black Level *
0.27
0.22
19%
0.26
4%
0.38
-41%
0.54
-100%
Contrast
1104
1282
16%
1046
-5%
731
-34%
478
-57%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.42
4.98
-13%
4.59
-4%
2.71
39%
9.74
-120%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.11
4.08
1%
4.28
-4%
2.11
49%
11.59
-182%
Gamma
2.5 96%
2.51 96%
2.23 108%
2.19 110%
21.9 11%
CCT
6329 103%
5877 111%
6848 95%
6314 103%
11851 55%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
54
54
0%
55
2%
48.5
-10%
76
41%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
82
83
1%
83
1%
76.9
-6%
100
22%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-7% / -1%
1% / 0%
5% / 2%
-27% / -42%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 4396 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms Incremento
↘ 22 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (27.1 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms Incremento
↘ 33 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (43.7 ms).
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
5472
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
22216
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5742
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
64.08 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.08 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.66 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
93.81 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
738 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
149 Points
Aiuto
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
149 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
149 Points ∼100%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
146 Points ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
141 Points ∼95% -5%
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
137 Points ∼92% -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
738 Points ∼100%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
730 Points ∼99% -1%
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
680 Points ∼92% -8%
Schenker XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
680 Points ∼92% -8%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points ∼92% -8%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.68 Points ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.66 Points ∼99%
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.65 Points ∼98% -1%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.65 Points ∼98% -1%
Schenker XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.6 Points ∼95% -4%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.16 Points ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.08 Points ∼99%
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.5 Points ∼92% -7%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.49 Points ∼92% -7%
Schenker XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.45 Points ∼91% -8%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Schenker XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5742 Points ∼100%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5568 Points ∼97% -3%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5550 Points ∼97% -3%
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5460 Points ∼95% -5%
Schenker XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5348 Points ∼93% -7%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Schenker XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22216 Points ∼100%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21976 Points ∼99% -1%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20639 Points ∼93% -7%
Schenker XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20394 Points ∼92% -8%
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20195 Points ∼91% -9%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Schenker XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
13693 Points ∼100%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
13346 Points ∼97% -3%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
12873 Points ∼94% -6%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Schenker XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
3558 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
3542 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
3256 Points ∼92% -8%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Schenker XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
14026 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
13058 Points ∼93% -7%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
12448 Points ∼89% -11%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4326 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
4321 Points ∼100%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
4119 Points ∼95% -5%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Edge 38)
252.12 Points ∼100% +2%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Edge 38)
247.33 Points ∼98% 0%
Schenker XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Edge 38)
247.2 Points ∼98%
PCMark 7 Score
6266 punti
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4069 punti
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5146 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5234 punti
Aiuto
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
5234 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5023 Points ∼96% -4%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
4920 Points ∼94% -6%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4831 Points ∼92% -8%
Gigabyte P34W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
4649 Points ∼89% -11%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
4069 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
4010 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
3899 Points ∼96% -4%
Gigabyte P34W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
3706 Points ∼91% -9%
Schenker XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
3371 Points ∼83% -17%
PCMark 7 - Score
Schenker XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
6266 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte P34W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
6242 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
6147 Points ∼98% -2%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
5874 Points ∼94% -6%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
3818 Points ∼61% -39%
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
Sequential Read: 1345 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1502 MB/s
512K Read: 320.3 MB/s
512K Write: 1276 MB/s
4K Read: 58.89 MB/s
4K Write: 171 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 625.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 539 MB/s
Schenker XMG P407
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
Schenker XMG P406
Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Gigabyte P34W v5
Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
14%
20%
31%
-96%
Write 4k QD32
539
287.3
-47%
508
-6%
418.9
-22%
1.234
-100%
Read 4k QD32
625.4
320.5
-49%
591.9
-5%
621.7
-1%
1.088
-100%
Write 4k
171
110.3
-35%
145.6
-15%
167.3
-2%
1.122
-99%
Read 4k
58.89
43.82
-26%
58.08
-1%
53.83
-9%
0.494
-99%
Write 512
1276
1285
1%
1030
-19%
1483
16%
56.98
-96%
Read 512
320.3
1149
259%
800.1
150%
936.6
192%
43.19
-87%
Write Seq
1502
1290
-14%
1668
11%
1524
1%
107.3
-93%
Read Seq
1345
1634
21%
1977
47%
2269
69%
112.4
-92%
3DMark 06 Standard
26084 punti
3DMark 11 Performance
9921 punti
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
83626 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22393 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score
7194 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
3766 punti
3DMark Time Spy Score
2659 punti
Aiuto
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11622 Points ∼100% +39%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
10791 Points ∼93% +29%
Schenker XMG P407
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
8376 Points ∼72%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
7646 Points ∼66% -9%
Gigabyte P34W v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
7457 Points ∼64% -11%
Schenker XMG P406
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
7436 Points ∼64% -11%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
6382 Points ∼55% -24%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
78820 Points ∼100% +46%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
61281 Points ∼78% +14%
Schenker XMG P407
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
53978 Points ∼68%
Schenker XMG P406
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
51975 Points ∼66% -4%
Gigabyte P34W v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
51225 Points ∼65% -5%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
49539 Points ∼63% -8%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
39824 Points ∼51% -26%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
15387 Points ∼100% +48%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
13534 Points ∼88% +30%
Schenker XMG P407
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
10402 Points ∼68%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
9725 Points ∼63% -7%
Gigabyte P34W v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
9691 Points ∼63% -7%
Schenker XMG P406
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
9649 Points ∼63% -7%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
8223 Points ∼53% -21%
basso medio alto ultra
Tomb Raider (2013) 360.1258.1199.298.9fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 168.9159.2152.276.4fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 178.6174.9145.771fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 63.245.640.4fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 9974.739.820.3fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 142.1122.162.456.3fps
Civilization VI (2016) 70.250.141.842.4fps
Titanfall 2 (2016) 143.7136.568.558.6fps
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
102.3 fps ∼100% +34%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
94 fps ∼92% +23%
Schenker XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
76.4 fps ∼75%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
72.8 fps ∼71% -5%
Gigabyte P34W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
71.4 fps ∼70% -7%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
66.2 fps ∼65% -13%
Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
144.9 fps ∼100% +47%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
131.7 fps ∼91% +33%
Schenker XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
98.9 fps ∼68%
Gigabyte P34W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
87.4 fps ∼60% -12%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
80.6 fps ∼56% -19%
Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
99.8 fps ∼100% +41%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
94 fps ∼94% +32%
Schenker XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
71 fps ∼71%
Schenker XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
58.1 fps ∼58% -18%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
52 fps ∼52% -27%
Battlefield 1 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Schenker XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
56.3 fps ∼100%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
51.2 fps ∼91% -9%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
44.4 fps ∼79% -21%
Ashes of the Singularity - 1920x1080 high
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
57.4 fps ∼100% +42%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
49.4 fps ∼86% +22%
Schenker XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
40.4 fps ∼70%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
29.1 fps ∼51% -28%
Titanfall 2 - 1920x1080 Very High (Insane Texture Quality) / Enabled AA:TS AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
78.5 fps ∼100% +34%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
66.7 fps ∼85% +14%
Schenker XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
58.6 fps ∼75%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
45.5 fps ∼58% -22%
Civilization VI - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS
Schenker XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
42.4 fps ∼100%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
34.1 fps ∼80% -20%
Deus Ex Mankind Divided - 1920x1080 High Preset AF:4x
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
52.4 fps ∼100% +32%
Schenker XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
39.8 fps ∼76%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
32.2 fps ∼61% -19%

Rumorosità

Idle
31 / 32 / 36 dB(A)
HDD
32 dB(A)
Sotto carico
43 / 48 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 29 dB(A)
Schenker XMG P407
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Schenker XMG P406
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P34W v5
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
Noise
-5%
-9%
-2%
1%
off / environment *
29
31
-7%
30.6
-6%
Idle Minimum *
31
30
3%
35
-13%
31.6
-2%
32.5
-5%
Idle Average *
32
32
-0%
36
-13%
31.6
1%
32.5
-2%
Idle Maximum *
36
40
-11%
37
-3%
32.5
10%
32.5
10%
Load Average *
43
47
-9%
43
-0%
46.5
-8%
36.4
15%
Load Maximum *
48
51
-6%
57
-19%
52.5
-9%
52.4
-9%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Carico massimo
 43.6 °C48.7 °C46 °C 
 43.6 °C49 °C45.7 °C 
 34.7 °C36.4 °C27 °C 
Massima: 49 °C
Media: 41.6 °C
44.7 °C43.8 °C44 °C
40.9 °C50.8 °C48.6 °C
30.1 °C31.9 °C31.6 °C
Massima: 50.8 °C
Media: 40.7 °C
Alimentazione (max)  49 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
Schenker XMG P407
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Schenker XMG P406
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P34W v5
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
Heat
-35%
-6%
-18%
2%
Maximum Upper Side *
49
55
-12%
54
-10%
59.3
-21%
44.9
8%
Maximum Bottom *
50.8
58.7
-16%
49.4
3%
56.5
-11%
38.2
25%
Idle Upper Side *
26.3
36.9
-40%
28
-6%
27.8
-6%
27.4
-4%
Idle Bottom *
24.1
41.7
-73%
26.8
-11%
31.8
-32%
29
-20%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Speakers

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.540.82539.236.13129.6314036.537.35027.228.46327.827.38027.429.910027.228.712522.928.316021.736.420022.650.625021.754.131519.855.940018.758.250018.161.36301867.680017.370.9100016.867.7125016.963.7160017.160.2200017.168.3250017.167.8315017.166.2400017.563.6500017.461.6630017.466.5800017.367.71000017.363.81250017.457.4160001751.5SPL29.778.2N1.342.9median 17.4Schenker XMG P407median 61.6Delta1.97.429.834.234.541.330.937.32833.925.431.125.927.723.831.823.740.72347.623.253.622.355.620.954.419.762.119.16219.362.919.664.120.370.419.370.119.269.52067.41969.718.968.718.96418.764.318.763.318.864.318.956.7195518.950.718.743.431.378.81.543.8median 19.2Razer Blade (2016) FHDmedian 62.91.15.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Schenker XMG P407 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 17%, worst was 32%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Razer Blade (2016) FHD audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 17%, worst was 32%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.6 / 1.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 10 / 15 / 24 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 82 / 124 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Schenker XMG P407
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Schenker XMG P406
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
Power Consumption
-13%
-10%
3%
Idle Minimum *
10
12
-20%
14
-40%
10.6
-6%
Idle Average *
15
16
-7%
18
-20%
14.5
3%
Idle Maximum *
24
22
8%
21
12%
15
37%
Load Average *
82
90
-10%
70
15%
90
-10%
Load Maximum *
124
170
-37%
146
-18%
135
-9%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
7ore 23minuti
Navigazione WiFi v1.3 (Edge 38)
4ore 01minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3ore 33minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
1ore 32minuti
Schenker XMG P407
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 45 Wh
Schenker XMG P406
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 45 Wh
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 70 Wh
Gigabyte P34W v5
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 61 Wh
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 41 Wh
Autonomia della batteria
-26%
40%
-22%
-18%
Reader / Idle
443
275
-38%
760
72%
392
-12%
387
-13%
Load
92
72
-22%
59
-36%
47
-49%
41
-55%
WiFi v1.3
241
197
-18%
427
77%
232
-4%
225
-7%
H.264
213
312
46%
217
2%

All'esterno l'XMG P407 non differisce dal predecessore. Ecco perché ci focalizziamo sulle nuove features, che si trovano prevalentemente all'interno. Il nuovo processore Kaby Lake fornisce un buon incremento di prestazioni. La nuova CPU ha anche un buono, ma modesto, impatto sull'autonomia. La GeForce GTX 1050 Ti fa parte della fascia superiore delle schede Nvidia, ma offre più prestazioni rispetto ai modelli top delle precedenti generazioni. In altre parole il chip GeForce GTX 970M dell'XMG P406 perde nei 3DMark benchmarks e nel gaming.

Lo sviluppo di calore sotto sforzo è moderato: l'XMG P407 non diventa caldo come il suo predecessore. La differenza tra il P406 ed il P407 in termini di rumorosità è minima. Tuttavia notiamo qualche miglioramento: la ventola della CPU del P406 accelera inaspettatamente e si fa sentire. Questo comportamento non si nota con il P407. Anche le porte sono aggiornate: una delle quattro porte USB 3.1 Type-A Gen-1 è una USB 3.1 Type-C Gen-2. In aggiunta, una delle due Mini DisplayPorts ora monta lo standard 1.4.

Con l'XMG P407, Schenker realizza un buon portatile gaming da 14".

Un velocissimo SSD NVMe garantisce la fluidità di sistema. Lo spazio di archiviazione è fornito da un hard drive da 2,5". Entrambi i drives possono essere cambiati, in quanto il vassoio inferiore si apre senza sforzi particolari. Nel pacchetto è compresa una buona tastiera. Il display IPS matto ha piacevoli angoli di visuale e buon contrasto. Tuttavia, il display potrebbe offrire di più in termini di luminosità. I tempi di switching del display sono leggermente migliori rispetto a quelli dell'XMG P406.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Pro

+ solido case in metallo ben realizzato
+ molte possibilità di configurazione
+ dispositivi di input molto buoni
+ display matto IPS
+ molte porte
+ NVMe SSD

Contro

- utilizzo del turbo e autonomia da migliorare
- display con tempi di switching lenti
- prestazioni basse con la batteria
- manda la Thunderbolt 3
In review: XMG P407. Test model provided by Schenker Technologies
In review: XMG P407. Test model provided by Schenker Technologies

On the outside, the XMG P407 is not different from its predecessor. That is why we shall focus on the new features, which are found primarily on the inside. The new Kaby Lake processor provides a slight performance increase. The fresh CPU also has a good, though modest, impact on battery life. The built-in GeForce GTX 1050 Ti core is in the upper middle range of Nvidia's current line-up, but it offers more performance than many top-range models of the previous generation. In other words: The GeForce GTX 970M chip built into the XMG P406 loses in 3DMark benchmarks as well as in real-world gaming.

The heat development under load can be described as moderate: The XMG P407 does not become as warm as its predecessor. The differences between the P406 and the P407 in terms of system noise are small. However, we notice some improvement: The CPU fan on the P406 likes to speed up unexpectedly and is then clearly perceptible. This behaviour is apparently not present on the P407. The ports bear further updates: One of the four USB 3.1 Type-A Gen-1 ports makes way for a USB 3.1 Type-C Gen-2 slot. In addition, one of the two Mini DisplayPorts is now equipped with the 1.4 standard.

 

 

With the XMG P407, Schenker delivers a well-rounded 14-inch gaming notebook.

A lightning-quick NVMe SSD ensures a snappy system. The required storage space is provided by a 2.5-inch hard drive. Both drives can be exchanged, since the bottom plate of the base unit can be removed effortlessly. A good keyboard is also in the package. The matte IPS display has pleasantly wide viewing angles and good contrast. However, the display could offer more in terms of brightness. The switching times of the built-in display are only slightly better than the ones on the XMG P406.

Schenker XMG P407 - 03/06/2017 v6
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
76 / 98 → 78%
Tastiera
83%
Dispositivo di puntamento
86%
Connettività
66 / 81 → 82%
Peso
62 / 66 → 93%
Batteria
73%
Display
86%
Prestazioni di gioco
90%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
94%
Temperatura
86 / 95 → 90%
Rumorosità
76 / 90 → 84%
Audio
71%
Fotocamera
52 / 85 → 61%
Media
77%
85%
Gaming - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Portatile Schenker Technologies XMG P407 (Clevo P641HK1)
Sascha Mölck, 2017-03-31 (Update: 2017-03-31)