Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Tablet Lenovo Tab 4 10

Florian Wimmer (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 10/01/2017

Multi-talentuoso. Con un pacchetto di accessori completo, Lenovo predispone il suo economico Tablet Tab 4 10 per tutti gli scenari. Vediamo la qualità di questo tablet nella nostra recensione.

Lenovo Tab 4 10 (Tab 4 Serie)
Processore
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
Scheda grafica
Qualcomm Adreno 308
Memoria
2048 MB 
Schermo
10.1 pollici 16:10, 1280x800 pixel 149 PPI, kapazitiver Touchscreen, IPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 9.5 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: 3,5mm-Audioport, Lettore schede: microSD, Sensori: Beschleunigung, Hall, UKW-Radio
Rete
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 8.4 x 247 x 170
Batteria
26.6 Wh, 7000 mAh polimeri di litio, Autonomia della batteria (dichiarata dal produttore): 9.5 ore
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 5 MPix Autofokus
Fotocamera Secondaria: 2 MPix
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Stereo-Front-Lautsprecher, Tastiera: virtuelle Tastatur, Ladegerät, USB-Kabel, SHAREit, SYNCit, Microsoft Office, Netflix, 24 Mesi Garanzia, Miracast, senza ventola
Peso
505 gr, Alimentazione: 83 gr
Prezzo
179 Euro

 

Lenovo Tab 4 10
Lenovo Tab 4 10
Lenovo Tab 4 10
Lenovo Tab 4 10
Lenovo Tab 4 10
Lenovo Tab 4 10
Lenovo Tab 4 10
Lenovo Tab 4 10
Lenovo Tab 4 10

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
615 MBit/s ∼100% +1147%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
122 MBit/s ∼20% +147%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
85.2 MBit/s ∼14% +73%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.3 MBit/s ∼8%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
569 MBit/s ∼100% +1018%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s ∼20% +120%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
84.9 MBit/s ∼15% +67%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
50.9 MBit/s ∼9%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – forest
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – forest
GPS Lenovo Tab 4 10 – overview
GPS Lenovo Tab 4 10 – overview
GPS Lenovo Tab 4 10 – crossroads
GPS Lenovo Tab 4 10 – crossroads
GPS Lenovo Tab 4 10 – forest
GPS Lenovo Tab 4 10 – forest

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
293
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
322
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
316
cd/m²
325
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 325 cd/m² Media: 304.6 cd/m² Minimum: 13.16 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 86 %
Al centro con la batteria: 316 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1580:1 (Nero: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 5.7 | - Ø
84% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.25
Lenovo Tab 4 10
IPS, 1280x800, 10.1
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
IPS, 1280x800, 9.6
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
IPS, 1280x800, 10.1
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Super AMOLED, 2048x1526, 9.7
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
TFT, 1920x1200, 10.1
Screen
6%
10%
48%
-30%
Brightness
305
409
34%
383
26%
468
53%
520
70%
Brightness Distribution
86
92
7%
81
-6%
82
-5%
91
6%
Black Level *
0.2
0.32
-60%
0.25
-25%
0.68
-240%
Contrast
1580
1281
-19%
1568
-1%
797
-50%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5
4.5
10%
4.2
16%
1.8
64%
4.2
16%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.7
2
65%
2.9
49%
1.2
79%
4.8
16%
Gamma
2.25 107%
2.17 111%
2.23 108%
2.11 114%
2.42 99%
CCT
7921 82%
6930 94%
7115 91%
6500 100%
7434 87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
82.32
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.06

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 55 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9304 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 247500) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms Incremento
↘ 17 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms Incremento
↘ 21 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.6 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
144426 Points ∼63% +292%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
44191 Points ∼19% +20%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
36871 Points ∼16% 0%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
36868 Points ∼16%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
34009 Points ∼15% -8%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
5432 Points ∼78% +64%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
3458 Points ∼50% +5%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
3307 Points ∼48%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
2980 Points ∼43% -10%
Work performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
5608 Points ∼66% +24%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
4813 Points ∼57% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
4796 Points ∼57% +6%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
4518 Points ∼54%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
3948 Points ∼47% -13%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1007 Points ∼65% +35%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
753 Points ∼49% +1%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
745 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
682 Points ∼44% -8%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
672 Points ∼44% -10%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
4941 Points ∼57% +1013%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
511 Points ∼6% +15%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
444 Points ∼5%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
437 Points ∼5% -2%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
292 Points ∼3% -34%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1931 Points ∼44% +155%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
1372 Points ∼31% +81%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
1362 Points ∼31% +80%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
758 Points ∼17%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
752 Points ∼17% -1%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
3505 Points ∼53% +138%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
2240 Points ∼34% +52%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
1475 Points ∼22%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
1397 Points ∼21% -5%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
1192 Points ∼18% -19%
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
2409 Points ∼64% +209%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
1015 Points ∼27% +30%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
891 Points ∼24% +14%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
780 Points ∼21%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
647 Points ∼17% -17%
Geekbench 4.1
Compute RenderScript Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
7063 Points ∼82% +405%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
1398 Points ∼16%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
1103 Points ∼13% -21%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
4187 Points ∼17% +121%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
1896 Points ∼8%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
1870 Points ∼7% -1%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
1697 Points ∼7% -10%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1745 Points ∼29% +158%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
676 Points ∼11%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
666 Points ∼11% -1%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
588 Points ∼10% -13%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1811 Points ∼60% +106%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
1657 Points ∼55% +88%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
895 Points ∼30% +2%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
880 Points ∼29%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
810 Points ∼27% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
4626 Points ∼60% +10914%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
388 Points ∼5% +824%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
167 Points ∼2% +298%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
43 Points ∼1% +2%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
42 Points ∼1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
3438 Points ∼69% +6387%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
468 Points ∼9% +783%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
203 Points ∼4% +283%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
55 Points ∼1% +4%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
53 Points ∼1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
21886 Points ∼30% +111%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
12095 Points ∼17% +16%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
10470 Points ∼15% +1%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
10388 Points ∼14%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
9076 Points ∼13% -13%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
34002 Points ∼7% +523%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
6151 Points ∼1% +13%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
5467 Points ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
5456 Points ∼1%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
4622 Points ∼1% -15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
30277 Points ∼15% +396%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
6905 Points ∼4% +13%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
6116 Points ∼3% 0%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
6100 Points ∼3%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
5188 Points ∼3% -15%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
92 fps ∼7% +1095%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
12 fps ∼1% +56%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
8.6 fps ∼1% +12%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
7.7 fps ∼1%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
7.6 fps ∼1% -1%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
59 fps ∼13% +354%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
14 fps ∼3% +8%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
13 fps ∼3% 0%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
13 fps ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
11 fps ∼2% -15%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
48 fps ∼9% +1614%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
4.9 fps ∼1% +75%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
3.1 fps ∼1% +11%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
2.8 fps ∼1%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
2.7 fps ∼0% -4%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
34 fps ∼9% +518%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
6.2 fps ∼2% +13%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
5.8 fps ∼2% +5%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
5.5 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
4.5 fps ∼1% -18%

Legenda

 
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425, Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425, Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) Mediatek MT8735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
9531 Points ∼100% +223%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98)
3855 Points ∼40% +30%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 (Chrome 60)
2955 Points ∼31%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 (Chrome 58)
2657 Points ∼28% -10%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) (Chrome 59)
2290 Points ∼24% -23%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
132 Points ∼100% +113%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98)
65 Points ∼49% +5%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 (Chrome 58)
62 Points ∼47% 0%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 (Chrome 60)
62 Points ∼47%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) (Chrome 59)
54 Points ∼41% -13%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) (Chrome 59)
13705 ms * ∼100% -11%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 (Chrome 58)
13191 ms * ∼96% -6%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 (Chrome 60)
12386 ms * ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98)
9788.7 ms * ∼71% +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
2244.4 ms * ∼16% +82%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Lenovo Tab 4 10Huawei MediaPad T3 10Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
AndroBench 3-5
-7%
-15%
29%
-11%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
59.9
58.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-2%
34.9
-42%
58.56 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-2%
50.09 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-16%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.5
83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-2%
40.9
-52%
76.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-10%
75.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-11%
Random Write 4KB
8.9
5.3
-40%
9.8
10%
13.13
48%
10.01
12%
Random Read 4KB
32.3
50
55%
23
-29%
45.82
42%
23.46
-27%
Sequential Write 256KB
45.3
41.1
-9%
66
46%
87.6
93%
45.88
1%
Sequential Read 256KB
275
154.7
-44%
216
-21%
288.58
5%
215.76
-22%
Carico massimo
 32.5 °C33 °C34.5 °C 
 31.6 °C29.9 °C30.5 °C 
 30.4 °C28.2 °C27.9 °C 
Massima: 34.5 °C
Media: 30.9 °C
35.6 °C37.2 °C34.6 °C
29.5 °C30.7 °C32.2 °C
27.7 °C29.7 °C30.1 °C
Massima: 37.2 °C
Media: 31.9 °C
Alimentazione (max)  53.1 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.129.230.12527.729.327.73128.630.728.64034.141.134.1503032.7306329.331.629.3802828.32810029.427.529.412537.528.737.516040.223.640.220046.622.646.625050.726.950.731553.221.753.240055.92155.950061.320.861.363064.71864.780069.617.569.6100073.517.373.5125074.616.874.6160072.615.872.6200071.715.871.7250073.116.173.1315073.415.973.4400073.21673.2500070.915.970.9630069.91669.9800067.416.167.41000063.91663.91250056.41656.41600045.415.845.4SPL83.629.783.6N55.51.355.5median 64.7Lenovo Tab 4 10median 16.8median 64.7Delta10.7310.727.328.427.326.62826.62629.42629.23129.225.726.725.72726.72726.325.726.328.828.128.836.430.736.43321.73334.120.434.13922.53947.722.847.748.320.248.356.522.356.564.220.364.271.821.371.868.819.668.869.518.869.569.416.469.471.91671.972.515.872.574.615.874.676.315.376.38115.28180.41580.474.71574.776.415.276.467.315.267.352.615.152.687.23087.264.81.464.8median 68.8Huawei MediaPad T3 10median 18.8median 68.813.33.313.3hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Lenovo Tab 4 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 15% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei MediaPad T3 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.13 / 0.14 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.09 / 3.71 / 3.84 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 5.07 / 6.88 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Tab 4 10
7000 mAh
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
4680 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
7300 mAh
Power Consumption
16%
-25%
-14%
Idle Minimum *
1.09
0.76
30%
2.08
-91%
1.18
-8%
Idle Average *
3.71
3.23
13%
3.5
6%
4.65
-25%
Idle Maximum *
3.84
3.35
13%
3.58
7%
4.74
-23%
Load Average *
5.07
4.79
6%
6.97
-37%
5.75
-13%
Load Maximum *
6.88
5.72
17%
7.4
-8%
6.97
-1%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
10ore 32minuti
Lenovo Tab 4 10
7000 mAh
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
4800 mAh
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
4680 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
7300 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
-31%
-26%
20%
31%
Reader / Idle
1134
1321
1903
2634
WiFi v1.3
632
439
-31%
467
-26%
760
20%
826
31%
Load
229
302
375
428
H.264
527
622
551
893

Pro

+ ampia autonomia
+ molto accessori
+ casse buone
+ GPS preciso
+ display con contrasto elevato
+ case non scivoloso

Contro

- mediocre stabilità del case
- scricchiolii se lo si torce
- WLAN lenta
- immagini della fotocamera in parte sgranate
- display scuro
- manca il sensore di luminosità
Recensione: Lenovo Tab 4 10. Modello fornito da notebooksbilliger.de
Recensione: Lenovo Tab 4 10. Modello fornito da notebooksbilliger.de

Con il Tab 4 10, Lenovo realizza un tablet economico per restare in gara con gli altri concorrenti dal prezzo simile. L'ampia autonomia, dovuta alla grande batteria è eccellente. Ma la vera highlight, è che Lenovo realizza un pacchetto di accessori per i bambini, per la produttività, o per lo smart assistant Alexa, che estende le funzioni del tablet. Anche se potrete comprare un altro case protettivo, una tastiera Bluetooth, o una cassa da un altro venditore, è piacevole che Lenovo si sia impegnata su questo dispositivo economico per renderlo più usabile dai clienti.

Il produttore potrebbe migliorare la stabilità del case del Lenovo Tab 4 10, la WLAN potrebbe essere più veloce, il display più luminoso, e le fotocamere sono quelle che vi aspettate: abbastanza mediocri. D'altro canto, il GPS è preciso, e le casse producono un suono abbastanza bilanciato.

Il Lenovo Tab 4 10 si distingue dalla massa per la grande batteria e i numerosi accessori - un buon acquisto nel complesso.

Ci sono vari motivi per scegliere il Lenovo Tab 4 10: i molti accessori, gli accounts utente multipli, la grande batteria, e le prestazioni tipiche di questa fascia di prezzo. Il tablet si comporta bene in molte aree.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Lenovo Tab 4 10 - 09/25/2017 v6
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
75%
Tastiera
65 / 80 → 82%
Dispositivo di puntamento
86%
Connettività
27 / 65 → 42%
Peso
83 / 88 → 90%
Batteria
93%
Display
83%
Prestazioni di gioco
6 / 68 → 9%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
39 / 76 → 52%
Temperatura
93%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
61 / 91 → 67%
Fotocamera
62 / 85 → 73%
Media
67%
79%
Tablet - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Tablet Lenovo Tab 4 10
Florian Wimmer, 2017-10- 1 (Update: 2017-10- 1)