Recensione breve del Tablet Huawei MediaPad T3 10
Veloce o lento? Lo Huawei MediaPad T3 10 impressiona con le elevate prestazioni del processore per essere un tablet di fascia medio bassa, ma non convince per le prestazioni complessive. Come si comporta? Vediamolo insieme.
Fotocamera Secondaria: 2 MPix
Size Comparison
I nostri Top 10
» Top 10 Portatili Multimedia
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming Leggeri
» Top 10 Portatili da Ufficio e Business economici
» Top 10 Portatili Premium da Ufficio/Business
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 300 Euro
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 500 Euro
» Top 10 dei Portatili Workstation
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibili
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Smartphones
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 |
|
Distribuzione della luminosità: 92 %
Al centro con la batteria: 410 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1281:1 (Nero: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
65.4% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.17
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 IPS, 1280x800, 9.6 | Samsung Galaxy Tab E (9.6, Wi-Fi) IPS, 1280x800, 9.6 | Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1 | Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A IPS, 1280x800, 10.1 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 TFT, 1920x1200, 10.1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -37% | -30% | -34% | -22% | |
Brightness middle | 410 | 457 11% | 392 -4% | 370 -10% | 542 32% |
Brightness | 409 | 453 11% | 385 -6% | 351 -14% | 520 27% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 87 -5% | 91 -1% | 89 -3% | 91 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.49 -53% | 0.59 -84% | 0.4 -25% | 0.68 -113% |
Contrast | 1281 | 933 -27% | 664 -48% | 925 -28% | 797 -38% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 4.5 | 5.75 -28% | 4.5 -0% | 4.6 -2% | 4.2 7% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 14.2 | 7.8 45% | 9.5 33% | 6.7 53% | |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 2 | 5.33 -167% | 4.8 -140% | 6.5 -225% | 4.8 -140% |
Gamma | 2.17 111% | 2.61 92% | 2.47 97% | 2.17 111% | 2.42 99% |
CCT | 6930 94% | 6820 95% | 7426 88% | 6354 102% | 7434 87% |
* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9953 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured. |
Tempi di risposta del Display
↔ Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco | ||
---|---|---|
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23 ms Incremento | |
↘ 17 ms Calo | ||
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.3 ms). | ||
↔ Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio | ||
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24 ms Incremento | |
↘ 23 ms Calo | ||
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (42.1 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab E (9.6, Wi-Fi) |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab E (9.6, Wi-Fi) | |
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab E (9.6, Wi-Fi) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 |
PCMark for Android | |
Work 2.0 performance score | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Work performance score | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab E (9.6, Wi-Fi) |
Geekbench 4.1/4.2 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab E (9.6, Wi-Fi) | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab E (9.6, Wi-Fi) |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab E (9.6, Wi-Fi) |
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 |
* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Settaggi | Valore | ||
high | 18 fps | ||
very low | 29 fps |
Real Racing 3 | |||
Settaggi | Valore | ||
high | 27 fps | ||
low | 49 fps |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 4800 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab E (9.6, Wi-Fi) 5000 mAh | Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro 6600 mAh | Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A 4680 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 7300 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Autonomia della batteria | 1% | 6% | 12% | 94% | |
Reader / Idle | 1134 | 850 -25% | 1230 8% | 1275 12% | 2634 132% |
H.264 | 527 | 502 -5% | 593 13% | 603 14% | 893 69% |
WiFi v1.3 | 439 | 518 18% | 416 -5% | 435 -1% | 826 88% |
Load | 229 | 264 15% | 248 8% | 279 22% | 428 87% |
Pro
Contro
Come sospettavamo lo Huawei MediaPad T3 10 non è una rivoluzione, ma un update. Le politiche dei modelli Huawei si rivelano negative: nella precedente generazione c'era un potente modello Pro di fascia media, ora c'è un modello più sottile dopo il modello top (M3 Lite) ed un modello meno potente di fascia media, che è il T3 10. Offre un case leggero, dotazioni adeguate, e software buono. Potete anche fare chiamate con il modello LTE che non è consentito sempre con i tablets LTE.
Non dovreste aspettarvi molto dalle fotocamere, non adatte a scattare video o immagini serie. Lo schermo ha luminosità media, ma distribuzione e contrasto buoni, ma offre una bassa copertura del colore.
Sfortunatamente, lo Huawei MediaPad T3 10 è tra due sedie: non ha un ottimo rapporto prezzo-prestazioni, e nemmeno prestazioni elevate con le singole applicazioni. Pertanto è un tablet medio, che richiede tempi di ricarica lunghi.
Dopo il segmento performance dove le prestazioni del processore sono adeguate e lo spazio abbastanza veloce, ci sono due cose da pensare, la soluzione grafica non ha prestazioni adeguate per gaming o applicazioni pesanti. L'autonomia è buona, ma i tempi di ricarica troppo lunghi.
Nel complesso, lo Huawei MediaPad T3 10 non è un ottimo affare, ma un dispositivo della sua fascia. Solo le prestazioni del processore possono risultare utili per questo prezzo. A parte questo, ci sono concorrenti più potenti, come il Galaxy Tab A Samsung, che ha un'autonomia maggiore e prestazioni grafiche superiori.
Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 - 06/23/2017 v6
Florian Wimmer