Notebookcheck

Recensione Breve dello Smartphone UMi Super Euro Edition

Florian Wimmer (traduzione a cura di G.DeLuca), 10/10/2016

Limited edition. Si suppone che saranno solo 999 gli smartphones UMi Super Euro Edition in distribuzione in tutto il mondo. Pertanto questo smartphone blue è abbastanza esclusivo, sebbene non differisca molto dall'UMi Super standard. Lo smartphone è eccellente in alcune aree, ma altre features sono tutt'altro che "super".

UMI Super Euro Edition (Super Serie)
Processore
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755
Scheda grafica
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memoria
4096 MB 
Schermo
5.5 pollici 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, kapazitiver Touchscreen, IPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 24.69 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: 3,5mm-Audiokombiport, Lettore schede: microSD fino a 128 GByte, 1 Lettore impronte digitali, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: sensore prossimità, bussola, sensore posizione, sensore accelerazione
Rete
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B7/​B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 8.5 x 151 x 77
Batteria
17.4 Wh, 4000 mAh ioni di litio
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 13 MPix f/​2.0, AF, dual LED flash, 1080p videos
Fotocamera Secondaria: 5 MPix
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Casse inferiori, Tastiera: Tastiera virtuale, alimentatore AC, cavo USB, tool SIM, radio FM, senza ventola
Peso
202 gr, Alimentazione: 78 gr
Prezzo
200 Euro

 

sidebar_1-multi

Größenvergleich

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Lenovo ZUK Z2
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
311 MBit/s ∼100% +185%
UMI Super Euro Edition
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
109 MBit/s ∼35%
Blackview R7
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s ∼33% -6%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.6 MBit/s ∼15% -56%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Lenovo ZUK Z2
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
154 MBit/s ∼100% +43%
UMI Super Euro Edition
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
108 MBit/s ∼70%
Blackview R7
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
79.4 MBit/s ∼52% -26%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
50 MBit/s ∼32% -54%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – intersection
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – intersection
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS UMi Super – overview
GPS UMi Super – overview
GPS UMi Super – intersection
GPS UMi Super – intersection
GPS UMi Super – bridge
GPS UMi Super – bridge

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
384
cd/m²
416
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
388
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
406
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 446 cd/m² Media: 410.4 cd/m² Minimum: 15.96 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 85 %
Al centro con la batteria: 418 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1348:1 (Nero: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
Gamma: 2.36
sidebar_3-multi
UMI Super Euro Edition
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Lenovo ZUK Z2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Blackview R7
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Honor 5X
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
-14%
-46%
-93%
-10%
Brightness middle
418
512
22%
414
-1%
552
32%
535
28%
Brightness
410
502
22%
420
2%
526
28%
521
27%
Brightness Distribution
85
84
-1%
94
11%
91
7%
85
0%
Black Level *
0.31
0.58
-87%
0.33
-6%
0.64
-106%
0.43
-39%
Contrast
1348
883
-34%
1255
-7%
863
-36%
1244
-8%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.4
3.8
14%
8.1
-84%
11
-150%
4.88
-11%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.5
11.2
-72%
13.8
-112%
20.8
-220%
8.66
-33%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.6
2.7
25%
9.6
-167%
14.3
-297%
5.2
-44%
Gamma
2.36 102%
2.09 115%
2 120%
2.21 109%
2.26 106%
CCT
6993 93%
6076 107%
7754 84%
12996 50%
7766 84%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms Incremento
↘ 10 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.2 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12 ms Incremento
↘ 17 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10377 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
50072 Points ∼22%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
122513 Points ∼54% +145%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
30676 Points ∼13% -39%
Blackview R7
50572 Points ∼22% +1%
Honor 5X
37152 Points ∼16% -26%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
1144 Points ∼31%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
1706 Points ∼47% +49%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
831 Points ∼23% -27%
Blackview R7
1155 Points ∼32% +1%
Honor 5X
1089 Points ∼30% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
523 Points ∼6%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
4506 Points ∼55% +762%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
172 Points ∼2% -67%
Blackview R7
518 Points ∼6% -1%
Honor 5X
103 Points ∼1% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
595 Points ∼9%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3302 Points ∼52% +455%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
209 Points ∼3% -65%
Blackview R7
590 Points ∼9% -1%
Honor 5X
129 Points ∼2% -78%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
11654 Points ∼15%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
20910 Points ∼26% +79%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
9768 Points ∼12% -16%
Blackview R7
12585 Points ∼16% +8%
Honor 5X
8174 Points ∼10% -30%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
10567 Points ∼2%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
32997 Points ∼7% +212%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4333 Points ∼1% -59%
Blackview R7
10334 Points ∼2% -2%
Honor 5X
7764 Points ∼2% -27%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
10791 Points ∼5%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
29241 Points ∼14% +171%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4944 Points ∼2% -54%
Blackview R7
10762 Points ∼5% 0%
Honor 5X
7852 Points ∼4% -27%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
17 fps ∼1%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
91 fps ∼5% +435%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
14 fps ∼1% -18%
Blackview R7
17 fps ∼1% 0%
Honor 5X
14 fps ∼1% -18%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
18 fps ∼4%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
60 fps ∼13% +233%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
8.4 fps ∼2% -53%
Blackview R7
17 fps ∼4% -6%
Honor 5X
14 fps ∼3% -22%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
7.1 fps ∼1%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
44 fps ∼8% +520%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
6 fps ∼1% -15%
Blackview R7
4.7 fps ∼1% -34%
Honor 5X
5.4 fps ∼1% -24%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
7.5 fps ∼2%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
43 fps ∼12% +473%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
3 fps ∼1% -60%
Blackview R7
4.7 fps ∼1% -37%
Honor 5X
5.9 fps ∼2% -21%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
4.7 fps ∼1%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
30 fps ∼6% +538%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4.4 fps ∼1% -6%
Blackview R7
2.5 fps ∼0% -47%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
5.1 fps ∼3%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
29 fps ∼17% +469%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1.9 fps ∼1% -63%
Blackview R7
2.5 fps ∼1% -51%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
4596 Points ∼48%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
6969 Points ∼73% +52%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
3813 Points ∼40% -17%
Blackview R7
4364 Points ∼46% -5%
Honor 5X
3794 Points ∼40% -17%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
771 Points ∼45%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
1071 Points ∼63% +39%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Blackview R7
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Honor 5X
9 Points ∼1% -99%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
666 Points ∼7%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
4335 Points ∼47% +551%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
286 Points ∼3% -57%
Blackview R7
655 Points ∼7% -2%
Honor 5X
763 Points ∼8% +15%
Memory (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
1052 Points ∼24%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
1983 Points ∼45% +88%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
450 Points ∼10% -57%
Blackview R7
1030 Points ∼23% -2%
Honor 5X
787 Points ∼18% -25%
System (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
2187 Points ∼21%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
2986 Points ∼29% +37%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1090 Points ∼11% -50%
Blackview R7
1971 Points ∼19% -10%
Honor 5X
1378 Points ∼13% -37%
Overall (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
1043 Points ∼27%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
2290 Points ∼58% +120%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
192 Points ∼5% -82%
Blackview R7
338 Points ∼9% -68%
Honor 5X
297 Points ∼8% -72%
Geekbench 4.0
Compute RenderScript Score (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
1561 Points ∼12%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
2818 Points ∼10%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1588 Points ∼6% -44%
Blackview R7
2851 Points ∼10% +1%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
727 Points ∼13%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
572 Points ∼10% -21%
Blackview R7
728 Points ∼13% 0%

Legenda

 
UMI Super Euro Edition Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo ZUK Z2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Liquid Zest Plus Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview R7 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
4117 Points ∼8%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
8436 Points ∼17% +105%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
2697 Points ∼5% -34%
Blackview R7
3885 Points ∼8% -6%
Honor 5X
3595 Points ∼7% -13%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
9410.2 ms * ∼16%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3290.2 ms * ∼6% +65%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
12910 ms * ∼22% -37%
Blackview R7
9748.3 ms * ∼16% -4%
Honor 5X
12510 ms * ∼21% -33%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
26.211 Points ∼0%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
51.655 Points ∼0% +97%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
18.028 Points ∼0% -31%
Blackview R7
25.349 Points ∼0% -3%
Honor 5X
21.92 Points ∼0% -16%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
17.88 MB/s ∼21%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
16.17 MB/s ∼19% -10%
Blackview R7
11.87 MB/s ∼14% -34%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
36.22 MB/s ∼38%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
27.68 MB/s ∼29% -24%
Blackview R7
15.56 MB/s ∼16% -57%
Random Write 4KB (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
11.88 MB/s ∼7%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
5.64 MB/s ∼3% -53%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
7.95 MB/s ∼5% -33%
Blackview R7
11.4 MB/s ∼7% -4%
Honor 5X
10 MB/s ∼6% -16%
Random Read 4KB (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
28.17 MB/s ∼16%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
21.27 MB/s ∼12% -24%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
20.25 MB/s ∼12% -28%
Blackview R7
28.02 MB/s ∼16% -1%
Honor 5X
17 MB/s ∼10% -40%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
126.95 MB/s ∼59%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
46.52 MB/s ∼22% -63%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
39.51 MB/s ∼18% -69%
Blackview R7
122.67 MB/s ∼57% -3%
Honor 5X
78 MB/s ∼36% -39%
Sequential Read 256KB (ordina per valore)
UMI Super Euro Edition
257.8 MB/s ∼31%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
239.42 MB/s ∼29% -7%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
178.65 MB/s ∼21% -31%
Blackview R7
247.58 MB/s ∼30% -4%
Honor 5X
144 MB/s ∼17% -44%
Carico massimo
 41.4 °C43.2 °C42.6 °C 
 41.7 °C42.3 °C42.9 °C 
 40.8 °C41.3 °C41.8 °C 
Massima: 43.2 °C
Media: 42 °C
39.2 °C40.2 °C41.4 °C
39.7 °C40.4 °C41 °C
39.7 °C40.1 °C41 °C
Massima: 41.4 °C
Media: 40.3 °C
Alimentazione (max)  37.4 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.635.32525.432.53125.331.84032.929.15033.634.26331.628.98028.428.21002726.412520.825.91602224.120021.323.225020.826.531521.232.740019.440.950019.551.763017.755.180017.963.9100017.867.4125017.368.6160017.465.6200016.768.4250017.267.2315018.269.2400017.974.9500017.667630017.763.9800017.866.11000017.963.11250018.151.61600018.247SPL3080.2N1.342.3median 17.9UMI Super Euro Editionmedian 63.1Delta1.314.233.232.433.229.931.329.930.331.730.332.42632.446.639.446.629.836.229.826.428.626.425.725.425.727.821.327.838.823.338.842.922.542.949.222.449.253.121.353.159.618.459.663.617.563.666.817.566.867.817.267.872.516.872.571.817.371.871.617.471.672.516.672.576.617.376.676.817.676.874.217.674.272.917.772.974.217.474.273.617.773.671.417.971.462.218.162.248.618.148.685.329.885.361.61.361.6median 67.8Lenovo ZUK Z2median 17.7median 67.811.81.611.832.435.631.335.231.735.82627.639.436.236.234.228.627.725.425.121.32323.326.122.532.222.440.121.346.418.454.617.563.217.564.317.268.316.871.117.372.817.47216.673.117.37317.672.917.674.117.772.717.473.117.772.917.972.118.173.918.175.829.884.31.357.6median 17.7Acer Liquid Zest Plusmedian 721.61224.323.124.324.322.32122.722.322.720.322.622.723.723.229.623.721.221.922.221.219.119.32019.117.617.118.517.620.120.12120.130.630.931.930.616.71616.516.718.218.317.318.217.817.618.317.81719.517.31719.529.216.419.527.13917.827.130.643.414.830.63850.915.73842.35616.442.345.66015.845.647.861.713.647.850.963.114.850.950.26312.650.252.264.711.252.252.86510.952.853.4669.753.452.4659.652.448.6619.748.64153.69.44134.147.69.434.129.743.79.429.761.774.426.161.712.828.50.812.8median 38Blackview R7median 50.9median 14.8median 3814.216.82.814.234.139.435.734.134.432.132.434.432.729.727.532.728.635.927.528.631.937.935.431.934.131.429.734.129.326.529.229.325.525.825.325.527.925.724.127.935.628.62335.640.535.223.140.548.943.418.548.953.945.720.553.95748.518.75760.150.218.160.159.750.918.259.75750.319.15764.457.11764.471.362.717.371.374.765.917.474.775.767.517.575.776.267.217.376.279.169.617.279.181.171.917.281.180.170.617.280.176.567.317.676.574.665.117.774.66757.917.86757.547.11857.541.931.417.941.988.279.129.988.265.638.11.365.6median 60.1Honor 5Xmedian 50.9median 17.9median 60.114.713.91.514.7hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
UMI Super Euro Edition audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.18 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo ZUK Z2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.29 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Acer Liquid Zest Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.28 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Blackview R7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.8% lower than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (42.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Honor 5X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | very high highs - on average 16.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.34 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.84 / 1.94 / 2.07 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 5.88 / 7.67 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
UMI Super Euro Edition
4000 mAh
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3500 mAh
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
5000 mAh
Blackview R7
3000 mAh
Honor 5X
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
-8%
15%
-53%
2%
Idle Minimum *
0.84
1.31
-56%
0.83
1%
1.83
-118%
0.87
-4%
Idle Average *
1.94
2.03
-5%
2.06
-6%
3.21
-65%
2.08
-7%
Idle Maximum *
2.07
2.08
-0%
2.08
-0%
3.45
-67%
2.22
-7%
Load Average *
5.88
5.45
7%
3.53
40%
5.67
4%
5.26
11%
Load Maximum *
7.67
6.75
12%
4.49
41%
9.16
-19%
6.34
17%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
20ore 54minuti
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10ore 38minuti
UMI Super Euro Edition
4000 mAh
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3500 mAh
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
5000 mAh
Blackview R7
3000 mAh
Honor 5X
3000 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
-14%
28%
-35%
-8%
Reader / Idle
1254
1053
-16%
WiFi v1.3
638
546
-14%
815
28%
412
-35%
643
1%
Load
144
H.264
602

Pro

+ robusto case in metallo
+ autonomia ampia
+ buon rapporto prezzo-valore
+ supporto dual-SIM
+ software recente e nessun bloatware
+ GPS ragionevolmente preciso
+ display vivido e con contrasto elevato
+ buone performance
+ casse decenti

Contro

- qualità di costruzione non sempre eccellente
- touchscreen impreciso
- supporto garanzia potrebbe essere problematico
- display non molto luminoso
- microfono con un eco metallico
- abbastanza pesante
- lettore impronte non affidabile
- il case si scalda tosso carico
In Review: UMi Super Euro Edition. Test model courtesy of UMi.
In Review: UMi Super Euro Edition. Test model courtesy of UMi.

L'UMi Super in alcune aree è sopre la media ed in altre è nella media - ma ci sono anche alcuni aspetti non accettabili per un dispositivo che si presume sia usato quotidianamente. Il colore blu è intenso e bello - ma ma trattandosi di una edizione limitata, non saranno in molti a poter comprare l'UMi Super Euro Edition. La maggioranza di utenti dovranno accontentarsi della versione argento o oro. Tuttavia. 200 Euro (~$225) per uno smartphone con un case in metallo ed una buona quantità di RAM - risulta essere un prezzo interessante. Il fatto che sia già stato annunciato l'aggiornamento ad Android 7, che il software sia senza inutili modifiche e l'assenza di bloatware sono argomenti a favore del produttore.

La comunicazione dello smartphone funziona bene nella maggior parte degli aspetti. Le fotocamere non sono proprio high-end, ma scattano foto decenti. Il display non è eccessivamente luminoso, ma è facile da configurare ed i colori sono molto precisi così come il contrasto. Le prestazioni sono più che adeguate, le casse hanno un suono piacevole e l'autonomia è impressionante.

Il principale punto debole è il touchscreen, che non è preciso e rende difficile l'utilizzo dello smartphone. Coloro che vogliono lavorare con un telefono riusciranno ad accettare questi problemi di input? Il case si scalda, il microfono non è impressionante e la maggioranza dei giochi risulta scattosa. 

Considerando tutto questo, l'UMi Super è uno smartphone con buone dotazioni ma qualche pecca di costruzione. Il principale problema è il touchscreen, che davvero può far dannare nell'utilizzo del telefono. 

Uno dei principali concorrenti è il (molto) più potente Lenovo ZUK Z2

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

UMI Super Euro Edition - 09/29/2016 v5.1
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
80%
Tastiera
67 / 75 → 89%
Dispositivo di puntamento
67%
Connettività
41 / 60 → 69%
Peso
88%
Batteria
93%
Display
86%
Prestazioni di gioco
25 / 63 → 39%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
45 / 70 → 64%
Temperatura
80%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Fotocamera
67%
Media
69%
77%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione Breve dello Smartphone UMi Super Euro Edition
Florian Wimmer, 2016-10-10 (Update: 2016-10-10)