Recensione breve del Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z All-in-One Desktop
Solo lavoro niente svago. Il ThinkCentre M910z è fedele alla sua eredità con un design funzionale, facile manutenzione, e buone performance—gazie alla CPU Core i5-7500 ed SSD NVMe. Ma come si comporta nei tests e benchmarks?
Fotocamera Principale: 2 MPix
SDCardreader Transfer Speed | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
HP Z1 G2 G1X47EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
HP Z1 G2 G1X47EA | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS |
I nostri Top 10
» Top 10 Portatili Multimedia
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming Leggeri
» Top 10 Portatili da Ufficio e Business economici
» Top 10 Portatili Premium da Ufficio/Business
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 300 Euro
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 500 Euro
» Top 10 dei Portatili Workstation
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibili
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Smartphones
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 |
|
Distribuzione della luminosità: 93 %
Contrasto: 961:1 (Nero: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.8 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
90.3% sRGB (Argyll) 58.44% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.38
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS LEN-M910z-B, IPS, 23.8, 1920x1080 | HP Z1 G2 G1X47EA HWP192F, IPS LED, 27, 2560x1440 | Apple iMac Retina 5K 27 Late 2015 3.2 GHz M390 MK472D/A 27, 5120x2880 | |
---|---|---|---|
Response Times | -66% | -2% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35.2 (15.2, 20) | 44.4 (16, 28.4, plateau) -26% | 30.4 (11.6, 18.8) 14% |
Response Time Black / White * | 17.6 (10.8, 6.8) | 30.2 (11.2, 19, plateau) -72% | 20.8 (4.4, 16.4) -18% |
PWM Frequency | 21740 (20) | 200 (95, 330) -99% | |
Screen | -3% | 15% | |
Brightness middle | 221 | 365 65% | 429 94% |
Brightness | 214 | 367 71% | 424 98% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 87 -6% | 95 2% |
Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.4 -74% | 0.58 -152% |
Contrast | 961 | 913 -5% | 740 -23% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 3.8 | 4.68 -23% | 2.8 26% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 7.3 | ||
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 3.7 | 6.6 -78% | 1.97 47% |
Gamma | 2.38 101% | 2.34 103% | 2.13 113% |
CCT | 6701 97% | 6094 107% | 6889 94% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58.44 | 66.26 13% | 79 35% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90.3 | 99.69 10% | 99.97 11% |
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio) | -35% /
-19% | 7% /
12% |
* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli
Tempi di risposta del Display
↔ Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco | ||
---|---|---|
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.8 ms Incremento | |
↘ 6.8 ms Calo | ||
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.3 ms). | ||
↔ Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio | ||
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.2 ms Incremento | |
↘ 20 ms Calo | ||
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 21740 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 21740 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 21740 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9953 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS |
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m | |
HP Z1 G2 G1X47EA | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS |
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - --- | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS | |
HP Z1 G2 G1X47EA |
* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli
PCMark 8 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
HP Z1 G2 G1X47EA | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
HP Z1 G2 G1X47EA | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
HP Z1 G2 G1X47EA | |
Dell Latitude 5580 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3916 punti | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5077 punti | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5053 punti |
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS | |
Dell Latitude 5580 |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
HP Z1 G2 G1X47EA | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
HP Z1 G2 G1X47EA | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 |
3DMark 06 Standard | 10165 punti | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1782 punti | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7160 punti | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 907 punti |
basso | medio | alto | ultra | ||
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 52 | 35 | 23 | 8 | fps |
Rumorosità
Idle |
| 34.5 / 34.6 / 34.6 dB(A) | |||
Sotto carico |
| 34.6 / 34.6 dB(A) | |||
![]() | |||||
30 dB silenzioso 40 dB(A) udibile 50 dB(A) rumoroso |
|||||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS HD Graphics 630, 7500, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK | HP Z1 G2 G1X47EA Quadro K2100M, E3-1226 v3, Micron M600 MTFDDAT256MBF mSATA | Apple iMac Retina 5K 27 Late 2015 3.2 GHz M390 MK472D/A Radeon R9 M390, 6500, Apple Fusion Drive 1TB (24 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD) | Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 GeForce 940MX, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Dell Latitude 5580 HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Toshiba MQ01ACF050 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 5% | -7% | 4% | -2% | |
off / environment * | 28 | 30 -7% | 29 -4% | 30.6 -9% | |
Idle Minimum * | 34.5 | 32.4 6% | 32.5 6% | 29 16% | 32.8 5% |
Idle Average * | 34.6 | 32.4 6% | 32.5 6% | 29 16% | 32.8 5% |
Idle Maximum * | 34.6 | 32.4 6% | 32.5 6% | 29 16% | 33.6 3% |
Load Average * | 34.6 | 33.7 3% | 39 -13% | 35.6 -3% | 37.6 -9% |
Load Maximum * | 34.6 | 33.7 3% | 48.2 -39% | 39.7 -15% | 37.6 -9% |
* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz(+) | good bass - only 4.7% away from median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.9% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 100% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 18%, average was 18%, worst was 18%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sotto carico |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Leggenda:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS 7500, HD Graphics 630, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 23.8 | HP Z1 G2 G1X47EA E3-1226 v3, Quadro K2100M, Micron M600 MTFDDAT256MBF mSATA, IPS LED, 2560x1440, 27 | Apple iMac Retina 5K 27 Late 2015 3.2 GHz M390 MK472D/A 6500, Radeon R9 M390, Apple Fusion Drive 1TB (24 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD), , 5120x2880, 27 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 7700HQ, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 2560x1440, 14 | Dell Latitude 5580 7300U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba MQ01ACF050, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -109% | -119% | 43% | 63% | |
Idle Minimum * | 14.4 | 36.8 -156% | 29.5 -105% | 3.8 74% | 4.3 70% |
Idle Average * | 29.4 | 65.3 -122% | 59.2 -101% | 6.5 78% | 10.1 66% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.7 | 67 -126% | 68 -129% | 7.2 76% | 11.8 60% |
Load Average * | 64.1 | 114 -78% | 126 -97% | 62.5 2% | 32 50% |
Load Maximum * | 88.4 | 142 -61% | 231 -161% | 99.6 -13% | 29 67% |
* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli
Pro
Contro
I desktops business, compresi gli all-in-ones, sono parte del mercato che è più semplice notare rispetto all'affollato settore business. Di base non c'è niente di eccitante nel ThinkCentre M910z (la nostra confugurazione: $1,285), ha un design funzionale e sobrio e ha tutto ciò che occorre per una macchina da ufficio.
Ma non è una cosa negativa: mantenendo fede alla sua eredita, il ThinkCentre fa un buon lavoro con un design e features apprezzate come la (quasi) facile manutenzione e possibilità di upgrades oltre alla versatilità. Ma è anche silenzioso (anche sotto carico), veloce nelle operazioni generiche grazie alla sua CPU quad-core ed all'SSD NVMe, ed ha delle casse che smentiscono la classica brutta reputazione dei dispositivi business. Il display lascia sensazioni miste, la luminosità è scarsa e il touchscreen lascia desiderare (perché usarlo se non va bene?) - ma è antiriflesso! Infine i consumi sono bassi.
Non c'è nulla di particolarmente eccitante nel ThinkCentre M910z, ma non è un male; è funzionale, con un design sobrio e spunta tutte le caselle di una macchina da ufficio convenzionale.
In definitiva non ci sono molte grosse pecche nel ThinkCentre M910z—è un buon dispositivo business desktop che copre tutti gli aspetti base nel mercato business ed è facile da manutenere.
Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS - 09/22/2017 v6
Steve Schardein