Nothing Phone (1)
Specifiche tecniche

Fotocamera Secondaria: 16 MPix f/2.45, videos @1080p/30fps
Pricecompare
Media dei 27 punteggi (dalle 40 recensioni)
recensioni per Nothing Phone (1)
L'ex direttore di OnePlus sta nuovamente realizzando uno smartphone. Questo ovviamente farà parlare di sé. Il Nothing Phone (1) si propone di fare molte cose in modo diverso e ha già un aspetto molto interessante grazie ai LED sul retro. Ma al prezzo di 500 euro (449 sterline), sarà in grado di impressionarci durante la nostra recensione?
Sorgente: 91mobiles

You will get more processor muscle on the likes of the Redmi K50i and the iQOO Neo 6, and those wanting a great camera and clean interface might also be attracted to the Google Pixel 6a, whose price is in the region of Rs 30,999 at the time of writing. But none of them can match the overall experience and design feel that the Nothing Phone (1) brings to the table. That transparent back and Glyph UI put it in a zone of its own. It remains the most flauntable mid-segment phone and its performance is improving consistently as well. With no successor in sight, and Nothing also having ironed out some of the early service and support issues, we think the Phone (1) is a great buy for those who want a phone that looks and works differently from the run-of-the-mill smartphones out there. There is – pun alert – literally Nothing like it out there.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 12/14/2022
Sorgente: Techradar

At first blush, the appeal of the Nothing Phone 1 rests on its standout design and the strength of its story. The company clearly learnt lessons from its first product and the level of polish applied to the Phone 1 surpasses expectations, while unique features like its transparent back and glyph lighting marry novelty and functionality in a way that's absent from most other phones.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 12/06/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 80% prezzo: 80% prestazioni: 80% schermo: 80% mobilità: 50% qualità di lavorazione: 80%
Sorgente: Yugatech

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 12/03/2022
Sorgente: Expert Reviews

The Nothing Phone (1) is a remarkable first effort for the fledgling company. With a unique design, quirky LED lighting effects, a clean installation of Android and a sublime screen, the Phone (1) is well and truly on the way to becoming a hallmark of the mid-range scene. Yet I’m curious to see how the Nothing Phone (1) is received by the average consumer. Primarily appealing to tech enthusiasts, it will be interesting to see whether the Phone (1) achieves a wider reach, including those less informed about the newest releases who simply want a new phone without having to pay too much. Indeed, the next few years are going to be very interesting. Nothing as a company could become the breakout success it hopes for, or it might simply plummet into obscurity. I can’t wait to find out what’s next – but as it stands, the Nothing Phone (1) is a head-turning handset that can compete with the very best in the business.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 11/21/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 80%
Sorgente: DxOMark

The Nothing Phone (1) showed decent autonomy in moderate use, but its consumption during the night was high, with an average 3% lost. When tested outside, the device struggled when scrolling on social apps and using the camera. Its autonomy in calibrated mode, however, was excellent, especially when calling, and streaming video and music. The 45W charger struggled to replenish the battery device faster than our database average, taking almost 2 hour to fully charge the 4500 mAh battery. Indeed, the device supported only 33W, and the time between 100% displayed on the screen and the true full charge was very long at 49 minutes. The charge efficiency was very low, even though the power adapter showed excellent efficiency. The residual consumption of the charger was excellent when the device was fully charged and still plugged in, but the charger itself, when plugged into an outlet, consumed more power than average. Wireless charging was long, too, taking 2 hours and 41 minutes to fully charge the battery. The charge efficiency was average, and the residual consumption was slightly lower than average. The discharge currents were low across almost all our use cases, meaning that the device is well-optimized, especially when calling, and streaming music and video. When compared with devices from the same price range ($400 – $599), the Nothing Phone (1) gets a global score that is slightly above average, with autonomy and efficiency scores slightly above average as well, but a low charging score.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 11/10/2022
Sorgente: GSM Choice

I won't hide that Nothing Phone (1) surprised me a lot - in a positive way. I expected it to be an overrated device with the only tinsel on the back. It turned out, however, that I received a well-made, original but quite well-styled smartphone, with a decent but still requiring refinement interface, with a good screen and nice cameras (although a telephoto lens would be useful). Overall, I got a smartphone devoid of any major weaknesses. The only exception was annoying clippings, but here I hope that the manufacturer will improve it by updating and it will only get better after the next update. There is one more important issue - the price! The cheapest version 8/128 GB costs €469. For €499 you will buy 8/256 GB and I would recommend this version more - remember, you will not increase the memory. For the most demanding customers, there is still the 12/256 GB variant for €549. As for what this smartphone represents, these are really good prices. It is better than I expected, even taking into account the need to buy a charger - not necessarily the one from the manufacturer, because the one offered by Nothing costs the entire €35 and has a power of 45 W, although the phone uses only 33 W. The manufacturer also offers a silicone cover also not very cheap, as much as €20, but at least of a little better quality than usual. Nevertheless, I evaluate the price list positively. I positively assess this entire smartphone - it is not perfect, I have the impression that its software is still plagued by some childhood diseases, but for the debut it is surprisingly good. Let's hope that the next model will be even better and just as well priced. Like nothing, and it turned out nice!
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 11/05/2022
Sorgente: Techradar

At first blush, the appeal of the Nothing Phone 1 rests on its standout design and the strength of its story. The company has clearly learnt lessons from its first product and the level of polish applied to the Phone 1 surpasses expectations, while unique features like its transparent back and glyph lighting marry novelty and functionality in a way that's absent from most other phones.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 10/28/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 80%
Sorgente: Tech Nave

Priced at RM2399, the 8GB+256GB variant of the Nothing Phone (1) is not too bad of a deal. You could also get the 12GB variant for RM2699, but most people won't need the extra RAM in a mid-range phone. Overall, the specs and features are not too bad. But this is if you are in it for the unique design. Otherwise, there are better options out there for that kind of money. For example, you could go for the ASUS ZenFone 8. It's more expensive at RM2699 and doesn't have as much RAM or storage. But it comes with a more powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset, a near-stock Android experience, and better cameras. Another option is the recently launched Xiaomi 12T Pro (RM2699), which has a 200MP main camera and a Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 10/21/2022
Sorgente: DxOMark

The Nothing Phone (1) is far from the upper echelons in our Audio ranking. It does poorly overall, but it benefits from having an acceptable amount of distortion at maximum volume. It’s not really a great pick for any playback use case, but it is best suited to watching movies. Music lovers and gamers should probably keep an eye out for alternatives. The phone performs slightly better in Recording than for Playback, but there is some variance between use cases. Sound quality is best when recording with the main camera, followed by office applications. Quality drops noticeably when using the front camera for selfie videos. In Recording, our testers liked the Nothing Phone’s audio zoom performance and found it to be quite effective at eliminating unwanted wind noises. It also offered an excellent signal-to-noise ratio and good resilience at high sound-pressure levels, where distortion remained well under control. This makes it an option for recording at concerts and similar events. On the downside, recording tonal balance is overall dark, and over-enthusiastic noise cancellation algorithms cause a variety of artifacts.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 10/07/2022
Sorgente: Slashgear

There are two ways you can look at the Nothing Phone 1. You can see it as a decent midrange phone with a few tricks that jack up the price but are of little practical value. Or you can see the Nothing Phone 1 as I do, which is to say, it's a decent midrange phone that has a lot of quirky, gimmicky, tricks that give an otherwise boring phone a little personality. That's something desperately lacking in the smartphone market at large. The Nothing Phone 1 is one that I will remember as a standout in 2022, which has been a year that gave us quite a few fun phones to play with. I regret that this phone won't see U.S. shores, but I'm happy that it made it to my doorstep. Quite frankly, it's neat, and if that's not enough for you to fork over your hard-earned dollars, I totally get that. But this phone's tricks are built on a solid base of features like a 120Hz screen, wireless charging, reverse wireless charging, and a lot of other things that you don't often see at this price point. Stir in some light-up glyphs on the back and a fun font throughout the phone, and there's a lot to like here.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 09/15/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 70%
Sorgente: Digital Trends

Quirky, individual, and enjoyable to use, the Nothing Phone 1 succeeds in being different from any other smartphone, at least on the outside. Inside, things are substantially more familiar, with the software sharing plenty of stylistic and interface similarities with the Google Pixel series. It’s reasonably priced, the specifications are good, the software is enjoyable to use, and it really does look and feel different from any other Android phone out there. However, it’s not perfect. The camera needs tuning, and the battery life is short. Confirmation an update to Android 13 won’t arrive until potentially mid-2023 is a concern, too, putting Nothing behind the competition in this respect. The company has been good at sending out software updates to improve the phone so far, though. The Nothing Phone 1 is a recommended buy and a very exciting start for the company.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 09/07/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 70%
Sorgente: TechDroider

Confronto, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 09/02/2022
Sorgente: Irish Mirror

There’s Nothing to fault here, when you take the phone’s price into consideration as it does everything reasonably well. This is a great opening salvo from Carl Pei’s new company.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 07/26/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 80%
Sorgente: Computerbild

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 12/31/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 92%
Sorgente: Nextpit Germany

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 10/03/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 90%
Sorgente: RP-Online

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 09/02/2022
Sorgente: Inside Handy

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 08/21/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 80%
Sorgente: Chip.de

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 08/16/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 95% prestazioni: 95% caratteristiche: 94% schermo: 94% mobilità: 99%
Sorgente: Netzwelt

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 08/13/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 80% caratteristiche: 70% mobilità: 70% qualità di lavorazione: 90%
Sorgente: Gamestar

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 08/09/2022
Sorgente: Chinahandys.net

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 07/29/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 84% prestazioni: 75% schermo: 90% mobilità: 80% qualità di lavorazione: 90%
Sorgente: Tech Stage

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 07/29/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 90%
Sorgente: Computerbase

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 07/15/2022
Sorgente: n-tv

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 07/15/2022
Sorgente: A1 Blog

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 07/14/2022
Sorgente: MuyComputer

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 09/14/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 82% prestazioni: 80% schermo: 80% mobilità: 90% qualità di lavorazione: 80%
Sorgente: Canaltech

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 10/06/2022
Sorgente: GadgetGear.nl

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 11/03/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 90%
Sorgente: XGN

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 09/15/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 85%
Sorgente: XGN

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 09/10/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 85%
Sorgente: Journal du Geek

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 12/29/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 80%
Sorgente: Presse Citron

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 12/28/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 80% prezzo: 75% prestazioni: 70% schermo: 95% mobilità: 80% qualità di lavorazione: 95%
Sorgente: Les Mobiles

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 11/11/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 80%
Sorgente: Charles Tech

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 10/17/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 82% prezzo: 90% prestazioni: 80% schermo: 90% mobilità: 80%
Sorgente: Nextpit France

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 09/29/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 90%
Sorgente: Telepolis

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 09/19/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 80%
Sorgente: ITC UA

Hands-On, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 11/18/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 70%
Sorgente: DGL.ru

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 10/19/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 80% prezzo: 80% prestazioni: 80% schermo: 80% mobilità: 50% qualità di lavorazione: 80%
Sorgente: MobilArena HU

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 09/13/2022
Valutazione: prezzo: 80% schermo: 95% mobilità: 85% qualità di lavorazione: 90%
Sorgente: Mere Mobil.dk

Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 09/01/2022
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 50%
Commenti
Qualcomm Adreno 642L:
Chip grafico per smartphone e tablet che è integrato nel SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G. Qualcomm sostiene che è il 40% più veloce dell'Adreno 620.
La maggior parte dei giochi attuali può essere giocata in modo fluido. Ma preparatevi ad una riduzione delle presentazioni grafiche considerando le impostazioni di dettaglio basse e la risoluzione limitata. Tuttavia, queste schede forniscono ancora abbastanza potenza per le applicazioni da ufficio e la proiezioni di video (ma non per i video HD).
>> Ulteriori informazioni le potete trovare nel nostroConfronto delle schede grafiche e nella nostra Lista dei Benchmark.
SD 778G+ 5G:
SoC ARM veloce di fascia media con 8 core CPU Kryo 670 (quattro core ARM Cortex-A78 veloci fino a 2,5 GHz e quattro core ARM Cortex-A55 piccoli fino a 1,9 GHz) e un modem X53 5G integrato (fino a 3300 Mbps in download). Il SoC è prodotto con il moderno processo a 6 nm di TSMC. Rispetto alla precedente variante non-plus, il 778G+ offre core CPU con clock superiore di 100 MHz.
>>Ulteriori informazioni le potete trovare nel nostroConfronto dei processori per portatili.
6.55":
Solo pochi smartphones hanno schermi più grandi.
I display con dimensioni maggiori consentono risoluzioni più elevate. Quindi, i dettagli come le lettere sono più grandi. D'altro canto, il consumo energetico è inferiore negli schermi con diagonali piccole e su dispositivi più piccoli, più leggeri ed economici.
>> Per scoprire come è la risoluzione del vostro schermo, andate a vedere la nostraLista DPI.
0.1935 kg: Questo è il tipico peso degli smartphones.
81.13%: Il punteggio deve essere considerato medio, in quanto il numero di portatili che hanno ottenuto un punteggio migliore è uguale a quello dei portatili che hanno avuto un punteggio peggiore.
>> Ulteriori informazioni le potete trovare nella nostra Guida all'acquisto di un portatile.