Notebookcheck

Recensione breve dello Smartphone Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S

Andreas Osthoff, 01/02/2017

Il migliore della classe grazie agli accessori? Il One Touch Idol 4S è il nuovo smartphone ammiraglia di Alcatel ed ha molti accessori. Tuttavia, uno sguardo da vicino mostra alcune pecche.

Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S (One Touch Serie)
Processore
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 1.8 GHz
Scheda grafica
Memoria
3072 MB 
Schermo
5.5 pollici 16:9, 2560x1440 pixel 534 PPI, kapazitiv, 10 Touchpunkte, AMOLED, lucido: si
Harddisk
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 21 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: 3.5 mm Headset, Lettore schede: microSD bis zu 200 GB, NFC, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: G-Sensor, E-Compass, Hall-Sensor, Gyroskop, USB-OTG, WiFi-Direct, SAR-Wert: 1.134 W/kg
Rete
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (1/2/5/8), LTE Cat.4 (B1/3/7/8/20/28A, 150 Mbit/s Download, 50 Mbit/s Upload)), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 6.99 x 153.9 x 75.4
Batteria
3000 mAh polimeri di litio
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 16 MPix (Blitz, Autofokus)
Fotocamera Secondaria: 8 MPix (Frontblitz, 84° Weitwinkel)
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Stereo auf der Vorderseite (2x 3.6 Watt), Tastiera: virtuell, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, modulares Netzteil, USB-Kabel, SIM-Tool, JBL-Kopfhörer, Display-Schutzfolie, transparente Schutzhülle, VR-Brille, Google-Apps, VR-Apps. AntiVirus, Waves MaxxAudio, WPS Office, Xender Dateiübertragung, 12 Mesi Garanzia, senza ventola
Peso
149 gr, Alimentazione: 64 gr
Prezzo
449 Euro

 

I nostri Top 10
» Top 10 Portatili Multimedia
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming
» Top 10 Portatili da Ufficio e Business economici
» Top 10 Portatili Premium da Ufficio/Business 
» Top 10 dei Portatili Workstation
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibili
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Smartphones

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
337 MBit/s ∼100% +841%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
257 MBit/s ∼76% +618%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
35.8 MBit/s ∼11%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 MBit/s ∼100% +784%
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
298 MBit/s ∼95% +742%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
35.4 MBit/s ∼11%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S: Overview
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S: Overview
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S: Crossing
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S: Crossing
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S: Turning point
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
Garmin Edge 500: Turning Point
Garmin Edge 500: Turning Point

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
631
cd/m²
628
cd/m²
650
cd/m²
621
cd/m²
625
cd/m²
659
cd/m²
624
cd/m²
639
cd/m²
672
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 672 cd/m² Media: 638.8 cd/m² Minimum: 6.14 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 92 %
Al centro con la batteria: 625 cd/m²
Contrasto: ∞:1 (Nero: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.9 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.27
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Honor 8
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
ZTE Axon 7
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
OnePlus 3T
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
BlackBerry DTEK60
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Screen
-25%
-1%
-35%
-9%
Brightness
639
443
-31%
334
-48%
430
-33%
608
-5%
Brightness Distribution
92
93
1%
88
-4%
84
-9%
88
-4%
Black Level *
0.4
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.9
5.4
8%
4.6
22%
7.1
-20%
6.6
-12%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.8
6.7
-76%
2.8
26%
6.8
-79%
4.3
-13%
Gamma
2.27 106%
2.33 103%
2.29 105%
2.23 108%
1.88 128%
CCT
7196 90%
8262 79%
6612 98%
7866 83%
6966 93%
Contrast
1128

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 235.8 Hz100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 235.8 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 235.8 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 456 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 10420) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms Incremento
↘ 3 ms Calo
Lo schermo ha mostrato valori di risposta molto veloci nei nostri tests ed è molto adatto per i gaming veloce.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (27.3 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms Incremento
↘ 11 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 250 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.9 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
159866 Points ∼100% +91%
BlackBerry DTEK60
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
134232 Points ∼84% +61%
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
122524 Points ∼77% +47%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
94671 Points ∼59% +13%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
83564 Points ∼52%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
75533 Points ∼47% -10%
Geekbench 4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
5481 Points ∼100% +60%
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
4236 Points ∼77% +24%
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
3867 Points ∼71% +13%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
3427 Points ∼63%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510 (32 Bit)
2511 Points ∼46% -27%
BlackBerry DTEK60
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
Points ∼0% -100%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
1881 Points ∼100% +28%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1726 Points ∼92% +17%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
1475 Points ∼78%
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1280 Points ∼68% -13%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510 (32 Bit)
1204 Points ∼64% -18%
BlackBerry DTEK60
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.1 Physics
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
2482 Points ∼100% +39%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
1800 Points ∼73% +1%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
1788 Points ∼72%
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1783 Points ∼72% 0%
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
1728 Points ∼70% -3%
BlackBerry DTEK60
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1328 Points ∼54% -26%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.1 Graphics
BlackBerry DTEK60
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2837 Points ∼100% +274%
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2528 Points ∼89% +233%
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
2418 Points ∼85% +219%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
818 Points ∼29% +8%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
759 Points ∼27%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
745 Points ∼26% -2%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.1
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2500 Points ∼100% +187%
BlackBerry DTEK60
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2265 Points ∼91% +160%
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
2221 Points ∼89% +155%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
961 Points ∼38% +10%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
870 Points ∼35%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
856 Points ∼34% -2%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
2587 Points ∼100% +44%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
1800 Points ∼70%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
1793 Points ∼69% 0%
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
1452 Points ∼56% -19%
BlackBerry DTEK60
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1106 Points ∼43% -39%
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1099 Points ∼42% -39%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
4619 Points ∼100% +262%
BlackBerry DTEK60
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
4466 Points ∼97% +250%
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
3310 Points ∼72% +160%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
1275 Points ∼28%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
1252 Points ∼27% -2%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1112 Points ∼24% -13%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2698 Points ∼100% +98%
BlackBerry DTEK60
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2666 Points ∼99% +96%
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
2577 Points ∼96% +89%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
1363 Points ∼51%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
1342 Points ∼50% -2%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1273 Points ∼47% -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
22426 Points ∼100% +104%
BlackBerry DTEK60
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
21822 Points ∼97% +98%
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
20408 Points ∼91% +85%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
15531 Points ∼69% +41%
OnePlus One
801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330
13167 Points ∼59% +19%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
11532 Points ∼51% +5%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
11020 Points ∼49%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
34494 Points ∼100% +61%
BlackBerry DTEK60
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
33037 Points ∼96% +54%
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
24310 Points ∼70% +14%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
22157 Points ∼64% +4%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
21668 Points ∼63% +1%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
21398 Points ∼62%
OnePlus One
801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330
18074 Points ∼52% -16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
30810 Points ∼100% +74%
BlackBerry DTEK60
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
29651 Points ∼96% +68%
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
23319 Points ∼76% +32%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
20235 Points ∼66% +14%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
18127 Points ∼59% +2%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
17695 Points ∼57%
OnePlus One
801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330
16692 Points ∼54% -6%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
91 fps ∼100% +194%
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
88 fps ∼97% +184%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
41 fps ∼45% +32%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
31 fps ∼34%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
30 fps ∼33% -3%
OnePlus One
801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330
28 fps ∼31% -10%
BlackBerry DTEK60
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
fps ∼0% -100%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
59 fps ∼100% +168%
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
53 fps ∼90% +141%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
43 fps ∼73% +95%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
31 fps ∼53% +41%
OnePlus One
801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330
29 fps ∼49% +32%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
22 fps ∼37%
BlackBerry DTEK60
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
fps ∼0% -100%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
46 fps ∼100% +207%
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
39 fps ∼85% +160%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
19 fps ∼41% +27%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
15 fps ∼33%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
14 fps ∼30% -7%
OnePlus One
801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330
12 fps ∼26% -20%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
45 fps ∼100% +384%
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
28 fps ∼62% +201%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
19 fps ∼42% +104%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
14 fps ∼31% +51%
OnePlus One
801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330
12 fps ∼27% +29%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
9.3 fps ∼21%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
32 fps ∼100% +240%
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
31 fps ∼97% +230%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
10 fps ∼31% +6%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
9.6 fps ∼30% +2%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
9.4 fps ∼29%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
32 fps ∼100% +581%
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
16 fps ∼50% +240%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
11 fps ∼34% +134%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
9.4 fps ∼29% +100%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
4.7 fps ∼15%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
6735 Points ∼100% +39%
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
5664 Points ∼84% +17%
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
4970 Points ∼74% +2%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
4964 Points ∼74% +2%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
4852 Points ∼72%
BlackBerry DTEK60
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
4589 Points ∼68% -5%
OnePlus One
801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330 (Android 4.4.4 Cyanogen 11S)
3571 Points ∼53% -26%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
1009 Points ∼100%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
994 Points ∼99% -1%
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
963 Points ∼95% -5%
BlackBerry DTEK60
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
927 Points ∼92% -8%
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
891 Points ∼88% -12%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
843 Points ∼84% -16%
OnePlus One
801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330
661 Points ∼66% -34%
Graphics
BlackBerry DTEK60
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
4763 Points ∼100% +201%
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
4631 Points ∼97% +193%
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
4444 Points ∼93% +181%
OnePlus One
801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330
2382 Points ∼50% +51%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
1703 Points ∼36% +8%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
1635 Points ∼34% +3%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
1581 Points ∼33%
Memory
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
2556 Points ∼100% +37%
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
1954 Points ∼76% +5%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
1861 Points ∼73%
BlackBerry DTEK60
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1642 Points ∼64% -12%
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
1489 Points ∼58% -20%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
798 Points ∼31% -57%
OnePlus One
801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330
587 Points ∼23% -68%
System
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
3952 Points ∼100% +69%
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
3307 Points ∼84% +41%
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
3130 Points ∼79% +34%
BlackBerry DTEK60
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2897 Points ∼73% +24%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
2582 Points ∼65% +10%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
2338 Points ∼59%
OnePlus One
801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330
1768 Points ∼45% -24%
Overall
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
2218 Points ∼100% +37%
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2165 Points ∼98% +33%
BlackBerry DTEK60
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
2141 Points ∼97% +32%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
2034 Points ∼92% +25%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
1623 Points ∼73%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
1297 Points ∼58% -20%
OnePlus One
801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330
1131 Points ∼51% -30%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4 (Chrome 52)
10692 Points ∼100% +19%
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530 (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
9798 Points ∼92% +9%
BlackBerry DTEK60
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530 (Chrome 54)
9473 Points ∼89% +5%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510 (Chrome 54)
9005 Points ∼84%
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
8062 Points ∼75% -10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510 (Chrome 54)
3401.9 ms * ∼100%
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
3096.5 ms * ∼91% +9%
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4 (Chrome 52)
2979 ms * ∼88% +12%
BlackBerry DTEK60
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530 (Chrome 54)
2880 ms * ∼85% +15%
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530 (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
2719.3 ms * ∼80% +20%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Honor 8
Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4 (Chrome 52)
64.046 Points ∼100% +23%
BlackBerry DTEK60
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530 (Chrome 54)
55.21 Points ∼86% +6%
OnePlus 3T
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530 (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
54.526 Points ∼85% +5%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
652 MSM8976, Adreno 510 (Chrome 54)
52 Points ∼81%
ZTE Axon 7
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
44.754 Points ∼70% -14%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
32 GB eMMC Flash
Honor 8
32 GB eMMC Flash
ZTE Axon 7
64 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus 3T
64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
BlackBerry DTEK60
32 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
14%
67%
212%
7%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
56.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
23.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-58%
51.34 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-9%
58.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
4%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
74.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
53.68 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-28%
78.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
5%
78.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
6%
Random Write 4KB
14.45
31.5
118%
16.22
12%
74.39
415%
15.1
4%
Random Read 4KB
36.53
34.16
-6%
121.07
231%
123.57
238%
43.1
18%
Sequential Write 256KB
80.81
119.25
48%
150.92
87%
165.3
105%
79
-2%
Sequential Read 256KB
231.85
247.46
7%
406.49
75%
436.43
88%
257.4
11%
Carico massimo
 42.1 °C40.8 °C36.8 °C 
 40.5 °C41.2 °C36.5 °C 
 38.9 °C38.9 °C35.7 °C 
Massima: 42.1 °C
Media: 39 °C
35.3 °C39.2 °C39.8 °C
34.3 °C36.5 °C39 °C
33.9 °C36.4 °C36.7 °C
Massima: 39.8 °C
Media: 36.8 °C
Alimentazione (max)  33.3 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.636.12525.427.13125.3324032.933.95033.640.36331.635.88028.431.61002727.212520.837.91602250.620021.351.325020.858.131521.260.940019.467.450019.570.163017.773.880017.971.9100017.875.8125017.377.1160017.475200016.776.2250017.279.5315018.280.6400017.979.1500017.678.2630017.776.6800017.873.21000017.968.41250018.165.11600018.260.8SPL3088.9N1.377.6median 17.9Alcatel One Touch Idol 4Smedian 71.9Delta1.38.926.128.726.12625.22625.42725.425.829.325.825.226.125.223.123.823.133.430.833.436.13336.135.428.935.434.724.734.743.324.943.349.71949.753.319.153.356.520.456.559.318.159.363.617.563.664.71764.768.815.968.869.114.569.170.713.770.772.614.372.675.813.475.874.213.674.275.513.375.574.312.974.371.812.771.871.81371.872.212.772.266.61366.65512.75584.427.584.456.9156.9median 66.6OnePlus 3Tmedian 14.5median 66.69.83.69.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.92 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 16%, average was 26%, worst was 43%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

OnePlus 3T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.35 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 16%, average was 26%, worst was 43%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.19 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.76 / 1.02 / 1.04 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 4.4 / 10.4 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
3000 mAh
Honor 8
3000 mAh
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
BlackBerry DTEK60
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
-31%
3%
-37%
-12%
Idle Minimum *
0.76
0.78
-3%
0.64
16%
0.61
20%
0.7
8%
Idle Average *
1.02
1.89
-85%
0.84
18%
1.77
-74%
1.13
-11%
Idle Maximum *
1.04
2.02
-94%
0.87
16%
1.81
-74%
1.2
-15%
Load Average *
4.4
5.28
-20%
6.02
-37%
6.67
-52%
6.52
-48%
Load Maximum *
10.4
5.44
48%
10.45
-0%
10.98
-6%
9.75
6%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Navigazione WiFi v1.3 (Chrome 54)
6ore 55minuti
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
3000 mAh
Honor 8
3000 mAh
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
BlackBerry DTEK60
3000 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
20%
-1%
19%
88%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
415
499
20%
411
-1%
494
19%
779
88%

Pro

+ eccellente chassis
+ schermo AMOLED molto luminoso
+ buone casse
+ molti accessori (VR googles)
+ registrazione video 4K

Contro

- solo micro-USB 2.0
- WLAN lenta
- prestazioni relativamente basse
- si scalda un po'
- slot ibrido (dual-SIM o microSD)
- mediocre qualità voce
- manca lo scanner per le impronte digitali
In review: Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S. Test model courtesy of Alcatel Germany.
In review: Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S. Test model courtesy of Alcatel Germany.

Riesce l'Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S a competere con i rivali? Non completamente. Lo smartphone attualmente può giustificare il prezzo con lo chassis stiloso, il buon display, ed i numerosi accessori, ma i concorrenti hanno meno punti deboli. L'Idol 4S soffre di una qualità vocale mediocre, ha una pessima fotocamera frontale e i risultati sono peggiori in confronto sia per le prestazioni che per l'autonomia.

Un buon smartphone mainstream con un eccellente chassis ed un display luminoso, ma la concorrenza riesce a fare un po' meglio.

Le cuffie VR sono più che altro un orpello, e le funzionalità sono limitate rispetto alle Samsung Gear VR. Il pulsante Boom non ci convince completamente nella pratica. L'Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S non è una brutta scelta, ma ci sono dispositivi migliori nel segmento di prezzo fino a 450 Euro (~$475).

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S - 12/29/2016 v6
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
90%
Tastiera
70 / 75 → 94%
Dispositivo di puntamento
94%
Connettività
40 / 60 → 67%
Peso
92%
Batteria
89%
Display
84%
Prestazioni di gioco
42 / 63 → 67%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
54 / 70 → 77%
Temperatura
90%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Fotocamera
67%
Media
75%
85%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

> Recensioni Portatili Notebook > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve dello Smartphone Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
Andreas Osthoff, 2017-01- 2 (Update: 2017-01- 2)