Asus VivoBook X202E-DH31T
Specifiche tecniche

Price comparison
Media dei 6 punteggi (dalle 7 recensioni)
recensioni per Asus VivoBook X202E-DH31T
Sorgente: Tech Advisor
EN→IT Archive.org versionThe Asus VivoBook x202 is unique, in that it's the perfect notebook for a very specific demographic: the demographic that wants a small, portable, touchscreen laptop for a relatively cheap price. The VivoBook is just £459, which makes it about half the price of an Ultrabook or a MacBook Air. Since there aren't a ton of ultraportable options at this price point, the VivoBook does have a niche to fill. So, if you're looking for a notebook that you can pop into your purse--and you definitely don't want a tablet--the VivoBook might be worth a look.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Corto, Data: 02/07/2013
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 60%
Sorgente: Computer Shopper
EN→IT Archive.org versionThe VivoBook X202E certainly isn't without shortcomings. Those who frequently task their laptops with CPU-taxing workloads like video editing and bulk crunching of high-resolution still images should look for a system with a more powerful Core i5 or i7 processor. And those who need long battery life should likewise look for something else.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 01/31/2013
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 80%
Sorgente: IT Reviews
EN→IT Archive.org versionThe new range of hybrid tablets and touchable laptops on the market now may offer better performance and battery life, but the Asus VivoBook X202E-DH31T puts touch capability into an affordable price range, which may make it worthwhile despite the flaws. Compared to other 10- to 12-inch touch-capable Windows 8 laptops, it’s cheap and usable, if not as portable and powerful as leading systems, like the Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 13.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 01/26/2013
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 60%
Sorgente: CNet
EN→IT Archive.org versionI love the idea of touch-screen Windows 8 laptops dipping down close to $500. There are trade-offs to be sure, in processing power, input device quality, and battery life, and spending another $150 to $200 could make a big difference. But as far as $550 Windows 8 laptops go, the X202E is portable and useful, and worth a look for budget shoppers.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 01/24/2013
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 77% prestazioni: 70% mobilità: 60%
Sorgente: PC Mag
EN→IT Archive.org versionThe new range of hybrid tablets and touchable laptops on the market now may offer better performance and battery life, but the Asus VivoBook X202E-DH31T puts touch capability into an affordable price range, which may make it worthwhile despite the flaws. Compared to other 10- to 12-inch touch-capable Windows 8 laptops, it's cheap and usable, if not as portable and powerful as leading systems, like the Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 13. But the price is hard to beat, especially when compared with the budget laptop Editors' Choice Acer Aspire V5-571-6891, which is only $50 less, without touch.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Corto, Data: 01/24/2013
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 70%
Sorgente: Laptop Mag
EN→IT Archive.org versionThis entry-level ASUS VivoBook X202E-DH31T provides a solid Windows 8 touch experience in a lightweight design for a tempting $549. Unfortunately, you'll need to bring the power cord with you, as this ultraportable is seriously lacking in battery life. While we don't recommend it either, at least the Acer Aspire V5-571, which also costs $549, offers a more powerful Core i5 processor.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 12/27/2012
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 50%
Sorgente: 3DNews.ru
RU→IT Archive.org versionSingola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 01/08/2013
Commenti
Intel HD Graphics 4000: Processore grafico high end tra i modelli Ivy Bridge. Offre una differente velocità clock nei diversi modelli di CPU (da ULV a desktop quad core) e di conseguenza con prestazioni variabili.
La maggior parte dei giochi attuali può essere giocata in modo fluido. Ma preparatevi ad una riduzione delle presentazioni grafiche considerando le impostazioni di dettaglio basse e la risoluzione limitata. Tuttavia, queste schede forniscono ancora abbastanza potenza per le applicazioni da ufficio e la proiezioni di video (ma non per i video HD).
>> Ulteriori informazioni le potete trovare nel nostroConfronto delle schede grafiche e nella nostra Lista dei Benchmark.
3217U: CPU ULV Ivy-Bridge-based del secondo quadrimestre 2012. Offre un core clock di 1.8 GHz (ma non il Turbo Boost) ed una GPU HD 4000 (350 - 1050 MHz). Il TDP è di 17 W.
>>Ulteriori informazioni le potete trovare nel nostroConfronto dei processori per portatili.

