Samsung Galaxy Grand 2
Specifiche tecniche

Price comparison
Media dei 3 punteggi (dalle 3 recensioni)
recensioni per Samsung Galaxy Grand 2
Sorgente: Tech2.in.com
EN→IT Archive.org versionIt’s an ever tougher sell when you consider the Lenovo Vibe X, which is superior in almost every respect, retailing for the same price. To sum up, the Grand 2 is a worthy upgrade to the Grand Duos but poor pricing, tough competition and lack of some crucial features might hurt its sales. At its current market price, you’re better off with the Lenovo Vibe X.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Corto, Data: 02/17/2014
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 70%
Sorgente: Techtree.com
EN→IT Archive.org versionThe GALAXY Grand 2 is a massive improvement over its predecessor. This handset has a good screen, camera, and battery life. However, priced at Rs 22,000, the phone’s performance is not consistent. Many will find its interface garish. The design is done-to-death and the handset doesn’t feel premium compared to the similarly priced phones. So if you’re planning to buy a phone in price bracket, the Lenovo Vibe X (Rs 23,000) and Nokia Lumia 920 (Rs 24,000) are definitely better options.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Corto, Data: 02/13/2014
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 60% prezzo: 60% prestazioni: 60% caratteristiche: 80% qualità di lavorazione: 60%
Sorgente: NDTV Gadgets
EN→IT Archive.org versionIt's no surprise that competition in the Rs. 17,000 to 22,000 range is hot right now. Features that were once exclusive to phones twice that price are tempting users, and multinational brands now find themselves competing with increasingly well-made phones from local manufacturers. Still, most phones in this price range tend to advertise a single trick such as a full-HD screen or new processor, while neglecting to mention that these things aren't very useful in isolation. In contrast, Samsung has delivered a well-rounded product that seems to strike a very sensible balance between price, features and performance. Large screens on phones at this price point are no longer crippled by low resolutions, and "quad-core processors" actually have enough meat on their bones to deliver superior performance.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 02/12/2014
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 80% prezzo: 80% prestazioni: 80% schermo: 80% mobilità: 60% qualità di lavorazione: 70%
Commenti
Qualcomm Adreno 305:
Queste schede grafiche per portatili non sono adatte al gaming. Anche se dovessero funzionare, ci sarebbero diversi errori grafici e un frame rate molto basso. Questi chips non sono affatto per i gamers! Applicazioni internet e da ufficio, invece non sono problematiche per queste GPUs.
>> Ulteriori informazioni le potete trovare nel nostroConfronto delle schede grafiche e nella nostra Lista dei Benchmark.
400 MSM8226:
>>Ulteriori informazioni le potete trovare nel nostroConfronto dei processori per portatili.



