Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Smartphone Wiko U Feel Prime

Florian Wimmer (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 01/11/2017

Economico Prime. Wiko offre uno smartphone da 5" con uno scanner per impronte digitali, schermo Full HD e dual-SIM per meno di 300 Euro (~$316). Il nostro report rivela se il dispositivo è solo economico o anche competitivo.

Wiko U Feel Prime (U Feel Serie)
Processore
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 1.4 GHz
Scheda grafica
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Memoria
4096 MB 
Schermo
5 pollici 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 441 PPI, touchscreen capacitive 5-punti, IPS, vetro 2.5D, laminazione completa, CABC, 16 milioni di colori, lucido: si
Harddisk
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: jack cuffie da 3.5 mm, Lettore schede: micro-SD max. 64 GB, 1 Lettore impronte digitali, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: accelerometro, giroscopio, sensore prossimità, bussola
Rete
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B7/​B20); bandwidth (download/​upload): 150Mbps/​50Mbps (LTE); SAR-rate: 0.99W/​kg (head), 0.80W/​kg (body), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 8.7 x 142.5 x 69.9
Batteria
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh polimeri di litio, Tempo conversazione 2G (dichiarata dal produttore): 28 ore, Tempo conversazione 3G (dichiarata dal produttore): 21 ore, Standby 3G (dichiarata dal produttore): 450 ore
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 13 MPix dual-LED flash, HDR, videos 1080p/​30fps
Fotocamera Secondaria: 8 MPix selfie flash, videos 720p/​30fps
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: cassa mono inferiore, Tastiera: Tastiera virtuale, cuffie, cavo USB, caricatore, tool SIM, adattatore SIM, News Republic, phone assistent, Zenly, One Clean, 24 Mesi Garanzia, USB-OTG, FM radio, senza ventola
Peso
150 gr, Alimentazione: 48 gr

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ZUK Z2
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
296 MBit/s ∼100% +434%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
Adreno 305, 400 MSM8928, 32 GB eMMC Flash (AVM FritzBox 6490 Cable)
101 MBit/s ∼34% +82%
Wiko U Feel Prime
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
55.4 MBit/s ∼19%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ZUK Z2
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
318 MBit/s ∼100% +498%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
Adreno 305, 400 MSM8928, 32 GB eMMC Flash (AVM FritzBox 6490 Cable)
104 MBit/s ∼33% +95%
Wiko U Feel Prime
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
53.2 MBit/s ∼17%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS Wiko U Feel Prime – overview
GPS Wiko U Feel Prime – overview
GPS Wiko U Feel Prime – crossing
GPS Wiko U Feel Prime – crossing
GPS Wiko U Feel Prime – bridge
GPS Wiko U Feel Prime – bridge

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
354
cd/m²
410
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
355
cd/m²
411
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
381
cd/m²
387
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 411 cd/m² Media: 385.6 cd/m² Minimum: 17.81 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 86 %
Al centro con la batteria: 411 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1142:1 (Nero: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.53
Wiko U Feel Prime
IPS, 1920x1080, 5
Sony Xperia XA
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Lenovo ZUK Z2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5
Honor 8
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2
Wiko U Feel
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Screen
-48%
-7%
-26%
-7%
5%
Brightness
386
475
23%
502
30%
443
15%
291
-25%
485
26%
Brightness Distribution
86
81
-6%
84
-2%
93
8%
96
12%
83
-3%
Black Level *
0.36
0.61
-69%
0.58
-61%
0.4
-11%
0.22
39%
Contrast
1142
849
-26%
883
-23%
1128
-1%
2273
99%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.3
6.8
-58%
3.8
12%
5.4
-26%
4.7
-9%
6.3
-47%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.8
7
-150%
2.7
4%
6.7
-139%
3
-7%
5.2
-86%
Gamma
2.53 95%
2.35 102%
2.09 115%
2.33 103%
2.03 118%
2.17 111%
CCT
6589 99%
8151 80%
6076 107%
8262 79%
6291 103%
7536 86%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2273 Hz1 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2273 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 1 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2273 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 456 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 10420) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms Incremento
↘ 13 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (27.3 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12 ms Incremento
↘ 31 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 250 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.9 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
44420 Points ∼24%
Sony Xperia XA
48331 Points ∼26% +9%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
122513 Points ∼66% +176%
Honor 8
94671 Points ∼51% +113%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
27232 Points ∼15% -39%
Wiko U Feel
28175 Points ∼15% -37%
Geekbench 4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
2085 Points ∼10%
Honor 8
5481 Points ∼26% +163%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
644 Points ∼13%
Honor 8
1726 Points ∼34% +168%
3DMark
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.1 Physics (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
1034 Points ∼41%
Sony Xperia XA
1236 Points ∼48% +20%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
1648 Points ∼65% +59%
Honor 8
2482 Points ∼97% +140%
Wiko U Feel
853 Points ∼33% -18%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.1 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
250 Points ∼5%
Sony Xperia XA
306 Points ∼6% +22%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
2792 Points ∼52% +1017%
Honor 8
818 Points ∼15% +227%
Wiko U Feel
101 Points ∼2% -60%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.1 (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
301 Points ∼8%
Sony Xperia XA
422 Points ∼11% +40%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
2419 Points ∼62% +704%
Honor 8
961 Points ∼25% +219%
Wiko U Feel
126 Points ∼3% -58%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
1118 Points ∼43%
Sony Xperia XA
1259 Points ∼49% +13%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
1706 Points ∼66% +53%
Honor 8
2587 Points ∼100% +131%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
709 Points ∼27% -37%
Wiko U Feel
860 Points ∼33% -23%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
514 Points ∼7%
Sony Xperia XA
525 Points ∼7% +2%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
4506 Points ∼58% +777%
Honor 8
1112 Points ∼14% +116%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
42 Points ∼1% -92%
Wiko U Feel
166 Points ∼2% -68%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
584 Points ∼12%
Sony Xperia XA
603 Points ∼12% +3%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3302 Points ∼68% +465%
Honor 8
1273 Points ∼26% +118%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
53 Points ∼1% -91%
Wiko U Feel
202 Points ∼4% -65%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Sony Xperia XA
12138 Points ∼18%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
20910 Points ∼31%
Honor 8
15531 Points ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9022 Points ∼13%
Wiko U Feel
9801 Points ∼14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Sony Xperia XA
10916 Points ∼2%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
32997 Points ∼7%
Honor 8
22157 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3838 Points ∼1%
Wiko U Feel
4355 Points ∼1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
9548 Points ∼5%
Sony Xperia XA
11156 Points ∼6% +17%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
29241 Points ∼15% +206%
Honor 8
20235 Points ∼10% +112%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4400 Points ∼2% -54%
Wiko U Feel
4969 Points ∼3% -48%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
17 fps ∼2%
Sony Xperia XA
18 fps ∼2% +6%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
91 fps ∼8% +435%
Honor 8
41 fps ∼4% +141%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
5.2 fps ∼0% -69%
Wiko U Feel
8.4 fps ∼1% -51%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
16 fps ∼4%
Sony Xperia XA
28 fps ∼8% +75%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
60 fps ∼16% +275%
Honor 8
43 fps ∼12% +169%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9.7 fps ∼3% -39%
Wiko U Feel
14 fps ∼4% -12%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
7.1 fps ∼1%
Sony Xperia XA
7.2 fps ∼1% +1%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
44 fps ∼8% +520%
Honor 8
19 fps ∼3% +168%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1.8 fps ∼0% -75%
Wiko U Feel
3 fps ∼1% -58%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
7.5 fps ∼6%
Sony Xperia XA
15 fps ∼13% +100%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
43 fps ∼36% +473%
Honor 8
19 fps ∼16% +153%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3.8 fps ∼3% -49%
Wiko U Feel
5.9 fps ∼5% -21%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
4.4 fps ∼1%
Sony Xperia XA
4.8 fps ∼2% +9%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
30 fps ∼10% +582%
Honor 8
10 fps ∼3% +127%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps ∼0% -100%
Wiko U Feel
1.9 fps ∼1% -57%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
4.8 fps ∼6%
Sony Xperia XA
11 fps ∼13% +129%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
29 fps ∼34% +504%
Honor 8
11 fps ∼13% +129%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps ∼0% -100%
Wiko U Feel
4.4 fps ∼5% -8%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
3347 Points ∼41%
Sony Xperia XA
4685 Points ∼58% +40%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
6969 Points ∼86% +108%
Honor 8
6735 Points ∼83% +101%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4126 Points ∼51% +23%
Wiko U Feel
3856 Points ∼47% +15%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
10 Points ∼1%
Sony Xperia XA
717 Points ∼46% +7070%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
1071 Points ∼69% +10610%
Honor 8
994 Points ∼64% +9840%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
551 Points ∼36% +5410%
Wiko U Feel
595 Points ∼39% +5850%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
740 Points ∼9%
Sony Xperia XA
669 Points ∼8% -10%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
4335 Points ∼50% +486%
Honor 8
1703 Points ∼20% +130%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
312 Points ∼4% -58%
Wiko U Feel
288 Points ∼3% -61%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
774 Points ∼20%
Sony Xperia XA
1076 Points ∼28% +39%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
1983 Points ∼52% +156%
Honor 8
2556 Points ∼66% +230%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
643 Points ∼17% -17%
Wiko U Feel
455 Points ∼12% -41%
System (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
1281 Points ∼19%
Sony Xperia XA
2289 Points ∼35% +79%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
2986 Points ∼45% +133%
Honor 8
3952 Points ∼60% +209%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1060 Points ∼16% -17%
Wiko U Feel
1121 Points ∼17% -12%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
290 Points ∼9%
Sony Xperia XA
1043 Points ∼32% +260%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
2290 Points ∼70% +690%
Honor 8
2034 Points ∼62% +601%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
585 Points ∼18% +102%
Wiko U Feel
544 Points ∼17% +88%

Legenda

 
Wiko U Feel Prime Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo ZUK Z2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko U Feel Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime (Chrome 55)
3383 Points ∼7%
Sony Xperia XA (Chrome 51)
4046 Points ∼9% +20%
Lenovo ZUK Z2 (Chrome Version 51)
8436 Points ∼19% +149%
Honor 8 (Chrome 52)
10692 Points ∼24% +216%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (Chrome 50)
2730 Points ∼6% -19%
Wiko U Feel
2723 Points ∼6% -20%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime (Chrome 55)
10826 ms * ∼18%
Sony Xperia XA (Chrome 51)
9609.8 ms * ∼16% +11%
Lenovo ZUK Z2 (Chrome Version 51)
3290.2 ms * ∼6% +70%
Honor 8 (Chrome 52)
2979 ms * ∼5% +72%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (Chrome 50)
13046 ms * ∼22% -21%
Wiko U Feel
13598.8 ms * ∼23% -26%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime (Chrome 55)
21.4 Points ∼0%
Sony Xperia XA (Chrome 51)
27.5 Points ∼0% +29%
Lenovo ZUK Z2 (Chrome Version 51)
51.655 Points ∼0% +141%
Honor 8 (Chrome 52)
64.046 Points ∼0% +199%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (Chrome 50)
16.8 Points ∼0% -21%
Wiko U Feel
18 Points ∼0% -16%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
35.21 MB/s ∼54%
Sony Xperia XA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
50.68 MB/s ∼77% +44%
Honor 8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
23.59 MB/s ∼36% -33%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
46.61 MB/s ∼71% +32%
Wiko U Feel (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
16.24 MB/s ∼25% -54%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
41.98 MB/s ∼50%
Sony Xperia XA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
72.87 MB/s ∼87% +74%
Honor 8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
53.68 MB/s ∼64% +28%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
79.83 MB/s ∼96% +90%
Wiko U Feel (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
30.25 MB/s ∼36% -28%
Random Write 4KB (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
9.4 MB/s ∼13%
Sony Xperia XA
10.6 MB/s ∼14% +13%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
5.64 MB/s ∼8% -40%
Honor 8
31.5 MB/s ∼42% +235%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
11.6 MB/s ∼15% +23%
Wiko U Feel
8.83 MB/s ∼12% -6%
Random Read 4KB (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
55 MB/s ∼40%
Sony Xperia XA
22.05 MB/s ∼16% -60%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
21.27 MB/s ∼15% -61%
Honor 8
34.16 MB/s ∼25% -38%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
21 MB/s ∼15% -62%
Wiko U Feel
23.24 MB/s ∼17% -58%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
137.3 MB/s ∼73%
Sony Xperia XA
68.64 MB/s ∼37% -50%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
46.52 MB/s ∼25% -66%
Honor 8
119.25 MB/s ∼63% -13%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
72 MB/s ∼38% -48%
Wiko U Feel
39.94 MB/s ∼21% -71%
Sequential Read 256KB (ordina per valore)
Wiko U Feel Prime
270.9 MB/s ∼46%
Sony Xperia XA
240.43 MB/s ∼40% -11%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
239.42 MB/s ∼40% -12%
Honor 8
247.46 MB/s ∼42% -9%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
147 MB/s ∼25% -46%
Wiko U Feel
234.83 MB/s ∼40% -13%
Carico massimo
 37.4 °C37.5 °C35.1 °C 
 37.8 °C37.1 °C34.2 °C 
 37.1 °C36.2 °C34.2 °C 
Massima: 37.8 °C
Media: 36.3 °C
35.8 °C35 °C35.1 °C
35.4 °C35.2 °C34.9 °C
34.3 °C34.7 °C35 °C
Massima: 35.8 °C
Media: 35 °C
Alimentazione (max)  31.1 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.649.52525.441.33125.3374032.935.45033.644.86331.641.38028.433.11002730.112520.829.81602234.320021.334.725020.842.431521.248.140019.452.350019.557.663017.764.280017.968100017.871.8125017.371.1160017.470.4200016.769.9250017.270.1315018.273400017.976.5500017.679.8630017.776.8800017.870.91000017.966.71250018.162.51600018.249.6SPL3085.5N1.359.1median 17.9Wiko U Feel Primemedian 66.7Delta1.311.137.727.732.437.722.330.631.322.326.529.131.726.52931.4262932.337.239.432.32927.736.22924.627.628.624.623.223.425.423.228.321.821.328.330.823.223.330.834.52422.534.537.222.922.437.242.126.921.342.147.428.218.447.456.236.117.556.262.641.517.562.670.848.617.270.875.853.716.875.872.450.217.372.470.548.117.470.568.146.716.668.167.245.117.367.268.547.217.668.570.949.417.670.974.953.217.774.976.554.417.476.576.354.717.776.365.242.617.965.251.330.718.151.346.826.118.146.884.162.229.884.156.714.71.356.7median 65.2Samsung Galaxy J5 2016median 42.6median 17.7median 65.213.911.21.613.928.726.528.725.52725.524.426.924.430.230.330.23125.2312223.12222.621.722.625.123.325.135.731.435.728.720.728.740.12040.149.620.449.654.821.154.85719.65757.220.957.256.520.156.557.92157.959.617.959.662.217.662.265.616.665.667.316.767.366.215.266.263.316.263.362.315.262.364.31464.361.613.861.659.213.659.26013.6606113.86156.313.456.375.329.375.334.21.234.2median 59.2HTC Desire 10 Lifestylemedian 17.6median 59.26.62.86.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Wiko U Feel Prime audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.46 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 16%, average was 26%, worst was 43%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.09 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 16%, average was 26%, worst was 43%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 16%, average was 26%, worst was 43%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.08 / 0.23 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.66 / 1.66 / 1.76 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 2.85 / 5.01 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Wiko U Feel Prime
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3500 mAh
Honor 8
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
Wiko U Feel
2500 mAh
Power Consumption
-6%
-53%
-28%
17%
-33%
Idle Minimum *
0.66
0.72
-9%
1.31
-98%
0.78
-18%
0.61
8%
0.82
-24%
Idle Average *
1.66
1.5
10%
2.03
-22%
1.89
-14%
1.41
15%
1.61
3%
Idle Maximum *
1.76
1.57
11%
2.08
-18%
2.02
-15%
1.51
14%
1.8
-2%
Load Average *
2.85
3.48
-22%
5.45
-91%
5.28
-85%
2.56
10%
5.99
-110%
Load Maximum *
5.01
6.04
-21%
6.75
-35%
5.44
-9%
3.1
38%
6.7
-34%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
20ore 54minuti
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
9ore 35minuti
Wiko U Feel Prime
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3500 mAh
Honor 8
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
Wiko U Feel
2500 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
-39%
-5%
3%
20%
-4%
Reader / Idle
1254
775
-38%
1487
19%
1599
28%
Load
170
255
402
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
575
353
-39%
546
-5%
499
-13%
643
12%
552
-4%
H.264
460
526
658

Pro

+ schermo high-resolution, con colori precisi
+ buona configurazione della memoria
+ decente autonomia della batteria
+ case solido
+ GPS relativamente veloce
+ molti controlli delle gesture
+ dual-SIM

Contro

- schermo leggermente scuro
- microfono basso
- fotocamera principale fuori fuoco
- alcune estremità irregolari
In review: Wiko U Feel Prime. Review sample courtesy of Wiko Germany.
In review: Wiko U Feel Prime. Review sample courtesy of Wiko Germany.

I 70 Euro (~$74) in più rispetto al Wiko U Feel sono ben investiti: il Wiko U Feel Prime supera il suo fratello minore in quasi tutti i tests. Sono vicini come durata della batteria, ma lo schermo ha una risoluzione superiore, la configurazione della memoria è migliore, per non parlare delle performance.

IL Wiko U Feel Prime mantiene la sua posizione anche contro la concorrenza. Tuttavia l'Honor 8 ed il Lenovo ZUK Z2 offrono molta più potenza per un prezzo leggermente superiore.

Le critiche vanno allo schermo non tanto buono e alla sua illuminazione un po' eterogenea. Il microfono è un modello inferiore e trasmette la vostra voce molto bassa all'interlocutore. Le fotocamere potrebbero essere migliori, e quella principale pecca di definizione in particolare, non convince.

L'acquirente avrà un case in metallo, pannello Full HD, buona configuraione di memoria, e prestazioni decenti per meno di 300 Euro (~$316). Il Wiko U Feel Prime è abbastanza impressionante ed offre un buon rapporto prezzo-prestazioni.

Nel complesso, il Wiko U Feel Prime è uno smartphone raccomandabile per la fascia medio bassa che ha molto da offrire per un prezzo contenuto.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Wiko U Feel Prime - 12/29/2016 v6
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
85%
Tastiera
68 / 75 → 90%
Dispositivo di puntamento
90%
Connettività
38 / 60 → 64%
Peso
92%
Batteria
92%
Display
86%
Prestazioni di gioco
19 / 63 → 31%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
35 / 70 → 49%
Temperatura
91%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Fotocamera
66%
Media
71%
82%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

> Recensioni Portatili Notebook > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Smartphone Wiko U Feel Prime
Florian Wimmer, 2017-01-11 (Update: 2017-01-11)